Xiyue Deng writes:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: important
> X-Debbugs-CC: debian-emac...@lists.debian.org
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "go-mode.el":
>
> * Package name : go-mode.el
>Version : 3:1.6.0+git202300823.8dce1e3-1
>
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-emac...@lists.debian.org
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "go-mode.el":
* Package name : go-mode.el
Version : 3:1.6.0+git202300823.8dce1e3-1
Upstream contact : Dominik Honnef
*
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On Mon, 4 Apr 2022 10:32:31 -0300 "Gabriel M. Dutra"
wrote:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "go-junit-report":
* Package name : go-junit-report
Version : 1.0.0-1
Upstream Author : TODO
* URL
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "go-junit-report":
* Package name : go-junit-report
Version : 1.0.0-1
Upstream Author : TODO
* URL : https://github.com/jstemmer/go-junit-report
* License : Expat
* Vcs :
Your message dated Sat, 26 Mar 2022 11:41:18 +0100
with message-id <80cc6c68-0480-0f73-bc4c-ceda794a9...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: RFS: go-sendxmpp/0.3.0-1 -- Command line utility to send
messages or files using XMPP
has caused the Debian Bug report #1008035,
regarding RFS: go-se
Your message dated Thu, 17 Feb 2022 16:51:00 +0100
with message-id <42e9ebed-a61f-a408-fe74-eae234eb1...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: RFS: go-sendxmpp/0.2.0-1 -- Command line utility to send
messages or files using XMPP
has caused the Debian Bug report #1005922,
regarding RFS: go-se
Ivan Wong a écrit :
So sounds like more people prefer google-go. I just renamed it and
re-uploaded it:
- URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/google-go
- Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian
unstable main contrib non-free
- dget
Hola Ivan Wong!
El 21/03/2010 a las 16:42 escribiste:
So sounds like more people prefer google-go. I just renamed it and
re-uploaded it:
- URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/google-go
- Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian
unstable main contrib
So sounds like more people prefer google-go. I just renamed it and
re-uploaded it:
- URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/google-go
- Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian
unstable main contrib non-free
- dget
David Baird dhba...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd be in favor of calling the Google implementation of Go google-go,
and if another implementation is ever created, it could be called
something-else-go.
or as short version: ggo
Fondest regards,
Joachim Wiedorn
signature.asc
Description: PGP
On Thursday 18 March 2010 16:50:03 Brian Nelson wrote:
'-lang' is commonly used in package names to refer to spoken languages
(e.g. texlive-lang-*). I actually prefer the google-go suggestion
since I think that's the least ambiguous.
Good point.
Going back to the package description, I see
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 01:25:21PM +0100, Dominique Dumont wrote:
On Thursday 18 March 2010 11:27:16 Ivan Wong wrote:
* Package name: go
It builds these binary packages:
go - Google's Go programming language compiler
Hmm, when I've the the subject of this mail, My first
Il giorno ven, 19/03/2010 alle 10.08 +0100, Adam Borowski ha scritto:
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 01:25:21PM +0100, Dominique Dumont wrote:
On Thursday 18 March 2010 11:27:16 Ivan Wong wrote:
* Package name: go
It builds these binary packages:
go - Google's Go programming
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 09:09:17AM +0100, Dominique Dumont wrote:
How about naming this package go-compiler ?
This way, the language is not tied to Google and the fact that go is a
computer language is implicit.
The problem with not tying it to Google is when someone decides to
package the
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 2:09 AM, Dominique Dumont
dominique.dum...@hp.com wrote:
How about naming this package go-compiler ?
This way, the language is not tied to Google and the fact that go is a
computer language is implicit.
I'd be in favor of calling the Google implementation of Go
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package go.
* Package name: go
Version : 2010.03.15-1
Upstream Author : Google
* URL : http://golang.org/
* License : BSD Style
Section : devel
It builds these binary packages:
go - Google's Go
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 3:57 PM, Ivan Wong ivan...@gmail.com wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package go.
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/go/go_2010.03.15-1.dsc
Hi,
Thanks a lot for your work. I was looking at 'go' from long time and
wondering when it will come to Debian.
Just FYI:
dh_strip -Xusr/lib/go/pkg -Xgoinstall -Xgodoc -Xgoyacc -Xhgpatch
-Xcgo -Xebnflint -Xgofmt
strip --remove-section=.comment --remove-section=.note
--strip-unneeded
/tmp/go-2010.03.15/debian/go/usr/lib/go/pkg/linux_386/libcgo.so
strip:
On Thursday 18 March 2010 11:27:16 Ivan Wong wrote:
* Package name: go
Version : 2010.03.15-1
Upstream Author : Google
* URL : http://golang.org/
* License : BSD Style
Section : devel
It builds these binary packages:
go - Google's Go
Hi,
On Donnerstag, 18. März 2010, Dominique Dumont wrote:
Hmm, when I've the the subject of this mail, My first thought was about the
venerable go game.
Me too. I didnt notice until your mail
May be this package should be named google-go or better go-lang (inspired
from the web site
Hi Mathieu,
Thanks very much for letting me know about the problem. I have just
fixed it.
Thanks,
-Ivan.
Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
Just FYI:
dh_strip -Xusr/lib/go/pkg -Xgoinstall -Xgodoc -Xgoyacc -Xhgpatch
-Xcgo -Xebnflint -Xgofmt
strip --remove-section=.comment --remove-section=.note
Hi Dominique,
Yes I can see the confusion. go-lang sounds good to me. But I would
like to have a little poll about which one is better, go-lang or
golang? Any other suggestions?
Thanks,
-Ivan.
Dominique Dumont wrote:
On Thursday 18 March 2010 11:27:16 Ivan Wong wrote:
* Package name: go
Le jeudi 18 mars 2010, Ivan Wong a écrit :
Yes I can see the confusion. go-lang sounds good to me. But I would
like to have a little poll about which one is better, go-lang or
golang? Any other suggestions?
go-lang, for me. golang gives the impression that it is a software
called Golang.
--
Ivan Wong ivan...@gmail.com writes:
Hi Dominique,
Yes I can see the confusion. go-lang sounds good to me. But I would
like to have a little poll about which one is better, go-lang or
golang? Any other suggestions?
'-lang' is commonly used in package names to refer to spoken languages
(e.g.
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 9:20 PM, Brian Nelson p...@debian.org wrote:
Yes I can see the confusion. go-lang sounds good to me. But I would
like to have a little poll about which one is better, go-lang or
golang? Any other suggestions?
'-lang' is commonly used in package names to refer to spoken
25 matches
Mail list logo
