Re: freeze policy - open requests for sponsorship

2012-07-20 Thread Thibaut Paumard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Le 19/07/12 21:30, Paul Tagliamonte a écrit : > On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 07:27:01PM +, Bart Martens wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 04:57:44PM +0200, Thibaut Paumard wrote: >>> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=sponsorship-request

Re: freeze policy - open requests for sponsorship

2012-07-19 Thread Paul Tagliamonte
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 07:27:01PM +, Bart Martens wrote: > On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 04:57:44PM +0200, Thibaut Paumard wrote: > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=sponsorship-requests;ordering=wheezy-bilevel > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=sponsorship-request

Re: freeze policy - open requests for sponsorship

2012-07-19 Thread Bart Martens
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 04:57:44PM +0200, Thibaut Paumard wrote: > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=sponsorship-requests;ordering=wheezy-bilevel > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=sponsorship-requests;ordering=wheezy-view > http://wiki.debian.org/Mentors/BTS#Usertags

Re: freeze policy - open requests for sponsorship

2012-07-19 Thread Thibaut Paumard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Le 19/07/12 15:15, Thibaut Paumard a écrit : > user sponsorship-reque...@packages.debian.org usercategory > wheezy-status * Wheezy Status [tag=] + Intended for Wheezy > [for-wheezy] + Not Intended for Wheezy [not-for-wheezy] + Fit for > Wheezy [fit-f

Re: freeze policy - open requests for sponsorship

2012-07-18 Thread Paul Tagliamonte
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 09:09:20PM +0200, Thibaut Paumard wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Le 18/07/12 15:42, Paul Tagliamonte a écrit : > > On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 02:31:16PM +0200, Thibaut Paumard wrote: Le > > 16/07/12 11:05, Thibaut Paumard a écrit : > Le 03/

Re: freeze policy - open requests for sponsorship

2012-07-18 Thread Thibaut Paumard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Le 18/07/12 15:42, Paul Tagliamonte a écrit : > On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 02:31:16PM +0200, Thibaut Paumard wrote: Le > 16/07/12 11:05, Thibaut Paumard a écrit : Le 03/07/12 08:20, Thibaut Paumard a écrit : > Le 03/07/12 01:41, Adam Borowski a

Re: freeze policy - open requests for sponsorship

2012-07-18 Thread Paul Tagliamonte
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 02:31:16PM +0200, Thibaut Paumard wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Le 16/07/12 11:05, Thibaut Paumard a écrit : > > Le 03/07/12 08:20, Thibaut Paumard a écrit : > >> Le 03/07/12 01:41, Adam Borowski a écrit : Hi, > > > >> We could agree on a u

Re: freeze policy - open requests for sponsorship

2012-07-18 Thread Thibaut Paumard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Le 16/07/12 11:05, Thibaut Paumard a écrit : > Le 03/07/12 08:20, Thibaut Paumard a écrit : >> Le 03/07/12 01:41, Adam Borowski a écrit : Hi, > >> We could agree on a usertag then, for instance: > >> User: sponsorship-reque...@packages.debian.org U

Re: freeze policy - open requests for sponsorship

2012-07-16 Thread Thibaut Paumard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Le 03/07/12 08:20, Thibaut Paumard a écrit : > Le 03/07/12 01:41, Adam Borowski a écrit : Hi, > > We could agree on a usertag then, for instance: > > User: sponsorship-reque...@packages.debian.org Usertags: > not-for-wheezy > > Using sponsorship-r

Re: freeze policy - open requests for sponsorship

2012-07-03 Thread Paul Tagliamonte
On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 08:20:20AM +0200, Thibaut Paumard wrote: > Le 03/07/12 01:41, Adam Borowski a écrit : > > On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 09:06:25AM -0600, Paul Wise wrote: > >> Perhaps use wheezy-ignore for stuff that shouldn't be in wheezy? > > > > Isn't that completely contrary to that tag's us

Re: freeze policy - open requests for sponsorship

2012-07-02 Thread Thibaut Paumard
Le 03/07/12 01:41, Adam Borowski a écrit : > On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 09:06:25AM -0600, Paul Wise wrote: >> Perhaps use wheezy-ignore for stuff that shouldn't be in wheezy? > > Isn't that completely contrary to that tag's usual meaning? > > You set it for stuff that should be in wheezy despite the

Re: freeze policy - open requests for sponsorship

2012-07-02 Thread Adam Borowski
On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 09:06:25AM -0600, Paul Wise wrote: > Perhaps use wheezy-ignore for stuff that shouldn't be in wheezy? Isn't that completely contrary to that tag's usual meaning? You set it for stuff that should be in wheezy despite the bug. What we'd want here, is some way to convey "do

Re: freeze policy - open requests for sponsorship

2012-07-02 Thread Arno Töll
Hi, On 02.07.2012 17:06, Paul Wise wrote: > On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 12:58 AM, Bart Martens wrote: > >> Comments on these suggestions ? > > Perhaps use wheezy-ignore for stuff that shouldn't be in wheezy? I > guess that might be stepping on the release team's tags, so maybe > setting up usercatego

Re: freeze policy - open requests for sponsorship

2012-07-02 Thread Paul Wise
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 12:58 AM, Bart Martens wrote: > Comments on these suggestions ? Perhaps use wheezy-ignore for stuff that shouldn't be in wheezy? I guess that might be stepping on the release team's tags, so maybe setting up usercategories and usertags for the sponsorship-requests metapacka

freeze policy - open requests for sponsorship

2012-07-01 Thread Bart Martens
Hello, Now that the freeze period has started, some of the open requests for sponsorship are now invalid because the packages don't conform to the freeze policy. http://release.debian.org/wheezy/freeze_policy.html With "open requests for sponsorship" I mean not only the RFS bugs but also the pack