Re: I'd appreciate if you could also give me upload rights for this package.

2018-03-01 Thread Georg Faerber
On 18-03-01 09:59:43, Geert Stappers wrote: > And so learn how to grant a DM upload privileges for a package. It's described in the wiki as well [1]. Cheers, Georg [1] https://wiki.debian.org/DebianMaintainer#Granting_Permissions signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: C++ and Python package combined

2018-04-07 Thread Georg Faerber
Hi, On 18-04-07 08:43:57, Nico Schlömer wrote: > > I guess you can set PKG_CONFIG_PATH and others appropriately. > > That sounds like what I got to do. I'm just figuring out which paths I > need exactly. Can I use export in d/rules? Yes, using export in d/rules works as expected. Cheers, Georg

Re: ed25519 keys and mentors.d.n

2018-04-08 Thread Georg Faerber
Hi, On 18-04-08 17:29:17, Daniele Nicolodi wrote: > On 08/04/2018 17:10, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 08, 2018 at 04:41:32PM -0600, Daniele Nicolodi wrote: > >> I just tried to upload a package to mentors.debian.net and it got > >> rejected because is is signed with an ed25519 key: > >>

Re: .dput.cf WAS: Upload failed: 301 Moved Permanently

2018-03-20 Thread Georg Faerber
On 18-03-20 20:33:14, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 06:50:27PM +0100, Georg Faerber wrote: > > > Questions, just to fulfil my curiosity: > > > 1) why do you prefer https over ftp? > > > > That's not a sign of my preference. I've just changed

Re: .dput.cf WAS: Upload failed: 301 Moved Permanently

2018-03-22 Thread Georg Faerber
On 18-03-22 12:29:34, Hugh McMaster wrote: > On Wednesday, 21 March 2018 10:58 PM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > > As an admin of mentors.d.n (and as a chronically lazy person) I'm > > curious as to why anybody would go to the extra length of using a > > local configuration when both dput and dput-ng

Re: .dput.cf WAS: Upload failed: 301 Moved Permanently

2018-03-21 Thread Georg Faerber
On 18-03-21 12:58:39, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 12:31:39AM +0100, Georg Faerber wrote: > > I've to admit: I'm not really getting your point, Mattia. > > Like I said in my first post¹, just to fulfil my curiosity. > As an admin of mentors.d.n (and as a chron

Re: .dput.cf WAS: Upload failed: 301 Moved Permanently

2018-03-20 Thread Georg Faerber
On 18-03-20 18:39:21, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 06:23:36PM +0100, Georg Faerber wrote: > > On 18-03-20 18:12:36, Geert Stappers wrote: > > > And what is now the content of you .dput.cf ? > > > > > > Yes, I'm looking for working

Re: .dput.cf WAS: Upload failed: 301 Moved Permanently

2018-03-20 Thread Georg Faerber
On 18-03-20 18:12:36, Geert Stappers wrote: > And what is now the content of you .dput.cf ? > > Yes, I'm looking for working .dput.cf [mentors] fqdn = mentors.debian.net incoming = /upload method = https allow_unsigned_uploads = 0 progress_indicator = 2 # Allow uploads for UNRELEASED packages

Re: RFC: aiomysql/0.0.20-1

2019-07-04 Thread Georg Faerber
Hi Adam, all, On 19-07-04 22:02:27, Adam Cecile wrote: > I'm willing to get back involved in Debian and I'd like some comments > about the Python package I just made, just to be sure I'm doing things > ok. Welcome back, and thanks for your work. I'm not able to look at the package, just a

Re: Salsa repository request

2019-11-14 Thread Georg Faerber
Hi, On 19-11-13 23:38:46, Fabian Wolff wrote: > I am currently working on the boogie package. There has been a new > upstream release which I'm trying to package; I'm not very familiar > with Mono and CLI packaging, but I'll see how far I can get. > > In any case, I would like to maintain my

Re: Salsa repository request

2019-11-16 Thread Georg Faerber
On 19-11-16 19:00:26, Fabian Wolff wrote: > It's 'wolff-guest'. (And please CC me in your replies, as I'm not > subscribed to debian-mentors.) I've created the repo, and gave you Maintainer access. Let me know if that's not sufficient. Cheers, Georg

Re: Feedback on post{inst,rm}-scripts?

2022-04-05 Thread Georg Faerber
Hi Peymaneh, all, Thank you for working on this! I'm not sure if there are similar packages in the archive, which build container images; there might be no established practice and policy so far. * The 'apk add' call in the Containerfile could rely on the '--no-cache' option, or