Re: Adding runtime dependencies that aren't caught by shlibs:Depends

On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 2:17 AM, Jens Reyer wrote: > Then (instead of creating a binary linking to the required > libraries and running dpkg-shlibdeps on this) I replicate things > from dpkg-shlibdeps(1) to identify the library package names for > these sonames: I wonder if the best solution

Bug#825237: RFS: mrpt/1:1.4.0-1 [ITA] [RC]

On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 4:15 PM, Sean Whitton wrote: > I think you should use a suffix other than -dbg because people expect > -dbg to be detached debugging symbols. I would go with either -dbg (slight preference) or -debug. -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

Bug#821270: Review of git version

Hello, On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 12:02:32PM +, nord-stream wrote: > Updated: > * Reworded the description. Great. It's really clear now. > > * There is no override anymore, although this is not yet perfect. The > package *generates* files using various tools. The Debian policy > requires the

Bug#821270: Review of git version

On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 08:38:02AM +0900, Sean Whitton wrote: > It needs to close the RFS bug! E.g. The ITP bug** -- Sean Whitton signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [Help] Re: Bug#825461: staden: FTBFS in testing

Hi Gianfranco, On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 07:53:45AM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hi, some quick googling found some possible solutions > https://www.google.it/search?client=ubuntu=fs=%22Scrt1.o%3A+In+function+`_start%27%3A%22=utf-8=utf-8_rd=cr=5ftHV7_JI8fA8geO-LmABQ > > I remember having

Bug#825237: RFS: mrpt/1:1.4.0-1 [ITA] [RC]

Hello, On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 11:55:07PM +0200, Jose Luis Blanco wrote: > > Based on your description, it sounds like the -g packages might be > > useful for someone. The only question is what you should call the > > binary package. Are you saying that those packages already exist in > >

Re: [Help] Re: Bug#825461: staden: FTBFS in testing

* Jakub Wilk , 2016-05-27, 10:05: gcc -shared -g -O2 -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -DUSE_NON_CONST -I/build/staden-2.0.0+b10/./tk_utils -I/build/staden-2.0.0+b10/./Misc -I/build/staden-2.0.0+b10/./tk_utils

Re: Bug#825461: [Help] Re: Bug#825461: staden: FTBFS in testing

On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 10:05:03AM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Andreas Tille , 2016-05-27, 09:27: > >>/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/5/../../../x86_64-linux-gnu/Scrt1.o: In > >>function `_start': > >>(.text+0x20): undefined reference to `main' > >>collect2: error: ld returned 1

Bug#825390: RFS: maldetect/1.5-1 [ITP] -- Linux Malware Detection

Dear Emily, On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 10:58:41AM -0500, Emily Ratliff wrote: > I have attempted to make the package reproducibly buildable and have > fixed some problems that were preventing that. However, there is still > a problem of time stamps in the file list which I haven't been able to >

Bug#821270: Review of git version

Updated: * Reworded the description. * There is no override anymore, although this is not yet perfect. The package *generates* files using various tools. The Debian policy requires the inclusion of source files. Thus this package can't be like a typical simple add-on package. * Corrected the

Re: add missing pristine-tar

Thanks, this did the trick. On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 1:43 PM Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 11:10:43AM +, Nico Schlömer wrote: > > Thanks for the hint. > > Unfortunately, it's not working dpt picks up an older version that > already > > is in pristine-tar

Bug#825531: RFS: libcork/0.15.0+ds-1 [ITP]

package: sponsorship-requests severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-Cc: rogershim...@gmail.com Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libcork" * Package name: libcork Version : 0.15.0+ds-1 Upstream Author : Douglas Creager * URL

Bug#825532: RFS: shadowsocks-libev/2.4.6+20160526+ds-1 [ITP]

Control: block -1 by 825531

Bug#825532: RFS: shadowsocks-libev/2.4.6+20160526+ds-1 [ITP]

package: sponsorship-requests severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-Cc: rogershim...@gmail.com, max.c...@gmail.com, 073p...@gmail.com Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "shadowsocks-libev" * Package name: shadowsocks-libev Version : 2.4.6+20160526+ds-1 Upstream

Re: a few questions on ITP shadowsocks-libev before formal RFS

On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 12:32 AM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > > Hi, alternative proposal > >>Now I understand my todo-list, briefly: >>- package libraries first: libcork/ipset >>- create debian/watch and ds repack >>- RFS shadowsocks-libev >>- apply for collab-maint

Bug#825105: RFS: udfclient/0.8.5-1

On Friday 27 May 2016 13:10:26 Andrew Shadura wrote: > I'll have a look. Now it is in sid: https://packages.debian.org/sid/udfclient -- Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Bug#825237: RFS: mrpt/1:1.4.0-1 [ITA] [RC]

* Sean Whitton , 2016-05-27, 17:15: I think you should use a suffix other than -dbg because people expect -dbg to be detached debugging symbols. You could write to debian-de...@lists.debian.org and/or debian-mentors@lists.debian.org to see if anyone is aware of a

Bug#825509: RFS: cdist/4.0.0-2 ITP

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "cdist" * Package name: cdist Version : 4.0.0-2 Upstream Author : Nico Schottelius * Url :

Bug#825491: RFS: python-bitstring/3.1.5-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-bitstring" * Package name: python-bitstring Version : 3.1.5-1 Upstream Author : Scott Griffiths * URL :

Bug#825105: RFS: udfclient/0.8.5-1

On 23 May 2016 18:12, "Pali Rohár" wrote: > > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: normal > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "udfclient" > > * Package name: udfclient >Version : 0.8.5-1 >Upstream Author : Reinoud Zandijk

Bug#825490: RFS: nfft/3.3.2~rc1-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "nfft" * Package name: nfft Version : 3.3.2~rc1-1 Upstream Author : Prof. Dr. Daniel Potts * URL

Bug#814859: RFS: runescape/0.1-1 [ITP] -- Set in a fantasy world of war, landscapes and sinister powers

Em 23-05-2016 6:22, Mattia Rizzolo escreveu: Hi Carlos! On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 07:30:51PM +, James Cowgill wrote: I have a few comments on this pavkage. This was Feb 16, more than 3 months ago, but with no replies from you. Are you still interested in this package? Hello Mattia, I

Bug#825236: marked as done (RFS: openfst/1.5.3-1 -- weighted finite-state transducers library)

Your message dated Fri, 27 May 2016 19:23:48 +0200 with message-id <20160527172348.ga8...@jwilk.net> and subject line Re: Bug#825236: RFS: openfst/1.5.3-1 -- weighted finite-state transducers library has caused the Debian Bug report #825236, regarding RFS: openfst/1.5.3-1 -- weighted finite-state

Bug#824967: RFS: budgie-desktop/10.2.5-1 [ITP]

Many thanks Paul for your review - even though you do not wish to sponsor this, your review has been very valuable. I've addressed your comments as discussed below. Looking on the mentors / mypackages webpage it says that the watch file I've included does not work. This is very strange because

Re: Adding runtime dependencies that aren't caught by shlibs:Depends

On 05/19/2016 05:53 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Jens Reyer , 2016-05-19, 16:57: >> First off, I'm not sure about every single dependency if it is needed >> at all. > > Quick grep over the *.dll.so indeed shows that they use a bunch of > libraries you mentioned: [...] > I

Bug#825559: RFS: node-regenerate/1.3.0-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "node-regenerate" * Package name: node-regenerate Version : 1.3.0-1 Upstream Author : Mathias Bynens * URL : https://github.com/mathiasbynens/regenerate *

Bug#825559: marked as done (RFS: node-regenerate/1.3.0-1)

Your message dated Fri, 27 May 2016 20:27:10 + (UTC) with message-id <1210816248.589190.1464380830973.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#825559: RFS: node-regenerate/1.3.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #825559, regarding RFS: node-regenerate/1.3.0-1 to be marked as

Bug#825509: marked as done (RFS: cdist/4.0.0-2 ITP)

Your message dated Fri, 27 May 2016 20:33:25 + (UTC) with message-id <529850055.930068.1464381205944.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#825509: RFS: cdist/4.0.0-2 ITP has caused the Debian Bug report #825509, regarding RFS: cdist/4.0.0-2 ITP to be marked as done. This

Bug#825491: marked as done (RFS: python-bitstring/3.1.5-1)

Your message dated Fri, 27 May 2016 20:23:26 + (UTC) with message-id <891159034.939441.1464380606966.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#825491: RFS: python-bitstring/3.1.5-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #825491, regarding RFS: python-bitstring/3.1.5-1 to be marked as

Bug#825490: marked as done (RFS: nfft/3.3.2~rc1-1)

Your message dated Fri, 27 May 2016 20:23:08 + (UTC) with message-id <846161236.912536.1464380588038.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#825490: RFS: nfft/3.3.2~rc1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #825490, regarding RFS: nfft/3.3.2~rc1-1 to be marked as done. This means

Re: Trying to disable error=format-security for clapack

Hi Gert, On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 04:27:25PM +0200, Gert Wollny wrote: > ... > Removing the file INCLUDE/f2c.h solves the problem, because then the > ... This tip saved my evening yesterday - thanks a lot. The only remaining issue is now E: libclapack3: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath

Re: Trying to disable error=format-security for clapack

Hi, > E: libclapack3: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath > usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libclapack.so.3.2.1 > /build/clapack-3.2.1+dfsg/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/BLAS/SRC >Is there any trick how I could tweak cmake files to prevent the >inclusion of rpath or is the only chance to solve this to use > >

Re: [Help] Re: Bug#825461: staden: FTBFS in testing

Hi, some quick googling found some possible solutions https://www.google.it/search?client=ubuntu=fs=%22Scrt1.o%3A+In+function+`_start%27%3A%22=utf-8=utf-8_rd=cr=5ftHV7_JI8fA8geO-LmABQ I remember having that issue on ettercap some years ago, this is how I fixed it [1], but probably it was a

Re: [Help] Re: Bug#825461: staden: FTBFS in testing

* Andreas Tille , 2016-05-27, 09:27: /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/5/../../../x86_64-linux-gnu/Scrt1.o: In function `_start': (.text+0x20): undefined reference to `main' collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status The command line that causes this is: gcc -shared -g -O2

Bug#825302: RFS: usbguard/0.4-2 [ITP]

src/ThirdParty and src/Library/RuleParser/quex contain embedded code copies. Please ask upstream to remove them from their VCS and tarballs and depend on them instead. You can then package them separately. Alternatively, package them separately and remove all of them at `debian/rules build` time

[Help] Re: Bug#825461: staden: FTBFS in testing

Hi, On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 02:29:28AM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote: > -- > capture.o: In function `tcl_capture': > /<>/staden-2.0.0+b10/tk_utils/capture.c:31: warning: the use of > `tmpnam' is dangerous, better use `mkstemp' I've

Bug#825509: RFS: cdist/4.0.0-2 ITP

> the rationale is: > what you have on git is different from what is in unstable. > > I had to change UNRELEASED to unstable > and to change the timestamp of the -1 version > https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/users/kaction-guest/cdist.git/commit/?id=3D= > 3527e379aad6e7d2621652b308676e000e7f866b >