Ho Joel, thanks for your contribution !
Looking at your work there are a couple of things that can be improved:
In that team normally we use git repos to keep track of the packaging; more
precisely we use the
le. Closes: #863054
-- Paolo Greppi Tue, 15 Jan 2019 18:17:17 +0100
I ran ratt, 31 of 729 packages genuinely FTBFS due to doxygen 1.8.15.
More details here:
All these failures are related to an issue with texlive-base 2018.20190126-1:
and ultimately due
BTW, I retried uhd and actually it does not fail.
So I created 9 new bugs:
Il 04/02/19 09:15, Samuel Thibault ha scritto:
> Perhaps we just happen to use some doxygen commands which require this.
> You can simply make doxygen-latex depend on the package that provides
> listofitems.sty, texlive-plain-generic.
good point !
doxygen-latex depends on
Hi Dominique, see below
Il 14/02/2019 15:16, Dominique Dumont ha scritto:
On Tuesday, 12 February 2019 16:54:12 CET Andreas Tille wrote:
not sure how to deal with the jquery.js one since this is potentially an
issue with lots of dependencies - I remember discussions about this
which I did
The latest full ratt job on amd64 is complete:
In synthesis, of 730 build deps of doxygen 59 failed but 51 "maybe unrelated to
new changes" and only 8 seem due to the new doxygen version.
I think no new issues appeared.
Following a suggestion by sthibault, I added texlive-plain-generic as build dep
With that change, I did a partial ratt job, focusing on the 9
build-dependencies of doxygen mentioned above.
The new version
I ran a new full ratt job after texlive-base 2018.20190131-2 fixed #920459.
Of 732 packages built on amd64, 52 fail, but of those:
- 33 "maybe unrelated to new changes"
- 10 failed because of unsatisfied build dependencies (texlive-extra-utils,
Mail list logo