On Monday 31 July 2006 06:28, George Danchev wrote:
> I looked at your source package and I think it is a better idea to split
> off a library package, or you have any good reasons not doing so ?
Yes, at the moment, we don't really expect anyone to be building against
the library - the package is
On Sunday 30 July 2006 23:50, Martin Ellis wrote:
> On Monday 03 July 2006 00:30, Martin Ellis wrote:
> > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pmplib".
> >
> > * Package name: pmplib
> >
> > Upstream Authors :
> > Nyaochi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Martin Ellis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Monday 03 July 2006 00:30, Martin Ellis wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pmplib".
>
> * Package name: pmplib
> Upstream Authors :
> Nyaochi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Martin Ellis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://pmplib.sourceforge.net/
> * License
On Mon, 2006-07-03 at 00:30 +0100, Martin Ellis wrote:
> I'm looking for someone to review the package as it stands, in order
> that any necessary changes for inclusion in Debian can be made
> before 0.12 is released.
Sure, no problem, here goes. In general the package looks good, good
work! I've
[Note that this request doesn't quite follow the mentors template...
CC'ing anibal, who uploaded a similar package by the same upstream author]
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pmplib".
* Package name: pmplib
Version : 0.11-1 (actually it's a 0.12 pre-release, see below)
5 matches
Mail list logo
