Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libfixbuf":
* Package name: libfixbuf
Version : 1.4.0-1
Upstream Author : Brian Trammell, Dan Ruef, Emily Ecoff
* URL : http://tools.netsa.cert.org/fixbuf/ind
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "fuseloop"
* Package name: fuseloop
Version : 1.0.1-1
Upstream Author : Johny Mattsson
* URL : https://github.com/jmattsson/fuseloop
* License : BSD
Sect
Hi,
Quoting Wookey (2014-01-14 01:59:22)
> +++ Johannes Schauer [2014-01-08 15:41 +0100]:
> > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libfixbuf":
> OK. Looks sound to me.
thanks for looking at it!
> A couple of minor points: You might want to include a watch file fo
Hi Ahmed,
Quoting أحمد المحمودي (2014-01-22 06:51:13)
> * I had to modify the hardening patch to get fuseloop to build, modified
> patch is attached.
I think you forgot to attach your patch but notice that after informing
upstream of the issue, they fixed it for fuseloop 1.0.2 which is packag
Hi Ahmed,
Quoting أحمد المحمودي (2014-01-22 08:51:02)
> Sorry, that I forgot to attach it. Please find it attached in this email.
thanks! What problem does that patch fix?
The only differences in comparison to my patch that I can make out are:
1) you add -lpthread but `pkg-config --libs fuse
Hi,
Quoting أحمد المحمودي (2014-01-22 10:36:11)
> Actually what happens implicitly (at least on Ubuntu precise) is: $(CC)
> $(CFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS) $^ -o $@
>
> which causes the compilation to fail, because the -l<...> should be
> after the object files (or source files in this case).
Ah f
Hi,
Quoting The Wanderer (2014-01-22 15:14:34)
> Do things still work fine in Debian when using ld.gold (by installing the
> binutils-gold package) rather than ld.bfd? I know there's an important
> difference in ld.gold related to --as-needed (or possibly to -
> --no-as-needed, I don't recall offh
Hi Ahmed,
Quoting أحمد المحمودي (2014-01-22 08:52:43)
> At the end of the README it says to use mountlo, but there isn't such a
> utility in Debian.
there is also no such utility in other distributions it seems. After some
digging I found out that mountlo is a utility which uses fuse and a minima
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new packages]
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "vcmi"
Package name: vcmi
Version : 0.95-1
Upstream Author : Micha³ Urbañczyk
Hi,
Quoting Jakub Wilk (2014-03-18 23:58:19)
> [I don't intend to sponsor this package. Sorry!]
dont worry, I'm happy for any help that can improve my packaging! :)
> We don't have "³" or "ñ" in the Polish alphabet. :-P It should be: Michał
> Urbańczyk. Please update debian/copyright accordingl
Hi Jakub,
Quoting Jakub Wilk (2014-03-23 20:11:17)
> I don't think that the “After installing this package, …” instructions belong
> in the package description. I'd rather put them in README.Debian.
Personally I didnt find myself reading README.Debian after package installation
very often. I read
Hi,
On Tue, 16 Feb 2016 00:16:06 -0200 Carlos Donizete Froes
wrote:
> To access further information about this package, please visit the
> following URL:
>
> http://mentors.debian.net/package/runescape
is it me or did the package vanish from mentors.debian.net?
How much sense does it ma
Hi Paul,
Quoting Sean Whitton (2016-08-03 06:20:26)
> On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 11:06:31PM -0500, Paul Elliott wrote:
> > Sometimes a user gets a sbuild chroot so screwed up that it does not
> > work anymore, and the user has no idea how to fix it, because he does not
> > know what he did wrong.
> >
Hi,
Quoting Paul Wise (2016-08-03 12:41:28)
> On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 1:06 PM, Johannes Schauer wrote:
>
> > The main issue here is, that it is not clear *where* the bug should be
> > filed.
> > Sbuild supports multiple backends. The probably most used one is the schroot
Hi,
Quoting Andrey Rahmatullin (2016-08-05 09:49:11)
> On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 02:42:27AM -0500, Paul Elliott wrote:
> > Before I was getting a different error complaining
> > that debfoster does not exist under "testing". BTW why does debfoster fail
> > to exist under testing?
> Because it was re
Hi Paul,
Quoting Paul Elliott (2016-08-05 21:28:25)
> OK this time I deleted the recommended files as before, but I noted there
> were no other chroots in use. So I purged both sbuild and schroot with
> apt-get and reinstalled.
note that purging sbuild and schroot will not remove the chroots. But
Hi Sean,
Quoting Sean Whitton (2016-08-13 23:30:54)
> Changes since the last upload:
>
> * QA upload.
> * Drop "Conflicts:/Provides:/Replaces: pdfrw" lines (Closes: #814289).
> The pdfrw binary package is long gone and was never part of a release.
> This fixes co-installing python-pdf
Hi,
Quoting Thomas Schmitt (2016-09-17 16:00:28)
> i am preparing the Debian package for a new upstream release of libisofs
> and see on its tracker page
> https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/libisofs
> a new "action needed":
>
> "Multiarch hinter reports 1 issue(s)"
>
> The link points to
> h
Hi,
Quoting Thomas Schmitt (2016-09-17 17:51:16)
> I saw the mouseover text "Toggle details", but the click only brought me to
> https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/libisofs#
> because i have Javascript disabled.
that should be reported as a bug against the tracker. Without Javascript, the
default s
Hi,
Quoting Thomas Schmitt (2016-09-18 09:09:09)
> Johannes Schauer wrote:
> > [the need for Javascript] should be reported as a bug against the tracker.
>
> Submitted as
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=838178
> and subscribed to it.
th
Hi,
Quoting Thomas Pircher (2016-09-14 20:21:14)
> Changes since the last upload:
>
>* Non-maintainer upload.
>* New upstream release (closes: #833081, #811988, #798624, #645616).
I once made a similar mistake in one of my packages and just listed all the
closed bugs without writing down
Hi,
Quoting Charles Plessy (2016-11-12 06:06:13)
> the laptop that I use mainly for Debian development will go to hardware
> maintainance tomorrow. I will of course remove my .gnupg folder, but out of
> curiosity I wonder if there are better practices. The mass storage is a SSD
> that I am not g
Hi,
Quoting Ole Streicher (2016-11-17 10:11:42)
> Paul Wise writes:
> > AFAICT we don't have an official statement about this, but:
> > https://lists.debian.org/debian-policy/2008/02/msg00060.html [...]
>
> Is there a reason why it is not there?
I guess because nobody wrote a patch for policy y
Hi!
Quoting Christian Seiler (2016-11-26 01:30:59)
> On 11/26/2016 01:59 AM, Ross Vandegrift wrote:
> > Could you point me to this policy? I'd like to learn more, but haven't
> > been able to find it.
> I just checked and it really isn't in there.
Oh. This is odd. I just reported #845715 to rect
Hi Jordan,
Quoting Gianfranco Costamagna (2017-02-17 11:11:35)
> >I do have reservations about moving the package from the PAPT umbrella into
> >collab-maint, but it's not my call anymore.
>
>
> lets review:
> a) PAPT seems more appropriate
> b) "alot (0.3.7-1) unstable; urgency=medium"
> this
Hi,
Quoting Andrey Rahmatullin (2017-03-18 07:58:56)
> On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 07:25:32AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > > James Clarke wrote in https://bugs.debian.org/853886#10:
> > >
> > > "For source-only builds, I don't understand why you would want to
> > > perform the build in a chroot.
>
Quoting Mattia Rizzolo (2017-03-18 08:53:21)
> On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 08:22:36AM +0100, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> > So just as with sbuild I don't see why anybody would want to *only* build
> > the
> > source package inside a chroot. Since the source package is the *in
Hi Ben,
Quoting Ben Finney (2017-04-21 14:44:52)
> How is this going?
thanks a lot for the ping!
> Jordan, have you made more changes that should be released?
>
> Johannes, are you waiting on any changes before you approve and upload
> this package?
Jordan and I were writing each other private
Hi,
Quoting Daniel Lintott (2014-06-01 00:00:03)
> I've had a look at dose-builddebcheck, but this doesn't seem to have an
> option for running on a single package.
dose-builddebcheck is what you are looking for and it can check a single
package by using the --checkonly option.
cheers, josch
-
Hi,
Quoting Daniel Lintott (2014-06-01 00:15:09)
> Okay... In fairness I haven't tried that as yet... But the option doesn't
> appear to mentioned in the manpage [0].
>
> [0]
> http://manpages.debian.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=dose-builddebcheck&apropos=0&sektion=0&manpath=Debian+7.0+wheezy&forma
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pdf2htmlex"
* Package name: pdf2htmlex
Version : 0.11+ds-1
Upstream Author : WANG Lu
* URL : http://github.com/coolwanglu/pdf2htmlEX
* License : GPL
Hi,
wow, thanks a lot for looking into this! :D
Quoting Jakub Wilk (2014-07-11 20:59:44)
> fix-spelling seems to be mainly about fixing the use "-" as minus sign in
> manpage... Could split the patch into two, one for hyphens, another for
> actual spelling mistakes?
okay. Done.
> More typos I f
Hi,
Quoting Jakub Wilk (2014-07-11 23:48:15)
> * Johannes Schauer , 2014-07-11, 21:33:
> >How did you find them? I ran codespell but that didnt find the ones you
> >found.
>
> I read carefully the source code. :-) (I admit that vim's spell checking
> helped me a
Hi,
Quoting Jakub Wilk (2014-07-12 11:50:39)
> It would guard against the possibility of losing source.
>
> But it could still happen that compatibility.js and compatibility.min.js
> versions (in /usr/share/pdf2htmlEX/) don't match.
okay. Indeed that's undesirable.
> Is the non-minified versio
Hi,
wow, amazing that you are still investing your time in improving my packaging -
thanks a lot! :D
Quoting Jakub Wilk (2014-07-12 18:24:26)
> I don't doubt that compatibility.min.js is needed. What I questioned is
> whether we ever need compatibility.js in the binary package.
Indeed. I missed
Hi again,
Quoting Jakub Wilk (2014-07-13 20:24:00)
> >>Who is the copyright holder for the files in debian/? According to the
> >>copyright file it's WANG Lu. :-P
> >Indeed it was. If you look at the upstream repository you'll see a
> >Debian directory
>
> Oops, I missed it.
> (Wouldn't it make
Hi,
Quoting Jakub Wilk (2014-07-16 00:26:09)
> >uscan does this automatically when repacking upstream tarballs.
>
> I don't believe this is the case. And the .orig.tar you uploaded to
> mentors certainly contains debian/:
indeed, you are right! I fixed it and the upstream tarball now comes with
Hi,
Quoting Jakub Wilk (2014-07-16 21:21:15)
> Now --download-current-version is broken:
>
> $ uscan --download-current-version --destdir .
> uscan warning: In debian/watch no matching hrefs for version 0.11 in watch
> line
> https://github.com/coolwanglu/pdf2htmlEX/releases .*/v(\d[\d\.]*)\.t
Hi,
Quoting Jakub Wilk (2014-07-17 09:46:58)
> * Johannes Schauer , 2014-07-17, 08:31:
> >What do we do about
> >debian-watch-file-should-dversionmangle-not-uversionmangle until
> >#753772 is fixed? Ignore it or create an override?
>
> Either way works for me.
oka
Hi,
Quoting Jakub Wilk (2014-07-17 13:36:47)
> export HOME=`mktemp --dry-run`
>
> This sets HOME literally to `mktemp --dry-run`. I think you wanted to
> say:
>
> export HOME=$(shell mktemp --dry-run)
oh shoot it's not shell, it's make... while that method will surely also yield
a nonexistant
Hi,
Quoting Jakub Wilk (2014-07-19 23:38:14)
> Your d/copyright says:
>
> Files: *
> Copyright: 2012 WANG Lu
>
> Shouldn't it be s/WANG Lu/Lu Wang/? The latter seems to be the spelling
> used in the code.
upstream responded and I updated their name with the one they told me.
> More important
Hi,
Quoting Jakub Wilk (2014-07-26 18:35:23)
> * Johannes Schauer , 2014-07-26, 12:37:
> >upstream responded and I updated their name with the one they told me.
>
> Perhaps also update patch headers?
Done.
> >I used the (fairly incomplete) testsuite of pdf2htmlEX to
Hi,
Quoting Jakub Wilk (2014-07-28 23:08:11)
> >I do not understand why it fails for you but not for me.
>
> How did you run the tests? I ran sadt(1) in the freshly-unpacked source
> tree.
I ran `adt-run -o /tmp/log --source pdf2htmlex_0.11+ds-1.dsc --- schroot
sid-amd64-sbuild`
Both invocati
Hi,
Quoting Jakub Wilk (2014-08-01 22:31:46)
> * Johannes Schauer , 2014-07-30, 07:24:
> >>>I do not understand why it fails for you but not for me.
> >>How did you run the tests? I ran sadt(1) in the freshly-unpacked
> >>source tree.
> >
> >I ran `ad
Hi,
Quoting Jakub Wilk (2014-08-04 23:03:54)
> * Johannes Schauer , 2014-08-02, 09:33:
> >I'm not familiar enough with the kind of disaster that may
> >happen when linking C++11 compiled code to C++98 libraries
>
> Crashes, I suppose.
>
> >I also do not se
Hi Eriberto,
Quoting Eriberto (2014-08-18 16:55:20)
> I saw your package in mentors.debian.org and it has several Lintian messages.
>
> IMHO, to get a sponsor you must, at least, clear your package removing
> all possible messages.
which Lintian messages are you referring to?
There is one pedan
Hi Eriberto,
Quoting Eriberto Mota (2014-08-19 14:29:34)
> Hi Johannes. Thanks for your reply.
sorry for my late reply but I was at the Debian Bootstrap sprint in Paris over
the weekend and am moving to Sweden tomorrow, so I'm a bit tight on free time
right now :)
> I understand your POV. Howeve
Hi,
Quoting Dariusz Dwornikowski (2014-08-23 11:04:09)
> Thanks for your work, but I think that your package should go to contrib,
> because in order to work it needs HoMM game, so it depends on something non
> free [1].
>
> Installation instruction from upstream's web page clearly state that
>
Hi Eriberto,
Quoting Eriberto (2014-08-24 07:09:20)
> > Thank you for elaborating on this and sorry for my dismissive last message.
> Ok. I just want help you. If you let me do it I will be grateful.
your help is very much appreciated! My packaging can only get better with your
help :)
> > At th
Hi,
iyou dropped the ITP bug as a recipient - was that intended?
In case it was I only quoted the small part below. I hope that's okay?
Quoting Eriberto (2014-08-25 16:01:36)
> 2014-08-24 17:22 GMT-03:00 Johannes Schauer :
> > But vcmi itself is GPL-2+ and both resources agreed t
Hi,
Quoting Paul Wise (2014-08-29 17:02:35)
> On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 6:52 AM, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> > the upstream of fuzzylite relicensed from apache 2.0 to LGPL 3.0 with the
> > release of fuzzylite 5.0 (but not the versions prior to that). So if
> > upstream should
Hi,
Quoting Paul Wise (2014-08-29 17:47:10)
> On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 8:16 AM, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> > Would this solve the license incompatibility between fuzzylite (apache 2.0)
> > and vcmi (gpl2+)?
>
> Yes because the latest version (5.0) of fuzzylite (LGPLv3) is
&
Hi,
Quoting Eriberto (2014-08-29 17:08:37)
> 2014-08-29 12:02 GMT-03:00 Paul Wise :
> > Please ask vmci upstream to remove the embedded copy of fuzzylite and
> > depend on the system version.
> >
> > https://wiki.debian.org/EmbeddedCodeCopies
> I thought about it too. This is the best option.
I s
Hi,
Quoting Eriberto (2014-09-02 13:52:11)
> vcmi (GPL-2+) with fuzzylite (Apache 2.0) can't be distributed from upstream.
> It is the problem. IMHO, you can't make a -dfsg version because the source
> code is 'improper', can't be distributed.
These two emails suggest otherwise:
http://lists.deb
Hi,
Quoting Ole Streicher (2014-09-13 15:20:36)
> Am 13.09.2014 um 15:09 schrieb Mattia Rizzolo:
> > On Sep 13, 2014 3:01 PM, "Ole Streicher" wrote:
> >> - the "casacore" needs the "casacore-data" package for unit tests
> >> - the "casacore-data" needs "casacore" to be build from the source data.
Package: sponsorship-requests
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "fuzzylite"
* Package name: fuzzylite
Version : 5.0+dfsg-1
Upstream Author : Juan Rada-Vilela
* URL : http://www.fuzzylite.com/cpp/
* License : LGPL3
Section
Control: block -1 by #761075
Everybody rejoice \o/
Juan Rada-Vilela, the author of fuzzylite agreed to port the parts of vcmi that
used the old fuzzylite to fuzzylite 5.0. He now finished his work and I
submitted his patch to vcmi upstream: https://github.com/vcmi/vcmi/pull/45
According to one of
Hi,
I just packed a new upstream release and am still looking for a sponsor :)
Vcmi is a GPL2+ reimplementation of the Heroes of Might and Magic 3 game
engine. It works with the (proprietary) assets from the original game CDs as
well as with the GOG.com version.
This is the third vcmi release I
Hi Stephen,
Quoting Stephen Kitt (2014-11-04 00:41:57)
> I've taken a look at the package and it seems fine, apart from the two points
> remaining from your exchanges with Jakub:
>
> * the hard-coded paths in src/Console.cpp
> * the spelling/grammar errors
>
> Regarding the latter, I prefer "...
Hi,
Quoting Paul Wise (2014-12-01 17:03:39)
> > Should I simply remove this test, or can I include the data file in the
> > package ?
>
> Can you include more details about this data file?
>
> What data format is the file in?
depending on the answer to this question it might be very simple to c
Hi,
Quoting Corentin Desfarges (2014-12-02 17:29:12)
> > Can you link to the file we are talking about?
> With the authorization of the responsibles of the project, I published the
> file here [2]
> [2] http://goo.gl/53sAzM
this looks a bit weird. I guess this google thing allows you to inspect
Hi,
Quoting Mohsen Pahlevanzadeh (2015-05-10 05:53:17)
>When i use : grep ^Status: /var/lib/dpkg/status ,
>Unfortunately , i only get "Status: install ok installed"
how sure are you of that? Did you just look at the first few hundred or did you
really find all unique values? Try:
grep ^S
Hi,
Quoting lumin (2015-05-22 06:31:34)
> override_dh_auto_clean:
> cp ./debian/my/Makefile.config.cpuonly ./Makefile.config
> dh_auto_clean
> # without following line the the source tree
> # would be not clean. Hence dpkg-bu
Hi,
Quoting Daniel Stender (2015-07-10 09:32:19)
> The problem is, I can add experimental as extra repository
> (--extra-repository),
> but the dependency solver won't pick over the package in Sid and always pulls
> 1.9.0 [1].
>
> Is this the way it's mend to work? Is there a way to cheat this?
Hi,
Quoting PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel (2015-07-10 10:54:20)
> Is it possible to configure this per chroot in order to avoir passing this
> command line each time ?
No.
But if bug #790354 (with patch) gets resolved, then you will able to pass a
custom configuration file which you can then use to se
Hi,
Quoting Daniel Stender (2015-07-19 17:52:16)
> I'm looking for a convenient way to test build source packages against resp.
> on hurd-i386 or kfreebsd-amd64 instead of setting up simple "end user" Qemu
> boxes and build within them. Sbuild and qemu-debootstrap somehow?
there seems to be this:
Hi,
Quoting gregor herrmann (2015-07-20 10:14:12)
> cowbuilder and qemu-debootstrap work for me (with armhf and armel,
> haven't tried with other architectures):
> http://info.comodo.priv.at/blog/cowbuilder_crossbuilds_for_raspbian.html
>
> The linked article
> http://blog.waja.info/2013/11/25/cr
Hi,
Quoting gustavo panizzo (gfa) (2015-07-21 08:05:47)
> On 2015-07-20 16:34, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> > crossbuilding is not equal to native building. I think Daniel was looking
> > for a
> > way to test if their packages build natively on hurd-i386 or kfreebsd-amd64.
Hi Jordan & Simon,
Quoting Jordan Justen (2017-04-24 10:00:32)
> On 2017-04-21 10:04:39, Jordan Justen wrote:
> > On 2017-04-21 06:12:21, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> > > Quoting Ben Finney (2017-04-21 14:44:52)
> > > > Jordan, have you made mo
Hi Ross,
sbuild maintainer here. :)
Quoting Ross Gammon (2017-06-23 21:18:13)
> I mainly use pbuilder/cowbuilder to build my packages, but I would
> really like to try using the tool from pkg-ruby-extras, because I am
> told it is very good for test building reverse dependencies and also
> runs d
Hi Ben,
sbuild maintainer here. In these cases you can always file a bug but lets see
if we can solve this here.
Quoting Ben Finney (2017-07-01 13:08:17)
> Andreas Moog writes:
>
> > Your sbuild-environment has outdated mirror information. For example
> > the current libreadline version in unst
Hola,
Quoting Ben Finney (2017-07-02 02:57:25)
> > Secondly, just using --upgrade will do nothing unless you also --update the
> > chroot.
> That seems like a bug; why would ‘--upgrade’ silently do nothing? I
> would think it should either complain that it's useless, or implicitly
> turn on ‘--upd
Hi Carlos,
Quoting Carlos Donizete Froes (2017-07-23 09:44:10)
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "runescape" version 0.2
>
> To access further information about this package:
>
> https://mentors.debian.net/package/runescape
>
> https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/runescape
the debdiff bet
Quoting Łukasz Walewski (2018-02-05 21:19:27)
> On 03.02.2018 14:23, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> > All Build-Depends are treated as host architecture by default. In this
> > case, it seems very likely that python is a build tool so you
> > (implicitly) requested python for the wrong architecture. Switch
Hi,
Quoting Danny Edel (2015-08-21 13:43:41)
> On 21/08/15 13:21, Danny Edel wrote:
> > Once sbuild is setup
>
> Just to clarify. In this use case (using sbuild as close to buildd as
> possible), the steps labeled "for personal use" in
> https://wiki.debian.org/sbuild#Configuration
> are *not* wh
Hi,
Quoting Jakub Wilk (2015-08-31 16:02:38)
> * Johannes Schauer , 2015-08-31, 15:53:
> >>From now on, "sbuild --dist sid --arch amd64 path/to/my.dsc" works.
> >
> >It must be mentioned that a common problem with sbuild is, that the
> >.changes
Hi,
Quoting Sebastiaan Couwenberg (2015-09-01 12:13:07)
> Add the repacksuffix option, e.g.:
>
> version=3
> opts=\
> dversionmangle=s/\+dfsg//,\
> uversionmangle=s/$/+dfsg/,\
> repacksuffix=+dfsg \
> http://heasarc.gsfc.nasa.gov/FTP/software/lheasoft/fv/ \
> fv(.+\..+)_src\.tar\.gz
>
is the uv
Hi,
Quoting Jakub Wilk (2015-09-01 12:22:22)
> See #748465. Some people abuse debian/copyright for excluding files for
> reasons unrelated to DFSG...
so am I for my packages. The simple reason: just running "uscan" to check,
download and repack upstream sources is just too simple and convenient i
Hi,
Quoting Christoph Biedl (2015-09-30 08:25:50)
> Personally, I'm not happy about adding extra magic to version numbers
> to identify binNMUs and would rather introduce a way to define a range
> of version numbers a package satifies, like in
>
> | Version: 5.25-3+b1# upper bound
> |
Hi,
Quoting gregor herrmann (2015-09-30 18:24:22)
> The last thing I heard about versioned Provides is that not all pieces of the
> infrastructure support it yet. (wanna-build or something was missing).
>
> I'd be more than happy to hear if this is all fixed by now.
dose3 (which is used to check
Hi Nico,
Quoting Nico Schlömer (2015-10-24 20:04:19)
> In [MOAB](https://bitbucket.org/fathomteam/moab/), we (optionally) depend on
> a rather new version of the [Metis](https://packages.debian.org/sid/metis)
> package, and that's what's enforced in our debian/control, too.
I cannot see any (buil
Hi Nico,
Quoting Nico Schlömer (2015-10-26 00:47:54)
> particularly those which have been released a while ago and are closed
> to adding now packages now.
packages can be added via backports.
> > - if you were talking about a *build* dependency, then you can generate
> these
> > before buildi
Hi,
Quoting Andrey Rahmatullin (2016-02-11 15:16:01)
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 11:20:14AM -0200, Herbert Fortes wrote:
> > libcdk5-dev was rejected by ftp-masters because
> > it has 'Multi-Arch: no' on debian/control.
> You could just omit the field, no need to use the explicit "no".
While this i
Hi,
Quoting Ben Finney (2016-04-21 04:17:02)
> I am using ‘sbuild(1)’ successfully for some packages. For one package,
> though, I'm getting an error I don't understand: The source package is not
> found by Sbuild.
>
> One version finds the source package correctly:
>
> =
> +
Hi,
Quoting Paul Wise (2016-05-02 08:37:49)
> On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 7:44 AM, Sean Whitton wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the responses, all.
>
> Another one is ratt (rebuild-all-the-things).
>
> I wonder if some of these should be merged together or removed.
from this thread I gather that there are
Hi Aidan,
On Thu, 18 Jan 2024 16:52:26 +0100 Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote:
> I see you added this tool to the list of similar tools on the wiki so you
> at least know about that list. So how is your tool better than other tools
> on that list, or at least than the ones packaged in Debian?
> Please
Hi Ferdinand,
in #1012684 Antoine Beaupré said they'd be happy to sponsor you. Did They
already contact you about that?
Quoting Ferdinand Bachmann (2023-02-14 16:41:49)
> Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command:
>
>dget -x
> https://mentors.debian.net/debi
87 matches
Mail list logo
