r-cran-git2r uses private header files of libgit2 (Was: Help with libgit2 needed to strip code copy from r-cran-git2r)

Hi again, On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 08:34:09AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > > # Add include paths for git2r > > -CPPFLAGS="-I. -Ilibgit2/src -Ilibgit2/include -Ilibgit2/deps/http-parser > > ${CPPFLAGS}" > > -+CPPFLAGS="-I. -I/usr/include/git2 ${CPPFLAGS}" > > ++CPPFLAGS="-I. -idirafter

Bug#886934: RFS: pt-websocket/0.2-5

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal X-Debbugs-CC: j...@debian.org, pkg-privacy-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsored upload of the package pt-websockets, maintained by the team pkg-privacy (which I am a member of). Here is the changelog for

Re: Taking over a package from an active DD

On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 09:26:23PM +0800, gustavo panizzo wrote: > I sent 2 emails to the DD asking its plans for the package > and offering to take over the maintenance. To date I have no answer. > > What can I do? Sadly, we have no good ways to deal with those cases. Your options are: 1 keep

Taking over a package from an active DD

Hello There is a package of my interest maintained by an active (with other packages) DD, that person is also the upstream maintainer of the package. I NMU'ed the package in the past and it was recently removed from testing. I sent 2 emails to the DD asking its plans for the package and

Re: Taking over a package from an active DD

2018-01-11 15:06 GMT+01:00 Mattia Rizzolo : > On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 09:26:23PM +0800, gustavo panizzo wrote: > > I sent 2 emails to the DD asking its plans for the package > > and offering to take over the maintenance. To date I have no answer. > > > > What can I do? > >

Bug#886834: marked as done (RFS: cligh/0.3-3)

Your message dated Thu, 11 Jan 2018 11:42:08 +0200 with message-id <422c3cec-22bb-9f5b-4ebf-3ecb71363...@aims.ac.za> and subject line Done has caused the Debian Bug report #886834, regarding RFS: cligh/0.3-3 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Splitting source package into two

Hi, I am the maintainer of the "python-astropy" package, that currently creates packages for both Python 2 and Python 3. Both packages have a number of reverse dependencies. Recently, upstream announced a new version 3.0 of astropy, which supports Python 3 only, and I want to have a smooth

Re: Splitting source package into two

On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 3:45 PM, Ole Streicher wrote: > Recently, upstream announced a new version 3.0 of astropy, which > supports Python 3 only, and I want to have a smooth migration path. I > thought of a temporary package split: create a new source package > "astropy" that inherits of the

Re: r-cran-git2r uses private header files of libgit2 (Was: Help with libgit2 needed to strip code copy from r-cran-git2r)

I had some friendly emails with Stefan (git2r upstream) when he started the R package git2r (as I needed some features in my drat R package) and he expressed quite some frustration at working with libgit2 as it changed so much upstream. I know we collectively really hate embedding copies, but

Bug#886934: marked as done (RFS: pt-websocket/0.2-5)

Your message dated Fri, 12 Jan 2018 08:39:04 +0200 with message-id <839e794f-a673-42ce-9dae-b629b99ca...@linux.com> and subject line Package uploaded has caused the Debian Bug report #886934, regarding RFS: pt-websocket/0.2-5 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has