On 27.06.2011 11:31, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
Hi,
[...]
Ok, I wouldn't bother much about the above, but one thing does stop me from
uploading: why are you setting the version number in such a way that Debian is
upstream? This doesn't seem to be accurate. IMHO you should be using 0.9.1-1
as
Hi,
Gunter Königsmann gun...@peterpall.de writes:
Did try to change the version number to 0.9.1-1 - which sounded great
for a non-native debian package. But this meant running into all kinds
of warnings. (debuild claims my native package has a version number
that contains a dash!)
You
Hi,
[...]
Ok, I wouldn't bother much about the above, but one thing does stop me from
uploading: why are you setting the version number in such a way that Debian
is
upstream? This doesn't seem to be accurate. IMHO you should be using 0.9.1-1
as
version number!?
Never found out
Hi,
Hmm, mind re-reading it? There's also this bit with
one line to give the program's name and a brief idea of what it does.
Copyright (C) year name of author
in there... :-)
Will do that as soon as my ecryptfs is working again - that currently won't let
me access my home
Hi,
I'm sorry for the huge wait...
As you claim it is GPL, you should familiarize yourself with its use:
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-howto.html
Well, at least you should have fully read the license text. The last
section is
titled How to Apply These Terms to Your New
Hi again,
[...]
- No copyright and license information in source files.
Is there any fixed or recommended format for doing this?
[...]
- It sounds weird that gnome-common is needed to build a command-line
utility
for ogg files!?
Will fix that before re-uploading the file: The only
On Monday 09 May 2011 09:27:49 Gunter Königsmann wrote:
- No copyright and license information in source files.
Is there any fixed or recommended format for doing this?
You should contact upstream and ask them to clarify copyright and license.
Ideally, this info should be somewhere in
As you claim it is GPL, you should familiarize yourself with its use:
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-howto.html
Well, at least you should have fully read the license text. The last section
is
titled How to Apply These Terms to Your New Programs. Please re-read that
part.
Cool! Did
On So, 2011-05-01 at 18:09 +0100, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
Hi,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package oggfix.
* Package name: oggfix
Version : 0.9.0
Upstream Author : Gunter Königsmann
* URL : http://launchpad.net/oggfix
* License : GPL V3+
Hi,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package oggfix.
* Package name: oggfix
Version : 0.9.0
Upstream Author : Gunter Königsmann
* URL : http://launchpad.net/oggfix
* License : GPL V3+
Section : sound
It builds these binary packages:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package oggfix.
* Package name: oggfix
Version : 0.9.0
Upstream Author : Gunter Königsmann
* URL : http://launchpad.net/oggfix
* License : GPL V3+
Section
11 matches
Mail list logo