Re: RFS: parcellite 1.0.2~rc5-1 (updated package)

2011-12-28 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
Hi, Andrew Starr-Bochicchio a.star...@gmail.com writes: Sigh... Any one feel giving me a Christmas present? Still builds in a clean sid chroot, still is lintian clean, and still fixes a bug reported by a Debian user.  dget -x

Re: RFS: parcellite 1.0.2~rc5-1 (updated package)

2011-12-28 Thread Andrew Starr-Bochicchio
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 6:45 AM, Ansgar Burchardt ans...@debian.org wrote: Hi, Andrew Starr-Bochicchio a.star...@gmail.com writes: Sigh... Any one feel giving me a Christmas present? Still builds in a clean sid chroot, still is lintian clean, and still fixes a bug reported by a Debian user.

RFS: stopmotion 0.6.2-1.2 (NMU to fix RC bugs)

2011-12-28 Thread Mahyuddin Susanto
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my NMU of stopmotion. it fixes #565056, #606721, and #612762. To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL: http://mentors.debian.net/package/stopmotion Alternatively, one can download the package with dget

Re: RFS: policyd-weight

2011-12-28 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Ansgar Burchardt ans...@debian.org, 2011-12-25, 19:43: Stable is frozen, we do not change packages there unless there is a very good reason to do so. The bug you are fixing does not seem to qualify as release critical thus we need to deal with the problem as is. OK, thanks for your details. I

Re: RFS: stopmotion 0.6.2-1.2 (NMU to fix RC bugs)

2011-12-28 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
Hi, Mahyuddin Susanto udi...@ubuntu.com writes: I am looking for a sponsor for my NMU of stopmotion. it fixes #565056, #606721, and #612762. [...] dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/stopmotion/stopmotion_0.6.2-1.2.dsc http://bugs.debian.org/565056

RFS: policyd-weight

2011-12-28 Thread werner
Hi, well, you're presumably the new maintainer. Hence it is up to you to package new versions whenever that seems feasible to you. Generally you should try to keep track with upstream so yes, package the new version by evolving the latest source package available in Sid. The current

Re: RFS: policyd-weight

2011-12-28 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
Hi, wer...@aloah-from-hell.de writes: I am looking for a sponsor for my package policyd-weight. [...] dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/policyd-weight/policyd-weight_0.1.15.2-1.dsc From d/changelog: ++ * New upstream release ++- (Closes: #641227) The second line

Re: RFS: owncloud 2.0.1

2011-12-28 Thread Damien Raude-Morvan
Le mercredi 23 novembre 2011 22:51:42, Thomas Müller a écrit : Dear mentors, Hi Thomas, I am STILL looking for a sponsor for my package owncloud. Meanwhile version 2.0.1 was released. Did anyone volunteered to be your sponsor for owncloud ? If not, I'm interested in this tool ! * Package

Re: RFS: policyd-weight

2011-12-28 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
Ansgar Burchardt ans...@debian.org writes: You should mention that the package has a new maintainer and close the bug indicating that the package is orphaned (#612734). Oh, I forgot: you also should retitle the bug from O (orphaned) to ITA (intend to adopt) and set yourself as owner. Regards,

Sofa-framework: Again QT help needed

2011-12-28 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, I'm afraid I need some Qt help again. I tried to build latest version of sofa-framework using Debian packaged libraries if possible but failed. I have uploaded my try to http://people.debian.org/~tille/packages/sofa-framework/ There is obviosely some trouble in the Qt3 compatibility

Re: RFS: owncloud 2.0.1

2011-12-28 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 5:37 AM, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote:  - I can't find any licence for JPlayer files, for instance :    apps/media/js/Jplayer.swf    apps/media/js/jquery.jplayer.min.js In addition, neither of these comes with source code, this is a violation of the GNU GPL:

Re: RFS: stopmotion 0.6.2-1.2 (NMU to fix RC bugs)

2011-12-28 Thread Mahyuddin Susanto
Hi, On 12/29/2011 02:40 AM, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: The current package built fine in unstable (as --no-add-needed is not the default yet). The other FTBFS bug (#565056) looks strange, more like a bug in gcc that has been fixed since. Are you sure your upload changed anything related? If