On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 07:42:23 +0100
Tobias Eliasson wrote:
> On 01/30/2012 12:13 AM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> >
> > The default value for "Locale telnet/Perl/SSH executable" dialogs
> > appears to be "gnome-terminal". (??!)
> It launches a terminal for launching the actual executable. It's not
> rest
Hi all,
Recently I have faced a problem of conflict while packaging libfreenect
which is the userspace driver using libusb-1.0 for the Microsoft Kinect.
I mention the name of the package for having a real example but the
problem exists for any USB userspace driver while a kernel module
imp
Dear mentors,
Does anyone know if using dh-buildinfo is still recommended practice or
is it obsolete?
When dh-buildinfo is useful and what could be a typical use case?
Thanks,
Dmitry.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 12:55:48 +0100
Nicolas Bourdaud wrote:
> Hi all,
>
Hi Nicolas,
> Recently I have faced a problem of conflict while packaging libfreenect
> which is the userspace driver using libusb-1.0 for the Microsoft Kinect.
> I mention the name of the package for having a real ex
Ok, I feel stupid because all the symptoms I have described about
libfreenect were my mistake (I went too fast...). See later
On 30/01/2012 13:49, Antonio Ospite wrote:
> I'd say update libfreenect to the latest version, which as a matter of
> fact is adopting solution 2, and live with the limitat
A Debian user hinted that the painting was totally screwed in
experimental ( Qt 4.8 ).
That's fixed in the new package:
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/q/qastools/qastools_0.17.1-1.dsc
> I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Well, still true.
Btw. the ITP i
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Ole Streicher
wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "xpa".
I cannot build the package. dpkg-source throws an error:
dpkg-source: error: diff
`xpa-2.1.13/debian/patches/fix_manpages.patch' patches file
xpa-2.1.13/man/man1/xpaset.1 t
* Mathieu Malaterre , 2012-01-30, 17:07:
Hi all,
I am trying to automated the list of archs from d/rules files. I am using :
...
include /usr/share/mono/mono-archs.make
%:
dh $@ --with cli
mono_archs=$(DEB_MONO_ARCHS)
override_dh_gencontrol:
dh_gencontrol -- -Vmono:Archs:"$(mon
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 8:02 PM, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
> Does anyone know if using dh-buildinfo is still recommended practice or
> is it obsolete?
>
> When dh-buildinfo is useful and what could be a typical use case?
For packages destined for the Debian archive it doesn't have much use
since we h
On 01/30/2012 12:18 PM, Tony Houghton wrote:
My 2c: a Debian package should default to x-terminal-emulator when
launching a terminal if it's desktop-agnostic. Or does XDG have a
standard way to find the user's favourite terminal?
Ah, thank you. That's a very good option! Added it in my TODO-pile
Hello List:
where can we grab the source of the sponsorship-requests Debian package ?
Thanks in advance,
Jerome
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f2
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 15:00:23 +, Jonathan McCrohan wrote:
> On 27/01/12 19:23, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 10:24:56 +, Jonathan McCrohan wrote:
> >
> >> Julien Cristau wrote:
> >>
> >>> Please don't change the -dev package name.
> >>
> >> All of the packages ex
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 2:08 PM, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> Hello List:
>
> where can we grab the source of the sponsorship-requests Debian package ?
sponsorship-requests is a pseudo-package -- it's like a package, but
it's not actually. This is so the BTS can be used for bugs, without
actually havin
>> where can we grab the source of the sponsorship-requests Debian package ?
>
> sponsorship-requests is a pseudo-package -- it's like a package, but
> it's not actually. This is so the BTS can be used for bugs, without
> actually having a package in Debian.
>
> It's for use with http://mentors.de
Is it active and the preferred way now? So as of now, we should file a bug
with sponsorship-requests instead of sending an email directly to
debian-mentors list?
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
>
>>>
>>> Is there already any howto ro document about it ?
>>
>>
>> About what? Pseudo-packages or mentors.debian.net?
>>
>
> I know what both are, but it is not clear to me how this pseudo-package is
> involved ?
>
> In practice, how does a r
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On 30.01.2012 20:51, Savvas Radevic wrote:
> Is it active and the preferred way now? So as of now, we should file a bug
> with sponsorship-requests instead of sending an email directly to
> debian-mentors list?
Yes. For now, mentors.debian.net is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hallo,
Dňa Mon, 30 Jan 2012 20:55:52 +0100 Arno Töll napísal:
> Yes. For now, mentors.debian.net isn't updated yet, so consider ourself
> being in a transitional period where both approaches are fine. That is
> something coming up in a few days thou
On 30.01.2012 15:52, Sergei Golovan wrote:
> dpkg-source: error: diff
> `xpa-2.1.13/debian/patches/fix_manpages.patch' patches file
> xpa-2.1.13/man/man1/xpaset.1 twice
This is true; however I didn't get this error.
I corrected it and re-uploaded the file. Could you try to build it again?
Thank
> Is it active and the preferred way now? So as of now, we should file
> a bug with sponsorship-requests instead of sending an email directly
> to debian-mentors list?
It generates too much noise in this mailing list I think. It will be very
uncomfortable to people who did not setup mailing filter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 30.01.2012 21:10, Slavko wrote:
> please, will be change in mandatory way announced here?
I will announce the the mentors.debian.net change, but I can't do much
to get people adapting the the new workflow.
- --
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC:
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 1:49 PM, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 3:17 PM, Samuel Bronson
> wrote:
>> > On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 2:10 PM, Matthias Klose
> wrote:
>> >> Samuel, thanks for doing this. However, I'm trying to get gcc-4.5
>> >> removed from unstable soonish, so
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 14:51:47 -0500, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> > In practice, how does a request for sponsorship appear at
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=sponsorship-requests;dist=unstable
> > ?
> I'm CC'ing the list again, because I think this is worthwhile to
> everyone (and
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Boris Pek wrote:
>> Is it active and the preferred way now? So as of now, we should file
>> a bug with sponsorship-requests instead of sending an email directly
>> to debian-mentors list?
>
> It generates too much noise in this mailing list I think. It will be very
>>> Is it active and the preferred way now? So as of now, we should file
>>> a bug with sponsorship-requests instead of sending an email directly
>>> to debian-mentors list?
>> It generates too much noise in this mailing list I think. It will be very
>> uncomfortable to people who did not setu
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Subject: RFS: libgxps
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libgxps".
* Package name: libgxps
Version : 0.2.1-1
Upstream Author : Carlos Garcia Campos , Jason Crain
* URL : http://live.gnome.org/
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 658032 RFS: libgxps/0.2.1-1 - library for handling and rendering XPS
Bug #658032 [sponsorship-requests] sponsorship-requests: library for handling
and rendering XPS documents
Changed Bug title to 'RFS: libgxps/0.2.1-1 - library for handli
1. If I have an already open bug in wnpp, do I close it or merge it with
the one in s-r (=sponsorship-requests)?
2. If I have a package uploaded, which bug should I mention in
debian/changelog? wnpp and/or s-r?
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=654892
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 658032 RFS: libgxps/0.2.1-1 -- library for handling and rendering XPS
> documents [NEW]
Bug #658032 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: libgxps/0.2.1-1 - library for handling
and rendering XPS
Changed Bug title to 'RFS: libgxps/0.2.1-1 -- librar
* Boris Pek , 2012-01-30, 23:01:
But this list was quite interesting (at least for me). Sponsored
maintainers can learn more not only by own mistakes but also when they
are reading other emails here.
System messages from the bot are not very useful. Just a noise...
I am sorry that this cause
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 22:35:53 +0100, Savvas Radevic wrote:
> 1. If I have an already open bug in wnpp, do I close it or merge it with
> the one in s-r (=sponsorship-requests)?
No, they are independent. The WNPP bug is about the package itself,
and the SR bug is about sponsoring.
> 2. If I have a
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 22:44:02 +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> We could ask listmasters to filter out BTS bot messages. Now, there
> are certainly people (e.g. me) who do want to see control messages.
> But they could always subscribe to sponsorship-requests via PTS.
> What do others think?
I'm happ to
Hi Jakub,
we should be nearly there...
http://mentors.debian.net/package/python-x2go
On Alioth:
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/x2go/python-x2go.git;a=summary
* Mike Gabriel , 2012-01-28, 04:11:
Hi Jakub,
Can you take a look again?
Lintian now emits:
P: python-x2go source:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 30/01/12 19:15, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 15:00:23 +, Jonathan McCrohan wrote:
>
>> On 27/01/12 19:23, Julien Cristau wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 10:24:56 +, Jonathan McCrohan
>>> wrote:
>>>
Julien Cristau
Dear mentors,
I'm working on tipa (see #534384) and I want to regenerate the orig source
because upstream updated PostScript Type 1 Fonts and added a reference
manual.
The problem is that upstream did't make a new release but updated 1.3
instead.
The last packaged version of tipa in Debian is
* Daniele Tricoli , 2012-01-31, 01:13:
I'm working on tipa (see #534384)
Thanks!
and I want to regenerate the orig source because upstream updated
PostScript Type 1 Fonts and added a reference manual.
The problem is that upstream did't make a new release but updated 1.3
instead.
The last
Hello Jakub,
On Tuesday 31 January 2012 01:22:52 Jakub Wilk wrote:
> Sorry, this won't work. Epoch is not included in .orig.tar name, and
> dak wouldn't accept a different file with the same name.
Many thanks for the explaination.
> Yes, ask upstream to do a proper release with new version numb
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "bibtool".
* Package name: bibtool
Version : 2.53-1
Upstream Author : Gerd Neugebauer
* URL :
http://www.gerd-neugebauer.de/software/TeX/BibTool/index.en.html
* License : GPL-1+
Section
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "atlas-cpp":
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/atlas-cpp/atlas-cpp_0.6.2-1.dsc
It builds these binary packages:
libatlas-cpp-0.6-1 - World Forge wire protocol library -
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> affects 658065 + src:wfmath
Bug #658065 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: atlas-cpp/0.6.2-1 [ITA] -- WorldForge
wire protocol library
Added indication that 658065 affects src:wfmath
> block 653950 by 658065
Bug #653950 [wnpp] ITA: atlas-cpp -- The prot
Thank you for confirming my suspicions.
On 31/01/12 03:25, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 8:02 PM, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
>
>> Does anyone know if using dh-buildinfo is still recommended practice or
>> is it obsolete?
>>
>> When dh-buildinfo is useful and what could be a typical use ca
41 matches
Mail list logo
