hello jasem,
i'm not a debian developer myself, so i can't help you with uploading,
nor should you rely solely on my opinion here, but i hope these comments
are helpful both to you and the developer reviewing your package for
upload:
* you already require debhelper 6, is there any reason you
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package libqsi.
* Package name: libqsi
Version : 6.0.3-1
Upstream Author : Quantum Scientific Imaging
* URL : http://www.qsimaging.com
* License : Propietary
Section : libs
It builds those binary
-- Forwarded message --
From: Jasem Mutlaq mutla...@ikarustech.com
Date: Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 8:08 PM
Subject: Re: RFS: libqsi
To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
Ok, I modified the subsection and updated copyright information for
the following packages:
1. libqsi (non-free): http
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 1:24 PM, Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote:
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Jasem Mutlaq wrote:
The driver that requires this library (INDI QSI driver) is released
under the LGPL v2.1. However, the library itself (QSI) is proprietary
and there is no open source
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Jasem Mutlaq wrote:
The driver that requires this library (INDI QSI driver) is released
under the LGPL v2.1. However, the library itself (QSI) is proprietary
and there is no open source alternative as this is a very special
purpose library for controlling
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package libqsi.
* Package name: libqsi
Version : 6.0.3-1
Upstream Author : Quantum Scientific Imaging
* URL : http://www.qsimaging.com
* License : BSD
Section : libs
It builds those binary
Hi,
Jasem Mutlaq mutla...@ikarustech.com writes:
* Package name: libqsi
Version : 6.0.3-1
Upstream Author : Quantum Scientific Imaging
* URL : http://www.qsimaging.com
* License : BSD
Section : libs
dget -x
There is no license included in the upstream tarball, only a copyright
notice and a disclaimer. Where did you get the information that it is
licensed under a BSD license?
I contacted the company to get explicit BSD-2 clause in the COPYING
file. Awaiting their reply.
You do not need to
Hi,
Jasem Mutlaq mutla...@ikarustech.com writes:
There seems to be no source for the PDF file in the doc/ directory.
Is this recommended or mandatory?
Source needs to be present for everything part of Debian. That includes
documentation and files that are not shipped in the binary packages.
Source needs to be present for everything part of Debian. That includes
documentation and files that are not shipped in the binary packages.
If you cannot provide the source, you need to repack to upstream
tarball and remove the sourceless files.
Ok, I got a confirmation from QSI that the
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 1:27 AM, Jasem Mutlaq wrote:
Ok, I got a confirmation from QSI that the source code for libqsi is
proprietary. They grant you the right to distribute source and binary
forms of the library, but not to modify the source itself. Can this be
added to Debian 'non-free' ?
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 8:06 AM, Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote:
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 1:27 AM, Jasem Mutlaq wrote:
Ok, I got a confirmation from QSI that the source code for libqsi is
proprietary. They grant you the right to distribute source and binary
forms of the library, but not to
12 matches
Mail list logo