Bug#891996: closed by Sven Hoexter <s...@timegate.de> (Re: Bug#891996: RFS: btrfsmaintenance/0.4-1 [I maintain the package])

On Sun, Mar 04, 2018 at 06:12:38PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2018 19:06:19 +0100 > From: Sven Hoexter > To: Nicholas D Steeves , 891996-d...@bugs.debian.org > Subject: Re: Bug#891996: RFS: btrfsmaintenance/0.4-1 [I maintain

Bug#892660: Subject: RFS: diodon/1.8.0-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "diodon" * Package name: diodon Version : 1.8.0-1 Upstream Author : Oliver Sauder * URL : https://launchpad.net/diodon/ * License :

Re: Bug#890203: RFS: gigalomania/1.0-1 [ITP]

On Mon, 19 Feb 2018 15:08:58 +0800 Paul Wise wrote: > On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 3:34 AM, Jose G. López wrote: > > > The package got rejected because I forgot to reference a copy of TinyXML. > > Please ask upstream to remove the copy from their VCS and tarballs and > depend on it

Re: Bug#890203: RFS: gigalomania/1.0-1 [ITP]

On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 7:01 PM, Jose G. López wrote: > I contacted upstream but answered that wasn't posible as it's needed for > other platforms. There are other options for that situation, like providing it only in the binary packages for those platforms, or providing a script to download

Bug#861649: Newer version uploaded

On Sunday 11 March 2018 00:18:32 CET Gard Spreemann wrote: > On Wednesday 7 March 2018 19:32:48 CET Tobias Frost wrote: > > Please review d/copyright. I found at least one undocumented file which > > is licensed Apache 2.0 and another one under LGPL3+. Neither are in > > d/copyright. > > I'm

Bug#892627: RFS: flameshot/0.5.1-3~bpo9+1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-backpo...@lists.debian.org Dear mentors and backports developers, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "flameshot" into Debian stretch-backports repository. Flameshot is a new screenshot tool written in Qt/C++ with

Bug#892153: Objective-C libraries (was: Bug#892153: marked as done (RFS: addresses-for-gnustep/0.4.8-3 [RC]))

Adam Borowski wrote: > On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 08:28:17AM +0200, Yavor Doganov wrote: > > * Package name: addresses-for-gnustep > >Version : 0.4.8-3 > I don't understand ObjC library stuff well enough to adequately > check these parts, but it's unlikely we'd get someone else who

Bug#892619: RFS: pidgin-sipe/1.23.2-1 -- Pidgin plugin for Skype for Business and Microsoft Lync

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for package "pidgin-sipe", whose source code is at: https://salsa.debian.org/xhaakon-guest/pidgin-sipe or you may also: dget -x

Bug#892634: RFS: dh-runit/2.7.1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist !Just recently I got upload to experimental recently. I am sorry, I meant unstable! Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dh-runit" * Package name : dh-runit Version : 2.7.1 Upstream Author : Dmitry Bogatov

Bug#892153: marked as done (RFS: addresses-for-gnustep/0.4.8-3 [RC])

Your message dated Sun, 11 Mar 2018 13:00:04 +0100 with message-id <20180311120004.7wzrhzwyfwxk7...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#892153: RFS: addresses-for-gnustep/0.4.8-3 [RC] has caused the Debian Bug report #892153, regarding RFS: addresses-for-gnustep/0.4.8-3 [RC] to be marked as done.

Bug#892417: RFS: streamlink/0.11.0+dfsg-1

Le 09/03/2018 à 03:14, Paul Wise a écrit : > On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 7:37 AM, Alexis Murzeau wrote: > >> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "streamlink" for a new >> upstream version 0.11.0. > > Uploaded. > > PS: if you would like to upload an official backport, feel free to > file

Bug#892153: Objective-C libraries (was: Bug#892153: marked as done (RFS: addresses-for-gnustep/0.4.8-3 [RC]))

On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 2:02 AM, Yavor Doganov wrote: > If -initWithAddressBook:readOnly: is removed in a new version of the > library, that's an API/ABI break but again, it won't be reflected in > the symbols table. In a C/C++ library you'll see a symbol > disappearing but it won't happen here.

Bug#892417: RFS: streamlink/0.11.0+dfsg-1

On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 1:31 AM, Alexis Murzeau wrote: > Shouldn't not so much used packages preferably not be backported (to > avoid maintenance costs to other involved parties) ? The backports policy says "Please only upload package with a notable userbase. User request for the package may be

Bug#892591: RFS: pinball/0.3.1-14 [ITA]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new packages] Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pinball" * Package name: pinball Version : 0.3.1-14 Upstream Author : Henrik Enqvist * URL

Bug#892544: RFS: lmms/1.1.3-7.1 [RC, NMU]

On Sat, Mar 10, 2018 at 07:53:47PM +0800, Boyuan Yang wrote: >... > I have prepared an NMU for package lmms with some of its uploaders' > acknowledgment [1] and am looking for a sponsor to upload it into > DELAYED/7 queue. Feel free to tell me if I should wait any longer. >... > Changes since