On Dec 22, 2007 9:38 AM, Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> tim wrote:
> > Has anyone pinged Eduardo recently? This is an important package, which
> > needs proper maintainance. The upload should probably be sponsored via
> > debian-multimedia rather than QA. Opinions, Offers? :)
>
> Its in
On Dec 15, 2007 4:56 AM, Keith Stribley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "kmfl-keyboards-mywin".
---| Stuff that should be fixed before this gets uploaded:
scim-kmfl-imengine needs to enter Debian:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2007/12/threads.html
On Dec 28, 2007 1:34 PM, Paul Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 15, 2007 4:56 AM, Keith Stribley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "kmfl-keyboards-mywin".
I forgot to say that you may want to register for an acco
On Dec 23, 2007 2:00 AM, chaica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "yougrabber".
In addition to Raphael's comments;
I tried yougrabber and youtube-dl on these URLs and none of them
worked in yougrabber, but they did in youtube-dl:
http://youtube.com/?v=W3ctTJ
On Dec 28, 2007 1:12 PM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.4.0-3
> of my package "thailatex".
Uploaded, please contact this list for future sponsoring.
Question:
Where does debian/babel.sty come from? Shouldn't it be generate
On Dec 28, 2007 4:12 PM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 03:28:15PM +0930, Paul Wise wrote:
> > Question:
> >
> > Where does debian/babel.sty come from? Shouldn't it be generated at
> > build time or something?
&g
. So
> no other comments from my side ...
Seems it has now passed through http://incoming.debian.org/ and is now
at http://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/t/thailatex/thailatex_0.4.0-3.dsc
> On Fr, 28 Dez 2007, Paul Wise wrote:
>
> > Ah. Perhaps it would be appropriate to ask the
On Dec 29, 2007 8:04 AM, CaStarCo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "freetube".
I don't think such a small script (wrapper around youtube-dl and
ffmpeg2theora) should be uploaded to Debian, except as part of another
package. Perhaps it could be added to youtub
On Jan 14, 2008 5:27 AM, Mel Gorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor/reviewer for my package "libhugetlbfs".
Since this is a new library package, it would be good if you used the
new symbols stuff:
http://wiki.debian.org/Projects/ImprovedDpkgShlibdeps
http://wiki.debian.or
On Jan 18, 2008 8:08 AM, Matthias Julius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I could file an RC bug myself to prevent it from migrating into
> testing and to let people know that it is going to be flaky on 64bit
> archs.
Better to run a test suite or otherwise cause an FTBFS on
architectures where it is
On Jan 20, 2008 8:25 PM, Thomas Viehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Also, the upstream URL seems to have changed to
> http://na.mirror.garr.it/mirrors/appuntilinux/
> there also seems to be a new upstream version.
>
> Is there any indication that anyone is actually using this except for the
>
On Jan 27, 2008 4:37 PM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.4.2-1
> of my package "thailatex".
cttex is no longer in Debian because it was orphaned and had "no
users"[1]. Please remove the recommends or re-introduce the package
On Jan 30, 2008 4:59 PM, picca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2:0.1.2-1
> of my package "lisaac".
Please use a proper subject line next time.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subjec
On Jan 31, 2008 3:16 AM, Wen-Yen Chuang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "xf86-input-tslib".
> You may think it as "xserver-xorg-input-tslib", a tslib based X server
> input device driver.
I'd suggest that you join the X Strike Force:
http://wiki.debian.org/
On Feb 2, 2008 7:55 AM, Prach Pongpanich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.23-2
> of my package "cttex". This package has been removed from debian package
> repository, because it was orphaned.
Your orig.tar.gz is different from the 1.23-1 one on snaps
On Feb 2, 2008 1:20 PM, Paul Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Your orig.tar.gz is different from the 1.23-1 one on snapshot.debian.net, why?
> Looking at the code, it seems you checked it out of CVS again, best
> just to use the old tarball.
In addition, it seems there is a new u
On Feb 2, 2008 3:48 PM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > In addition, it seems there is a new upstream version, or a fork or
> > something (I don't read Thai):
> >
> > http://vuthi.blogspot.com/2004/07/cttex.html
> >
> > You might want to figure out what the deal is there.
On Jan 31, 2008 11:19 AM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.1.9-2
> of my package "libthai".
A review:
Maybe libthai0/libthai-data shouldn't have any docs (README/TODO/etc)
in them since those are mostly automatically installe
On Jan 27, 2008 4:37 PM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.4.2-1
> of my package "thailatex".
lintian -I:
I: thailatex source: build-depends-without-arch-dep dpkg-dev
debian/control:
...based on _the_ babel package...
s/Th
A review of your package:
debian/control:
s/insert/inserting/
debian/copyright:
files-in-licence
commas-missing-in-copyright
blurbs-missing-in-licence
debian/rules:
nostrip is handled by dh_strip now
CFLAGS doesn't seem to be passed to configure
h, not sure about make -j2 - isn't there
On Feb 5, 2008 9:44 PM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > blurbs-missing-in-licence
>
> Done, although thinking equally not-a-bug.
Please revert that, sorry for the noise.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
On Feb 5, 2008 7:21 PM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If it's to be changed, I'd rather bump the versions in the
> symbols file to 0.1.7 and ignore etch completely. Would
> there be any drawback in doing so?
Sounds fine given the private symbols stuff.
> For the standard
On Feb 5, 2008 9:44 PM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > blurbs-missing-in-licence
>
> Done, although thinking equally not-a-bug.
Please revert that, sorry for the noise.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
On Feb 6, 2008 8:30 PM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > warzone2100/warzone2100-data is one example of such a pair of descriptions.
>
> Thanks. I hope my similar modification is fine.
Yep, it is.
> > So, I'll upload once you remove the licence blurb I wrongly asked you t
On Feb 6, 2008 4:15 PM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I got another idea to solve this: just drop babel.sty from
> > thailatex, and copy it from texlive-latex-base with edition
> > on postinst. Also remove it on prerm.
>
> Done, and updated with version unchanged:
> h
On Feb 6, 2008 8:41 PM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Done and uploaded:
>
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/swath/swath_0.3.2-1.dsc
Uploaded, please contact this list for future uploads.
> Other changes left?
For next time:
Well, I just checked the Vcs-
On Feb 7, 2008 11:03 PM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A minor follow-up, please. My debian/rules appeared to fail
> on arch builds, for example:
>
> http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?&pkg=libthai&ver=0.1.9-2&arch=amd64&stamp=1202305145&file=log
>
> So, I have moved li
On Feb 7, 2008 3:00 PM, Kartik Mistry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > chmlib
> > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/chmlib/chmlib_0.39-7.dsc
Uploaded.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble
Feb 13, 2008 3:53 AM, Giancarlo Niccolai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The checks performed by Ubuntu maintainers have been quite extensive
> and deep, and the package should be ready as is; so, I am requesting a
> sponsor to forward the package in Debian too.
I was intrigued by this claim, so her
On Feb 13, 2008 7:58 PM, Thibaut Paumard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> how can you find out the position in the queue?
Here for one:
http://buildd.debian.org/~jeroen/status/package.php?p=yorick
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
On Feb 14, 2008 4:28 AM, Giancarlo Niccolai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> License proliferation is bad, but it's a lesser evil with respect to
> license fuzziness.
>
> FPL license is derived from Apache2. Among OSI accepted license,
> Apache2 was the one covering exactly the needs of Falcon projec
On Feb 14, 2008 1:20 PM, Charles Plessy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There is a minor new upstream release for a package I maintain, but on
> the other hand the current build will enter testing tomorrow. I
> therefore tried a delayed upload, but as I am a DM, I have no access to
> gluck. Is there
First, a question:
How does lynis compare with bastille (already in Debian)?
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 5:59 AM, Patrick Schoenfeld
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> IANADD so I cannot sponsor your upload. However I think my comments may
> be useful for you. CC'ing my AM: Eventually he has additional
On Feb 16, 2008 11:13 AM, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there any equivalent to 'apt-get autoclean' to remove unnecessary
> packages installed by pbuilder? I looked in
> http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/software/pbuilder-doc/pbuilder-doc.html
> but could not find anything.
On Feb 18, 2008 9:28 PM, Patrick Schoenfeld
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > - dget
> > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/nettee/nettee_0.1.8-3.dsc
Some additional comments:
> Now to your package:
>
> - debian/changelog
s/rewrited/rewritten/
> - debian/copyright
Please move onto a
On Feb 20, 2008 6:27 AM, Mauro Lizaur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It builds these binary packages:
> ee - An "easy editor" for novices and compuphobics
What are compuphobics? Sounds like a word that should not be in a
short description.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
-
On Feb 19, 2008 2:44 AM, Neutron Soutmun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - - dget
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xiterm+thai/xiterm+thai_1.07-1.dsc
Some comments:
Unless you need new features of debhelper compat 6, please leave it at
the latest compat level available in stable.
Des
On Feb 20, 2008 8:53 AM, Francisco García <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have made the changes that you suggest me. I think
> the package is better now.
Uploaded, thanks for your contribution to Debian.
Please take care of the lintian -I messages about unescaped hyphens in
the manual page in the
On Feb 20, 2008 11:08 PM, Toby Smithe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you check the fluid-soundfont package, you will find it only has
> four files outside of the Debian directory. There has to be an
> authoritative original source that we trust, and in this case the
> original source is at [0]. I
On Feb 21, 2008 12:01 AM, Toby Smithe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Are the two binary files in there prebuilt, or are they what you would
> > edit if you wanted to change the soundfont? I'm thinking of DFSG #2
> > here. Which package would I edit them with?
>
> No, the sf2 format is the prefe
On Feb 21, 2008 12:28 AM, Toby Smithe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 3:22 PM, Paul Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What made you choose /usr/share/sounds/sf2 for installing the
> > soundfont? I notice that freepats uses /usr/share/mid
On Feb 21, 2008 12:04 AM, Paul Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please leave a note about this in debian/changelog or debian/copyright
> for the ftpmasters.
What made you choose /usr/share/sounds/sf2 for installing the
soundfont? I notice that freepats uses /usr/share/midi for t
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 1:46 PM, Neutron Soutmun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> - - dget
> >>>
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xiterm+thai/xiterm+thai_1.07-1.dsc
> > To whom may download this package before, please re-download for the
> > update by the comments below:
> >>
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 2:11 PM, Paul Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> Description suggestion:
> > >
> > >> Description: X terminal program with Thai languague support
> > >> xiterm+thai is an X terminal emulator program with Th
Woops, forwarding to the list.
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 11:13 PM, Paul Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Uploaded the package. Please contact this list for future uploads.
>
> Please investigate and fix these warnings for the next upload:
>
> There are lots of GCC warnings
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 8:54 PM, Amaya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > Does there exist a list of "public" usertags in use? I'd like to see
> > a big list of these, probably a good use of the wiki.
>
> It's funny, I was wondering this myself just now :)
> Any pointers?
>F
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 4:25 AM, Neutron Soutmun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> > Hi Maintainer,
> >
> > rejected, your debian/copyright file is incomplete and misses
> > (C)holders/license data. You have to include all such differences.
> >
> > Like that of the grkelot
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 12:10 PM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 9:15 AM, Paul Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > OK, now there is a real problem, most of the licences mentioned are
> > non-free and cannot be put
Hi all,
[Please CC me in all replies, or reply only to me]
We've had bits from the DPL[1][2], bits from the release team[3], bits
from the listmasters[4] and bits from other people and groups within
Debian[5][6][7][8][9].
Since new contributors are important for Debian (or any free software
proj
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 2:57 PM, Barry deFreese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here is another one of my way too intrusive NMUs that closes RC bug
> #465633 and bug #400257 as well as quite a bit of package cleanup,
> standards update, etc.
>
> If someone has time to review and/or upload I would
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 8:20 AM, Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Neither orange in the archive nor the result of your NMU even work for
> > zip files (with unzip installed) nor other files where it should work.
> > >>From strace, it looks like it is acually extracting stuff, but the
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 2:52 PM, Bart Martens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 23:37 +, Neil Williams wrote:
> > > > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/rcalc/rcalc_0.5.0-1.3.dsc
>
> http://packages.qa.debian.org/r/rcalc/news/20080303T143226Z.html
>
> This NMU seems
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 3:34 PM, Neutron Soutmun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just update the debian/copyright which included the quotes from
> doc/COPYRIGHT.HISTORY and doc/LSM.
>
> The text which show that Guylhem Aznar relicensed the xiterm with
> authorization from the author was added to c
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 4:07 PM, Paul Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Neither orange in the archive nor the result of your NMU even work for
> zip files (with unzip installed) nor other files where it should work.
> From strace, it looks like it is acually extracting
[sent to -devel for a wider audience]
On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 11:54 +0900, Paul Wise wrote:
> [Please CC me in all replies, or reply only to me]
>
> We've had bits from the DPL[1][2], bits from the release team[3], bits
> from the listmasters[4] and bits from other people
On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 6:38 AM, Asheesh Laroia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > You have dh_makeshlibs commented out in your debian/rules file. You have
> > to run dh_makeshlibs when building shared libraries. Otherwise, you don't
> > get a shlibs file, which means that the shared library pack
On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 6:17 PM, Nick Leverton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've read up on the shlibs question I posted yesterday, and I'm satisfied
> that removing debian/libupnp3.shlibs in favour of using dh_makeshlibs
> and dh_shlibdeps does the right thing for this package. Thanks to Russ
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 3:46 PM, Neutron Soutmun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry, I'm late. After I buy the new computer and quickly install debian.
>
> Change the debian/copyright file as your comment and also upload to
> mentors.debian.net.
Uploaded, thanks for your contribution to Debian!
P
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 4:39 AM, Mauro Lizaur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> originally (i.e. ~ 20 years ago), we took mined from the Minix
> operating system which was a free academic project,
> and the mined.doc file did not mention a copyright.
> So no, I do not think the original author coul
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 9:30 PM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.3.3-1
> of my package "swath".
Please fix this GCC warning, after that I will upload:
/tmp/buildd/swath-0.3.3/src/wordseg.cpp:244: warning: the use of
`tmpna
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 6:38 PM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This may be better done by a new upstream release.
Indeed.
> In fact, using mkstemp() instead of tmpnam() means quite substantial
> change to the program logic, because the temp files are actually
> creat
On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 11:46 AM, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So, I have uploaded a new package with raised urgency. Please find it
> at the old place:
>
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/swath/swath_0.3.3-1.dsc
>
> debian/changelog timestamp: Sun, 23 M
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 3:40 AM, David Bremner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "vrr". This is my second
> post, essentially unchanged. Since last time I added icons and a
> .desktop file.
...
> Vcs-Svn: svn://svn.debian.org/pkg-science/vrr/
> Vcs-Bro
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 9:46 AM, Chris Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Goneri Le Bouder wrote:
>
> > I wonder if it's not a better solution to provide a script in the
> > urbanterror package that download urbanterror files.
>
> Please don't do this. :(
The ftpmasters (specifically Ganneff) su
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 10:17 PM, Alexander Rodin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for update my package "qstardict".
Did you read my earlier comments and questions?
http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2007/11/msg00171.html
http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2007/
On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 12:55 AM, Romain Beauxis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I cannot find the .dsc file mentionned in the RFS.
...
> If not, they seems important enough *not* to upload the package.
> And I cannot check it since the link is broken..
Mentors deletes packages once they get ann
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 11:14 AM, Joel Franco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "winhardware".
Firstly, your package is a native package (dsc + tar.gz), instead of a
normal package (dsc + diff.gz + orig.tar.gz). Please fix that.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.de
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 1:43 PM, Joel Franco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm sorry but i think that it is already a native package like you can
> see in http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/w/winhardware/. What
> is wrong?
It should be a normal package unless there is any specific reaso
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 6:53 PM, Michael Schutte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm looking for a sponsor to upload the first revision of my "rush"
> package. The source package can be downloaded from:
I don't know ruby, here are some comments:
Have you sent the patches and manual pages to upst
On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 12:30 AM, Helmut Grohne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/lynis/lynis_1.0.9-1.dsc
>
> 1) Remove unneeded example files please.
>
> Can someone explain what debian/control.org is? Does it belong there?
Where do you see tha
On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 11:46 PM, Barry deFreese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here is a QA upload for eterm-themes with basically just updating the
> maintainer to QA Group, bump standards, etc.
Perhaps the pkg-e team would like to take it? Or request its removal
or something? Anyone contacted
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 2:05 AM, Michael Schutte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Package looks good otherwise, you might want to get the Debian ruby
> > people to take a look:
> >
> > http://lists.debian.org/debian-ruby/
>
> Judging from their archives, it seems to be unusual to get packages
>
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 1:10 PM, Joel Franco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Now its a normal package like you have suggested.
>
> Please give a loot at it.
I've read the discussion on the ITP bug and I agree that a new package
is not needed for a small script such as this. Please reassign the ITP
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 12:31 PM, Barry deFreese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here is an NMU to fix conglomerate double-build bugs.
Geert looks inactive on his 3 packages, despite being active on the
lists & bts. Might be a good idea to prod him about orphaning
conglomerate/p3nfs and removing him
On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 4:39 AM, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would like to make 2 suggestions for the new maintainer's guide.
Please file bugs on the maint-guide package:
http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSC
On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 5:51 AM, Helmut Grohne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have no clue what package of mine you might be talking about. Could
> you rephrase that?
I imagine he was talking about a link to the email you mentioned.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBS
On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 4:07 PM, Francisco M. García Claramonte
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I mean that your lynis package is not in mentors.debian.net, and I would
> like review it. So please, can you send me your package, or a link
> to download it?
Helmut was giving you suggestions for how
On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 8:23 PM, Zainab Rehman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We are using GUI-based Debian,we have explored "Synaptic Package Manager"
> the tool used in debian for package management. It is showing two type of
> packages "installed" and "not installed" and the package we want to use
On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 11:25 PM, Michael Rasmussen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Someone knows what is holding sun-java6-jdk at 6.04 while the rest of
> the sun-java6 packages are upgraded to 6.05? This situation prevents
> upgrades of all java packages.
Your question is off-topic here.
Short
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 11:24 PM, Gerber van der Graaf
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor of the following packages. Older packages of
> this software are already in Debian. It concerns here new upstream
> releases:
You might want to ask people on the science list, join the
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 3:12 AM, Brandon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor so I can adopt the package "pydance." It is
> a dancing simulator, much like the ones in the arcades, such as Dance
> Dance Revolution. It is programmed in python. It is published under the
> GNU Ge
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 10:10 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ext3grep".
You might want to join the forensic software packaging team and
maintain your package there:
http://alioth.debian.org/projects/forensics/
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 5:45 PM, Mikko Rapeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "cs46xx-firmware".
>
> * Package name: cs46xx-firmware
> Version : 0.1-1
> Upstream Author : Jaroslav Kysela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Cirrus Logic
>
[daniel CCed since he offered to integrate this non-distributable
firmware into firmware-nonfree]
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 8:06 PM, Mikko Rapeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This firmware has been distributed with Linux kernel sources since ages,
A shame.
> but has now been dropped in Debian.
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 12:20 AM, Jan Hauke Rahm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm working on a package that includes some php libs (e.g. pear
> packages). Some of those are already packaged for debian so it'd be
> better at all if I'd set a dependency on it and don't ship the code
> again, rig
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 11:10 PM, Neutron Soutmun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.08-1
> of my package "xiterm+thai".
Please try to fix the many GCC warnings in the next upstream release.
> The package appears to be lintian clean.
I see several wa
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 3:44 PM, Miriam Ruiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's the zlib license (http://www.gzip.org/zlib/zlib_license.html)
> with an extra clause forbidding some kind of commercial usage
> ("Neither this software nor any of its individual components, in
> original or modifi
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 4:19 PM, Paul Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That is a similar clause to the one in the Open Font Library. Fonts
> using the OFL have been accepted into Debian, so presumably the
> ftpmasters would accept this licence.
s/Library/Licence
--
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 7:16 AM, Jack Coulter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've spoken again to matricks, he's stated that in the next release, he'll
> be changing the license slightly, it will still remain free, but he's going
> to clarify the last point.
Please ask him to just drop it, since it
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 2:40 PM, Jack Coulter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> After having a heated debate with matricks and another developer void_ on
> the teeworlds IRC channel, they are unwilling to change/remove point 4, but
> brought up (as it has been here) that there are already packages in m
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 6:00 AM, Francisco García <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.1.1-1
> of my package "lynis".
Sorry I missed the previous version, some comments:
#474020 should not have been closed with a -done message, instead you
should have c
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 5:22 AM, Francisco García <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> El mar, 15-04-2008 a las 22:32 +0800, Paul Wise escribió:
> > #474020 should not have been closed with a -done message, instead you
> > should have closed it in the changelog of the new version
Now I get a FTBFS due to not depending on libxt-dev for
X11/Intrinsic.h, which is used by main.h and xdefaults.h. Not sure
what changed since the other day, but please add libxt-dev to the
Build-Depends. Strangely the configure script did not fail, the
upstream Makefile did not fail and as a resu
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 11:25 AM, Paul Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> for X11/Intrinsic.h in the configure script and investigate why the
> build doesn't fail when it isn't present. It looks like the return
> value from make in the src subdir isn't getting
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 8:26 PM, Francisco M. García Claramonte
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Should I upload your 1.1.1 package now or do you want to switch to
> > quilt (or dpatch).
>
> Well, If you agree with me, I would like you upload the package, and I
> send my changes to upstream. Any
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 12:21 AM, Andrea De Iacovo
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I recently adopted the wordpress package and now I'm looking for a sponsor.
> The old sponsor (Lionel Elie Mamane) apparently doesn't want to
> sponsor it anymore.
Are you in contact with the security team to fix t
There is a simpler way this could be fixed:
Pick a clearly-DFSG licence (GPL/BSD/etc) and just upload to main.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 9:38 PM, Neutron Soutmun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> in the meantime I'm searching the informations for the security issue
> about the setuid/setgid which this package done, for now I found the
> security audit tools which I can do the basically tests.
> But I still do
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 5:48 PM, Neutron Soutmun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.09-1
> of my package "xiterm+thai".
Uploaded.
For future reference, please mention changes like the security issue in the RFS.
Please remember to prepare a security u
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 5:48 PM, Neutron Soutmun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.09-1
> of my package "xiterm+thai".
Uploaded.
For future reference, please mention changes like the security issue in the RFS.
Please remember to prepare a security u
1 - 100 of 2570 matches
Mail list logo
