Re: RFS: policyd-weight (3rd)

2012-01-09 Thread werner
Hi Ansgar, sorry that I could not look at your package even after I said that I would earlier, but I did not have enough free time. But it was uploaded in the end anyway :) No problem - I've just fixed another bug (#641538) in my local packet. It is not possible to change the package

Re: RFS: policyd-weight (3rd)

2012-01-08 Thread werner
Hi, can anyone re-upload the package ? :) regards, Werner Detter Am 07.01.12 11:45, schrieb wer...@aloah-from-hell.de: Dear Mentors, I've just installed my policyd-weight package from unstable. There my /etc/default/policyd-weight file is not created, currently I'm not sure if the version

Re: RFS: policyd-weight (3rd)

2012-01-08 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 01/06/2012 09:32 PM, wer...@aloah-from-hell.de wrote: Hi Thomas, I've received an email from Debian FTP-Masters with the information that the package got rejected: --- Reject Reasons: policyd-weight_0.1.15.2-1_all.deb: deb contents timestamp check failed [type

Re: RFS: policyd-weight (3rd)

2012-01-08 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 01/08/2012 10:27 PM, wer...@aloah-from-hell.de wrote: Hi, can anyone re-upload the package ? :) regards, Werner Detter http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=wer...@aloah-from-hell.de It's in, as you can see! I don't think re-uploading only for the /etc/default/policyd-weight is worth

Re: RFS: policyd-weight (3rd)

2012-01-08 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
Hi, sorry that I could not look at your package even after I said that I would earlier, but I did not have enough free time. But it was uploaded in the end anyway :) wer...@aloah-from-hell.de writes: Could you please re-upload the package? I've just uploaded the latest version to mentors.

Re: RFS: policyd-weight (3rd)

2012-01-07 Thread werner
Dear Mentors, I've just installed my policyd-weight package from unstable. There my /etc/default/policyd-weight file is not created, currently I'm not sure if the version that has been uploaded to mentors does include the /etc/default/policyd-weight file already so I've downloaded the source and

Re: RFS: policyd-weight (3rd)

2012-01-06 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 01/06/2012 01:14 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote: Your debian/init.d script shouldn't set the PATH at all. All the folders it is putting in PATH are already accessible in the default $PATH, so don't change it. FYI, pabs don't agree with me, and think declaring the $PATH is the way to go. So

Re: RFS: policyd-weight (3rd)

2012-01-06 Thread werner
Hi Thomas, thanks for your helpfull comments. What was in /etc/default/policyd-weight? Why aren't you using it anymore? It behaves like the current package in unstable/testing/stable. The file /etc/default/policyd-weight isn't created but the init script takes account of it.

Re: RFS: policyd-weight (3rd)

2012-01-06 Thread Arno Töll
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Werner, On 06.01.2012 12:44, wer...@aloah-from-hell.de wrote: What should we do here? Generate the file? Or don't take account of it in the init script? there is a slight disagreement between several positions within Debian regarding

Re: RFS: policyd-weight (3rd)

2012-01-06 Thread werner
Hi Arno, there is a slight disagreement between several positions within Debian regarding /etc/default/daemon options. That's confusing and something we should work on, but that needs to be addressed at a higher level. Ok, i see. For you, in particular, you can choose either alternative for

Re: RFS: policyd-weight (3rd)

2012-01-06 Thread Arno Töll
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Werner, On 06.01.2012 13:32, wer...@aloah-from-hell.de wrote: I think that's the way to go. But where in source package should i put the file in my source package? I would then copy the file by postinst to /etc/default/policyd-weight ?

Re: RFS: policyd-weight (3rd)

2012-01-06 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 01/06/2012 07:44 PM, wer...@aloah-from-hell.de wrote: Hi Thomas, thanks for your helpfull comments. What was in /etc/default/policyd-weight? Why aren't you using it anymore? It behaves like the current package in unstable/testing/stable. The file /etc/default/policyd-weight

Re: RFS: policyd-weight (3rd)

2012-01-06 Thread werner
Hi Thomas, I'd add a file there, with lots of comments, and all the options that you can put in it. It doesn't mater if absolutely every options are commented out, the point is to document what can be done with useful comments. Maybe you can do that on your next upload? done :) I've added

Re: RFS: policyd-weight (3rd)

2012-01-06 Thread werner
Hi Thomas, I've received an email from Debian FTP-Masters with the information that the package got rejected: --- Reject Reasons: policyd-weight_0.1.15.2-1_all.deb: deb contents timestamp check failed [type 'exceptions.NameError': global name 'MTime' is not defined] --- What's wrong? Thanks,

Re: RFS: policyd-weight (3rd)

2012-01-06 Thread Arno Töll
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06.01.2012 14:32, wer...@aloah-from-hell.de wrote: What's wrong? That seems to be a bug in in dak to me. I've tried to ask relevent persons, maybe they can help you out. - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC

Re: RFS: policyd-weight (3rd)

2012-01-06 Thread werner
Hi Arno, That seems to be a bug in in dak to me. I've tried to ask relevent persons, maybe they can help you out. OK, thank you :) Have a nice day, Werner -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Re: RFS: policyd-weight (3rd)

2012-01-06 Thread Arno Töll
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06.01.2012 14:45, wer...@aloah-from-hell.de wrote: That seems to be a bug in in dak to me. I've tried to ask relevent persons, maybe they can help you out. Mark fixed a bug in dak which produced your faulty error message. The problem was the

Re: RFS: policyd-weight (3rd)

2012-01-06 Thread werner
Hi again, I do have another question left. I've just discovered that there are some files left in the debian directory after package creation, e.g. debian/files debian/policyd-weight.* debian/policyd-weight.*.debhelper debian/*.dephelper.log debian/policyd-weight/ As source packages should

Re: RFS: policyd-weight (3rd)

2012-01-06 Thread Arno Töll
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Werner, On 06.01.2012 21:24, wer...@aloah-from-hell.de wrote: a) it's ok that the files reside in the debian directory ? b) I missed a dh_clean (or pedant) somewhere ? c) I have to delete those manually? I didn't actually try your source

Re: RFS: policyd-weight (3rd)

2012-01-06 Thread werner
Hi Arno, a) it's ok that the files reside in the debian directory ? b) I missed a dh_clean (or pedant) somewhere ? c) I have to delete those manually? I didn't actually try your source package, but it looks feasible. These files are created by a regular build process and entirely typical

RFS: policyd-weight (3rd)

2012-01-05 Thread werner
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package policyd-weight. * Package name: policyd-weight Version : 0.1.15.2-1 Upstream Author : Robert Felber * URL : www.policyd-weight.org * License : GPL-2+ Section : mail It builds those binary

Re: RFS: policyd-weight (3rd)

2012-01-05 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 01/06/2012 02:07 AM, wer...@aloah-from-hell.de wrote: Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package policyd-weight. * Package name: policyd-weight Version : 0.1.15.2-1 Upstream Author : Robert Felber * URL : www.policyd-weight.org * License