Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my packages
* Package name: php-ssh2
Version : 0.10-2
Upstream Author : Sara Golemon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://pecl.php.net/package/ssh2
* License : PHP
Section : web
* Package name: php-geoip
/p/php-crack/
> The licence (2.02) is not suitable for main but for php itself.
> You should convince upstream to upgrade to 3.01 or to a more
> common license like GPL.
Actually, for php-geoip and php-crack it's 3.0. Is this ok?
For the php-ssh2 I will contact upstream.
--
(c
> It needs to be 3.01. Sorry.
Ok. Now the php-geoip's license is 3.01:
http://pecl.php.net/package/geoip/
http://cvs.php.net/viewvc.cgi/pecl/geoip/geoip.c?revision=1.16&view=markup
The updated package is now up on mentors.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsub
> ftp-master won't find that php-geoip has changed to 3.01. You should at
> least add a link to the CVS change in debian/copyright.
Well, debian/copyright already contain the 3.01 version of the license.
Is it not enougth?
Or should I package CVS version of php-geoip? Actually, the changes
fr
> I am not sure, but I think that if you add
> in debian/copyright the link to the commit that tells that php-geoip is
> licensed under PHP license 3.01, it may be OK.
Hmm, okay.
Done:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/php-geoip/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
> One last thing about the short description. It should not start with a
> capital. It should not start with "a". And I think that the wording is
> unfortunate. I am not a native english speaker but I would suggest:
> php5 module mapping IP addresses to geographic places
Now it's: "GeoIP modu
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libapache2-mod-bw".
* Package name: libapache2-mod-bw
Version : 0.8-1
Upstream Author : Ivan Berrara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://apache.ivn.cl/
* License : Apache 2.0
Section : web
It bu
> Uploaded. Let's hope that link to CVS commit will be sufficient
> for ftp-masters.
New upstream release contains the right version of the license:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/php-geoip/
Could you upload this version instead?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fixed,
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libapache2-mod-bw/
Current description looks ok, isn't?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> This is a bit short. You could say for example that you can limit
> bandwidth by IP and by user agent, have different bandwidth management
> for large and small files and depending on file types. Moreover, it
> supports virtual hosts.
I have added this sentence:
The bandwidth cont
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0.5-1
of my package "php-geoip".
It builds these binary packages:
php5-geoip - GeoIP module for php5
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/po
В Чтв, 25/12/2008 в 19:08 +0100, Stefan Fritsch пишет:
> But looking at the diff between 1.0.3 and 1.0.5 and at
> http://cvs.php.net/viewvc.cgi/pecl/geoip/geoip.c?r1=1.21&r2=1.22 , it
> seems the crash bug was only introduced in 1.0.4, which was never
> released. So there is nothing to fix in le
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "auto-07p"
Package name: auto-07p
Version : 0.9.1+dfsg-1
Upstream Author: Eusebius Doedel
URL: http://indy.cs.concordia.ca/auto/
License : BSD
Section
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "awstats". I have problems
getting in touch with the Debian Developer (Jonas Smedegaard) that
I've originally worked with. Could someone else update my DM flag as
per new procedure[1]?
CC'd
retitle 695991 awstats/7.1~dfsg-1
thanks
Imported new upstream version.
http://mentors.debian.net/package/awstats
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/awstats/awstats_7.1~dfsg-1.dsc
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "parser".
* Package name: parser3
Version : 3.3.0-5
Upstream Author : Alexandr Petrosian
* URL : http://www.parser.ru/en/
* License : GPL2+
Programming Lang: C++
Description : Parser 3, HTML-embed
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0.7-1
of my package "php-geoip".
It builds these binary packages:
php5-geoip - GeoIP module for php5
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/po
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libapache2-mod-qos".
* Package name: libapache2-mod-qos
Version : 9.19-1
Upstream Author : Pascal Buchbinder
* URL : http://mod-qos.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Section : httpd
It builds th
Michal, thank you for reply and suggestions.
> Few comments:
>
> - You don't need README.source for 3.0 source packages.
> - Please document why is needed lintian override in
> debian/monit.lintian-overrides
Done
> - Please rename and document debian-changes-1:5.2.3-1 patch
> P: monit: copyrigh
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 03:09:47PM +0100, Michal Čihař wrote:
> There is /usr/share/doc/monit/monit.html . It might have same
> content as man page, but I still think it is worth registering it into
> doc-base.
Right now it's out of sync with patched upstream manpage. I think, it's
better don't i
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.92-1 of my package
"libapache2-mod-bw".
It builds these binary packages:
libapache2-mod-bw - bandwidth limiting module for apache2
The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/li
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 9.54-1
of my package "libapache2-mod-qos".
It builds these binary packages:
libapache2-mod-qos - quality of service module for the apache2
The package appears to be lintian clean.
Note: this version set DM-Upload-Allowed debian/contro
> did you think about a solution for RC bug #629896? Apparently upstream
> is not interested to fix the issue right now. You would need to replace
> select(2) by poll(2) or something even more efficiently.
I'm unsure if it's RC at all. I'll try to fix this that way
on next upload, but it seems be
> I'd agree with Jossip though
> who claimed the issue would be release-critical. The fact you render the
> package unusable on heavy loaded servers sounds pretty critical, doesn't
> it?
No. 1) Not just on "heavy loaded servers", but only in
some setups. Not for fcgi, for example.
2) Let's me q
> I'd agree with Jossip though
> who claimed the issue would be release-critical. The fact you render the
> package unusable on heavy loaded servers sounds pretty critical, doesn't
> it?
No. 1) Not just on "heavy loaded servers", but only in
some setups. Not for fcgi, for example.
2) Let's me
> No, but that bug is what prevented me to do a QA upload
Please, do it. Or let me integrate your changes.
> before you took over maintaining the package
Or just adopt one.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libapache2-mod-rpaf".
Package name: libapache2-mod-rpaf
Version : 0.6-3
Upstream Author : Thomas Eibner
URL : http://stderr.net/apache/rpaf/
License : Apache
Section : httpd
It builds those binary pa
Hello,
> in theory I'm willing to sponsor an upload (well I did the QA upload
> of this package a few month ago) but I don't like people setting DMUA
> on public sponsoring requests.
I'm sorry, but that was noted in comments. Feel free to drop this
control field.
> I don't see how I can judge i
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "php-memcached".
* Package name : php-memcached
Version : 2.0.0b2-1
Upstream Author : Andrei Zmievski
* URL : http://pecl.php.net/package/memcached/
* License : PHP 3.0.1
Section : php
It builds php5-memcached - memcached exten
> before this falls through the cracks I've uploaded the package to get
> the bug fixed.
Thank you.
>> I'm sorry, but that was noted in comments. Feel free to drop this
>> control field.
>
> Droped.
>
>> > I don't see how I can judge if you're able to handle the package or not.
>>
>> E.g. by lo
> You seem to misunderstand the DM status.
I don't think so, but thank you for explanation.
> It is not a Debian Developer
> Lite. It does not mean you, as a DM, are trusted to upload any given
> package to Debian at any time.
It just a meaningless thing for now. See below.
> If you got DM sta
> On 16.01.2012 23:57, Sergey B Kirpichev wrote:
>> For example, that was not "a very first upload" (of mod_rpaf) for me.
>> But next time I should convince new sponsor and so on.
>
> That's unfortunate, but this happens. I'm sorry for you, and I made
>
> The reason I am asking is that if we do this upload to unstable and
> later we find an annoying important bug (i.e. severity important), then
> we can no longer fix it for Wheezy[1].
Looks like there is testing-proposed-updates for that, isn't?
-->8--
Rule #5. If the version in unstable already
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "awstats".
Package name : awstats
Version : 7.1.1~dfsg-1
Homepage : http://awstats.sourceforge.net/
License : GPL-2
Section : web
Closes bugs : 703596 (important)
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "auto-07p"
Package name: auto-07p
Version : 0.9.1+dfsg-1
Upstream Author: Eusebius Doedel
URL: http://indy.cs.concordia.ca/auto/
License : BSD
Section : math
ITP-bug: http://bugs.debi
L:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/auto-07p
Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/auto-07p/auto-07p_0.9.1+dfsg-1.dsc
Regards,
Sergey B Kirpichev
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "monit"
* Package name: monit
Version : 1:5.5.1-1~bpo60+1
* URL : http://mmonit.com/monit/download/
* License : AGPL-3+ with OpenSSL exception
Section
with dget using this command:
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/nlopt/nlopt_2.3+dfsg-2.dsc
Changes since the last upload:
[ Tim Gardner ]
* Add 04-python-includes.patch to detect correct include
python paths (Closes: #697638)
[ Sergey B Kirpichev ]
* Removed d
severity 717822 important
retitle 717822 RFS: nlopt/2.3+dfsg-2 [RC]
thanks
The package was updated (closes: #718054):
https://mentors.debian.net/package/nlopt
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/nlopt/nlopt_2.3+dfsg-2.dsc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.
can download the package with dget using this command:
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/monit/monit_5.6-1~bpo70+1.dsc
Regards,
Sergey B Kirpichev
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe&qu
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "awstats"
* Package name: awstats
Version : 7.2+dfsg-1
* URL : http://awstats.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL-3+
Section : web
It builds those
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 10:48:17AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> its very resonable you included debian-science list in your RFP.
Well, it's not a first attempt (third, I guess)...
> It would be even better if you would add the VCS URL of the package
It's in debian/control of the package.
> (I
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "nlopt"
* Package name: nlopt
Version : 2.4+dfsg-1
* URL : http://ab-initio.mit.edu/wiki/index.php/NLopt
* License : MIT
Section : math
It buil
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 10:48:17AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I checked the Blends tasks whether the package is mentioned there but I
> can not find it. If you want me to sponsor according to my SoB
> effort[1] the package please at least mention in what task you would
> like to see the package
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 10:06:59PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I checked out the git repository and have the following remarks:
>
> 1. in d/README.source you wrote:
> ./07/tek2ps/ have been removed from sources
>
> It is OK to remove things from upstream source if needed but this
>
ntrol
index 4956a15..5ecd1cf 100644
--- a/debian/control
+++ b/debian/control
@@ -1,16 +1,21 @@
Source: auto-07p
+Maintainer: Sergey B Kirpichev
Section: math
Priority: optional
-Maintainer: Sergey B Kirpichev
-Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 9), gfortran, dh-python, python (>= 2.6.6-3~)
-
in m.d.o (I'll recheck that) and in repo.
> > @@ -1,16 +1,21 @@
> > Source: auto-07p
> > +Maintainer: Sergey B Kirpichev
>
> This should rather be:
>
> Maintainer: Debian Science Maintainers
>
> Uploaders: Sergey B Kirpichev
Ok.
Thank you for review.
--
> It is not (yet) in DEP5 but the patch made it in devscripts Git. What
> drawbacks do you mean?
For example, this:
-->8--
One drawback of the Files-Excluded method was mentioned: There is no
reasonable way to give file by file (rather pattern by pattern)
comment why the file(s) were removed.
-->
> Well, considering that you had
>
>./07/tek2ps/ have been removed from sources
>
> where exactly is the problem that you can not give pattern by pattern
> comments?
Yep. Perhaps, this is a reason to improve this comment.
Anyway, I would like to adopt something like this
for others my pac
On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 04:02:26PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > >./07/tek2ps/ have been removed from sources
> > >
> > > where exactly is the problem that you can not give pattern by pattern
> > > comments?
> >
> > Yep. Perhaps, this is a reason to improve this comment.
>
> >From my per
On Sat, Feb 08, 2014 at 08:20:38AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> > * Remove donation link in index.html (fix lintian E:
> > privacy-breach-donation) in favor of debian/upstream
>
> This is *not* the right way to fix this issue. The form should remain,
> just remove the problematic part of it (th
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 09:36:12AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sun, 2014-02-16 at 15:19 +0400, Sergey Kirpichev wrote:
>
> > I hope, that's fixed in:
> > http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/awstats.git;a=commit;h=9c8f27ceb7f9490387a32b9fb2f45b21f69f853d
>
> It doesn't have any priva
ely there is a problem with debcheck itself:
https://bugs.debian.org/727550
Regards,
Sergey B Kirpichev
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hello,
is there any chance that this trivial upload will
be sponsored before the Jessie freeze?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
https://lists.debian.org/20141025181531.ga3
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 08:26:43PM +0200, Anton Gladky wrote:
> Where is it? On mentors?
Yes.
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=763615#5
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 08:34:10PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 10:15:31PM +0400, Sergey B Kirpichev wrote:
>
On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 07:38:44AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Well, this is not really an effect of the VCS maintenance. It
> is simply because your timestamp was not correct.
But last commit is yours and timestamp wasn't changed.
> You should commit everything that's needed to build the pack
reopen 738101
thanks
Hello,
is there any chance for this package [1] to enter Jessie after
~1 year sitting on mentors.d.n?! (see #739247 about the
privacy-breach-google-cse lintian error)
If no, what exactly I should do?
[1] http://mentors.debian.net/package/awstats
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 08:37:31PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> In general Debian expects sponsored package maintainers to be
> proactive about finding sponsors; contacting former sponsors,
Sure, I like waste my time for Debian's bureacracy)
> working on their packages
I did this for ~3 years, unt
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
I (current maintainer of the package) am looking for (6 or 7-th time?) a sponsor
for my backport of the package monit.
Package can be downloaded from m.d.n:
https://mentors.debian.net/package/monit
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
I am looking for a sponsor for my backport package "monit":
To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:
https://mentors.debian.net/package/monit
On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 06:56:53AM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> buster-backports is now open, but the monit package cannot be uploaded
> to it in its current shape.
>
> The version is not correct: 5.26.0-1~bpo9+1
>
> For buster-backports '~bpo10+1` should be used.
>
> Beware that `dch -
61 matches
Mail list logo
