Rejected experimental package (was Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package))
On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 13:28:19 +0100 Tony Houghton h...@realh.co.uk wrote: I think releasing to experimental would be the best option at the moment, so I'll upload a new version later. I tried that and my package was rejected by m.d.n: You are not uploading to one of those Debian distributions: unstablestable-backports oldstable-backports stable-backports-sloppy oldstable-backports Is experimental now disallowed or might I have done something else wrong and triggered a misleading error message? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110915143040.6fd7e9cc@junior
Re: Rejected experimental package (was Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package))
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 9:30 AM, Tony Houghton h...@realh.co.uk wrote: On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 13:28:19 +0100 Tony Houghton h...@realh.co.uk wrote: I think releasing to experimental would be the best option at the moment, so I'll upload a new version later. I tried that and my package was rejected by m.d.n: You are not uploading to one of those Debian distributions: unstablestable-backports oldstable-backports stable-backports-sloppy oldstable-backports Is experimental now disallowed or might I have done something else wrong and triggered a misleading error message? This is certainly a bug. You can file bugs against the debexpo project on Alioth: https://alioth.debian.org/projects/debexpo/ -- Andrew Starr-Bochicchio Ubuntu Developer https://launchpad.net/~andrewsomething Debian Contributor http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=a.starr.b%40gmail.com PGP/GPG Key ID: D53FDCB1 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cal6k_ayowcukbks2yro99zxoet1kmy_ecva4dt_ptezmsce...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Rejected experimental package (was Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package))
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 This is certainly a bug. You can file bugs against the debexpo project on Alioth: No need to do. I already fixed that a few days ago [1]. However I didn't merge our master branch to live (i.e. the deployment branch) yet. [1] http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=debexpo/debexpo.git;a=commitdiff;h=4347537533b2e917542369df48ff8bc0989589d3 - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOch2sAAoJEMcrUe6dgPNtsicQAIR06MJ3Xz92UBBc2H3Plw73 Z/4mgi3hQ5rWc5H3FLoW5hvB5Zpdz48ILUBbi35Kur7BlTQCWuIJFxQ0D6DRBA+p PEn+gI0wb2LOmyxBdfSf+ZMSifZk4T/V9l4e5+WUR8O2jg+OQ3C1SNzWyf4l/ZGm Q6MkxhVpStOsiFfPH0GSPMitIUm5cagvOKDNV2qM4jkf/0zc6LwhWnxgM77uQ+Sy LkejJ9EoIQvu9eB5XIsaeAFLeRbMQ1oqy+p1JkRe6eQz8XX6kWF0QcT9+jisuKNa EcSfqbHeRjPXVJDdLM7dhv79ATg/R0I+cZY53TdwFXhdhGssdvG/FiKATHHNB5Au Qg88cd/vyN5CfiIxmr2vPbRsuAGNcxfR8qRyVY4o23yyQBeCOzYotriKaZ/cd3ra Q268i6uwaoeSkQ9FIV5MPHostgMxlEuTgjFxx0+wMR+N4ycGYBiylHXlBV2HZJrd rP/OGV0iFS8mvjk205myDtq8rvxZ97Kio1msT5L3L1qwqLuVLONgiK3nEWIb5U6N p470Jxx2qit3dQOC4q+m0KmpR9nWNU5Bd1UROvu6C+L3jpKACMURDva7RtgLwYVz 0hfb1cHli0dCIb+ptTDtKVvOOr+aoF8HuNB8QKlxdmgq/jh8nesuoNSok3bSnc80 VTr8fKkdLNpsGCneN/MP =MLYd -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e721dac.90...@toell.net
Re: Rejected experimental package (was Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package))
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Arno Töll deb...@toell.net wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 This is certainly a bug. You can file bugs against the debexpo project on Alioth: No need to do. I already fixed that a few days ago [1]. However I didn't merge our master branch to live (i.e. the deployment branch) yet. Heh. I guess that explains why I was just looking at that piece of code wondering what in the world the problem could be. experimental is listed there. Is there a missing comma somewhere? I can't see any reason why this shouldn't work! Pro tip: Look at the log messages first! Thanks! -- Andrew Starr-Bochicchio Ubuntu Developer https://launchpad.net/~andrewsomething Debian Contributor http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=a.starr.b%40gmail.com PGP/GPG Key ID: D53FDCB1 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAL6k_AzG=u9X2kdwEdN8YTAdBbzdFW6s9tuEaU1=l3nsib0...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Rejected experimental package (was Re: RFS: roxterm (updated package))
On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 17:45:48 +0200 Arno Töll deb...@toell.net wrote: No need to do. I already fixed that a few days ago [1]. However I didn't merge our master branch to live (i.e. the deployment branch) yet. OK. Please post again when you do so I know when I can try again to upload roxterm. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110915174044.5cb1a931@tiber.centauri
