Queue of uploaded packages on m.d.n.

Hi, Is any problem with scripts on m.d.n.? I uploaded my package about 9 hours ago via http. And it was not processed yet. Sources are still in the directory for uploads (tested using dput). Best regards, Boris -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject

Bug archiving

Hi list, I just re-inserted a package that was removed from Debian a year ago (saods9), and following some recommendations, I exhumated the old bugs and set them to fixed in the new version. Shall I archive them now again manually? Or is this done somehow automatically? What is this archived

Re: Bug archiving

On 2012-06-21 09:37, Olе Streicher wrote: Hi list, I just re-inserted a package that was removed from Debian a year ago (saods9), and following some recommendations, I exhumated the old bugs and set them to fixed in the new version. Shall I archive them now again manually? Or is this done

Re: Queue of uploaded packages on m.d.n.

On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 2:51 PM, Boris Pek wrote: Is any problem with scripts on m.d.n.? I uploaded my package about 9 hours ago via http. And it was not processed yet. Sources are still in the directory for uploads (tested using dput). The importer was down, I've restarted it and it is

Re: Queue of uploaded packages on m.d.n.

Processed moment ago. Thanks. 2012-06-21 09:51, Boris Pek wrote: Hi, Is any problem with scripts on m.d.n.? I uploaded my package about 9 hours ago via http. And it was not processed yet. Sources are still in the directory for uploads (tested using dput). Best regards, Boris -- To

Bug#678368: RFS: libvisual/0.4.0-5 [QA] -- Audio visualization framework

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Hi, (Please Cc me in replies, I am not subscribed to debian-qa mailing list) I am looking for a sponsor for my package libvisual. It builds those binary packages:   libvisual-0.4-0 - Audio visualization framework   libvisual-0.4-0-i18n - Audio

git, first later steps

Hi, I intent to set up a Git repository for my project. A source package is already available (see http://mentors.debian.net/package/bilibop). Now, at least five successive versions have been uploaded on mentors.debian.net. So, my question about Git is: should I start it from the initial

Bug#675532: RFS: bilibop/0.3.2 (ITP #675467)

Hi, Le 2012-06-17 19:42, intrigeri a écrit : Hopefully, I'll review this before the end of the month. Other potential sponsors: if you can be faster than me, please do. There is a new version (after tests on freshly installed systems):

Re: git, first later steps

On 06/21/2012 06:16 AM, bilibop project wrote: I intent to set up a Git repository for my project. A source package is already available (see http://mentors.debian.net/package/bilibop). Now, at least five successive versions have been uploaded on mentors.debian.net. So, my question about

Bug#678414: RFS: dwarftherapist/0.6.12+hg20120621-1 [ITP]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package dwarftherapist * Package name: dwarftherapist Version : 0.6.12+hg20120621-1 Upstream Author : Justin Ehlert ehler...@gmail.com * URL :

Bug#674291: Olena - packages updated

On 06/08/2012 06:00 PM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Guillaume Lazzara guillaume.lazz...@lrde.epita.fr wrote: Anyway why is the package on mentors so damn huge ! $ dget -u http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/olena/olena_2.0-1.dsc $ wget

Processed: retitle to RFS: bilibop/0.3.2 (ITP #675467)

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: retitle 675532 RFS: bilibop/0.3.2 (ITP #675467) Bug #675532 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: bilibop/0.3.1 (ITP #675467) Changed Bug title to 'RFS: bilibop/0.3.2 (ITP #675467)' from 'RFS: bilibop/0.3.1 (ITP #675467)' stop Stopping processing here.

Bug#678214: marked as done (RFS: qmpdclient/1.2.2-2)

Your message dated Thu, 21 Jun 2012 16:14:22 + with message-id e1shk1w-0003o1...@ravel.debian.org and subject line closing RFS: qmpdclient/1.2.2-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #678214, regarding RFS: qmpdclient/1.2.2-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#677019: RFS: chordii

Hi Malcolm, http://mentors.debian.net/package/chordii Uploaded: 2012-02-25 23:28 The file /usr/share/doc/chordii/changelog.gz is no longer installed, and that is not mentioned in debian/changelog. Regards, Bart Martens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#677013: Debian time package sponsor?

The latest 'time' package release candidate is here: http://www.proulx.com/~bob/debian/pool/sid/main/time/2012-06-21/ -rw-r--r-- 1 16649 Jun 21 13:38 time_1.7-24.debian.tar.gz -rw-rw-r-- 1 1038 Jun 21 13:48 time_1.7-24.dsc -rw-r--r-- 1 12317 Jun 21 13:39 time_1.7-24_amd64.build

Bug#663151: RFS: rhinote/0.7.4-2

On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 09:12:40AM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote: Have you forwarded these patches upstream? I planned to forward them as soon as the package was accepted into Debian, but as it’s apparently going to take very long I have done it yesterday. You changed priority from extra to option,

RFS: capi4hylafax/1:01.03.00.99.svn.300-17 (adopted; hardenend, 2. try)

Dear mentors, that is my second try searching for a sponsor my package. the old maintainer allowed an NMU, see: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=653539#15 and after some mails in the last two weeks he allowed me to adopt his package because of lacking in time. So I am looking

Bug#677622: RFS: dhelp/0.6.21 -- Debian online help [New version to also close #678055]

Hi, I have uploaded a new version of the dhelp package to also address bug #678055, which showed up shortly after my initial RFS. In case someone is reviewing the previous version of the package, the changes are located in only one file: src/dhelp_parse.rb (and also debian/changelog, of course).

Bug#677092: RFS: wmctrl/1.07-7 [ITA] -- control an EWMH/NetWM compatible X Window Manager

Hi Jeroen, thanks for adopting wmctrl! I would sponsor your package, but please fix the following small issues first: - use the current homepage in debian/watch - remove 03_makefile_prelibs.patch (it is not in debian/patches/series and does not work because either Makefile.in need to be

Bug#678468: RFS: sgml-data/2.0.7 [RC] [QA] -- common SGML and XML data

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Hi, I am looking for a sponsor for my package sgml-data. It builds binary package: sgml-data - common SGML and XML data To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL:

Bug#673457: RFS: psi-plus-i18n/0.15.5338.4-1 [ITP] -- translation files for Psi+

retitle 673457 RFS: psi-plus-i18n/0.15.5338.4-1 [ITP] -- translation files for Psi+ thanks Package was updated to new release. Current direct link for download: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/psi-plus-i18n/psi-plus-i18n_0.15.5338.4-1.dsc -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Processed: Re: Bug#673457: RFS: psi-plus-i18n/0.15.5338.4-1 [ITP] -- translation files for Psi+

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: retitle 673457 RFS: psi-plus-i18n/0.15.5338.4-1 [ITP] -- translation files for Psi+ Bug #673457 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: psi-plus-i18n/0.15.5333.2-1 [ITP] -- translation files for Psi+ Changed Bug title to 'RFS: psi-plus-i18n/0.15.5338.4-1

RSF: BDSup2Sub++/1.0.0-1 [ITP]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package bdsup2sub++. Package: BDSup2Sub++ Version: 1.0.0-1 Upstream author: Adam Thomas-Murphy Source URL: https://github.com/amichaelt/BDSup2SubPlusPlus License: Apache Public License version 2

Processed: RFS: haxe and neko [ITA]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: clone 674483 -1 Bug #674483 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: haxe and neko [ITA] Bug 674483 cloned as bug 678480 retitle 674483 RFS: haxe/1:2.9+20120414-1 [ITA] Bug #674483 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: haxe and neko [ITA] Changed Bug title to 'RFS: