Re: RFS: libmatheval (updated package)

2011-02-08 Thread Julian Taylor
Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.1.7-2
of my package libmatheval.

It builds these binary packages:
libmatheval1 - GNU library for evaluating symbolic mathematical
expressions (run
libmatheval1-dev - GNU library for evaluating symbolic mathematical
expressions (dev

The package appears to be lintian clean.

The upload would fix these bugs: 595546
I have made some changes since my last request which I deferred to after
the squeeze release.
- made copyright DEP5 compliant, added a DEP3 tag to a patch
- dropped the leaf .la file according to
http://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/LAFileRemoval
- added the internal dependencies to Libs.private of the pkg-config file
so static linking is still easy (patch 0002)
- dropped the integer truncation patch I added last time as I could not
produce a testcase where it causes problems and the fortran interface is
not used by the reverse dependencies. So I deem it not worth bumping the
abi.

the rest of the changes (mostly updating to newer standards) are all
listed in the changelog.

The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libmatheval
- Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable
main contrib non-free
- dget
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libmatheval/libmatheval_1.1.7-2.dsc

I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.

Kind regards
 Julian Taylor


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: RFS: libmatheval (updated package)

2011-02-08 Thread Sylvestre Ledru
Hello Julian,
Le mardi 08 février 2011 à 15:17 +0100, Julian Taylor a écrit :
 Dear mentors,
 
 I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.1.7-2
 of my package libmatheval.

I can sponsor this package but could you follow Debian Science policy in
particular:
http://debian-science.alioth.debian.org/debian-science-policy.html#id227565

And could you also import the package in the Debian Science repository ?
(svn or git, as you wish)

Thanks,
Sylvestre


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1297174787.6213.6464.ca...@korcula.inria.fr



Re: RFS: libmatheval (updated package)

2011-02-08 Thread Peter Pentchev
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 03:17:09PM +0100, Julian Taylor wrote:
 Dear mentors,
 
 I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.1.7-2
 of my package libmatheval.
 
 It builds these binary packages:
 libmatheval1 - GNU library for evaluating symbolic mathematical
 expressions (run
 libmatheval1-dev - GNU library for evaluating symbolic mathematical
 expressions (dev

Hi,

I'm not a DD, so I cannot upload your package, but just a little note -
for some time now, the Release Team has expressed a preference to have
lib*-dev packages not contain the library SONAME in the package name in
order to ease transitions to newer library versions (when the SONAME
would change).  IMHO, you would do well to either:

1. Rename the libmatheval1-dev package to libmatheval-dev, add a
   Provides: libmatheval1-dev to its Package stanza in the control file,
   notify the maintainers of the packages that depend on it (it would
   seem that those would be h5utils and science-mathematics) to change
   their Build-Depends line to libmatheval-dev, wait for them to upload
   new versions with the fix, and then drop the Provides line.

...or...

2. Also provide a dummy libmatheval-dev package that simply depends on
   libmatheval1-dev and notify the maintainers of the packages that
   depend on it to change their Build-Depends lines.

Of course, it is entirely your right to decide that this is a change too
big for the first upload in which you are adopting the package; still, I
just thought I'd say that as a longer-term idea :)

Thanks for your work in adopting and refreshing the package!

G'luck,
Peter

-- 
Peter Pentchev  r...@ringlet.net r...@freebsd.org pe...@packetscale.com
PGP key:http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc
Key fingerprint FDBA FD79 C26F 3C51 C95E  DF9E ED18 B68D 1619 4553
I am the thought you are now thinking.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: RFS: libmatheval (updated package)

2011-02-08 Thread Julian Taylor
On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 16:49 +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote:
 On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 03:17:09PM +0100, Julian Taylor wrote:
  Dear mentors,
  
  I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.1.7-2
  of my package libmatheval.
  
  It builds these binary packages:
  libmatheval1 - GNU library for evaluating symbolic mathematical
  expressions (run
  libmatheval1-dev - GNU library for evaluating symbolic mathematical
  expressions (dev
 
 Hi,
 
 I'm not a DD, so I cannot upload your package, but just a little note -
 for some time now, the Release Team has expressed a preference to have
 lib*-dev packages not contain the library SONAME in the package name in
 order to ease transitions to newer library versions (when the SONAME
 would change).  IMHO, you would do well to either:
 
 1. Rename the libmatheval1-dev package to libmatheval-dev, add a
Provides: libmatheval1-dev to its Package stanza in the control file,
notify the maintainers of the packages that depend on it (it would
seem that those would be h5utils and science-mathematics) to change
their Build-Depends line to libmatheval-dev, wait for them to upload
new versions with the fix, and then drop the Provides line.
 
 ...or...
 
 2. Also provide a dummy libmatheval-dev package that simply depends on
libmatheval1-dev and notify the maintainers of the packages that
depend on it to change their Build-Depends lines.
 
 Of course, it is entirely your right to decide that this is a change too
 big for the first upload in which you are adopting the package; still, I
 just thought I'd say that as a longer-term idea :)
 
 Thanks for your work in adopting and refreshing the package!
 
 G'luck,
 Peter
 

I guess this makes sense as the libmatheval api is unlikely to change in
a backward incompatible way.
I chose the first way and added a Conflicts and Replaces on so versioned
package.

A new version is uploaded with the debian-science policy changes in the
control file.
Also a git repository is added on alioth.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: RFS: libmatheval (updated package)

2011-02-08 Thread Julian Taylor
On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 18:17 +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
 Le mardi 08 février 2011 à 17:21 +0100, Julian Taylor a écrit :
  On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 16:49 +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote:
   On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 03:17:09PM +0100, Julian Taylor wrote:
Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.1.7-2
of my package libmatheval.

It builds these binary packages:
libmatheval1 - GNU library for evaluating symbolic mathematical
expressions (run
libmatheval1-dev - GNU library for evaluating symbolic mathematical
expressions (dev
   
 [...]
  A new version is uploaded with the debian-science policy changes in the
  control file.
  Also a git repository is added on alioth.
 Is it ok for a review now ?
 
 thanks
 Sylvestre
 

Yes, I have done all I can think of now. But this is my first package I
attempt to get uploaded so there might still be some rough edges.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: RFS: libmatheval (updated package)

2011-02-08 Thread Sylvestre Ledru
Le mardi 08 février 2011 à 17:21 +0100, Julian Taylor a écrit :
 On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 16:49 +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote:
  On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 03:17:09PM +0100, Julian Taylor wrote:
   Dear mentors,
   
   I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.1.7-2
   of my package libmatheval.
   
   It builds these binary packages:
   libmatheval1 - GNU library for evaluating symbolic mathematical
   expressions (run
   libmatheval1-dev - GNU library for evaluating symbolic mathematical
   expressions (dev
  
[...]
 A new version is uploaded with the debian-science policy changes in the
 control file.
 Also a git repository is added on alioth.
Is it ok for a review now ?

thanks
Sylvestre




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1297185470.4222.30.ca...@losinj.inria.fr



Re: RFS: libmatheval (updated package)

2010-11-13 Thread Michael Tautschnig
Hi Julian,

[...]

 
 Unfortunately I only just realized this probably changes the abi (function
 definition changed) and thus a soname bump. I'll have to look into this with
 more detail.
 So this RFS was probably a bit premature, but I would still be grateful for
 an review of what is already done as this is my first package.
 

[...]

Thank you very much for updating this package to match current packaging
best-practice. Having checked the debdiff to the package currently in the
archives, to me it looks pretty good, you should only fix one more thing:

I: libmatheval source: binary-control-field-duplicates-source field section 
in package libmatheval1

Once you have also done the soname bump, please also consider introducing symbol
control files. It could help to ensure you cannot accidentally miss such soname
bumps.

Hope this help,
Michael



pgp5fLz501rMO.pgp
Description: PGP signature


RFS: libmatheval (updated package)

2010-11-09 Thread Julian Taylor
Dear mentors, debian-science

I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.1.7-2
of my package libmatheval.

It builds these binary packages:
libmatheval1 - GNU library for evaluating symbolic mathematical expressions
(run
libmatheval1-dev - GNU library for evaluating symbolic mathematical
expressions (dev

The package appears to be lintian clean.

The upload would fix these bugs:
- 595546
- integer truncation in fortran interface on 64 bit (forwarded upstream)

The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libmatheval
- Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main
contrib non-free
- dget
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libmatheval/libmatheval_1.1.7-2.dsc

I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.

Kind regards
Julian Taylor


Re: RFS: libmatheval (updated package)

2010-11-09 Thread Bernhard R. Link
* Julian Taylor jtaylor.deb...@googlemail.com [101109 18:15]:
 I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.1.7-2
 of my package libmatheval.

As this is clearly not targeted at squeeze (you did almost repackaged
it, it seems), this should not go to unstable but to experimental.

 - integer truncation in fortran interface on 64 bit (forwarded upstream)

It would be nice if you could add some information about that to the
patch you included.

Also please take a look at debian/copyright. It does not even list the
same copyright holder as the source files.

(incomplete list of issues, I not even got so far as to looking at the actual
package).

Bernhard R. Link


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20101109174420.ga18...@pcpool00.mathematik.uni-freiburg.de



Re: RFS: libmatheval (updated package)

2010-11-09 Thread Julian Taylor
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 6:44 PM, Bernhard R. Link brl...@debian.org wrote:


 As this is clearly not targeted at squeeze (you did almost repackaged
 it, it seems), this should not go to unstable but to experimental.


fixed


  - integer truncation in fortran interface on 64 bit (forwarded upstream)

 It would be nice if you could add some information about that to the
 patch you included.


the fortran interface transfers function pointers as integers to fortran. It
always uses int64_t/INTEGER*8 for this.
In some functions the pointers where implicitly and also explicitly casted
to int.
This should lead to bugs when the function pointers lie in 64 bit space and
int is 32 bit, so I fixed the casts and forwarded the issue to upstream.

Unfortunately I only just realized this probably changes the abi (function
definition changed) and thus a soname bump. I'll have to look into this with
more detail.
So this RFS was probably a bit premature, but I would still be grateful for
an review of what is already done as this is my first package.



 Also please take a look at debian/copyright. It does not even list the
 same copyright holder as the source files.


Should be fixed.

Thank you for having a look at the package.


RFS: libmatheval (updated package)

2010-09-11 Thread Julian Taylor
Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.1.7-2
of my package libmatheval.

It builds these binary packages:
libmatheval1 - GNU library for evaluating symbolic mathematical
expressions (run
libmatheval1-dev - GNU library for evaluating symbolic mathematical
expressions (dev

The package appears to be lintian clean.

The upload would fix these bugs: 595546
And it updates the packaging to 3.9.1 standard and compatibility 7

The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libmatheval
- Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable
main contrib non-free
- dget
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libmatheval/libmatheval_1.1.7-2.dsc

I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.

Kind regards
Julian Taylor


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part