On Fri, 2012-11-23 at 12:01 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > P.S: The above isn't an approval for embedding yet another version of
> > jquery in your package, I think it should be avoided as well if
> > possible. Probably one of the options is to patch upstream source code
> > so that it can work wit
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 12:01:05PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> For right now, I think the best thing for the Doxygen *clients* to do is
> just ignore this issue. It may need a bug against doxygen, though (and
> possibly some help for the Doxygen maintainer).
I'm just wild-guessing that the new v
Thomas Goirand writes:
> On 11/24/2012 01:54 AM, Gert Wollny wrote:
>> Now I've seen that Doxgen has the jquery-1.3.2.js file in the debian/
>> directory and in fact with this script the pages display correctly. My
>> question is now, should I also include this source file in the source
>> distri
On 11/24/2012 01:54 AM, Gert Wollny wrote:
> Now I've seen that Doxgen has the jquery-1.3.2.js file in the debian/
> directory and in fact with this script the pages display correctly. My
> question is now, should I also include this source file in the source
> distribution, or would it suffice to
Dear all,
I'm currently staring with packaging some software (initially intended
for debian-med) and amongst these packages is a software library with
its Doxygen created documentation.
Doxygen created a jquery.js script that depends somehow on the options
used to run the document creation b
5 matches
Mail list logo
