Hi Kai, hi Mike
On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 06:35:16PM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 6:24 PM, Kai Storbeck wrote:
Hi Mike,
Thanks for your prompt review.
It seems I wasn't fully aware of the Freeze Policy. I was under a wrong
assumtion that I could make the
* Michael Gilbert mgilb...@debian.org, 2012-10-30, 18:56:
+ * fix warning description-synopsis-starts-with-article
This is cosmetic, so it shouldn't be done in the freeze.
+ * Rebuild documentation using python-sphinx during package creation
+and use dh_sphinxdoc to fix all occurrences
Michael Gilbert mgilb...@debian.org wrote:
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 10:11 AM, gustavo panizzo wrote:
hello, i've prepared an updated version of slapd package which fix
the bug #665199
Hi, I've just reviewed this, and it looks reasonable. However, the
changelog note is not really descriptive
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 10:51 AM, Martin Meredith mar...@sourceguru.net wrote:
Still working on it - busy busy busy :(
Ping?
One week has passed.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hi Markus,
I read that the license is GPL 2, but I don't read or (at your option) any
later version. Where did you read that ?
Why experimental and not unstable ?
I'm not sure about merge the old patches into one. Are you sure that this is
an improvement ?
Why base the debian/watch file on
Hi Bastien,
About imagemagick at mentors 2012-10-24 10:30.
http://mentors.debian.net/package/imagemagick
I read on the RFS before end of freeze, fix a memory leak and yes for
wheezy and asap due to security problem. But the package doesn't seem to
close any bug in the bts. I don't think that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Le 02/11/2012 16:46, Bastien ROUCARIES a écrit :
Yes for wheezy and asap due to security problem that could lead to
dos
Bastien, have you contacted the security team? If this is a security
issue, the security team should always be contacted and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Le 02/11/2012 16:33, Jerome BENOIT a écrit :
Hello:
On 31/10/12 14:36, Thibaut Paumard wrote: package
sponsorship-requests user sponsorship-reque...@packages.debian.org
usertags 686070 - not-fit-for-wheezy thanks
I'm removing the
(I don't intend to sponsor this package.)
* Pekko Metsä pjme...@gmail.com, 2012-10-31, 11:20:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Tags: not-for-wheezy
That should have been s/Tags/Usertags/, I guess? It it's not for wheezy,
then distribution in the changelog should be set to
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package poedit. I upgraded to
the latest upstream release.
To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/poedit
Changes
Hi Pedro,
On Sa, 03 Nov 2012, Pedro Ribeiro wrote:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/poedit
I am interested in that, since I have been building my own 1.5pre packages
since quite some time... but ..
* building in a clean cowbuilder does not succeed, could be a cowbuilder issue:
$
On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 11:11:13AM -0300, gustavo panizzo gfa wrote:
updated package can be found at
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/openldap/openldap_2.4.31-1.1.dsc
This is not the correct procedure for an NMU. Please send a debdiff to the
bug report.
--
Steve Langasek
On 11/03/2012 04:34 AM, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 11:11:13AM -0300, gustavo panizzo gfa
wrote:
updated package can be found at
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/openldap/openldap_2.4.31-1.1.dsc
This is not the correct procedure for an NMU. Please send a
gustavo panizzo gfa g...@zumbi.com.ar writes:
sending it again
$ debdiff /var/cache/pbuilder/result/slapd_2.4.31-1.1_i386.deb
/var/cache/apt/archives/slapd_2.4.31-1_i386.deb
It's the change to the source package, not the binary package, that's
important for an NMU, so you have to debdiff the
tags 665199 + patch
tags 665199 + pending
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for openldap (versioned as 2.4.31-1.1)
attached is the diff between the sources as nmudiff shows
Regards.
--
1AE0 322E B8F7 4717 BDEA BF1D 44BB 1BA7 9F6C 6333
diff -u
On Sat, Nov 03, 2012 at 11:38:19PM +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote:
* Pekko Metsä pjme...@gmail.com, 2012-10-31, 11:20:
(...)
That should have been s/Tags/Usertags/, I guess? It it's not for
wheezy, then distribution in the changelog should be set to
experimental rather than unstable.
The freeze
16 matches
Mail list logo
