Hi,
I am working on packaging a Java application called BT747 [0]. For now,
I have some doubts (I think I'll have more in the future ;-)):
* Licenses: this package has quite a lot of licenses, one of the
licenses is GPL (without the version). Is it a problem? The exact header
is:
/**
*
Yep, package any embedded code copies separately.
For modified code copies, try to get the changes into their proper
upstream or the Debian package if it exists. Then depend on that
version.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Mònica
* Licenses: this package has quite a lot of licenses, one of the
licenses is GPL (without the version). Is it a problem? The exact header
is:
This is no problem. GPL states (verbatim quote from GPL-2, still present
in GPL-3):
If the
El dg 15 de 05 de 2011 a les 19:08 +0800, en/na Paul Wise va escriure:
Yep, package any embedded code copies separately.
For modified code copies, try to get the changes into their proper
upstream or the Debian package if it exists.
Ok, I'll try it, altough this library doesn't exist in
El dg 15 de 05 de 2011 a les 13:10 +0200, en/na Arno Töll va escriure:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Mònica
* Licenses: this package has quite a lot of licenses, one of the
licenses is GPL (without the version). Is it a problem? The exact header
is:
This is no
Hello Monica,
interesting that you're now working on bt747: I'm also using this
program to download my GPS tracks and flag my photos, wanted as well to
package it, and basically silently gave up as I looked into it :-P
Anyway I'm happy that someone has more courage and/or time to do it!
On
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Mònica,
On 15.05.2011 13:40, Mònica Ramírez Arceda wrote:
So, thinking in DEP5: If I choose GPL-3.0+, what should I write in the
description of the license? (Suppose I have the GPL-3.0+ already
detailed):
The GPL paragraph I cited does not
On Sunday 15 May 2011 14:48:07 Eric Lavarde wrote:
Hello Monica,
Hi,
interesting that you're now working on bt747: I'm also using this
program to download my GPS tracks and flag my photos, wanted as well to
package it, and basically silently gave up as I looked into it :-P
I'd actually
Hi again,
El dg 15 de 05 de 2011 a les 15:49 +0300, en/na George Danchev va
escriure:
On Sunday 15 May 2011 14:48:07 Eric Lavarde wrote:
Hello Monica,
Hi,
interesting that you're now working on bt747: I'm also using this
program to download my GPS tracks and flag my photos, wanted as
Mònica Ramírez Arceda mon...@probeta.net writes:
Perfect!
So, thinking in DEP5: If I choose GPL-3.0+, what should I write in the
description of the license? (Suppose I have the GPL-3.0+ already
detailed):
I would record the license as GPL-1+. That's really what that declaration
means
On Sunday 15 May 2011 21:01:44 Mònica Ramírez Arceda wrote:
Hi,
To be honest, I had the same problem as you with Freeplane and JOrtho,
and I decided to keep JOrtho as part of the freeplane package, under
the binary name libjortho-freeplane-java.
The reasons were:
- JOrtho was not
11 matches
Mail list logo
