Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Problems to recreate minimized JS in r-cran-jsonld

Hi, On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 01:31:56PM +0500, Pirate Praveen wrote: > > You'll need to update webpack.config.js with system path for it to find apt > installed modules. I naively tried diff --git a/webpack.config.js b/webpack.config.js index 7ce5c6e..87f7559 100644 --- a/webpack.config.js +++

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Problems to recreate minimized JS in r-cran-jsonld

On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 3:05 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: Hi, I was stumbling upon an issue with some minimized JS in the package r-cran-jsonld (ITPed in #898224). I tried to recreate jsonld.min.js and have written a script[1] which calls webpack in a clone of the Github

Bug#898278: marked as done (RFS: arptables/0.0.4-2 - ARP table administration)

Your message dated Thu, 10 May 2018 13:06:37 +0200 with message-id and subject line RFS: arptables/0.0.4-2 - ARP table administration has caused the Debian Bug report #898278, regarding RFS: arptables/0.0.4-2 - ARP table

r-cran-dbi changed from arch=any to arch=all which makes it "unvisible" in unstable (Was: New version of r-bioc-genomicranges breaks autopkgtests of r-bioc-summarizedexperiment in testing)

Hi, a lot of r-* packages received mails about test suite errors like this: On Wed, May 09, 2018 at 02:16:29PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote: > ... > [2] > https://ci.debian.net/packages/r/r-bioc-summarizedexperiment/testing/amd64/ I think the problem is that the packages depend directly or

Bug#898308: marked as done (RFS: streamlink/0.12.1+dfsg-1)

Your message dated Thu, 10 May 2018 10:20:13 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: streamlink/0.12.1+dfsg-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #898308, regarding RFS: streamlink/0.12.1+dfsg-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#898308: RFS: streamlink/0.12.1+dfsg-1

Le 10/05/2018 à 04:01, Paul Wise a écrit : > On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 7:40 AM, Alexis Murzeau wrote: > >> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "streamlink" for a new >> upstream version 0.12.1. > > Uploaded. > > Some things you might want to do if you have spare time: > >> * Remove

Bug#898308: Upstream minimum supported python version 3.4 and lintian tag ancient-python-version-field

Hi, I maintain the "streamlink" package were upstream supports only python >= 3.4, so I have added X-Python3-Version >= 3.4 in control file. But the new lintian tag ancient-python-version-field want it to be removed as oldstable has python3 >= 3.4. Removing X-Python3-Version changes the binary

Re: r-cran-dbi changed from arch=any to arch=all which makes it "unvisible" in unstable (Was: New version of r-bioc-genomicranges breaks autopkgtests of r-bioc-summarizedexperiment in testing)

On 10 May 2018 at 11:54, Andreas Tille wrote: | Hi, | | a lot of r-* packages received mails about test suite errors like this: | | On Wed, May 09, 2018 at 02:16:29PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote: | > ... | > [2] https://ci.debian.net/packages/r/r-bioc-summarizedexperiment/testing/amd64/ | | I

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Problems to recreate minimized JS in r-cran-jsonld

On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 2:31 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > jsonld.js does not work. The file size of this uncompressed file is way > smaller than the minimazion result and doese not work together with the > R code. Thus I really need to undergo the process to create

Re: r-cran-dbi changed from arch=any to arch=all which makes it "unvisible" in unstable (Was: New version of r-bioc-genomicranges breaks autopkgtests of r-bioc-summarizedexperiment in testing)

Hi Dir, On 10-05-18 14:04, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > Sorry about that. It must have been an old packaging oversight that only came > to light now -- DBI never had a src/ directory and should have been 'all' all > along. > > Any idea how we can correct that at the repo? Shall we file a bug with

Re: r-cran-dbi changed from arch=any to arch=all which makes it "unvisible" in unstable (Was: New version of r-bioc-genomicranges breaks autopkgtests of r-bioc-summarizedexperiment in testing)

On 10 May 2018 at 19:47, Paul Gevers wrote: | Hi Dir, | | On 10-05-18 14:04, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > Sorry about that. It must have been an old packaging oversight that only came | > to light now -- DBI never had a src/ directory and should have been 'all' all | > along. | > | > Any idea

Re: r-cran-dbi changed from arch=any to arch=all which makes it "unvisible" in unstable (Was: New version of r-bioc-genomicranges breaks autopkgtests of r-bioc-summarizedexperiment in testing)

Hi, On 10-05-18 19:57, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > On 10 May 2018 at 19:47, Paul Gevers wrote: > | On 10-05-18 14:04, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > | > Sorry about that. It must have been an old packaging oversight that only > came > | > to light now -- DBI never had a src/ directory and should have

Bug#897238: Bits about Intel MKL packaging -- Higher Priority than OpenBLAS

On Sun, May 06, 2018 at 08:29:29AM +, Lumin wrote: > > He put forward a simpler solution: Just don't provide libblas.so.3, such > > that MKL will never be used to satisfy the dependency of libblas.so.3 . > > Based on his idea, my new solution is the follows: > > > > libmkl-rt -- > >

Re: Problems to recreate minimized JS in r-cran-jsonld

On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 5:35 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: > I was stumbling upon an issue with some minimized JS in the package > r-cran-jsonld (ITPed in #898224). I tried to recreate jsonld.min.js and > have written a script[1] which calls webpack in a clone of the Github >

Bug#898389: RFS: proxychains-ng/4.12-2

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal X-Debbugs-CC: proxycha...@packages.debian.org Dear mentors and proxychains maintainers, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "proxychains-ng". I am also looking for a DD to help migrate the packaging git repository onto Debian group on

RFS: pygithub/1.40a3-1 [ITP]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pygithub" * Package name: pygithub Version : 1.40a3-1 Upstream Author : Author : Adam Dangoor

Bug#898363: RFS: wrapperfactory.app/0.1.0-5

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "wrapperfactory.app". * Package name: wrapperfactory.app Version : 0.1.0-5 Upstream Author : Raffael Herzog * URL : N/A * License :

Re: r-cran-dbi changed from arch=any to arch=all which makes it "unvisible" in unstable (Was: New version of r-bioc-genomicranges breaks autopkgtests of r-bioc-summarizedexperiment in testing)

On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 12:57:54PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > | > | ftp.debian.org is the right pseudo-package for removal (of the 0.8-1 > | packages) from unstable. > > Ok, thanks, filed as #898354. Seems that bug is somehow needed for this specific issue. However, I think I had other

Re: r-cran-dbi changed from arch=any to arch=all which makes it "unvisible" in unstable (Was: New version of r-bioc-genomicranges breaks autopkgtests of r-bioc-summarizedexperiment in testing)

Hi Andreas On 10-05-18 22:08, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 12:57:54PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: >> | >> | ftp.debian.org is the right pseudo-package for removal (of the 0.8-1 >> | packages) from unstable. >> >> Ok, thanks, filed as #898354. > > Seems that bug is somehow