Re: watch file - remove or only comments?

> To avoid a false impression that you ignored the watch file by > laziness and to inform an actual status, I created three fake > packages[1]. These packages say if there no upstream site, if there no > release in upstream site or if the upstream site there a package but > doesn't allow track it

Bug#837798: RFS: libcgicc/3.2.16-0.1 NMU -- C++ class library for writing CGI applications

Hi, >I missed to add you and 837...@bugs.debian.org in my last mail. In the >upload to mentors from last week I have addressed your feedback (at >least I think I did, that is). The only thing I'm not entirely sure >about is the missing build-dependency on pkg-config as build-dependency, >as

Re: watch file - remove or only comments?

Hi Dominik, 2016-10-11 8:53 GMT-03:00 Dominik George : > > I wonder what of these two options is the "correct" solution for an > upstream that is not watch'able (e.g. has no release tarballs, etc.) - > besides making upstream have release tarballs, that is ;): > > a) no watch

Bug#840424: RFS: verilog-mode/0:20160910.debfc6d.vpo-1

control: tag -1 +moreinfo Dear Kiwamu, I'd like to ask you to package this addon using the new dh-elpa infrastructure. The pkg-emacsen team are slowly working to convert all existing Emacs Lisp addon packages, such as major modes, to use dh-elpa. Here is what you should do if you'd like to

Re: watch file - remove or only comments?

On 11.10.2016 14:41, Eriberto wrote: > Hi Dominik, > > 2016-10-11 8:53 GMT-03:00 Dominik George : >> >> I wonder what of these two options is the "correct" solution for an >> upstream that is not watch'able (e.g. has no release tarballs, etc.) - >> besides making upstream have

watch file - remove or only comments?

Hi, I wonder what of these two options is the "correct" solution for an upstream that is not watch'able (e.g. has no release tarballs, etc.) - besides making upstream have release tarballs, that is ;): a) no watch file b) a watch file with only comments In case a), lintian complains and

Bug#840396: RFS: dblatex/0.3.9-1 [RC]

Hi, >I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dblatex" source-only uploaded. G.

Bug#840424: RFS: verilog-mode/0:20160910.debfc6d.vpo-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "verilog-mode" Package name: verilog-mode Version : 0:20160910.debfc6d.vpo-1 Upstream Author : Michael McNamara , Wilson Snyder URL

Re: Bug#837798: RFS: libcgicc/3.2.16-0.1 NMU -- C++ class library for writing CGI applications

Hi, >I have uploaded a new package to mentors, with the two outstanding >issues fixed. not sure... I see you forgot to probably run dh_clean (I see debian/autoreconf.before and debian/autoreconf.after files) and I still see a libcgicc3-dev package (instead of libcgicc-dev) >Thanks again for

Bug#840456: marked as done (RFS: logdata-anomaly-miner/0.0.5-1 ITA)

Your message dated Tue, 11 Oct 2016 21:26:11 + (UTC) with message-id <1025206217.7069927.1476221171...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#840456: RFS: logdata-anomaly-miner/0.0.5-1 ITA has caused the Debian Bug report #840456, regarding RFS: logdata-anomaly-miner/0.0.5-1 ITA to be marked

Bug#837650: RFS: cf-python/1.3.1+dfsg.1-1 [ITP]

Hi Gianfranco, Am 11.10.2016 um 08:25 schrieb Gianfranco Costamagna: >>> $(LDFLAGS)<-- this should be at the end of the line, not at the begin, >>> otherwise >>> you might see some libraries stripped just because the .o files needing them >>> are put after (this happens when wl-asneeded is

Bug#840456: RFS: logdata-anomaly-miner/0.0.5-1 ITA

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "logdata-anomaly-miner" * Package name: logdata-anomaly-miner Version : 0.0.5-1 Upstream Author : Roman Fiedler * URL :

Re: watch file - remove or only comments?

Thanks Daniel! Thanks Sascha! Cheers, Eriberto

Bug#840450: RFS: peg-solitaire/2.1-1 (package already in Debian)

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "peg-solitaire" * Package name: peg-solitaire Version : 2.1-1 Upstream Author : I. De Marchi * URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/peg-solitaire/ * License

Bug#839725: uptimed: 0.4.0+git20150923.6b22106-1 [ITA]

[2016-10-10 20:44] gustavo panizzo > > part text/plain 336 > On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 07:57:30AM +0300, Dmitry Bogatov wrote: > > > Could you please add option to run it in foreground? Runit init > > system, which I package exect services to be foreground

Re: watch file - remove or only comments?

Dominik George writes: > I wonder what of these two options is the "correct" solution for an > upstream that is not watch'able (e.g. has no release tarballs, etc.) - > besides making upstream have release tarballs, that is ;): > > a) no watch file > b) a watch file with

Re: Bug#837798: RFS: libcgicc/3.2.16-0.1 NMU -- C++ class library for writing CGI applications

On 2016-10-11 16:18, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: let me know that last two bits and I'll probably sponsor in deferred/10 (due to the high changes number) (Adding Chris to the loop, in case he as maintainer has a different opinion) Hi Gianfranco, I have uploaded a new package to mentors,

Bug#840424: RFS: verilog-mode/0:20160910.debfc6d.vpo-1

Hi Sean, On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 10:56 PM, Sean Whitton wrote: > I'd like to ask you to package this addon using the new dh-elpa > infrastructure. The pkg-emacsen team are slowly working to convert all > existing Emacs Lisp addon packages, such as major modes, to use

Bug#836903: RFS: qevercloud/3.0.2+ds-1 [ITP] -- Unofficial Evernote Cloud API library for Qt

Hello Boyuan, Have you read /usr/share/doc/doxygen/README.jquery? I think you shouldn't be symlinking jquery. On Sun, Oct 09, 2016 at 07:19:43PM +0800, Boyuan Yang wrote: > I made a small investigation on my own Debian testing. doing > `file /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/*.so` would return some

Bug#836903: RFS: qevercloud/3.0.2+ds-1 [ITP] -- Unofficial Evernote Cloud API library for Qt

Hello Boyuan, On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 07:43:18PM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote: > Have you read /usr/share/doc/doxygen/README.jquery? > > I think you shouldn't be symlinking jquery. It would probably be good to use dh_oxygen, too. -- Sean Whitton signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#836903: RFS: qevercloud/3.0.2+ds-1 [ITP] -- Unofficial Evernote Cloud API library for Qt

Hello Sean, 2016-10-12 10:43 GMT+08:00 Sean Whitton : > Hello Boyuan, > > Have you read /usr/share/doc/doxygen/README.jquery? > > I think you shouldn't be symlinking jquery. Wow, I did not read it before since I trusted lintian :p Looks like it is kind of disagreement

Re: Bug#837798: RFS: libcgicc/3.2.16-0.1 NMU -- C++ class library for writing CGI applications

Gianfranco Costamagna: > Hi, > >> I have uploaded a new package to mentors, with the two outstanding > >> issues fixed. > > not sure... > I see you forgot to probably run dh_clean > (I see debian/autoreconf.before and debian/autoreconf.after files) > > [...] > > G. > That needs a

Bug#837650: RFS: cf-python/1.3.1+dfsg.1-1 [ITP]

Hi Klaus > I removed most of the offending content and added the information for the > remaining stuff, namely two files of static sphinx content. wonderful > > 3) > > > > something about: > > cf/um/umread/c-lib/Makefile > > > > CC=gcc > > > > such stuff is a no-go for my personal policy.

Bug#840396: RFS: dblatex/0.3.9-1 [RC]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dblatex" Package name: dblatex Version : 0.3.9-1 Upstream Author : Benoît Guillon URL : http://dblatex.sourceforge.net/

Bug#837476: RFS: willow/0.3.1-1 [ITP #837471]

Hi Christopher, > I've asked upstream for clarification [0]. If there isn't a > satisfactory answer I could either exclude these images and the > associated tests or provide alternative images for the tests. Thanks for forwarding the issue to recurser/exif-orientation-examples :