Re: Start to help with a RFA package (or else)

Hi, >I'm Vincent Carluer, a senior dev but a newbie with Debian dev/packaging. >But I really want to contribute to this great project ! thanks for your interest :) >It does not seems really easy to start with it but I think I have found a >package which seems not to big, can be fun for me to

Re: Start to help with a RFA package (or else)

On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 05:43:26PM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Note: this particular package has an RC bug (Fails To Build From Source), so > you should start by fixing that one, because otherwise > you won't be able to build it :) Also, it's removed from testing and we are approaching

Bug#847383: RFS: pm/0.32-1.2 (RC, NMU)

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "cpm" * Package name: cpm Version : 0.32-1.2 Section : utils It builds those binary packages: cpm - Curses based password manager using PGP-encryption It

Bug#847350: RFS: golang-github-minio-minio-go/2.0.2+dfsg-1

Hi Dmitry, >I believe that should be fairly obvious that we repack to drop all bundled >dependencies. That's Golang for you where it is common to incorporate all >dependency libraries into tarball. Throwing away private copies of those >libraries is important to avoid using 'em accidentally,

Bug#847375: marked as done (RFS: forge/0.9.0-2)

Your message dated Wed, 07 Dec 2016 18:27:38 + with message-id <1481135258.30098.8.ca...@gmail.com> and subject line Re: Bug#847375: RFS: forge/0.9.0-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #847375, regarding RFS: forge/0.9.0-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#847383: marked as done (RFS: pm/0.32-1.2 (RC, NMU))

Your message dated Wed, 7 Dec 2016 19:02:37 + (UTC) with message-id <315993679.2520074.1481137357...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#847383: RFS: pm/0.32-1.2 (RC, NMU) has caused the Debian Bug report #847383, regarding RFS: pm/0.32-1.2 (RC, NMU) to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#847375: RFS: forge/0.9.0-2

Hi, >I am looking for a sponsor for my package "forge": *happily* sponsored :) G.

Re: Start to help with a RFA package (or else)

On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 06:33:25PM +0100, Vincent Carluer wrote: > I'm Vincent Carluer, a senior dev but a newbie with Debian dev/packaging. > But I really want to contribute to this great project ! Glad to hear this :) Please consider joining #debian-mentors on irc.debian.org and use this ML only

Bug#847350: RFS: golang-github-minio-minio-go/2.0.2+dfsg-1

On Wednesday, 7 December 2016 2:13:08 PM AEDT Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > what is the reason for the repack? non-dfsg files? > if it is just to skip some tests, I really prefer a debian/clean target, > and not a repack of the whole source tarball. > diverging from upstream tarballs has a lot of

Start to help with a RFA package (or else)

Hello, I'm Vincent Carluer, a senior dev but a newbie with Debian dev/packaging. But I really want to contribute to this great project ! It does not seems really easy to start with it but I think I have found a package which seems not to big, can be fun for me to maintain and which suits my

Bug#847375: RFS: forge/0.9.0-2

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "forge": * Package name: forge   Version : 0.9.0-2   Upstream Author : ArrayFire * URL : https://github.com/arrayfire/forge * License : BSD   Section :

Bug#847386: RFS: libwnck/2.30.7-5.1 (RC, NMU)

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the package "libwnck" * Package name: libwnck Version : 2.30.7-5.1 Section : libs It builds those binary packages: gir1.2-wnck-1.0 - GObject introspection data for the

Bug#847350: RFS: golang-github-minio-minio-go/2.0.2+dfsg-1

Hi again :) > >I think "ds" is quite confusing let alone that it matches my initials. ;) lol >IMHO DFSG-repacking fits all cases even when we throw away useless files to >avoid documenting their copyrights. Often you just don't know whether >excluded content is DFSG compliant or not. And

Bug#847350: RFS: golang-github-minio-minio-go/2.0.2+dfsg-1

On Wednesday, 7 December 2016 6:02:33 PM AEDT Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > repacking to drop bundled dependencies is sometimes called ds (Debian > Source) repack, non dfsg (even if nobody ever wrote some documentation for > this). I think "ds" is quite confusing let alone that it matches my

Bug#847426: RFS: fortune-zh/2.0

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal X-Debbugs-CC: a...@debian.org, as...@debian.org, 073p...@gmail.com Dear mentors,   I am looking for a sponsor for my package "fortune-zh"  * Package name: fortune-zh    Version : 2.0    Upstream Author : myself  * URL :

Bug#847403: RFS: nlohmann-json/2.0.6-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "nlohmann-json" * Package name: nlohmann-json Version : 2.0.6-1 Upstream Author : Niels Lohmann * Url : https://nlohmann.github.io/json/ * Licenses:

Bug#840424: RFS: verilog-mode

Dear Sean, On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 12:42 AM, Sean Whitton wrote: >> I think "Forwarded: no" is valid, because >> http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep3/ say following: > > Right, but the convention is that "no" means "I should forward this but > I haven't forwarded it yet" and

Bug#840424: RFS: verilog-mode

control: tag -1 -moreinfo +confirmed control: noowner -1 I consider git revision 4ba937fbc958fb5037e65fe351d18f2da8e0b988 ready for upload. Thank you for your patience, Kiwamu. -- Sean Whitton signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#846399: RFS: rush/1.8+dfsg-1 -- New upstream's release.

Hello there! Onsdag den 7:e december 2016, klockan 15:56, skrev Gianfranco Costamagna detta: > > > >+ debian/upstream/signing-key.pgp: New file. > >+ debian/source/include-binaries: New file. > > please use a text-version of the signing-key and avoid the include-binaries > file? Then I

Re: Start to help with a RFA package (or else)

Ok thank you :) Let's do this! I will contact the maintainer and hope he will respond and help me to start.

Bug#847350: RFS: golang-github-minio-minio-go/2.0.2+dfsg-1

On Wednesday, 7 December 2016 6:52:04 PM AEDT Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > ...in this case there is no license/copyright issue, at least I can't > see it So we are not discussing a generic issue? This particular package did not have DFSG-repackaging to begin with nor does it need one... :)

Bug#847308: RFS: gnome-shell-extension-shortcuts/1.0.2-1 [ITP] -- Creates a shortcuts help pop-up in GNOME Shell

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gnome-shell-extension-shortcuts" * Package name: gnome-shell-extension-shortcuts Version : 1.0.2-1 Upstream Author : Kyle Robbertze * URL :

Bug#847305: RFS: gnome-shell-extension-log-out-button/1.0.4-1 [ITP] -- A GNOME Extension to add a log out button to the system activities menu)

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gnome-shell-extension-log-out-button" * Package name: gnome-shell-extension-log-out-button Version : 1.0.4-1 Upstream Author : Kyle Robbertze * URL :

Bug#847308: RFS: nome-shell-extension-shortcuts/1.0.3-1 [IPT] -- Creates a shortcuts help pop-up in GNOME Shell

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gnome-shell-extension-shortcuts" * Package name: gnome-shell-extension-shortcuts Version : 1.0.3-1 Upstream Author : Kyle Robbertze * URL :

Bug#847350: RFS: golang-github-minio-minio-go/2.0.2+dfsg-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for "golang-github-minio-minio-go": golang-github-minio-minio-go - Go library for Amazon S3 compatible cloud storage Package: golang-github-minio-minio-go Version: 2.0.2+dfsg-1 Upstream Author: Minio,

Bug#841366: marked as done (RFS: task-spooler/1.0-1)

Your message dated Wed, 7 Dec 2016 13:51:20 + (UTC) with message-id <1170435545.2170691.1481118680...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#841366: RFS: task-spooler/1.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #841366, regarding RFS: task-spooler/1.0-1 to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#847350: RFS: golang-github-minio-minio-go/2.0.2+dfsg-1

control: owner -1 ! control: tags -1 moreinfo >I am looking for a sponsor for "golang-github-minio-minio-go": >2.0.2 is needed to complete the packaging of restic (ITP #846176). I would like to see it sponsored by the maintainer, but here something I'm worried about: what is the reason for the

Re: packaging dependencies for gnu-social

Hi, >Bug#839383: RFS: php-net-idna2/0.1.1-1 [ITP] in new queue >Bug#842157: RFS: php-db-dataobject/1.11.5-1 [ITP] -- PHP PEAR module for >object based SQL query building in testing :) Will probably look at gnu-social once the new queue is cleared. G.

Bug#832970: marked as done (RFS: txwinrm/1.1.28-1 [ITP])

Your message dated Wed, 7 Dec 2016 13:47:49 + (UTC) with message-id <145833544.2090421.1481118469...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#832970: RFS: txwinrm/1.1.28-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #832970, regarding RFS: txwinrm/1.1.28-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means

Bug#845472: marked as done (RFS: openbox/3.6.1-4 [RC])

Your message dated Wed, 7 Dec 2016 13:57:52 + (UTC) with message-id <1317419267.2093514.1481119072...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#845472: RFS: openbox/3.6.1-4 [RC] has caused the Debian Bug report #845472, regarding RFS: openbox/3.6.1-4 [RC] to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#847070: marked as done (RFS: patat/0.4.4.0-2)

Your message dated Wed, 7 Dec 2016 14:45:47 + (UTC) with message-id <90863864.2126510.1481121947...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#847070: RFS: patat/0.4.4.0-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #847070, regarding RFS: patat/0.4.4.0-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#846399: RFS: rush/1.8+dfsg-1 -- New upstream's release.

Hi >> please use a text-version of the signing-key and avoid the include-binaries >> file? > > >Then I need education on the procedure to create a keyring file on the go, >since gpgv only handles keyrings, not armoured keyfiles.

Bug#847386: marked as done (RFS: libwnck/2.30.7-5.1 (RC, NMU))

Your message dated Wed, 7 Dec 2016 19:04:51 + (UTC) with message-id <1964915285.2521778.1481137491...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#847386: RFS: libwnck/2.30.7-5.1 (RC, NMU) has caused the Debian Bug report #847386, regarding RFS: libwnck/2.30.7-5.1 (RC, NMU) to be marked as done.

Bug#833193: closed by Sean Whitton <spwhit...@spwhitton.name> (Closing inactive ITP RFSs)

Hello Sean, Thank you for taking the time to review this package. I have addressed much of the feedback that you have provided, as well as upgraded the package to the latest Chapel release, 1.14.0. An easily-browsable version of the source package contents can be here:

Bug#840424: RFS: verilog-mode

Hi Gianfranco, On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 11:10 AM, Sean Whitton wrote: > You don't need to: just provide Gianfranco with a tarball to upload, or > tell him how to produce it from your git repository. Thanks for your advice. Could you upload my package with following? >

Bug#840424: RFS: verilog-mode

control: owner -1 ! control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi >I consider git revision 4ba937fbc958fb5037e65fe351d18f2da8e0b988 ready >for upload. > >Thank you for your patience, Kiwamu. tarball? verilog-mode (master) $ gbp buildpackage -S -d gbp:warning: Pristine-tar branch "pristine-tar" not found

Convert debian/pkg-name.triggers into systemd unit file?

Hello, is it possible to convert a debian package trigger into systemd unit file? Best regards, Patrick

Bug#840424: RFS: verilog-mode

Hello, On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 11:46:19PM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > verilog-mode (master) $ gbp buildpackage -S -d > gbp:warning: Pristine-tar branch "pristine-tar" not found > gbp:error: Pristine-tar couldn't checkout > "verilog-mode_20161124.fd230e6.orig.tar.gz": pristine-tar: no

Bug#833193: closed by Sean Whitton <spwhit...@spwhitton.name> (Closing inactive ITP RFSs)

control: reopen -1 control: noowner -1 control: tag -1 -moreinfo Dear Ben, Thank you for your renewed interest in this ITP. The deadline for getting new packages into stretch is fast approaching, and I won't be able to throughly examine your work until late next week at the earliest. For this

Bug#846399: RFS: rush/1.8+dfsg-1 -- New upstream's release.

Onsdag den 7:e december 2016, klockan 23:38, skrev Gianfranco Costamagna detta: > > >> please use a text-version of the signing-key and avoid the > >> include-binaries file? > > > >Then I need education on the procedure to create a keyring file on the go, > >since gpgv only handles keyrings, not

Can debian/pkg.triggers wait for another package's systemd unit file?

Hello, a script in my debian/pkg.triggers depends on another package's systemd unit being active. [If both packages are upgraded, the other packages's systed unit file is stopped while my package's trigger depends on it. Hence fails.] Is it possible to delay my package's trigger until the other

Bug#846399: RFS: rush/1.8+dfsg-1 -- New upstream's release.

control: owner -1 ! control: tags -1 moreinfo >I am looking for a sponsor of the package "rush": > >+ debian/upstream/signing-key.pgp: New file. >+ debian/source/include-binaries: New file. please use a text-version of the signing-key and avoid the include-binaries file? G.

Bug#847350: RFS: golang-github-minio-minio-go/2.0.2+dfsg-1

On 2016-12-07 16:06+0100, Félix Sipma wrote: > On 2016-12-07 14:13+, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: >> control: owner -1 ! >> control: tags -1 moreinfo >>>I am looking for a sponsor for "golang-github-minio-minio-go": >> >>>2.0.2 is needed to complete the packaging of restic (ITP #846176). >>

Bug#846974: marked as done (RFS: bit-babbler/0.6~bpo8+1)

Your message dated Wed, 7 Dec 2016 16:08:39 + (UTC) with message-id <980037179.2333835.1481126919...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#846974: RFS: bit-babbler/0.6~bpo8+1 has caused the Debian Bug report #846974, regarding RFS: bit-babbler/0.6~bpo8+1 to be marked as done. This means

Bug#840424: RFS: verilog-mode

Dear Kiwamu, On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 01:48:37PM +0900, Kiwamu Okabe wrote: > On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 1:14 PM, Sean Whitton wrote: > > Looks good, but you need "Forwarded: not-needed" not "Forwarded: no". > > I think "Forwarded: no" is valid, because >

Bug#846973: marked as done (RFS: sndio/1.1.0-3~bpo8+1)

Your message dated Wed, 7 Dec 2016 16:03:01 + (UTC) with message-id <1402720840.2332409.1481126581...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#846973: RFS: sndio/1.1.0-3~bpo8+1 has caused the Debian Bug report #846973, regarding RFS: sndio/1.1.0-3~bpo8+1 to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#840424: RFS: verilog-mode

Hi all, On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 9:07 AM, Sean Whitton wrote: >> verilog-mode (master) $ gbp buildpackage -S -d >> gbp:warning: Pristine-tar branch "pristine-tar" not found >> gbp:error: Pristine-tar couldn't checkout >> "verilog-mode_20161124.fd230e6.orig.tar.gz":

Bug#840424: RFS: verilog-mode

Dear Kiwamu, On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 10:22:00AM +0900, Kiwamu Okabe wrote: > Could you advice me how to use the command in this situation? You don't need to: just provide Gianfranco with a tarball to upload, or tell him how to produce it from your git repository. -- Sean Whitton

Bug#844184: RFS: muse-el/3.20+dfsg-1 [ITA]

Dear Sean, Thank you once again for holding me to high standards and for taking the time to point out what needs work! 1-to-5, and 8: done > > 6. In d/NEWS, > > > Unfortunately, it is not possible to distribute this manual with the > > muse-el Debian package because the Debian project has

Bug#842520: RFS: glances/2.7.1.1-1

Hi Gianfranco! 2016-10-31 11:56 GMT-05:00 Gianfranco Costamagna : > control: owner -1 ! > control: tags -1 moreinfo > > Hi, > >>I am looking for a sponsor for my package "glances" > > > missing licenses and copyrights: > e.g. > > +++

Bug#847228: marked as done (RFS: ipband/0.8.1-5 -- mostly spelling mistakes)

Your message dated Wed, 7 Dec 2016 14:28:35 + (UTC) with message-id <726620182.2073667.1481120915...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#847228: RFS: ipband/0.8.1-5 -- mostly spelling mistakes has caused the Debian Bug report #847228, regarding RFS: ipband/0.8.1-5 -- mostly spelling

Bug#847120: RFS: engauge-digitizer/9.7-1

control: owner -1 ! control: tags -1 moreinfo > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "engauge-digitizer" sigh: Binary files /tmp/B972iVgMET/engauge-digitizer-9.3/dev/windows/appveyor/fftw-3.3.5-dll32.zip and

Bug#847079: RFS: groonga/6.1.1-1

control: owner -1 ! control: tags -1 moreinfo >I am looking for a sponsor for my package "groonga" missing copyrights: Roman Arutyunyan Ruslan Ermilov Maxim Dounin Valentin V. Bartenev Unbit S.a.s. 2009-2010 Vlad Krasnov Sergey A. Osokin Austin Appleby Manlio Perillo Scott James Remnant

Bug#840598: RFS: poppassd/1.8.7-1 [QA]

Hi Adam, >In light of the recently announced forced 10-day migration delay after >Dec 5 and the soft freeze on Jan 5, I would like to move forward with >the proposed changes so the package is in shape for stretch. > >Adam, I do not wish to take over poppassd. If you could sponsor one >or two

Bug#847350: RFS: golang-github-minio-minio-go/2.0.2+dfsg-1

On 2016-12-07 14:13+, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > control: owner -1 ! > control: tags -1 moreinfo >>I am looking for a sponsor for "golang-github-minio-minio-go": > >>2.0.2 is needed to complete the packaging of restic (ITP #846176). > > I would like to see it sponsored by the maintainer,

Bug#847350: marked as done (RFS: golang-github-minio-minio-go/2.0.2-1)

Your message dated Wed, 7 Dec 2016 16:26:00 + (UTC) with message-id <296479808.2364146.1481127960...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#847350: RFS: golang-github-minio-minio-go/2.0.2+dfsg-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #847350, regarding RFS: golang-github-minio-minio-go/2.0.2-1 to

Bug#841017: marked as done (RFS: openbox/3.6.1-4)

Your message dated Wed, 07 Dec 2016 16:26:59 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: openbox/3.6.1-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #841017, regarding RFS: openbox/3.6.1-4 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been