Re: RFS: oggfix

2011-12-06 Thread Gunter Königsmann
On 27.06.2011 11:31, Michael Tautschnig wrote: Hi, [...] Ok, I wouldn't bother much about the above, but one thing does stop me from uploading: why are you setting the version number in such a way that Debian is upstream? This doesn't seem to be accurate. IMHO you should be using 0.9.1-1 as

Re: RFS: oggfix

2011-12-06 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
Hi, Gunter Königsmann gun...@peterpall.de writes: Did try to change the version number to 0.9.1-1 - which sounded great for a non-native debian package. But this meant running into all kinds of warnings. (debuild claims my native package has a version number that contains a dash!) You

Re: RFS: oggfix

2011-06-27 Thread Michael Tautschnig
Hi, [...] Ok, I wouldn't bother much about the above, but one thing does stop me from uploading: why are you setting the version number in such a way that Debian is upstream? This doesn't seem to be accurate. IMHO you should be using 0.9.1-1 as version number!? Never found out

Re: RFS: oggfix

2011-06-26 Thread gun...@peterpall.de
Hi, Hmm, mind re-reading it? There's also this bit with      one line to give the program's name and a brief idea of what it does.      Copyright (C) year  name of author in there... :-) Will do that as soon as my ecryptfs is working again - that currently won't let me access my home

Re: RFS: oggfix

2011-06-25 Thread Michael Tautschnig
Hi, I'm sorry for the huge wait... As you claim it is GPL, you should familiarize yourself with its use: http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-howto.html Well, at least you should have fully read the license text. The last section is titled How to Apply These Terms to Your New

Re: RFS: oggfix

2011-05-10 Thread Michael Tautschnig
Hi again, [...] - No copyright and license information in source files. Is there any fixed or recommended format for doing this? [...] - It sounds weird that gnome-common is needed to build a command-line utility for ogg files!? Will fix that before re-uploading the file: The only

Re: RFS: oggfix

2011-05-10 Thread Dominique Dumont
On Monday 09 May 2011 09:27:49 Gunter Königsmann wrote: - No copyright and license information in source files. Is there any fixed or recommended format for doing this? You should contact upstream and ask them to clarify copyright and license. Ideally, this info should be somewhere in

Re: RFS: oggfix

2011-05-10 Thread Gunter Königsmann
As you claim it is GPL, you should familiarize yourself with its use: http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-howto.html Well, at least you should have fully read the license text. The last section is titled How to Apply These Terms to Your New Programs. Please re-read that part. Cool! Did

Re: RFS: oggfix

2011-05-09 Thread Gunter Königsmann
On So, 2011-05-01 at 18:09 +0100, Michael Tautschnig wrote: Hi, I am looking for a sponsor for my package oggfix. * Package name: oggfix Version : 0.9.0 Upstream Author : Gunter Königsmann * URL : http://launchpad.net/oggfix * License : GPL V3+

Re: RFS: oggfix

2011-05-01 Thread Michael Tautschnig
Hi, I am looking for a sponsor for my package oggfix. * Package name: oggfix Version : 0.9.0 Upstream Author : Gunter Königsmann * URL : http://launchpad.net/oggfix * License : GPL V3+ Section : sound It builds these binary packages:

RFS: oggfix

2011-02-19 Thread Gunter Königsmann
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package oggfix. * Package name: oggfix Version : 0.9.0 Upstream Author : Gunter Königsmann * URL : http://launchpad.net/oggfix * License : GPL V3+ Section