On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 06:00:59PM -0400, Aliaksei Sheshka wrote:
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 2:04 PM, Bart Martens ba...@debian.org wrote:
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 10:51:46AM -0400, Aliaksei Sheshka wrote:
I've read the policy but still confused, if some one can help, please
take a look.
Hello Andreas,
On 14/07/12 22:39, Andreas Tille wrote:
Just tell me if you are accepted
to Debian Science team (I'm not admin) and you have commited the
packaging. Meanwhile I have uploaded libgtkdatabox and I might consider
moving the current state to Git to maintain some consistency.
I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Le 03/07/12 08:20, Thibaut Paumard a écrit :
Le 03/07/12 01:41, Adam Borowski a écrit : Hi,
We could agree on a usertag then, for instance:
User: sponsorship-reque...@packages.debian.org Usertags:
not-for-wheezy
Using
Dear mentors,
Dňa Sun, 15 Jul 2012 09:54:17 + (UTC) mentors.debian.net
supp...@mentors.debian.net napísal:
Your package nbc all versions has been removed from mentors.debian.net
for the following reason:
Your package found no sponsor for 20 weeks
I was patient with my package, but i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Le 16/07/12 11:17, Slavko a écrit :
Dear mentors,
Dňa Sun, 15 Jul 2012 09:54:17 + (UTC) mentors.debian.net
supp...@mentors.debian.net napísal:
Your package nbc all versions has been removed from
mentors.debian.net for the following
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
owner 666243 !
Bug #666243 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: peg/0.1.9-1 [ITP] -- recursive-descent
parser generators for C
Ignoring request to unset the owner of bug #666243 which was not set
owner 663916 !
Bug #663916 [sponsorship-requests] RFS:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Thibaut,
thank you for quick reply.
Dňa Mon, 16 Jul 2012 11:30:35 +0200 Thibaut Paumard
paum...@users.sourceforge.net napísal:
It's not easy to get a sponsor, especially during a freeze (please
read my previous message from 15min ago entitled
On Monday 16 July 2012 11:58:23 Slavko wrote:
Hi Thibaut,
Hi,
thank you for quick reply.
Dňa Mon, 16 Jul 2012 11:30:35 +0200 Thibaut Paumard
paum...@users.sourceforge.net napísal:
It's not easy to get a sponsor, especially during a freeze (please
read my previous message from 15min
Aliaksei Sheshka sheshka...@gmail.com writes:
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 2:04 PM, Bart Martens ba...@debian.org wrote:
If you intend to package this software, then please retitle [bug
report #392333] to ITP and set yourself as the owner.
I would like, but not sure yet I have skills *today*.
Aliaksei Sheshka sheshka...@gmail.com writes:
1) should a package 'inherit' license from the original COPYING file if
not stated otherwise ?
I don't know how to understand that sentence.
If you are asking whether the mere presence of a ‘COPYING’ file, but no
explicit license grant, applies
On Monday 16 July 2012 04:00:17 Aliaksei Sheshka wrote:
You still have to look through your debian/copyright file manually to
check for any mistakes or inconsistencies, but at the very least, the
syntax would be correct. There's also a DEP-5 parser that you can use
to check the syntax
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi again Slavko,
Le 16/07/12 11:58, Slavko a écrit :
Don't give up, re-upload and try to send your RFS to maintainers
(team or other) who you think should be interested (not only to
debian-mentors). When I'm looking for a sponsor, I personally
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 7:01 AM, Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.auwrote:
Aliaksei Sheshka sheshka...@gmail.com writes:
1) should a package 'inherit' license from the original COPYING file if
not stated otherwise ?
I don't know how to understand that sentence.
If you are asking
Aliaksei Sheshka sheshka...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 7:01 AM, Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.auwrote:
The grant needs to be explicit, written, specifying exactly what
work is being licensed, in a statement from the copyright holder.
Ideally of the form:
This is
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 08:59:51AM -0400, Aliaksei Sheshka wrote:
I don know any real life proper multi-license new format Debian package to
use as a reference,
cd /usr/share/doc
find . -name copyright |xargs grep
'http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/'
--
1AE0
Hi Daniele,
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 10:50:29AM +0200, Daniele E. Domenichelli wrote:
On 14/07/12 22:39, Andreas Tille wrote:
Just tell me if you are accepted
to Debian Science team (I'm not admin) and you have commited the
packaging. Meanwhile I have uploaded libgtkdatabox and I might
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 9:41 AM, gustavo panizzo gfa g...@zumbi.com.arwrote:
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 08:59:51AM -0400, Aliaksei Sheshka wrote:
I don know any real life proper multi-license new format Debian package
to
use as a reference,
cd /usr/share/doc
find . -name copyright |xargs
On 2012-07-16 10:35:03 -0400 (-0400), Aliaksei Sheshka wrote:
Sorry, but not helpful. They only represent ~13% on nearly default
Wheezy setup
[...]
While still not a perfect example, my weather-util package has
ISC-licensed and public domain components...
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 10:35:03AM -0400, Aliaksei Sheshka wrote:
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 9:41 AM, gustavo panizzo gfa
g...@zumbi.com.arwrote:
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 08:59:51AM -0400, Aliaksei Sheshka wrote:
I don know any real life proper multi-license new format Debian package
to
On Monday 16 July 2012 14:59:51 Aliaksei Sheshka wrote:
I don know any real life proper multi-license new format Debian package to
use as a reference, which makes packaging for beginner even harder.
Here's one that was not trivial to write:
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Dominique Dumont d...@debian.org wrote:
On Monday 16 July 2012 14:59:51 Aliaksei Sheshka wrote:
I don know any real life proper multi-license new format Debian package to
use as a reference, which makes packaging for beginner even harder.
Here's one that was
The current version appears to be at:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/peg/peg_0.1.9-1.dsc
Lintian says:
P: peg source: package-lacks-versioned-build-depends-on-debhelper 7
W: peg: hardening-no-relro usr/bin/leg
W: peg: hardening-no-relro usr/bin/peg
blhc confirms that there's a
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
retitle 677239 RFS: fractalnow/0.8.1-1 [ITP #673395] -- Fast, advanced
fractal generator
Bug #677239 [sponsorship-requests] RFS: fractalnow/0.8.1-2 [ITP #673395] --
Fast, advanced fractal generator
Changed Bug title to 'RFS: fractalnow/0.8.1-1
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
block 681704 by 681685
Bug #681704 [wnpp] ITP: homealoned -- Daemon that run personalized scripts when
is alone in the network
681704 was not blocked by any bugs.
681704 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 681704: 681685
stop
Hi Darren,
The package at mentors is no longer there. What happened ?
Regards,
Bart Martens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au writes:
Aliaksei Sheshka sheshka...@gmail.com writes:
2) Which license do have auto generated files, like 'configure',
'Makefile', *am', etc ?
If there is no human creativity in the generation of the files, then my
understanding of international
Aliaksei Sheshka sheshka...@gmail.com writes:
I don know any real life proper multi-license new format Debian package
to use as a reference, which makes packaging for beginner even
harder.
http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/r/remctl/current/copyright
includes all of the
On the no relo issue try putting DPKG_EXPORT_BUILDFLAGS = 1
include /usr/share/dpkg/buildflags.mk in the debian/rules file
Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org wrote:
The current version appears to be at:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/peg/peg_0.1.9-1.dsc
Lintian says:
P: peg source:
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 9:41 AM, gustavo panizzo gfa
g...@zumbi.com.arwrote:
cd /usr/share/doc
find . -name copyright |xargs grep
'http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/'
Le Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 10:35:03AM -0400, Aliaksei Sheshka a écrit :
Sorry, but not
* Nathan Owens ndow...@gmx.us, 2012-07-16, 13:15:
On the no relo issue try putting DPKG_EXPORT_BUILDFLAGS = 1
include /usr/share/dpkg/buildflags.mk in the debian/rules file
Nope, this is neither required nor sufficient to fix this particular
problem.
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Is it possible to have a generic git watchfile?
How about gitorius?
thanks!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
Hello,
Quoting alberto fuentes (2012-07-17 00:54:32)
Is it possible to have a generic git watchfile?
The watchfile system is designed to detect new tarballs, it is not
(yet?) capable of detecting $VCS tags. If your upstream forge offers
some way to download tarballs of the said tags, or even
32 matches
Mail list logo
