Re: Reproducible builds erroneous ticks

2021-10-12 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
s on the bug you know of? Is it related to build paths? Varying build paths is not done for builds outside of unstable, and the reproducible builds website exports its data based on testing instead. The reason is simply because varying build paths causes still way too many unreproducibi

Reproducible builds erroneous ticks

2021-10-11 Thread Matthew Fernandez
Hello mentors, I was reviewing one of my own packages on the QA page¹ and was surprised to notice it gets full marks for CI/Rep. “Surprised? Isn’t that a good thing?” you say. It’s surprising because I’ve been tracking an upstream bug that I *know* makes this package’s build not-reproducible.

Re: reproducible-builds

2016-07-19 Thread Herbert Fortes
Em Ter, 2016-07-19 às 12:42 +, Mattia Rizzolo escreveu: > On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 09:38:44AM -0300, Herbert Fortes wrote: > > I do not have a special interest in the package. Just > > a QA to do. I also did a repository (collab-maint) for > > it. > > You could/shoud have set Vcs-* in

Re: reproducible-builds

2016-07-19 Thread Herbert Fortes
Hi, > Something failed somewhere in the second build, not in the package build > itself but rather in the building script and was not properly detected > as an infrastructure error (but rather as a FTBFS). > I triggered another build of the package and not it has built > successfully. Thanks for

Re: reproducible-builds

2016-07-19 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 09:38:44AM -0300, Herbert Fortes wrote: > I do not have a special interest in the package. Just > a QA to do. I also did a repository (collab-maint) for > it. You could/shoud have set Vcs-* in d/control for that. -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG

Re: reproducible-builds

2016-07-19 Thread Paul Wise
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 5:29 PM, Dominique Dumont wrote: > Is there anyone left who use DV tapes to perform backups There are apparently at least two computers that run it regularly: https://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=dvbackup Also, I assume Herbert has some reason for working on it. --

Re: reproducible-builds

2016-07-19 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 06:20:51PM -0300, Herbert Fortes wrote: > Em Seg, 2016-07-18 às 20:28 +0800, Paul Wise escreveu: > > On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 8:18 PM, Herbert Fortes wrote: > > > > > I did a QA and reproducible-builds says that > > > it FTBFS with arm

Re: reproducible-builds

2016-07-19 Thread Christian Seiler
Am 2016-07-19 11:29, schrieb Dominique Dumont: On Monday, July 18, 2016 6:20:51 PM CEST Herbert Fortes wrote: dvbackup Is this package worth the effort ? Not a user myself, but the package is already in the archive (it's not an ITP), and I think reproducibility for _all_ of Debian is a goal

Re: reproducible-builds

2016-07-19 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Dominique Dumont , 2016-07-19, 11:29: dvbackup Is this package worth the effort ? Is there anyone left who use DV tapes to perform backups when a 16GB thumb drive has more capacity and is more practical for this purpose than a DV camcorder ? I certainly wouldn't

Re: reproducible-builds

2016-07-19 Thread Dominique Dumont
On Monday, July 18, 2016 6:20:51 PM CEST Herbert Fortes wrote: > dvbackup Is this package worth the effort ? Is there anyone left who use DV tapes to perform backups when a 16GB thumb drive has more capacity and is more practical for this purpose than a DV camcorder ? All the best --

Re: reproducible-builds

2016-07-18 Thread Adam Borowski
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 06:20:51PM -0300, Herbert Fortes wrote: > Em Seg, 2016-07-18 às 20:28 +0800, Paul Wise escreveu: > > On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 8:18 PM, Herbert Fortes wrote: > > > > > I did a QA and reproducible-builds says that > > > it FTBFS with arm

Re: reproducible-builds

2016-07-18 Thread Herbert Fortes
Em Seg, 2016-07-18 às 20:28 +0800, Paul Wise escreveu: > On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 8:18 PM, Herbert Fortes wrote: > > > I did a QA and reproducible-builds says that > > it FTBFS with armhf on 2016-07-09. The > > build was not tried again. > > Which package ? dvbac

Re: reproducible-builds

2016-07-18 Thread Paul Wise
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 8:18 PM, Herbert Fortes wrote: > I did a QA and reproducible-builds says that > it FTBFS with armhf on 2016-07-09. The > build was not tried again. Which package? > I can do something about the status of the > package on reproducible-builds ? Or just >

reproducible-builds

2016-07-18 Thread Herbert Fortes
Hi, I did a QA and reproducible-builds says that it FTBFS with armhf on 2016-07-09. The build was not tried again. I did a build with harris (ssh) and the build ran fine. I can do something about the status of the  package on reproducible-builds ? Or just wait for a new try by them ? regards