Re: RFS: sqwebmail-de: german templates for sqwebmail (fixes RC-bug)

2006-11-21 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
On Sun, 2006-11-19 at 12:21 +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote: Neil Williams wrote: Why is this double space seen as mandatory? - it is not. Single spacing is fine in most cases. roumors has it that some automatic tools are in need of having two leading spaces. This is way too vague, because I

Re: RFS: sqwebmail-de: german templates for sqwebmail (fixes RC-bug)

2006-11-19 Thread Daniel Baumann
Daniel Baumann wrote: Going now to bed, will take care tomorrow. ok, here we go: * '* Old changelog entries just for history.' is not needed in changelog, we do always keep the old changelog, even if the package was completely remade. * remove the useless empty line at the end of

Re: RFS: sqwebmail-de: german templates for sqwebmail (fixes RC-bug)

2006-11-19 Thread Neil Williams
On Sun, 19 Nov 2006 09:05:47 +0100 Daniel Baumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * Before Hompepage:, there must be two leading spaces, not just one. I think this has been covered before and I can't see why it's continued. One space before Homepage is fine - two spaces just prevents linewrapping

Re: RFS: sqwebmail-de: german templates for sqwebmail (fixes RC-bug)

2006-11-19 Thread Daniel Baumann
Willi Mann wrote: that the patch doesn't contain an explicit copyright notice. Is the way I've done it Ok? at the upstream site, the patch is advertised as: Updated Templates for version 5.1.3 - Martin Kos (updated Patch against 5.1.3 english) This looks like it is a sqwebmail derivation with

Re: RFS: sqwebmail-de: german templates for sqwebmail (fixes RC-bug)

2006-11-19 Thread Willi Mann
at the upstream site, the patch is advertised as: Updated Templates for version 5.1.3 - Martin Kos (updated Patch against 5.1.3 english) This looks like it is a sqwebmail derivation with additional, translation related copyright of the patch author. I'd say you try now to contact Martin

RFS: sqwebmail-de: german templates for sqwebmail (fixes RC-bug)

2006-11-18 Thread Willi Mann
Hi! I'm searching a sponsor for the my completely redone sqwebmail-de package. The current version in sid is very outdated: You cannot even send mail (with current sqwebmail in sid). I've redone the packaging completely, because the current build procedure is so simple that I didn't want to

Re: RFS: sqwebmail-de: german templates for sqwebmail (fixes RC-bug)

2006-11-18 Thread Daniel Baumann
Willi Mann wrote: I'm searching a sponsor for the my completely redone sqwebmail-de package. The current version in sid is very outdated: You cannot even send mail (with current sqwebmail in sid). I was wanting that for so long, but didn't reserved the time to do it myself, or in other words,