Re: Files permission in the debian directory

2012-02-13 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 04:05:11PM +0100, fre...@free.fr wrote: > What are the recommended permissions for all the files that reside inside the > debian directory ? Usual 644/755 I suppose, what makes you think about different perms? -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS: dwarf-fortress

2012-02-21 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 04:47:42PM +0100, Beren Minor wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dwarf-fortress". That's good news. Unfortunately, the package is not ready yet. > dwarf-fortress-bin - Dwarf Fortress binaries > dwarf-fortress-data - Dwarf Fortress data files > dwarf-fort

Re: RFS: dwarf-fortress

2012-02-21 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 05:48:50PM +0100, Beren Minor wrote: > The other correct way, as far as I could see, to have an i386 package > available on amd64 is to use ia32-libs package, however this package > does not contain all the required dependencies for dwarf-fortress > (sdl-ttf, sdl-image and g

Re: RFS: dwarf-fortress

2012-02-21 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 06:15:00PM +0100, Beren Minor wrote: > > I'm not talking about patches, gbp and gbp-pq. I mean git checkout magic > > in your Makefile. > > > > As with any other standalone Debian package, dget --build for .dsc URL or > > dpkg-source -x and dpkg-buildpackage for downloaded o

Re: RFS: dwarf-fortress

2012-02-22 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 01:15:39AM +0100, Beren Minor wrote: > I've updated the packages on mentors and splitted the original one in > two. There's the main dwarf-fortress with binaries, data files and > scripts for modding support, and the default graphic mod package that > is also required. I've

Re: Standard Versions

2012-02-27 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 02:01:57PM +0100, Werner Detter wrote: > I'm currently wondering where to check stuff that has changed from one > standard version > to the next (e.g. 3.9.2 vs. 3.9.3) and what is relevant for own packages. Is > there > something like a changelog? /usr/share/doc/debian-pol

Bug#666925: RFS: mpdscribble/0.22-3 [ITA]

2012-04-02 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
* Update debian/copyright to the latest DEP5 version. * Drop obsolete README.source. * Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.3 (no change needed). * Drop an ancient version from the ucf dependency. Regards, Andrey Rahmatullin -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Bug#659047: RFS: rpg - Readable Password Generator

2012-04-07 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 01:13:35PM -0300, Fernando Lemos wrote: > First, If you're proposing a different algorithm for password > generation, have you looked into contributing the algorithm to apg? If > not, why? Please also note that while apg generates secure passwords, rpg doesn't care about su

Re: Bug#659047: RFS: rpg - Readable Password Generator

2012-04-08 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Sun, Apr 08, 2012 at 04:24:19AM +0400, Vladimir Stavrinov wrote: > As for security, I hope there are no such problems in last uploaded > version. Please clearly state somewhere that your software doesn't attempt to generate cryptographically secure passwords. -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Descr

Re: hints for creating deb packages with cmake build system

2012-04-09 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 02:19:44PM +0200, Werner Detter wrote: > I am looking for instructions on how to create a debian package that uses > cmake as build > system as I'm wondering how the debian/rules should look and what it should > contain for > cmake? Can anyone tell me a small package that

Re: *.dirs and *.install files

2012-05-02 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 11:27:20AM -0800, Christopher Howard wrote: > Hello. I've created a number of Debs for single-binary packages in the > past, but now I am getting into packaging libraries. For the most part > it has not been difficult to figure out how to package a library, but I > am not qu

Re: burp FTBFS (was: Re: Problems with build)

2012-05-18 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 05:26:47PM +, Bart Martens wrote: > > Build for hppa and powerpcspe won't build with this meesages: > > > > burp (= 1.3.4-2) build-depends on one of: > > - debhelper (= 9.20120513) > > I don't see that on https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=burp > so whe

Re: Problems with build

2012-05-18 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 05:00:57PM +, Bas van den Dikkenberg wrote: > Can some help with this problem? > > Build for hppa and powerpcspe won't build with this meesages: > > burp (= 1.3.4-2) build-depends on one of: > - debhelper (= 9.20120513) I don't think these ports are supposed to wor

Re: bad lintian warning?

2012-05-20 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 08:59:02PM +, Daniel Pocock wrote: > > My package: > http://mentors.debian.net/package/resiprocate > > The warning: > http://lintian.debian.org/tags/dev-pkg-without-shlib-symlink.html > > a) I notice the warning is appearing for the lib package and NOT the > -dev pack

Re: bad lintian warning?

2012-05-21 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 09:03:09AM +, Daniel Pocock wrote: > >> b) I notice the verbose output (on the mentors summary page) > >> shows an SONAME in a slightly different format: > >> > >> usr/lib/librutil-1.8.so.0.0.0 usr/lib/librutil-1.8.so > >> > >> Notice: librutil-1.8.so, while the -dev p

Re: dh >= 9 builds strange debug-pkg

2012-06-04 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 10:03:06AM +0200, Björn Esser wrote: > Why does dh >= 9 (in paticular the latest version in sid) put the > debugging-symbols in > usr/lib/debug/.build-id/$(2-Byte-Random)/$(Random).debug when building > a lib with multi-arch-support? Because it uses NT_GNU_BUILD_ID field to

Bug#676516: RFS: prelink/0.0.20090925-2 [QA]

2012-06-07 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Hello. I request a fast QA upload of the prelink package with several patches from the upstream VCS that fix the wine build. I want to have wine built with this version (more precisely, with the version that produces proper binaries, if this upload

Bug#659522: O: prelink -- ELF prelinking utility to speed up dynamic linking

2012-06-08 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 05:33:31AM +, Bart Martens wrote: > There are two RFS bugs for prelink, bug 659522 from Daniel Martí and bug > 676516 > from Andrey Rahmatullin. Both RFS'es claim to have a package ready for > sponsoring at mentors. > > At first sight the p

Re: unable to upload packages dsc files.. URGENCY

2012-06-08 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 11:42:12AM -0430, PICCORO McKAY Lenz wrote: > i try to upload my dsc packages and sources but i get key singin errors, i > generated the 4096 key and put in debian mentors profile.. but when i > upload this happened: > > GnuPG signature check failed on XX.change

Bug#659522: RFS: prelink/0.0.20111012-1 [ITA] - ELF prelinking utility to speed up dynamic linking

2012-06-09 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Sat, Jun 09, 2012 at 10:13:16AM +0200, Daniel Martí wrote: > Thanks for the QA upload. I'll repack my ITA as NMU and retitle this bug > now. If I understand the process correctly, I should put the QA team as > its maintainer, but leave myself in the changelog entry for this NMU, > right? Daniel,

Bug#659522: prelink - problems with 0.0.20090925-4

2012-06-11 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 05:28:33PM +0200, Daniel Martí wrote: > /usr/bin/ld: /tmp/ccH3oLmR.o: undefined reference to symbol 'bar' > /usr/bin/ld: note: 'bar' is defined in DSO ./reloc1lib1.so so try adding > it to the linker command line > ./reloc1lib1.so: could not read symbols: Invalid operation >

Bug#678212: RFS: xboxdrv/0.8.4-1

2012-06-19 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "xboxdrv" * Package name: xboxdrv Version : 0.8.4-1 Upstream Author : Ingo Ruhnke * URL : http://pingus.seul.org/~grumbel/xboxdrv/ * License : GPL-3

Bug#678214: RFS: qmpdclient/1.2.2-2

2012-06-19 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "qmpdclient" * Package name: qmpdclient Version : 1.2.2-2 Upstream Author : Voker57 * URL : http://bitcheese.net/wiki/QMPDClient * License : GPL-2+

Bug#678414: RFS: dwarftherapist/0.6.12+hg20120621-1 [ITP]

2012-06-21 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dwarftherapist" * Package name: dwarftherapist Version : 0.6.12+hg20120621-1 Upstream Author : Justin Ehlert * URL : http://code.google.com/p/dwarfthera

Re: Copyright problems for the opensource reimplementation of a closed-source library (ITP #679504)

2012-07-06 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Fri, Jul 06, 2012 at 11:35:34AM +0200, Christophe-Marie Duquesne wrote: > I want the libary to be a fully compatible runtime and compile-time > replacement for the closed-source one, so I have no choice but to use > the exact same symbol names in my header. What I do is I take the > header of th

Re: Looking for an sponsor

2012-07-10 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 09:27:15PM +1000, Ruben Rubio Rey wrote: > I have been reading lots of documentation in the last days, and I believe > that next thing I need to move forward is to find an sponsor. > > I have some idea to get started: > - I have packaged a beanstalk python client, which do

Re: RFS: xinetd

2012-08-04 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Sat, Aug 04, 2012 at 05:57:46PM +0200, Salvo Tomaselli wrote: > Greetings, > > could someone sponsor this? > > http://galileo.dmi.unict.it/~ltworf/xinetd/ It's 403 so I cannot be sure it targets sid, but if it does, are you aware of the freeze and its implications? -- WBR, wRAR signature.

Re: RFS: xinetd

2012-08-04 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Sat, Aug 04, 2012 at 06:28:56PM +0200, Salvo Tomaselli wrote: > > > Greetings, > > > > > > could someone sponsor this? > > > > > > http://galileo.dmi.unict.it/~ltworf/xinetd/ > > > > It's 403 > 403? All files yield 403 Forbidden. > > so I cannot be sure it targets sid, but if it does, are y

Re: RFS: xinetd

2012-08-04 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Sat, Aug 04, 2012 at 06:57:12PM +0200, Salvo Tomaselli wrote: > > Updating a package in unstable during the freeze makes updating that > > package in testing (if needed) more complicated. > Well it's not _STRICTLY_ needed for it to go into testing, the changes are > not > that important. I me

Re: dpkg-source aborting due to unexpected upstream changes when run inside pbuilder

2012-08-16 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 06:21:39PM -0400, Alex Korobkin wrote: > 1. Download the source of my package: apt-get source liblcms2-2 Note that we don't have Ubuntu precies as our default repo so the command doesn't do the same as for you. You mean dget http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/l/lcms2

Re: dpkg-source aborting due to unexpected upstream changes when run inside pbuilder

2012-08-17 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 08:51:58AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > > The problem is Makefile files that are regenerated by configure called in > > the clean target. > > That these files are patched by debian/patches/debian-changes-* is another > > problem, caused by this one. > Sounds like a situation wh

Re: tool to create .deb for proprietary software?

2012-08-23 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 03:46:08PM -0500, Matt Zagrabelny wrote: > Is there a tool to create a .deb from a directory of files? I am > thinking of a Mathematica install I just had to perform and I'd rather > put a .deb in our local repo and have clients pull it rather than > manually installing this

Re: New Maintainer Question: Upgrade to Sid?

2012-09-18 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 11:33:52AM -0700, Eric wrote: > I'm a new maintainer taking over the maintenance of an existing > package. I have a question about the computer on which I'm creating > the package. Should I upgrade it to sid or leave it at stable? If you are able to live on sid, do it, as it

Re: mentors site: uploading fails - 403 Forbidden

2012-09-30 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 01:12:38PM +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote: > Can someone please let me know if this is my fault or a server issue? There is already turnserver 0.6-1 on the mentors incoming queue, did you try to upload it twice? -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: mentors site: uploading fails - 403 Forbidden

2012-09-30 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 02:23:26PM +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote: > >> Can someone please let me know if this is my fault or a server > >> issue? > > There is already turnserver 0.6-1 on the mentors incoming queue, > > did you try to upload it twice? > Yes, I made another change and then tried to uplo

Re: mentors site: uploading fails - 403 Forbidden

2012-09-30 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 02:36:39PM +0200, Arno Töll wrote: > Can someone please let me know if this is my fault or a server > issue? > >>> There is already turnserver 0.6-1 on the mentors incoming queue, > >>> did you try to upload it twice? > >> Yes, I made another change and then tried

Re: shlib-calls-exit and the flex-generated function yy_fatal_error

2012-11-02 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 09:47:49PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > Overrides are discouraged for experimental/info level tags. Perhaps > lintian could be modified to ignore this when the exit() occurs inside > yy_fatal_error(), not sure how it detects this though. By checking the symbol table, obviously,

Re: Any idea how to write watch file for codeplex hosted sources?

2012-11-05 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 03:23:02PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > I have spent some time into writing a watch file for > > https://csb.codeplex.com/releases/ > > but failed and some research on mailing lists revealed some other > failures. Any idea whether a clever mangling might help anyway?

Re: Any idea how to write watch file for codeplex hosted sources?

2012-11-06 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 07:40:11PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > > > I have spent some time into writing a watch file for > > > > > > https://csb.codeplex.com/releases/ > > > > > > but failed and some research on mailing lists revealed some other > > > failures. Any idea whether a clever man

Re: shlib-calls-exit and the flex-generated function yy_fatal_error

2012-11-13 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 05:10:58PM +0100, Erik Sjölund wrote: > I got rid of the shlib-calls-exit by letting CMake replace the exit() > call with an abort call(). That sounds very wrong. > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13364139/lintian-reports-shlib-calls-exit-from-flex-generated-source-code

Re: dhrystone package looking for a sponsor

2012-11-15 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 12:30:22PM +, Chris Wilson wrote: > Hi all, > > I packaged the Dhrystone benchmark for Debian, as I coulnd't find a > package for it: > > https://github.com/qris/dhrystone-deb > > And I'd like to find a sponsor to check and maybe upload it for me. > Thanks in advance.

Re: dhrystone package looking for a sponsor

2012-11-16 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 11:17:25PM +, Chris Wilson wrote: > The warnings and errors are: > > W: dhrystone: new-package-should-close-itp-bug > W: dhrystone: description-synopsis-starts-with-article > E: dhrystone: section-is-dh_make-template > W: dhrystone: binary-without-manpage usr/bin/dhry

Bug#694817: RFS: mcelog/1.0~snapshot20121127-1~exp1 [ITA]

2012-11-30 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "mcelog" * Package name: mcelog Version : 1.0~snapshot20121127-1~exp1 Upstream Author : Andi Kleen * URL : http://mcelog.org/download.html * License

Re: git-buildpackage: can it recreate the orig.tar.gz without the pristine-tar?

2012-12-03 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 01:44:55PM +0100, Miguel Telleria de Esteban wrote: > Why does git-buildpackage need pristine-tar to generate the orig.tar.gz > file?. It doesn't and it's even not enabled by default. > Can't it just pick the contents from the upstream branch > together with version number

Re: git-buildpackage: can it recreate the orig.tar.gz without the pristine-tar?

2012-12-03 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 03:30:09PM +0100, Antonio Ospite wrote: > In my limited experience if the upstream project uses git already and > _tags_ stable releases it is very easy to avoid using pristine-tar It's also very easy to avoid it in any other workflow: just don't enable it. There is no diffe

Using ccache with git-buildpackage

2010-10-02 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
Hello. I use git-buildpackage and want to use ccache. I tried exporting overriden CC and PATH, but that had no effect and `echo' in debian/rules shows that both variables are reverted to the defaults. Does git-buildpackage clear the environment? How can I use ccache in this configuration? -- WBR,

Re: DEP5 and multiple copyrights for same file

2011-01-20 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 04:32:44PM -0500, Jean Schurger wrote: > Another question: is there a sort of inheritance ? like: > > -- > Files: directory/*.c > Copyright: 2004-2010, Somebody > License: GPL-2 > See /usr/share/common-licenses/GPL-2.

Re: RFS: openteacher

2011-02-20 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 02:29:17PM +0530, Arvind S Raj wrote: > Oh I didn't know that! Made the necessary changes! And one question-is it > possible to view the files in a particular git repository via the browser? > Navigating to http://git.debian.org/git/collab-maint/openteacher.git/ didn't > he

Re: RFS: openteacher

2011-02-20 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 03:13:26PM +0530, Arvind S Raj wrote: > > http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/openteacher.git;a=summary > > It's already in your debian/control as Vcs-Browser: > Thanks Andrey! That link is invalid; updated it to the right one! Wouldn't > have even guess it was wrong :). R

Re: Renaming and gzipping upstream changelog

2011-03-14 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 03:10:24PM -0400, Scott Howard wrote: > In your debian rules file you can use: > dh_installchangelogs -k {your_changelog_filename} > > (the -k is to keep the upstream changelog file name and symlink it to > changelog.gz, feel free to drop it if you wish, it will rename the

Re: Re: Renaming and gzipping upstream changelog

2011-03-17 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 02:23:01PM +0100, Michele Gastaldo wrote: > > > In your debian rules file you can use: > > > dh_installchangelogs -k {your_changelog_filename} > > > > > > (the -k is to keep the upstream changelog file name and symlink it to > > > changelog.gz, feel free to drop it if you w

Re: what if upstream provides debian build directory

2011-03-18 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 12:41:00PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote: > You can also suggest to upstream that they include the debian > directory in a examples directory or similar, so that it doesn't get > in the way of packaging (or just not distribute it in the main package > at all.) See also http://w

Re: RFS: udisks-glue

2011-03-30 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 06:01:00PM +0200, Benoît Knecht wrote: > - In debian/copyright, the Format header should contain the versioned >DEP5 URL [1]. And you could avoid repeating the BSD-2-clause license >text by using a standalone license paragraph. Also, you should not >duplicate th

RFC/RFS: hg-fast-export

2011-04-09 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
Hi all. I've packaged hg-fast-export (ITP#574914), it is uploaded to http://mentors.debian.net/cgi-bin/maintainer-packages?action=details;package=hg-fast-export and http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/hg-fast-export.git;a=summary I've seeking not only a sponsor, but, more importantly, any comme

Re: RFC/RFS: hg-fast-export

2011-04-09 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 06:30:20AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > Is there no git-svn style way to interact with hg repos through git? From the docs: The way the hg API and remote access protocol is designed it is not possible to use hg-fast-export on remote repositories (http/ssh). First clone the rep

Re: RFC/RFS: hg-fast-export

2011-04-10 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 11:03:09AM +0600, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > Well, there is https://github.com/offbytwo/git-hg , it is a 120-lines > shell script which uses (bundled) hg-fast-export and seems to create a hg > repo at .git/hgcheckout, but I didn't try it. I've trie

Re: RFC/RFS: hg-fast-export

2011-04-11 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 07:33:20AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > The git-remote-hg project seems like a much more natural way to > interact with remote hg repositories. I saw some evidence on the git > list and wiki that git-remote-foo is the way forward for foreign VCS > support in git. There was even

Re: RFC/RFS: hg-fast-export

2011-04-14 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 11:29:35PM +0600, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > > Well, there is https://github.com/offbytwo/git-hg , it is a 120-lines > > shell script which uses (bundled) hg-fast-export and seems to create a hg > > repo at .git/hgcheckout, but I didn't try it. &

RFS: librsync (updated package)

2011-05-02 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main contrib non-free - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/librsync/librsync_0.9.7-8.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards Andrey Rahmatullin -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Descriptio

Re: Workflow with debian/ in VCS

2011-05-15 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 10:46:00AM -0400, Nikolaus Rath wrote: > Am I missing a tool? svn users use svn-buildpackage to store only debian/ in VCS, so yes. -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Licensing question

2011-05-19 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 06:18:17PM -0500, Elías Alejandro wrote: > > If you link against code which links against OpenSSL, IANAL, but I think > > you also need to have the exception in your own code. > So you mean add this exception in debian/copyright? No, you can't change the upstream license. I

Re: RFS: archivemount (updated package, 3rd try)

2011-05-27 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 09:39:57PM +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote: > The first one is the config.sub replacement. What about using something > like the following for your configure target: > set -e; if ! [ -f config/config.sub.backup ]; then \ > mv config/config.sub config/config.sub.backup; \ >

Re: RFS: archivemount (updated package, 3rd try)

2011-05-27 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 11:29:49PM +0300, Nanakos Chrysostomos wrote: > Will this upload resolve the problem of compiling only > to linux and kfreebsd and exclude hurd-i386 architecture? > I changed Architecture Field from any to linux-any. kfreebsd is not linux so setting linux-any you excluded it

Re: RFS: librsync (updated package)

2011-05-30 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 10:27:56PM +0800, Kan-Ru Chen wrote: > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.9.7-8 > > of my package "librsync". > The package looks good. > Have you found a sponsor? Not yet. -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Git and tarballs

2011-07-06 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 03:12:41PM +0200, Thomas Preud'homme wrote: > Does pristine-tar work if the upstream branch contains files which have been > removed during repack? Unfortunately the directory and the tarball must have identical contents. -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: Digital

Re: Git and tarballs

2011-07-07 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 02:31:02PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > > > Does pristine-tar work if the upstream branch contains files which have > > > been > > > removed during repack? > > Unfortunately the directory and the tarball must have identical contents. > > That's not true, but the larger the d

Re: Please try expo.debian.net -- a replacement for mentors.debian.net

2011-07-27 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 05:53:48PM +0200, Fabrizio Regalli wrote: > > But after dput, may be explain the process ? Both, briefly the before > > debexpo uploading workflow ? Imo, to have a little tuto on packaging > > on this website will be great. :) > Really? I think there are many documents on ho

Re: Please try expo.debian.net -- a replacement for mentors.debian.net

2011-07-27 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 05:41:37PM +0200, benoît tuduri wrote: > I have seen this notice on the website for dput command, thanks :) . > But after dput, may be explain the process ? Both, briefly the before > debexpo uploading workflow ? Imo, to have a little tuto on packaging Do you mean the proces

Re: RFS: aescrypt

2011-08-03 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 04:16:23PM +, mezgani ali wrote: > * License : gpl3 No, it's GPL2+ for aes.c and sha256.c and non-free "freeware" license (not explicitly allowing modification) for other files. -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RFS: aescrypt

2011-08-04 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 06:13:52AM +, mezgani ali wrote: > My motivation for maintaining this package is: [fill in]. Huh? > The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: > - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/aescrypt > - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/de

RFS: gkrellm-gkrellmpc

2011-08-24 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
using this command: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gkrellm-gkrellmpc/gkrellm-gkrellmpc_0.1~beta10-2.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards, Andrey Rahmatullin -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: Digital signature

RFS: qmpdclient

2011-08-24 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
t -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/q/qmpdclient/qmpdclient_1.2.2-1.dsc I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me. Kind regards, Andrey Rahmatullin -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Cavalry

2011-08-29 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 05:03:19PM +0200, Misha Strong wrote: > I've just written my own program, and I'd like it added to your distro. I've already filed two ITPs: #637761, #639366. That means that you are going to make a Debian package for this software. If that is true, did you make the package?

Re: Cavalry

2011-08-29 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 09:41:08PM +0600, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 05:03:19PM +0200, Misha Strong wrote: > > I've just written my own program, and I'd like it added to your distro. > I've already filed two ITPs: #637761, #639366. I mea

Re: Cavalry

2011-08-31 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 08:40:27AM +0200, Misha Strong wrote: > You guys say that my app. won't be very useful, why is that? It provides > a good way for people with low-quality connections to access remote > data. It's hard to say anything specific without seeing the source. -- WBR, wRAR signa

Re: flashcache - call for resolution / seeking for a mentor

2011-09-20 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 01:21:00PM +1000, onlyjob wrote: > Could someone please kindly have a look at the package I've made > (and provide comments)? You didn't fix Vcs-* per Arno comments in the ITP bug. What is "This has to be exported to make some magic below work." (before 'export DH_OPTIO

Re: flashcache - call for resolution / seeking for a mentor

2011-09-21 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 08:13:33PM +1000, onlyjob wrote: > > You didn't fix Vcs-* per Arno comments in the ITP bug. > I can't quite do it yet because I have no public repository. Then remove the tags. They are optional. > Given that our only option is merge, it looks like there will be no > second

Re: package errors requiring human judgment to detect?

2011-11-02 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Wed, Nov 02, 2011 at 02:10:39PM +0100, Arno Töll wrote: > * Check (build-)dependencies > + Are all dependencies declared? In particular: Does the package make > use of external commands/includes only insofar they are (build-)essential? > + Can they be satisfied in main? > + Are they proper

Re: Buildings fails due to missing link against gzclose

2011-11-06 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Sun, Nov 06, 2011 at 05:34:41PM +0100, Daniel Stender wrote: > we are trying to build the Gummi (LaTeX editor with preview pane) 0.6 beta > with Pdebuilder (Sid) on > Ubuntu Oneiric, but the building fails due to a missing link against > 'gzclose' (Zlib) - please see > the build log: http://pa

Re: Buildings fails due to missing link against gzclose

2011-11-08 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
nments, but that doesn't mean they do not exist at all. gummi-0.5.999-svn1032.tar.gz cannot be built on my sid system even without pbuilder. > Greetings, > Daniel Stender > > On 06.11.2011 22:35, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 06, 2011 at 05:34:41PM +0100, Daniel St

Re: What to do if there's already a debian-dir inside the .orig.tar?

2011-11-09 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 03:15:35AM -0800, Vincent Cheng wrote: > You can simply ignore it; there's no need to repack the tarball just > to remove the debian dir. dpkg-buildpackage (or your favourite > wrapper) will remove the debian dir inside the original tarball and > use yours at build time. Thi

Re: Buildings fails due to missing link against gzclose

2011-11-09 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 12:06:00PM +0100, Daniel Stender wrote: > >> Info: the problem vanished when I've builded with other builders than > >> pbuilder. > > pbuilder was created to be able to build in a controlled environment. No > > wonder that some > > errors are not present in uncontrolled en

Re: RFS: python-ipcalc [update]

2011-11-09 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 12:49:32PM +, mezgani ali wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-ipcalc". > > * Package name: python-ipcalc >Version : 0.3-2 >Upstream Author : Wijnand Modderman > * URL : http://dev.tehmaze.com/p

Re: RFS: python-ipcalc [update]

2011-11-09 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 02:31:36PM +, mezgani ali wrote: > updated but still have a warning, please take a look at it Your diff.gz creates python-ipcalc-0.3/pkg-info. Patch headers should be in DEP-3 form, though this is not a requirement. License issues still exist. README.source seems redunda

Re: RFS: python-ipcalc [update]

2011-11-09 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 03:33:09PM +, mezgani ali wrote: > > > updated but still have a warning, please take a look at it > > Your diff.gz creates python-ipcalc-0.3/pkg-info. > Please can you explain me this point ? > What is the problem with diff.gz ? Did you read the description of patch-syst

Re: RFS: python-ipcalc [update]

2011-11-09 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
burden on the package users by changing the package license. - The Debian packaging is: Copyright (C) 2011? What about 2009? debian/control: Description still starts from lowercase letters. > On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 3:48 PM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at

Re: RFS: python-ipcalc [update]

2011-11-10 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 03:36:40PM +, mezgani ali wrote: > Why may i rename my work to MIT ? Because you have the copyright. > please explain , if i understand i have to remove GPL-3 and let the > package licence as is it What should I explain? -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: Digit

Re: How to rebuild a package with full source upload?

2011-12-11 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 02:17:27PM +0100, With No Name wrote: > in the changes/upload file I have only those three files, but I need the > > package_1.2.3.tar.gz > > too. How do I do this? Add -sa to the build command you use. -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: regarding lintain errors in my package

2011-12-19 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 01:12:27PM +0530, karunakar medamoni wrote: > i was uploaded one package scl-sandhi to mentors.debian.net please > check lintain errors and suggest me how to remove those error from my > package. Did you read the descriptions of these tags? -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc De

Re: content of a package on repo

2012-12-22 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 05:24:50PM +0400, Игорь Пашев wrote: > 2012/12/22 Vincent Cheng : > > dpkg-deb -x systemtap-sdt-dev_1.7-1+b1_amd64.deb . > > This only lists the contents without unpacking: > deb -I systemtap-sdt-dev_1.7-1+b1_amd64.deb ITYM dpkg-deb Also, -c only lists the contents. -- WB

Re: content of a package on repo

2012-12-23 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 10:59:11PM +0100, Tomasz Muras wrote: > >>>dpkg-deb -x systemtap-sdt-dev_1.7-1+b1_amd64.deb . > >> > >>This only lists the contents without unpacking: > >>deb -I systemtap-sdt-dev_1.7-1+b1_amd64.deb > >ITYM dpkg-deb > >Also, -c only lists the contents. > > I was wondering a

Re: lintian warning hardening-no-fortify-functions in dualword project...

2012-12-25 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 09:40:54PM +0300, Alexander Busorguin wrote: > It was caused by calls to Festival functions, for example: void > festival_tidy_up(); (because -lFestival is static-only) -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: I'm so frustrated trying to adopt a package, I could scream.

2013-02-10 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 10:29:49PM -0600, Paul Johnson wrote: > > It's ITA, not ITP, and you forgot to retitle and claim the bug.. > I don't see how I'm supposed to do that? > > I'm pasting in what I see when I run reportbug in an Emacs shell. You use reportbug to report bugs. You use the email in

Re: I'm so frustrated trying to adopt a package, I could scream.

2013-02-12 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 02:45:42PM -0600, Paul Johnson wrote: > I appreciate your time. I had tried the email to control as my first > method, but there was no response, no success or error. That's strange. Make sure you've sent the email to the proper address. > So after reading through the debi

Re: Watch file help needed

2013-02-13 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 04:39:11PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > the watch file of the prospective package meme[1] is reporting a new > version but fails to download the latest version (4.9.0.4). It was > working nicely with version 4.9.0.3. I just get: For the reference: opts="uversionmangle=s/

Re: Packaging virtual machine images .ova?

2013-03-01 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Sat, Mar 02, 2013 at 03:57:57AM +, adrelanos wrote: > Many users having trouble downloading the (rather big) images. (Download > corruption, network breakdown...) [...] > If it could be installed with a "apt-get install whonix", that would be > much better than manually downloading. Not re

Re: Packaging virtual machine images .ova?

2013-03-01 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Sat, Mar 02, 2013 at 06:30:27AM +, adrelanos wrote: > >> Many users having trouble downloading the (rather big) images. > >> (Download > >> corruption, network breakdown...) > > > > [...] > > > >> If it could be installed with a "apt-get install whonix", that would > >> be > >> much better t

Re: Packaging virtual machine images .ova?

2013-03-02 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Sat, Mar 02, 2013 at 01:16:43PM +, adrelanos wrote: > > Hash sum verification is easy these days [...] > > For whom? > > Certainly not for the average mortal user. If they cannot run one console command, how can they use ISOs? -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#702628: RFS: pidgin-audacious/2.0.0-3 [RC, QA]

2013-03-09 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pidgin-audacious" * Package name: pidgin-audacious Version : 2.0.0-3 Upstream Author : Yoshiki Yazawa * URL : http://www.honeyplanet.jp/download.html *

Re: install rule in Makefile

2013-03-09 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Sat, Mar 09, 2013 at 07:15:40PM +0200, Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote: > This is just for copying files from debian/tmp to debian/package in the > case where you have multiple binary packages. "From debhelper compatibility level 7 on, dh_install will fall back to looking in debian/tmp for files, if

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >