Hi Arno,
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 2:48 AM, Arno Töll deb...@toell.net wrote:
snipped
You are missing dwm_5.9.orig.tar.gz there. If you forgot it for mentors
too, that would explain your problem (however, you should have gotten a
reject mail then).
I think I missed while copying it to server.
Dear Thomas,
Thomas Weber schrieb am 08.11.2011 00:18:
I'm in the process of converting Debian's Octave packages into a
structure with proper library packaging. The symbols file of these three
C++ libraries has about 30k lines.
I'm pretty new to symbols handling, so I'm looking for advice
Hi,
There is a package I desperately want in Debian and there already is an ITP
for it that is almost a year old. There wasn't any activity on it except that
the author reverted the automatic ITP - RFP conversion after 6 monts of
inactivity. I did write to the bug-author a few days ago if he
Mathias Ertl m...@fsinf.at writes:
There is a package I desperately want in Debian and there already is an ITP
for it that is almost a year old. There wasn't any activity on it except that
the author reverted the automatic ITP - RFP conversion after 6 monts of
inactivity. I did write to
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 12:18 AM, Thomas Weber twe...@debian.org wrote:
Hi,
I'm in the process of converting Debian's Octave packages into a
structure with proper library packaging. The symbols file of these three
C++ libraries has about 30k lines.
I'm pretty new to symbols handling, so I'm
Obviously, you should give the ITP/RFP bug author much more than a few
days to respond... Have you mentioned your interest to the bug page?
I would try to contact the bug author at least a few more times.
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Gergely Nagy alger...@balabit.hu wrote:
Mathias Ertl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
On 08.11.2011 12:21, Gergely Nagy wrote:
This largely depends on which ITP bug we're talking about, as there
might be good reasons the ITP is still pending. Without more
information, though, no reasonable suggestion can be made, in my
You could also offer to co-maintain...
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Guido van Steen
vanst...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
Obviously, you should give the ITP/RFP bug author much more than a few
days to respond... Have you mentioned your interest to the bug page?
I would try to contact the
On Tuesday, November 08, 2011 12:21:20 PM Gergely Nagy wrote:
This largely depends on which ITP bug we're talking about, as there
might be good reasons the ITP is still pending. Without more
information, though, no reasonable suggestion can be made, in my
opinion.
Its about php-pecl-http and
Mathias Ertl m...@fsinf.at writes:
On Tuesday, November 08, 2011 12:37:17 PM Guido van Steen wrote:
You could also offer to co-maintain...
I did offer to co-maintain. I will however give the author another week or
two
and try another email in a week or so.
On Tuesday, November 08, 2011
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Mathias,
On 08.11.2011 12:54, Mathias Ertl wrote:
I did offer to co-maintain. I will however give the author another week or
two
and try another email in a week or so.
It is not visible you did so. Please CC: the bug report for increased
While I think this package is interesting, I do not intend to sponsor it.
That said, here is a review of the source package:
I'm not sure it is appropriate to change the ABI names used by
upstream to a Debian-specific one. If you want to change the library
names that should be done upstream.
Hi,
Boris Pek tehnic...@yandex.ru writes:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package leechcraft.
I probably won't sponsor the package, but I was wondering if it is
really necessary to build 53 binary packages (if I did not miscount)?
Regards,
Ansgar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I have uploaded one of the packages I maintain and in the PTS [1] I have
many out of date on i386 and so on messages. It seems that was the
reason why the previous version (1.01.1-4) didn't reach testing.
Since I don't understand this problem, I
Hi!
Am 08.11.2011 15:09, schrieb Xavier Grave:
I have uploaded one of the packages I maintain and in the PTS [1] I have
many out of date on i386 and so on messages. It seems that was the
reason why the previous version (1.01.1-4) didn't reach testing.
Since I don't understand this problem,
While I think this package is interesting, I do not intend to sponsor it.
Thanks a lot for such detailed review!
And for possibility to practice in English. =)
That said, here is a review of the source package:
I'm not sure it is appropriate to change the ABI names used by
upstream to a
Hi,
I probably won't sponsor the package, but I was wondering if it is
really necessary to build 53 binary packages (if I did not miscount)?
The short answer: yes, it is.
Here I can cite the description from my first message:
LeechCraft is a free open source cross-platform modular
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 08/11/2011 15:58, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl a écrit :
Hi!
snip
Ha, that's a tricky one.
Fixing it with your help will make me learn more about Debian internals,
thanks !
First guess would have been: Not yet build on
all archs, however
On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 07:19, Damien Raude-Morvan draz...@debian.orgwrote:
Le dimanche 06 novembre 2011 16:02:55, Joey Parrish a écrit :
Hi Joey,
I haven't heard back in a while. Anything wrong with my package or repo
that's holding up an upload?
Your repository doesn't show up on [1],
Hi!
Am 08.11.2011 16:24, schrieb Xavier Grave:
Checking reverse dependencies...
# Broken Depends:
liblog4ada: liblog4ada1-dev
narval: libnarval-dbg [amd64 i386 ia64 kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386
powerpc s390 sparc]
libnarval1-dev [amd64 i386 ia64 kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 08:02, Jaldhar H. Vyas jald...@debian.org wrote:
On Sun, 6 Nov 2011, Joey Parrish wrote:
Jaldhar,
I haven't heard back in a while. Anything wrong with my package or repo
that's holding up an upload?
Sorry, real life got in the way. A couple of things I noticed.
Info: the problem vanished when I've builded with other builders than pbuilder.
Greetings,
Daniel Stender
On 06.11.2011 22:35, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
On Sun, Nov 06, 2011 at 05:34:41PM +0100, Daniel Stender wrote:
we are trying to build the Gummi (LaTeX editor with preview pane) 0.6 beta
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package yubiserver.
* Package name: yubiserver
Version : 0.1-1
Upstream Author : [Nanakos Chrysostomos nana...@wired-net.gr]
* URL :
[http://www.include.gr/debian/yubiserver/yubiserver-0.1.tar.gz]
* License :
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package mpg321.
* Package name: mpg321
Version : 0.3.0-1
Upstream Author : Nanakos Chrysostomos nana...@wired-net.gr
* URL : http://mpg321.sourceforge.net
* License : GPL-2+
Section : sound
It builds
Hello Arno,
On 22:18 Mon 07 Nov , Arno Töll wrote:
Hello Vasudev,
On 05.11.2011 15:09, Vasudev Kamath wrote:
Sure I've uploaded all the files at this URL[1]
snipped
[1] http://silpa.org.in/~vasudev/dwm/
You are missing dwm_5.9.orig.tar.gz there. If you forgot it for mentors
Quoting Vasudev Kamath kamathvasu...@gmail.com:
As I mentioned I've uploaded orig.tar ball to above URL. I tried
uploading the package again today but no luck it won't showup on the
mentors web inteface.
According to one of the mentors, there has a glitch in the upload script
for the last
Hi,
Boris Pek tehnic...@yandex.ru writes:
I probably won't sponsor the package, but I was wondering if it is
really necessary to build 53 binary packages (if I did not miscount)?
The short answer: yes, it is.
Here I can cite the description from my first message:
LeechCraft is a free open
Siegfried-Angel Gevatter Pujals (RainCT) wrote...
Hi Björn,
Maybe someone else can give you more details, but in the meantime here
are some useful links (which should have more than enough information
to get you started if you're already familiar with packaging):
2011/11/7 Björn Esser
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Boris,
On 08.11.2011 15:58, Boris Pek wrote:
qxmpp, Qxt, eiskaltdcpp, miniupnpc, parseUri, lightbox,
hunspell/myspell (and anything else in 3rdparty or third-party dirs)
are either already in Debian or should be packaged separately, you
* Ole Streicher debian-de...@liska.ath.cx, 2011-11-03, 21:07:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/python-cpl
Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/python-cpl/python-cpl_0.3.5-1.dsc
I don't intend to
[...]
You can use wildcards in .install files like these:
[...]
usr/share/leechcraft/translations/leechcraft_poshuku_*.qm
[...]
I have just found again the reason to not use it. Available wildcards are very
primitive. And they will affect to sub-plugins. For example:
Hi,
I probably won't sponsor the package, but I was wondering if it is
really necessary to build 53 binary packages (if I did not miscount)?
The short answer: yes, it is.
Here I can cite the description from my first message:
LeechCraft is a free open source cross-platform modular
Hi,
qxmpp, Qxt, eiskaltdcpp, miniupnpc, parseUri, lightbox,
hunspell/myspell (and anything else in 3rdparty or third-party dirs)
are either already in Debian or should be packaged separately, you
should not include them in the binary package or tarball.
You are really mistaken at this
On Tue, Nov 08, 2011 at 06:41:33PM +0200, Nanakos Chrysostomos wrote:
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/y/yubiserver/yubiserver_0.1-1.dsc
It doesn't build with pbuilder. Please see below.
[...]
dh_testdir
# Add here commands to configure the package.
./configure
On Tue, Nov 08, 2011 at 12:21:16PM +0100, roucaries bastien wrote:
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 12:18 AM, Thomas Weber twe...@debian.org wrote:
Hi,
I'm in the process of converting Debian's Octave packages into a
structure with proper library packaging. The symbols file of these three
C++
On Tue, 08 Nov 2011 23:23:06 +0200
Boris Pek tehnic...@yandex.ru wrote:
This seems to be a bit excessive. There is no real use in having
many tiny packages for every function; please keep in mind that
this will make the Packages index even larger (which also affects
users that do not
On Tue, 8 Nov 2011, Joey Parrish wrote:
No, but my last company used Flex quite a lot, and every new version seemed
to introduce incompatibilities. Software written for 4.1 won't necessarily
work without modification on 4.5. So I thought it would make sense to be
prepared to provide multiple
On Tue, Nov 08, 2011 at 05:23:10PM +0100, Daniel Stender wrote:
Info: the problem vanished when I've builded with other builders than
pbuilder.
pbuilder was created to be able to build in a controlled environment. No
wonder that some errors are not present in uncontrolled environments, but
that
38 matches
Mail list logo
