Your message dated Thu, 9 Oct 2014 23:41:00 +0200
with message-id 20141009234100.64c02...@heffalump.sk2.org
and subject line Re: Bug#759796: RFS: gemrb/0.8.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #759796,
regarding RFS: gemrb/0.8.1-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Hello Stephen,
Thanks for your reply, I have updated the copyright years and uploaded the
package to mentors.d.n again.
I have also found and fixed another issue during the build: whenever
libpython3-dev and cmake = 3.0 are installed, python3 libraries were
selected instead of python2.
Control: owner -1 !
Hi Beren,
On Thu, 25 Sep 2014 23:21:20 +0200, Beren Minor
beren.minor+deb...@gmail.com wrote:
I am still looking for a sponsor for my GemRB package.
The details are in the OP of this bug report (#759796
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=%20759796).
I've
Dear mentors,
I am still looking for a sponsor for my GemRB package.
The details are in the OP of this bug report (#759796
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=%20759796).
--
Beren Minor
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package gemrb
* Package name: gemrb
Version : 0.8.1-1
Upstream Author : The GemRB Project
* URL : http://www.gemrb.org
* License : GPL-2.0+
Section :
On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 04:13:45PM +0200, Beren Minor wrote:
* Package name: gemrb
When attempting to build:
.
CMake Error at CMakeLists.txt:211 (MESSAGE):
Looking for Glew: not found!
CMake Error at CMakeLists.txt:212 (MESSAGE):
Please install the Glew library and headers first!
Hello Adam,
Thanks for looking into this and sorry for the missing B-D.
I have added it and checked with pbuilder, it should work fine now.
I have updated the mentors.d.n upload if you fancy trying again.
--
Beren Minor
On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 12:20 AM, Adam Borowski kilob...@angband.pl
Your message dated Sat, 23 Nov 2013 04:27:20 +
with message-id e1vk4os-0007tn...@quantz.debian.org
and subject line closing RFS: gemrb/0.8.0-1 [ITP] -- Open-source engine for
Black Isle Studio's RPGs
has caused the Debian Bug report #668505,
regarding RFS: gemrb/0.8.0-1 [ITP] -- Open-source
Your message dated Mon, 22 Oct 2012 04:20:15 +
with message-id e1tq9ut-0007ai...@quantz.debian.org
and subject line closing RFS: gemrb/0.7.0-5 [ITP] -- Open-source engine for
Black Isle Studio#39;s RPGs
has caused the Debian Bug report #668505,
regarding RFS: gemrb/0.7.0-5 [ITP] -- Open
Hi,
Trying again, since I've got no answer to the last e-mail I sent on
the Games Team list.
I've uploaded a new version of the GemRB package to mentors.debian.net
and I'm still looking for a sponsorship.
You'll find all the details here, and on the bug #668505:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
retitle 668505 RFS: gemrb/0.7.0-5 [ITP] -- Open-source engine for Black Isle
Studio#39;s RPGs
Bug #668505 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: gemrb/0.7.0-2 [ITP] -- Open-source
engine for Black Isle Studio's RPGs
Changed Bug title to 'RFS: gemrb/0.7.0
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package gemrb. I have recently
updated it to the newest gemrb version 0.7.0 and therefore trying to
request sponsorship one more time.
* Package name: gemrb
Version : 0.7.0-1
Upstream Author :
I've built the package on another amd64 system and it builds smoothly as
well.
Are there any other comments on the package?
On 04.12.2011 20:53, Arno Töll wrote:
Hello,
On 04.12.2011 20:15, Andrea Veri wrote:
On Sun, 04 Dec 2011, Mikołaj Izdebski wrote:
If it builds on your box it
On Sat, 03 Dec 2011, Mikołaj Izdebski wrote:
Doesn't build on GNU/Linux sid amd64.
That's not true, it's building fine on my amd64 box with a full
up-to-date sid's pbuilder.
Log at [1].
cheers,
Andrea
[1] http://people.debian.org/~and/gemrb-0.6.6-1.build
signature.asc
Description: Digital
Doesn't build on GNU/Linux sid amd64.
That's not true, it's building fine on my amd64 box with a full
up-to-date sid's pbuilder.
If it builds on your box it doesn't mean it does on mine. I also used
up-to-date sid. I tried 3 times in row with similar results.
For me it looks like a bug in
On Sun, 04 Dec 2011, Mikołaj Izdebski wrote:
If it builds on your box it doesn't mean it does on mine. I also used
up-to-date sid. I tried 3 times in row with similar results.
If you build a package on a dirty system and not on a clean chroot
you'll get many many FTBFS you wouldn't get on a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
On 04.12.2011 20:15, Andrea Veri wrote:
On Sun, 04 Dec 2011, Mikołaj Izdebski wrote:
If it builds on your box it doesn't mean it does on mine. I also used
up-to-date sid. I tried 3 times in row with similar results.
If you build a
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package gemrb.
* Package name: gemrb
Version : 0.6.6-1
Upstream Author :
http://gemrb.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=gemrb/gemrb;a=blob;f=AUTHORS;hb=HEAD
* URL : http://www.gemrb.org
* License : GPL-2+
* Package name: gemrb
Version : 0.6.6-1
Doesn't build on GNU/Linux sid amd64.
Build log attached.
log.bz2
Description: BZip2 compressed data
19 matches
Mail list logo
