On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 04:05:11PM +0100, fre...@free.fr wrote:
> What are the recommended permissions for all the files that reside inside the
> debian directory ?
Usual 644/755 I suppose, what makes you think about different perms?
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 04:47:42PM +0100, Beren Minor wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dwarf-fortress".
That's good news.
Unfortunately, the package is not ready yet.
> dwarf-fortress-bin - Dwarf Fortress binaries
> dwarf-fortress-data - Dwarf Fortress data files
> dwarf-fort
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 05:48:50PM +0100, Beren Minor wrote:
> The other correct way, as far as I could see, to have an i386 package
> available on amd64 is to use ia32-libs package, however this package
> does not contain all the required dependencies for dwarf-fortress
> (sdl-ttf, sdl-image and g
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 06:15:00PM +0100, Beren Minor wrote:
> > I'm not talking about patches, gbp and gbp-pq. I mean git checkout magic
> > in your Makefile.
> >
> > As with any other standalone Debian package, dget --build for .dsc URL or
> > dpkg-source -x and dpkg-buildpackage for downloaded o
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 01:15:39AM +0100, Beren Minor wrote:
> I've updated the packages on mentors and splitted the original one in
> two. There's the main dwarf-fortress with binaries, data files and
> scripts for modding support, and the default graphic mod package that
> is also required. I've
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 02:01:57PM +0100, Werner Detter wrote:
> I'm currently wondering where to check stuff that has changed from one
> standard version
> to the next (e.g. 3.9.2 vs. 3.9.3) and what is relevant for own packages. Is
> there
> something like a changelog?
/usr/share/doc/debian-pol
* Update debian/copyright to the latest DEP5 version.
* Drop obsolete README.source.
* Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.3 (no change needed).
* Drop an ancient version from the ucf dependency.
Regards,
Andrey Rahmatullin
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 01:13:35PM -0300, Fernando Lemos wrote:
> First, If you're proposing a different algorithm for password
> generation, have you looked into contributing the algorithm to apg? If
> not, why?
Please also note that while apg generates secure passwords, rpg doesn't
care about su
On Sun, Apr 08, 2012 at 04:24:19AM +0400, Vladimir Stavrinov wrote:
> As for security, I hope there are no such problems in last uploaded
> version.
Please clearly state somewhere that your software doesn't attempt to
generate cryptographically secure passwords.
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Descr
On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 02:19:44PM +0200, Werner Detter wrote:
> I am looking for instructions on how to create a debian package that uses
> cmake as build
> system as I'm wondering how the debian/rules should look and what it should
> contain for
> cmake? Can anyone tell me a small package that
On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 11:27:20AM -0800, Christopher Howard wrote:
> Hello. I've created a number of Debs for single-binary packages in the
> past, but now I am getting into packaging libraries. For the most part
> it has not been difficult to figure out how to package a library, but I
> am not qu
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 05:26:47PM +, Bart Martens wrote:
> > Build for hppa and powerpcspe won't build with this meesages:
> >
> > burp (= 1.3.4-2) build-depends on one of:
> > - debhelper (= 9.20120513)
>
> I don't see that on https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=burp
> so whe
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 05:00:57PM +, Bas van den Dikkenberg wrote:
> Can some help with this problem?
>
> Build for hppa and powerpcspe won't build with this meesages:
>
> burp (= 1.3.4-2) build-depends on one of:
> - debhelper (= 9.20120513)
I don't think these ports are supposed to wor
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 08:59:02PM +, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>
> My package:
> http://mentors.debian.net/package/resiprocate
>
> The warning:
> http://lintian.debian.org/tags/dev-pkg-without-shlib-symlink.html
>
> a) I notice the warning is appearing for the lib package and NOT the
> -dev pack
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 09:03:09AM +, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> >> b) I notice the verbose output (on the mentors summary page)
> >> shows an SONAME in a slightly different format:
> >>
> >> usr/lib/librutil-1.8.so.0.0.0 usr/lib/librutil-1.8.so
> >>
> >> Notice: librutil-1.8.so, while the -dev p
On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 10:03:06AM +0200, Björn Esser wrote:
> Why does dh >= 9 (in paticular the latest version in sid) put the
> debugging-symbols in
> usr/lib/debug/.build-id/$(2-Byte-Random)/$(Random).debug when building
> a lib with multi-arch-support?
Because it uses NT_GNU_BUILD_ID field to
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Hello.
I request a fast QA upload of the prelink package with several patches
from the upstream VCS that fix the wine build. I want to have wine built
with this version (more precisely, with the version that produces proper
binaries, if this upload
On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 05:33:31AM +, Bart Martens wrote:
> There are two RFS bugs for prelink, bug 659522 from Daniel Martí and bug
> 676516
> from Andrey Rahmatullin. Both RFS'es claim to have a package ready for
> sponsoring at mentors.
>
> At first sight the p
On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 11:42:12AM -0430, PICCORO McKAY Lenz wrote:
> i try to upload my dsc packages and sources but i get key singin errors, i
> generated the 4096 key and put in debian mentors profile.. but when i
> upload this happened:
>
> GnuPG signature check failed on XX.change
On Sat, Jun 09, 2012 at 10:13:16AM +0200, Daniel Martí wrote:
> Thanks for the QA upload. I'll repack my ITA as NMU and retitle this bug
> now. If I understand the process correctly, I should put the QA team as
> its maintainer, but leave myself in the changelog entry for this NMU,
> right?
Daniel,
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 05:28:33PM +0200, Daniel Martí wrote:
> /usr/bin/ld: /tmp/ccH3oLmR.o: undefined reference to symbol 'bar'
> /usr/bin/ld: note: 'bar' is defined in DSO ./reloc1lib1.so so try adding
> it to the linker command line
> ./reloc1lib1.so: could not read symbols: Invalid operation
>
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "xboxdrv"
* Package name: xboxdrv
Version : 0.8.4-1
Upstream Author : Ingo Ruhnke
* URL : http://pingus.seul.org/~grumbel/xboxdrv/
* License : GPL-3
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "qmpdclient"
* Package name: qmpdclient
Version : 1.2.2-2
Upstream Author : Voker57
* URL : http://bitcheese.net/wiki/QMPDClient
* License : GPL-2+
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dwarftherapist"
* Package name: dwarftherapist
Version : 0.6.12+hg20120621-1
Upstream Author : Justin Ehlert
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/dwarfthera
On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 11:35:34AM +0200, Christophe-Marie Duquesne wrote:
> I want the libary to be a fully compatible runtime and compile-time
> replacement for the closed-source one, so I have no choice but to use
> the exact same symbol names in my header. What I do is I take the
> header of th
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 09:27:15PM +1000, Ruben Rubio Rey wrote:
> I have been reading lots of documentation in the last days, and I believe
> that next thing I need to move forward is to find an sponsor.
>
> I have some idea to get started:
> - I have packaged a beanstalk python client, which do
On Sat, Aug 04, 2012 at 05:57:46PM +0200, Salvo Tomaselli wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> could someone sponsor this?
>
> http://galileo.dmi.unict.it/~ltworf/xinetd/
It's 403 so I cannot be sure it targets sid, but if it does, are you
aware of the freeze and its implications?
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.
On Sat, Aug 04, 2012 at 06:28:56PM +0200, Salvo Tomaselli wrote:
> > > Greetings,
> > >
> > > could someone sponsor this?
> > >
> > > http://galileo.dmi.unict.it/~ltworf/xinetd/
> >
> > It's 403
> 403?
All files yield 403 Forbidden.
> > so I cannot be sure it targets sid, but if it does, are y
On Sat, Aug 04, 2012 at 06:57:12PM +0200, Salvo Tomaselli wrote:
> > Updating a package in unstable during the freeze makes updating that
> > package in testing (if needed) more complicated.
> Well it's not _STRICTLY_ needed for it to go into testing, the changes are
> not
> that important.
I me
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 06:21:39PM -0400, Alex Korobkin wrote:
> 1. Download the source of my package: apt-get source liblcms2-2
Note that we don't have Ubuntu precies as our default repo so the command
doesn't do the same as for you. You mean dget
http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/l/lcms2
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 08:51:58AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> > The problem is Makefile files that are regenerated by configure called in
> > the clean target.
> > That these files are patched by debian/patches/debian-changes-* is another
> > problem, caused by this one.
> Sounds like a situation wh
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 03:46:08PM -0500, Matt Zagrabelny wrote:
> Is there a tool to create a .deb from a directory of files? I am
> thinking of a Mathematica install I just had to perform and I'd rather
> put a .deb in our local repo and have clients pull it rather than
> manually installing this
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 11:33:52AM -0700, Eric wrote:
> I'm a new maintainer taking over the maintenance of an existing
> package. I have a question about the computer on which I'm creating
> the package. Should I upgrade it to sid or leave it at stable?
If you are able to live on sid, do it, as it
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 01:12:38PM +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> Can someone please let me know if this is my fault or a server issue?
There is already turnserver 0.6-1 on the mentors incoming queue, did you
try to upload it twice?
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 02:23:26PM +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> >> Can someone please let me know if this is my fault or a server
> >> issue?
> > There is already turnserver 0.6-1 on the mentors incoming queue,
> > did you try to upload it twice?
> Yes, I made another change and then tried to uplo
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 02:36:39PM +0200, Arno Töll wrote:
> Can someone please let me know if this is my fault or a server
> issue?
> >>> There is already turnserver 0.6-1 on the mentors incoming queue,
> >>> did you try to upload it twice?
> >> Yes, I made another change and then tried
On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 09:47:49PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> Overrides are discouraged for experimental/info level tags. Perhaps
> lintian could be modified to ignore this when the exit() occurs inside
> yy_fatal_error(), not sure how it detects this though.
By checking the symbol table, obviously,
On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 03:23:02PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I have spent some time into writing a watch file for
>
> https://csb.codeplex.com/releases/
>
> but failed and some research on mailing lists revealed some other
> failures. Any idea whether a clever mangling might help anyway?
On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 07:40:11PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > > I have spent some time into writing a watch file for
> > >
> > > https://csb.codeplex.com/releases/
> > >
> > > but failed and some research on mailing lists revealed some other
> > > failures. Any idea whether a clever man
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 05:10:58PM +0100, Erik Sjölund wrote:
> I got rid of the shlib-calls-exit by letting CMake replace the exit()
> call with an abort call().
That sounds very wrong.
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13364139/lintian-reports-shlib-calls-exit-from-flex-generated-source-code
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 12:30:22PM +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I packaged the Dhrystone benchmark for Debian, as I coulnd't find a
> package for it:
>
> https://github.com/qris/dhrystone-deb
>
> And I'd like to find a sponsor to check and maybe upload it for me.
> Thanks in advance.
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 11:17:25PM +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> The warnings and errors are:
>
> W: dhrystone: new-package-should-close-itp-bug
> W: dhrystone: description-synopsis-starts-with-article
> E: dhrystone: section-is-dh_make-template
> W: dhrystone: binary-without-manpage usr/bin/dhry
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "mcelog"
* Package name: mcelog
Version : 1.0~snapshot20121127-1~exp1
Upstream Author : Andi Kleen
* URL : http://mcelog.org/download.html
* License
On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 01:44:55PM +0100, Miguel Telleria de Esteban wrote:
> Why does git-buildpackage need pristine-tar to generate the orig.tar.gz
> file?.
It doesn't and it's even not enabled by default.
> Can't it just pick the contents from the upstream branch
> together with version number
On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 03:30:09PM +0100, Antonio Ospite wrote:
> In my limited experience if the upstream project uses git already and
> _tags_ stable releases it is very easy to avoid using pristine-tar
It's also very easy to avoid it in any other workflow: just don't enable
it. There is no diffe
Hello. I use git-buildpackage and want to use ccache. I tried exporting
overriden CC and PATH, but that had no effect and `echo' in debian/rules
shows that both variables are reverted to the defaults. Does
git-buildpackage clear the environment? How can I use ccache in this
configuration?
--
WBR,
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 04:32:44PM -0500, Jean Schurger wrote:
> Another question: is there a sort of inheritance ? like:
>
> --
> Files: directory/*.c
> Copyright: 2004-2010, Somebody
> License: GPL-2
> See /usr/share/common-licenses/GPL-2.
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 02:29:17PM +0530, Arvind S Raj wrote:
> Oh I didn't know that! Made the necessary changes! And one question-is it
> possible to view the files in a particular git repository via the browser?
> Navigating to http://git.debian.org/git/collab-maint/openteacher.git/ didn't
> he
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 03:13:26PM +0530, Arvind S Raj wrote:
> > http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/openteacher.git;a=summary
> > It's already in your debian/control as Vcs-Browser:
> Thanks Andrey! That link is invalid; updated it to the right one! Wouldn't
> have even guess it was wrong :).
R
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 03:10:24PM -0400, Scott Howard wrote:
> In your debian rules file you can use:
> dh_installchangelogs -k {your_changelog_filename}
>
> (the -k is to keep the upstream changelog file name and symlink it to
> changelog.gz, feel free to drop it if you wish, it will rename the
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 02:23:01PM +0100, Michele Gastaldo wrote:
> > > In your debian rules file you can use:
> > > dh_installchangelogs -k {your_changelog_filename}
> > >
> > > (the -k is to keep the upstream changelog file name and symlink it to
> > > changelog.gz, feel free to drop it if you w
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 12:41:00PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> You can also suggest to upstream that they include the debian
> directory in a examples directory or similar, so that it doesn't get
> in the way of packaging (or just not distribute it in the main package
> at all.)
See also http://w
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 06:01:00PM +0200, Benoît Knecht wrote:
> - In debian/copyright, the Format header should contain the versioned
>DEP5 URL [1]. And you could avoid repeating the BSD-2-clause license
>text by using a standalone license paragraph. Also, you should not
>duplicate th
Hi all.
I've packaged hg-fast-export (ITP#574914), it is uploaded to
http://mentors.debian.net/cgi-bin/maintainer-packages?action=details;package=hg-fast-export
and http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/hg-fast-export.git;a=summary
I've seeking not only a sponsor, but, more importantly, any comme
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 06:30:20AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> Is there no git-svn style way to interact with hg repos through git?
From the docs:
The way the hg API and remote access protocol is designed it is not
possible to use hg-fast-export on remote repositories
(http/ssh). First clone the rep
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 11:03:09AM +0600, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> Well, there is https://github.com/offbytwo/git-hg , it is a 120-lines
> shell script which uses (bundled) hg-fast-export and seems to create a hg
> repo at .git/hgcheckout, but I didn't try it.
I've trie
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 07:33:20AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> The git-remote-hg project seems like a much more natural way to
> interact with remote hg repositories. I saw some evidence on the git
> list and wiki that git-remote-foo is the way forward for foreign VCS
> support in git. There was even
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 11:29:35PM +0600, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> > Well, there is https://github.com/offbytwo/git-hg , it is a 120-lines
> > shell script which uses (bundled) hg-fast-export and seems to create a hg
> > repo at .git/hgcheckout, but I didn't try it.
&
repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main
contrib non-free
- dget
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/librsync/librsync_0.9.7-8.dsc
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Kind regards
Andrey Rahmatullin
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Descriptio
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 10:46:00AM -0400, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
> Am I missing a tool?
svn users use svn-buildpackage to store only debian/ in VCS, so yes.
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 06:18:17PM -0500, Elías Alejandro wrote:
> > If you link against code which links against OpenSSL, IANAL, but I think
> > you also need to have the exception in your own code.
> So you mean add this exception in debian/copyright?
No, you can't change the upstream license. I
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 09:39:57PM +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote:
> The first one is the config.sub replacement. What about using something
> like the following for your configure target:
> set -e; if ! [ -f config/config.sub.backup ]; then \
> mv config/config.sub config/config.sub.backup; \
>
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 11:29:49PM +0300, Nanakos Chrysostomos wrote:
> Will this upload resolve the problem of compiling only
> to linux and kfreebsd and exclude hurd-i386 architecture?
> I changed Architecture Field from any to linux-any.
kfreebsd is not linux so setting linux-any you excluded it
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 10:27:56PM +0800, Kan-Ru Chen wrote:
> > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.9.7-8
> > of my package "librsync".
> The package looks good.
> Have you found a sponsor?
Not yet.
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 03:12:41PM +0200, Thomas Preud'homme wrote:
> Does pristine-tar work if the upstream branch contains files which have been
> removed during repack?
Unfortunately the directory and the tarball must have identical contents.
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: Digital
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 02:31:02PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > > Does pristine-tar work if the upstream branch contains files which have
> > > been
> > > removed during repack?
> > Unfortunately the directory and the tarball must have identical contents.
>
> That's not true, but the larger the d
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 05:53:48PM +0200, Fabrizio Regalli wrote:
> > But after dput, may be explain the process ? Both, briefly the before
> > debexpo uploading workflow ? Imo, to have a little tuto on packaging
> > on this website will be great. :)
> Really? I think there are many documents on ho
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 05:41:37PM +0200, benoît tuduri wrote:
> I have seen this notice on the website for dput command, thanks :) .
> But after dput, may be explain the process ? Both, briefly the before
> debexpo uploading workflow ? Imo, to have a little tuto on packaging
Do you mean the proces
On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 04:16:23PM +, mezgani ali wrote:
> * License : gpl3
No, it's GPL2+ for aes.c and sha256.c and non-free "freeware" license (not
explicitly allowing modification) for other files.
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 06:13:52AM +, mezgani ali wrote:
> My motivation for maintaining this package is: [fill in].
Huh?
> The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
> - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/aescrypt
> - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/de
using this command:
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gkrellm-gkrellmpc/gkrellm-gkrellmpc_0.1~beta10-2.dsc
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Kind regards,
Andrey Rahmatullin
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
t -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/q/qmpdclient/qmpdclient_1.2.2-1.dsc
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Kind regards,
Andrey Rahmatullin
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 05:03:19PM +0200, Misha Strong wrote:
> I've just written my own program, and I'd like it added to your distro.
I've already filed two ITPs: #637761, #639366. That means that you are
going to make a Debian package for this software. If that is true, did you
make the package?
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 09:41:08PM +0600, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 05:03:19PM +0200, Misha Strong wrote:
> > I've just written my own program, and I'd like it added to your distro.
> I've already filed two ITPs: #637761, #639366.
I mea
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 08:40:27AM +0200, Misha Strong wrote:
> You guys say that my app. won't be very useful, why is that? It provides
> a good way for people with low-quality connections to access remote
> data.
It's hard to say anything specific without seeing the source.
--
WBR, wRAR
signa
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 01:21:00PM +1000, onlyjob wrote:
> Could someone please kindly have a look at the package I've made
> (and provide comments)?
You didn't fix Vcs-* per Arno comments in the ITP bug.
What is "This has to be exported to make some magic below work." (before
'export DH_OPTIO
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 08:13:33PM +1000, onlyjob wrote:
> > You didn't fix Vcs-* per Arno comments in the ITP bug.
> I can't quite do it yet because I have no public repository.
Then remove the tags. They are optional.
> Given that our only option is merge, it looks like there will be no
> second
On Wed, Nov 02, 2011 at 02:10:39PM +0100, Arno Töll wrote:
> * Check (build-)dependencies
> + Are all dependencies declared? In particular: Does the package make
> use of external commands/includes only insofar they are (build-)essential?
> + Can they be satisfied in main?
> + Are they proper
On Sun, Nov 06, 2011 at 05:34:41PM +0100, Daniel Stender wrote:
> we are trying to build the Gummi (LaTeX editor with preview pane) 0.6 beta
> with Pdebuilder (Sid) on
> Ubuntu Oneiric, but the building fails due to a missing link against
> 'gzclose' (Zlib) - please see
> the build log: http://pa
nments, but
that doesn't mean they do not exist at all.
gummi-0.5.999-svn1032.tar.gz cannot be built on my sid system even without
pbuilder.
> Greetings,
> Daniel Stender
>
> On 06.11.2011 22:35, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 06, 2011 at 05:34:41PM +0100, Daniel St
On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 03:15:35AM -0800, Vincent Cheng wrote:
> You can simply ignore it; there's no need to repack the tarball just
> to remove the debian dir. dpkg-buildpackage (or your favourite
> wrapper) will remove the debian dir inside the original tarball and
> use yours at build time.
Thi
On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 12:06:00PM +0100, Daniel Stender wrote:
> >> Info: the problem vanished when I've builded with other builders than
> >> pbuilder.
> > pbuilder was created to be able to build in a controlled environment. No
> > wonder that some
> > errors are not present in uncontrolled en
On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 12:49:32PM +, mezgani ali wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-ipcalc".
>
> * Package name: python-ipcalc
>Version : 0.3-2
>Upstream Author : Wijnand Modderman
> * URL : http://dev.tehmaze.com/p
On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 02:31:36PM +, mezgani ali wrote:
> updated but still have a warning, please take a look at it
Your diff.gz creates python-ipcalc-0.3/pkg-info.
Patch headers should be in DEP-3 form, though this is not a requirement.
License issues still exist.
README.source seems redunda
On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 03:33:09PM +, mezgani ali wrote:
> > > updated but still have a warning, please take a look at it
> > Your diff.gz creates python-ipcalc-0.3/pkg-info.
> Please can you explain me this point ?
> What is the problem with diff.gz ?
Did you read the description of patch-syst
burden on the package users
by changing the package license.
- The Debian packaging is: Copyright (C) 2011? What about 2009?
debian/control: Description still starts from lowercase letters.
> On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 3:48 PM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 03:36:40PM +, mezgani ali wrote:
> Why may i rename my work to MIT ?
Because you have the copyright.
> please explain , if i understand i have to remove GPL-3 and let the
> package licence as is it
What should I explain?
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: Digit
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 02:17:27PM +0100, With No Name wrote:
> in the changes/upload file I have only those three files, but I need the
>
> package_1.2.3.tar.gz
>
> too. How do I do this?
Add -sa to the build command you use.
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 01:12:27PM +0530, karunakar medamoni wrote:
> i was uploaded one package scl-sandhi to mentors.debian.net please
> check lintain errors and suggest me how to remove those error from my
> package.
Did you read the descriptions of these tags?
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
De
On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 05:24:50PM +0400, Игорь Пашев wrote:
> 2012/12/22 Vincent Cheng :
> > dpkg-deb -x systemtap-sdt-dev_1.7-1+b1_amd64.deb .
>
> This only lists the contents without unpacking:
> deb -I systemtap-sdt-dev_1.7-1+b1_amd64.deb
ITYM dpkg-deb
Also, -c only lists the contents.
--
WB
On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 10:59:11PM +0100, Tomasz Muras wrote:
> >>>dpkg-deb -x systemtap-sdt-dev_1.7-1+b1_amd64.deb .
> >>
> >>This only lists the contents without unpacking:
> >>deb -I systemtap-sdt-dev_1.7-1+b1_amd64.deb
> >ITYM dpkg-deb
> >Also, -c only lists the contents.
>
> I was wondering a
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 09:40:54PM +0300, Alexander Busorguin wrote:
> It was caused by calls to Festival functions, for example: void
> festival_tidy_up();
(because -lFestival is static-only)
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 10:29:49PM -0600, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > It's ITA, not ITP, and you forgot to retitle and claim the bug..
> I don't see how I'm supposed to do that?
>
> I'm pasting in what I see when I run reportbug in an Emacs shell.
You use reportbug to report bugs. You use the email in
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 02:45:42PM -0600, Paul Johnson wrote:
> I appreciate your time. I had tried the email to control as my first
> method, but there was no response, no success or error.
That's strange. Make sure you've sent the email to the proper address.
> So after reading through the debi
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 04:39:11PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> the watch file of the prospective package meme[1] is reporting a new
> version but fails to download the latest version (4.9.0.4). It was
> working nicely with version 4.9.0.3. I just get:
For the reference:
opts="uversionmangle=s/
On Sat, Mar 02, 2013 at 03:57:57AM +, adrelanos wrote:
> Many users having trouble downloading the (rather big) images. (Download
> corruption, network breakdown...)
[...]
> If it could be installed with a "apt-get install whonix", that would be
> much better than manually downloading.
Not re
On Sat, Mar 02, 2013 at 06:30:27AM +, adrelanos wrote:
> >> Many users having trouble downloading the (rather big) images.
> >> (Download
> >> corruption, network breakdown...)
> >
> > [...]
> >
> >> If it could be installed with a "apt-get install whonix", that would
> >> be
> >> much better t
On Sat, Mar 02, 2013 at 01:16:43PM +, adrelanos wrote:
> > Hash sum verification is easy these days [...]
>
> For whom?
>
> Certainly not for the average mortal user.
If they cannot run one console command, how can they use ISOs?
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pidgin-audacious"
* Package name: pidgin-audacious
Version : 2.0.0-3
Upstream Author : Yoshiki Yazawa
* URL : http://www.honeyplanet.jp/download.html
*
On Sat, Mar 09, 2013 at 07:15:40PM +0200, Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote:
> This is just for copying files from debian/tmp to debian/package in the
> case where you have multiple binary packages.
"From debhelper compatibility level 7 on, dh_install will fall back to
looking in debian/tmp for files, if
1 - 100 of 1104 matches
Mail list logo
