Re: RFS: proxycheck -- link

2006-01-30 Thread Al Nikolov
отправлено в группы и по почте Christoph Haas wrote: Found it. Checked it. Uploaded it. Thank you. Minor thoughts on the package: - Please don't change past entries in the changelog even though I understand that you wanted to correct the line wrapping. Yes, i understand such the

dpatch vs. quilt [was: Re: RFS: proxycheck -- link]

2006-01-29 Thread Kevin B. McCarty
Frank Küster wrote: There are also other alternatives to dpatch; one is Debian-specific and i keep forgetting its name, and there's quilt. The main advantage of quilt IMHO is that it doesn't duplicate the whole tree when editing and updating the patch, which can be time- and disk-consuming

Re: dpatch vs. quilt [was: Re: RFS: proxycheck -- link]

2006-01-29 Thread justin
On Sun, Jan 29, 2006 at 11:39:17AM -0500, Kevin B. McCarty wrote: Frank K?ster wrote: There are also other alternatives to dpatch; one is Debian-specific and i keep forgetting its name, Are you thinking of dbs? Justin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

Re: dpatch vs. quilt [was: Re: RFS: proxycheck -- link]

2006-01-29 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Kevin B. McCarty [Sun, 29 Jan 2006 11:39:17 -0500]: Frank Küster wrote: There are also other alternatives to dpatch; one is Debian-specific and i keep forgetting its name, and there's quilt. The main advantage of quilt IMHO is that it doesn't duplicate the whole tree when editing and

Re: dpatch vs. quilt [was: Re: RFS: proxycheck -- link]

2006-01-29 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Adeodato Simó [Mon, 30 Jan 2006 04:08:52 +0100]: With respect to speed, (Er, sorry; this paragraph refers to dpatch, which isn't immediately clear.) it must be that most people use it in small trees, -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es

Re: RFS: proxycheck -- link

2006-01-28 Thread Christoph Haas
Hi, Al... On Friday 27 January 2006 20:20, Al Nikolov wrote: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/proxycheck/ Found it. Checked it. Uploaded it. Minor thoughts on the package: - Please don't change past entries in the changelog even though I understand that you wanted to correct the

Re: RFS: proxycheck -- link

2006-01-28 Thread Thomas Viehmann
Hi. Christoph Haas wrote: - Please don't change past entries in the changelog even though I understand that you wanted to correct the line wrapping. Correcting factual mistakes or typos in the changelog seems to be accepted practice and I can't really see the harm of doing so with the line

Re: RFS: proxycheck -- link

2006-01-28 Thread Christoph Haas
On Saturday 28 January 2006 18:57, Thomas Viehmann wrote: Christoph Haas wrote: - Please don't change past entries in the changelog even though I understand that you wanted to correct the line wrapping. Correcting factual mistakes or typos in the changelog seems to be accepted practice

Re: RFS: proxycheck -- link

2006-01-28 Thread Frank Küster
Christoph Haas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - Consider using dpatch for changing the upstream sources. You may find it easier to keep or remove patches when the next upstream version is released. It's good to know the option, but for minor changes that are likely to either be kept or

Re: RFS: proxycheck -- link

2006-01-27 Thread Al Nikolov
Al Nikolov wrote: Excuse me, forgot link to http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/proxycheck/ -- Regards, Al Nikolov JID [EMAIL PROTECTED]IRC clown UIN 312108671 PGP 4B50 F1E3 080C 21A2 91F4 8BF0 CD60 3B5A 2ECF 984B -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a