Debian Queue daemon wrote:
> hashalot_0.3-5_arm.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
> [...]
Thanks!
--
1KB // Microsoft corollary to Hanlon's razor:
// Never attribute to stupidity what can be
// adequately explained by malice.
--
T
Hello,
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008, Adam Borowski wrote:
> Ok, I did this, then overwrote 0.3-5 on mentors. There's a watch file for
> uscan now as well.
Good work. One last correction...
Under the new policy apt-get installs all recommended packages by
default. Moreover, "Recommends:" means that the p
On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 06:19:57AM +0530, Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Sorry about the delay in responding. Different time zones!
Hah, it's 4am, it's me who's hitting the bed now...
>
> On Thu, 24 Jan 2008, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > Actually, it seems that reverting to upstream autot
Hello,
Sorry about the delay in responding. Different time zones!
On Thu, 24 Jan 2008, Adam Borowski wrote:
> Actually, it seems that reverting to upstream autotooling doesn't break
> anything (except obviously being unfriendly to those who want to update
> autotoolage themselves). I would need
On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 04:44:48PM +0530, Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Jan 2008, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 09:25:05AM +0100, Luca Bruno wrote:
> > > Anyway your gzipped diff is 70K (almost as big as the original
> > > tarball), which seems to clash with your previ
Hello,
On Thu, 24 Jan 2008, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 09:10:11AM +0530, Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote:
> > Has this patch been submitted upstream?
>
> Yes, albeit only a week ago.
Is upstream still working on this package? The last upload seems to
have been in 2004!
On Thu, 24
On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 09:10:11AM +0530, Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Some quick comments.
>
> On Thu, 24 Jan 2008, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > * Buffer overflow on RMD160:
> > It will cause only a crash instead of executing arbitrary code, and
> > considering the typical usage this
On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 09:25:05AM +0100, Luca Bruno wrote:
> Adam Borowski scrisse:
>
> > As the diff is small (except for file deletions), this shouldn't take
> > much of your time. If someone could upload this, that would be cool.
>
> I've seen that you've already found Kapil available, fine
On Thursday 24 January 2008 04:40, Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote:
> > * Vcs-Svn and Vcs-Browser.
>
> Shouldn't the Vcs-Svn entry start with "svn:" instead of "http:"?
SVN can be run over a variety of protocols, next to svn including ssh and
http(s). Which is an excellent feature if you ask me :-)
Adam Borowski scrisse:
> As the diff is small (except for file deletions), this shouldn't take
> much of your time. If someone could upload this, that would be cool.
I've seen that you've already found Kapil available, fine :).
Anyway your gzipped diff is 70K (almost as big as the original
tar
Hello,
Some quick comments.
On Thu, 24 Jan 2008, Adam Borowski wrote:
> * Buffer overflow on RMD160:
> It will cause only a crash instead of executing arbitrary code, and
> considering the typical usage this is nearly always harmless. Yet, in
> non-typical uses even wrong output can be pre
Hi!
I seem to have issues catching the previous sponsor, for some time already.
There's an updated package at:
dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/h/hashalot/hashalot_0.3-5.dsc
Issues fixed:
* Buffer overflow on RMD160:
It will cause only a crash instead of executing arbitrary cod
12 matches
Mail list logo
