On 03/03/12 14:01, Julien Cristau wrote:
Feel free to go ahead now.
libconfig 1.4.8-2 has been uploaded to unstable.
Please schedule binNMUs against the following packages:
* flush
* libffado
* libguestfs
* lldpad
* meterec
* qwo
* yubiserver
I believe the wanna-build lingo is:
nmu flush
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 02:34:51 +, Jonathan McCrohan wrote:
As far as I can see, sitplus is the only package involved in other
transitions. Once the opencv transition is over, am I ok so look for a
sponsor to review and upload my package to unstable?
Feel free to go ahead now.
Cheers,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/02/12 18:45, Jonathan McCrohan wrote:
I've fixed these and reuploaded 1.4.8-1 to mentors now.
libconfig 1.4.8-1~exp1 is currently in experimental and I have now
uploaded libconfig 1.4.8-2 to mentors.d.n.
libconfig (1.4.8-2) unstable;
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 19:21:02 +, Jonathan McCrohan wrote:
I have upload a new version of libconfig to mentors, with the
following changelog:
this change to debian/rules looks weird:
- $(MAKE) install DESTDIR=$(CURDIR)/debian/tmp
+ $(MAKE) install
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/02/12 13:44, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 19:21:02 +, Jonathan McCrohan wrote:
I have upload a new version of libconfig to mentors, with the
following changelog:
this change to debian/rules looks weird:
-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/02/12 23:02, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 23:08:17 +, Jonathan McCrohan wrote:
This is my first upload which requires a transition, and I am
unsure of what happens next. It seems common for packages to be
uploaded to
Hi Jose,
On 03/02/12 00:50, Jose Luis Tallón wrote:
My apologies if you did send an e-mail and I didn't read it. My inbox is
severely overloaded as of lately...
Isn't it good style to notify the maintainer and/or coordinate with them
before an NMU ?
Apologies. I posted on the -devel thread
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 23:08:17 +, Jonathan McCrohan wrote:
This is my first upload which requires a transition, and I am unsure
of what happens next. It seems common for packages to be uploaded to
experimental for a time prior to the actual transistion to allow other
maintainers update
Hi, Jonathan
My apologies if you did send an e-mail and I didn't read it. My inbox is
severely overloaded as of lately...
Isn't it good style to notify the maintainer and/or coordinate with them
before an NMU ?
On 31/01/12 00:08, Jonathan McCrohan wrote:
Julien Cristaujcris...@debian.org
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 15:00:23 +, Jonathan McCrohan wrote:
On 27/01/12 19:23, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 10:24:56 +, Jonathan McCrohan wrote:
Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
Please don't change the -dev package name.
All of the packages
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 30/01/12 19:15, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 15:00:23 +, Jonathan McCrohan wrote:
On 27/01/12 19:23, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 10:24:56 +, Jonathan McCrohan
wrote:
Julien Cristau
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 27/01/12 19:23, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 10:24:56 +, Jonathan McCrohan wrote:
Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
Please don't change the -dev package name.
All of the packages except one have versioned
Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 01:02:57 +, Jonathan McCrohan wrote:
Hi Cyril,
AFAICT the primary ABI change between these versions is that upstream
has depreciated longs and replaced with ints in an effort to
standardise lengths across platforms.
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 10:24:56 +, Jonathan McCrohan wrote:
Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
Please don't change the -dev package name.
All of the packages except one have versioned Build-depends on
libconfig8-dev. Surely this needs to be replaced with libconfig-dev or
at
Dear mentors/release team,
I am looking for both a sponsor and a transition slot for my package
libconfig.
It is an updated version of an existing Debian package.
See discussion regarding libconfig here:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/11/msg00406.html
* Package name:
Hi Jonathan,
Jonathan McCrohan jmccro...@gmail.com (26/01/2012):
apt-rdepends lists the following reverse dependencies:
libconfig8
Reverse Depends: guestfish (1:1.14.8-3)
Reverse Depends: guestmount (1:1.14.8-3)
Reverse Depends: libconfig8-dev (= 1.3.2-2)
Reverse Depends:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Cyril,
AFAICT the primary ABI change between these versions is that upstream
has depreciated longs and replaced with ints in an effort to
standardise lengths across platforms.
Assuming updating the Build-depends field in debian/control (to
On Fri, 2012-01-27 at 01:02 +, Jonathan McCrohan wrote:
Assuming updating the Build-depends field in debian/control (to
reflect the new package name) is not counted as a source change:
In this context, the difference between can binNMUed and needs source
change is basically whether an
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 01:02:57 +, Jonathan McCrohan wrote:
Hi Cyril,
AFAICT the primary ABI change between these versions is that upstream
has depreciated longs and replaced with ints in an effort to
standardise lengths across platforms.
Assuming updating the Build-depends field in
19 matches
Mail list logo
