Re: Looking for sponsor to upload a fix to Midori

On Saturday, September 19 2015, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hi, next time you might want to just open an RFS bug. Sorry, I did not know about this procedure (it's the first time I am looking for another sponsor). > Anyway, I sponsored the debdiff, it was looking fine to me. Thanks! > (you

Re: Help getting a bug report in order

On Monday, September 21 2015, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > Thanks to Wookey, Paul, Rebecca, Jakub, I was able to send the control > email for report. > > The control messaged resulted in a few issues: > > Processing control commands: > > > user debian-...@lists.debian.org > Unknown command

Re: Help getting a bug report in order

On Monday, September 21 2015, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 8:20 PM, Sergio Durigan Junior > <sergi...@sergiodj.net> wrote: >> On Monday, September 21 2015, Jeffrey Walton wrote: >> >>> Thanks to Wookey, Paul, Rebecca, Jakub, I was able to send

Looking for sponsor to upload a fix to Midori

Hi, I am the new Midori package maintainer, and I need a sponsor to upload a fix to #799337 ("Accept self-signed SSL/TLS certificates"). This bug is a regression that has been introduced in the last version (0.5.11-1), because of an outdated patch that was mistakenly not deleted when doing an

Source tarball update/fix

Hi, When I had my first Debian package accepted (Midori, last year), somehow the source tarball (.orig.tar.bz2) file got changed during the upload by my sponsor. I do not really know what happened (I remember checking everything over and over, and the pristine-tar branch on the repository *is*

Re: Source tarball update/fix

On Monday, December 28 2015, Ben Finney wrote: Hi Ben, Thanks for the reply. > Sergio Durigan Junior <sergi...@sergiodj.net> writes: > >> After reading the policy and having a brief chat with Paul Tagliamonte >> on #debian-devel, the apparent solution would be to rena

Re: Source tarball update/fix

On Monday, December 28 2015, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hi, > > also the - is a good separator. Heh, sometimes the solution is so obvious... For some reason (so obscure that I cannot remember), I thought that '-' could not be used in this specific case. That's why I was trying with '+' or

Re: Source tarball update/fix

On Monday, December 28 2015, Ben Finney wrote: > Sergio Durigan Junior <sergi...@sergiodj.net> writes: > >> On Monday, December 28 2015, Ben Finney wrote: >> > If you want a suffix indicating “later than 0.5.11”, a conventional >> > separator to use is “+”.

Bug#827333: RFS: newlisp/10.7.0-1 [ITP]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "newlisp" * Package name: newlisp Version : 10.7.0-1 Upstream Author : Lutz Mueller * URL : http://www.newlisp.org * License : GPL-3+,

Bug#827528: RFS: libterm-animation-perl/2.6-1 [ITP: #823693]

On Friday, June 17 2016, Niklas Sombert wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libterm-animation-perl" > > * Package name: libterm-animation-perl >Version : 2.6-1 >Upstream Author : Kirk Baucom > * URL :

Bug#827333: RFS: newlisp/10.7.0-1 [ITP]

Control: tags -1 - moreinfo Hi Andrey, Thanks for the review. Comments below. On Sunday, June 19 2016, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > The package generates quite a lot of lintian output: > > P: newlisp source: source-contains-prebuilt-java-object > guiserver/guiserver.jar This file is

Bug#827333: RFS: newlisp/10.7.0-1 [ITP]

On Monday, June 20 2016, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 04:58:32PM -0400, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: >> > The package generates quite a lot of lintian output: >> > >> > P: newlisp source: source-contains-prebuilt-java-object >> > g

Bug#827333: RFS: newlisp/10.7.0-1 [ITP]

On Tuesday, June 14 2016, I wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: wishlist > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "newlisp" > > * Package name: newlisp > Version : 10.7.0-1 > Upstream Author : Lutz Mueller > * URL

Bug#828166: RFS: speedcrunch/0.11-1 [ITA]

On Saturday, June 25 2016, Felix Krull wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "speedcrunch" > > * Package name: speedcrunch > Version : 0.11-1 > Upstream Author : Helder Correia & others > * URL : http://speedcrunch.org > * License

Bug#828157: RFS: lua-stdlib/41.2.0-1 [ITP #727169]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "lua-stdlib": * Package name: lua-stdlib Version : v35 Upstream Author : Reuben Thomas et al. * URL or Web page : https://github.com/rrthomas/lua-stdlib * License :

Bug#831061: RFS: newlisp/10.7.0-3

On Thursday, July 14 2016, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: >>Additionally, I'd like to request DM rights for newLISP, if Gianfranco > >>is comfortable with it. There is at least one major task (porting >>newLISP to GNU/Hurd, which is almost complete) that will go in soon, and >>it would be nice to

Bug#831061: RFS: newlisp/10.7.0-3

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Hi, I'd like to get new changes to the newLISP package uploaded. The changes are: * Silence a warning when compiling on GNU/kFreeBSD. When enabling builds on GNU/kFreeBSD, I forgot to forward-declare the prototype for strptime, which

Re: uscan for a single text file

On Sunday, July 17 2016, Ole Streicher wrote: > Sergio Durigan Junior <sergi...@sergiodj.net> writes: >> On Saturday, July 16 2016, Ole Streicher wrote: >> >>> Sergio Durigan Junior <sergi...@sergiodj.net> writes: >>>>> What is wrong here?

Re: uscan for a single text file

On Monday, July 18 2016, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: >>Seriously, though. I've also had to do a few modifications to the >>get-orig-source.sh script, and you'll also need to run uscan with the >>--no-symlink option, but this should work. Oh, and you will also need >>to specify

Re: uscan for a single text file

On Saturday, July 16 2016, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hi Sergio Hey Gianfranco, >>Yeah, uscan is the responsible for invoking mk-origtargz. That can be a >>problem indeed for cases like yours. > > > do you have a solution for virtualbox-guest-additions-iso package? > the same happens here

Re: uscan for a single text file

On Saturday, July 16 2016, Ole Streicher wrote: > Sergio Durigan Junior <sergi...@sergiodj.net> writes: >>> What is wrong here? I thought that mk-orig.tar.gz should be called only >>> when it is a tar archive? >> >> Yeah, uscan is the responsib

Re: uscan for a single text file

On Friday, July 15 2016, Ole Streicher wrote: > Hi, Hey, > I want to create a watch file for a package that contains a single text > file (which itself has the version into it): > version=3 > http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/IAGA/vmod/igrf.html igrf(\d+)coeffs.txt \ > debian debian/repackage.sh > >

Bug#827333: RFS: newlisp/10.7.0-1 [ITP]

On Monday, June 20 2016, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 03:37:55PM -0400, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: >> > I've uploaded the package, thanks for your contribution to Debian :) >> Thank you! I guess I will ping you again when the package has been >> a

Bug#828889: RFS: elisp-slime-nav-el/0.9-1 ITP

On Tuesday, June 28 2016, Dmitry Bogatov wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "elisp-slime-nav-el" > > * Package name: elisp-slime-nav-el > Version : 0.9-1 > Upstream Author : Steve Purcell > * Url :

Bug#828157: RFS: lua-stdlib/41.2.0-1 [ITP #727169]

On Saturday, June 25 2016, I wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "lua-stdlib": > > * Package name: lua-stdlib > Version : v35 > Upstream Author : Reuben Thomas et al. > * URL or Web page : https://github.com/rrthomas/lua-stdlib > * License

Bug#829286: RFS: newlisp/10.7.0-2

On Monday, July 04 2016, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: >>Still nothing. I had read the page, but it mentions the format of the >>.commands file, and not dcut's CLI options. I also tried specifying the >>options in a different order, but I get the same error. > > > dcut ftp-master reschedule -d 0

Bug#829286: RFS: newlisp/10.7.0-2

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Hi, I'd like to get a few changes I've made to newlisp uploaded. They basically fix two bugs: 828805 and 828806. The changes are: - Support GNU/kFreeBSD builds (by creating the necessary makefiles and adjusting source files accordingly), and -

Bug#829208: RFS: evil-paredit-el/0.0.2-1 ITP

On Friday, July 01 2016, Dmitry Bogatov wrote: >> 1. In d/copyright, the license should be called "Expat" not "MIT" since >>"MIT" is ambiguous between several different licenses. > > Is it true? AFAIC, there are 3 versions of BSD (2,3,4 clauses) and only > one MIT. Debian uses Expat instead

Bug#829286: RFS: newlisp/10.7.0-2

Control: tags -1 - moreinfo On Saturday, July 02 2016, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: >>I'd like to get a few changes I've made to newlisp uploaded. They > >>basically fix two bugs: 828805 and 828806. >> >>The changes are: >> >>- Support GNU/kFreeBSD builds (by creating the necessary makefiles

Bug#829286: RFS: newlisp/10.7.0-2

On Saturday, July 02 2016, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > I agree with your POV, lets see Andrey's opinion, I'm fine with the changes > now :) Thanks for the review, Gianfranco. If I may, I'd like to propose that you upload the package as-is by the end of tomorrow (Sunday) even if Andrey

Bug#829286: RFS: newlisp/10.7.0-2

ng queue Hm, here's what I see when I try it: D: dcut 0.2.1 D: trying to get maintainer email from environment D: Uploader from env: Sergio Durigan Junior <sergi...@sergiodj.net> D: first argument "ftp-master" treated as host D: loading dput D: calling dput.read_confi

Bug#828889: RFS: elisp-slime-nav-el/0.9-1 ITP

On Wednesday, June 29 2016, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: >>3) Any reason why you're using debhelper version 10? It's still > >>experimental, so you probably should be using version 9. > > > I'm not sure about this, some days ago debhelper 11 implementation started, > so I think compat > level

Bug#814859: RFS: runescape/0.1-1 [ITP] -- Set in a fantasy world of war, landscapes and sinister powers

On Tuesday, June 07 2016, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > 6)Please add some upstream metadata: https://wiki.debian.org/UpstreamMetadata Hi Carlos, You asked for help on #debian-devel-br about the UpstreamMetadata part, and I didn't have a chance to reply before you left, so I'm sending this

Bug#829286: RFS: newlisp/10.7.0-2

On Sunday, July 03 2016, James Cowgill wrote: >> Hm, here's what I see when I try it: >> >>   D: dcut 0.2.1 >>   D: trying to get maintainer email from environment >>   D: Uploader from env: Sergio Durigan Junior <sergi...@sergiodj.net> >>   D: first ar

Bug#898557: RFS: doclifter/2.17-1 [QA upload]

On Monday, May 14 2018, Fabian Wolff wrote: > On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 08:38:41PM -0400, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: >> Have you considered moving this package to salsa? It'd be a shame to >> not have a VCS for it. > > Sure, I can do that. The only problem is that since th

Re: Salsa repository request (gpp)

On Monday, May 14 2018, Fabian Wolff wrote: > On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 06:39:47PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote: >> There is now https://salsa.debian.org/debian/gpp >> Account wolff-guest has developer privilege. >> >> Take it for a spin ( slang for testdrive ) >> and come with your feedback

Re: Salsa repository request (gpp)

On Monday, May 14 2018, Fabian Wolff wrote: > On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 06:39:47PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote: >> There is now https://salsa.debian.org/debian/gpp >> Account wolff-guest has developer privilege. >> >> Take it for a spin ( slang for testdrive ) >> and come with your feedback

Bug#897046: RFS: link-grammar/5.4.4-1 [QA upload]

[ Adding debian-legal to the Cc list. ] On Friday, April 27 2018, Fabian Wolff wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for a QA upload of the link-grammar > package. [...] > The package is available on Mentors: > > https://mentors.debian.net/package/link-grammar So, here's the

Bug#897046: RFS: link-grammar/5.4.4-1 [QA upload]

On Friday, April 27 2018, Fabian Wolff wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for a QA upload of the link-grammar > package. > > My changes are summarized in the latest changelog entry: > > link-grammar (5.4.4-1) unstable; urgency=medium > > * QA upload. > * New upstream release. > *

Bug#898557: RFS: doclifter/2.17-1 [QA upload]

Control: owner -1 ! On Sunday, May 13 2018, Fabian Wolff wrote: > Dear mentors, Hey Fabian, > I am looking for a sponsor for a QA upload of the doclifter package. > > My changes are summarized in the latest changelog entry: > > doclifter (2.17-1) unstable; urgency=medium > >* QA upload. >

Re: Salsa repository request (gpp)

On Tuesday, May 15 2018, Fabian Wolff wrote: > On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 10:16:42PM -0400, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: >> Hey Fabian, >> >> Can you add yourself on d/copyright, under the entry for the "debian/*" >> files? After all, you deserve the

Bug#895940: RFS: python-dataclasses/0.5-1 [ITP]

On Monday, May 14 2018, Joel Cross wrote: > On Mon, 30 Apr 2018, at 6:21 PM, Joel Cross wrote: >> > Ah! Found it. It's listed in the "setup.py" file. Hmm... I wonder if >> > that's a problem, because no other file contains any kind of copyright >> > notice, and there's no LICENSE file. I'd

Re: Salsa repository request

On Monday, June 18 2018, Fabian Wolff wrote: > On Sun, Jun 17, 2018 at 07:02:15PM -0400, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: >> I see a few problems here; some I need you to address before moving >> forward, and others can be tackled later. Let me make a list: >> >> 1

Re: Salsa repository request

On Saturday, June 16 2018, Fabian Wolff wrote: > Dear mentors, Hi Fabian, > I am currently preparing a QA upload for the libantlr3c package. > > This package is currently orphaned and not maintained in any packaging > VCS repository. For this reason, I think it would be a good idea to > create

Re: RFS: pcapy/0.11.3-1 [ITA]

Control: owner -1 ! Control: tags -1 + moreinfo On Thursday, June 07 2018, eamanu wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pcapy" > > * Package name: pcapy > Version : 0.11.3-1 > Upstream Author : Core Security > * URL :

Re: Salsa repository request

On Saturday, June 16 2018, Fabian Wolff wrote: > On Sat, Jun 16, 2018 at 02:53:54PM -0400, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: >> On Saturday, June 16 2018, Fabian Wolff wrote: >> > Could someone please create a 'libantlr3c' repository in the Debian >> > group on Salsa and

Bug#896115: RFS: python-cerberus/1.2-1 [ITP]

On Thursday, April 26 2018, Joel Cross wrote: > Hi Sergio, Hey, Joel, > Thanks for all the comments. I've addressed most of them and re-uploaded the > package. As for this one: Hm, from what I've seen the package is pretty much the same as it was when you submitted it. I'm using the

Re: Salsa repository request (link-grammar)

On Thursday, April 26 2018, Fabian Wolff wrote: > Dear mentors, Hey, Fabian, > I am currently preparing a QA upload for the link-grammar Debian > package. The link-grammar packaging Git repository is currently still > hosted on Alioth: > >

Bug#895942: RFS: python-base58/0.2.5-1 [ITP]

On Tuesday, April 17 2018, Joel Cross wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-base58" > > * Package name: python-base58 >Version : 0.2.5-1 >Upstream Author : David Keijser > * URL :

Bug#897046: RFS: link-grammar/5.4.4-1 [QA upload]

On Monday, April 30 2018, Fabian Wolff wrote: > On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 01:16:04PM -0400, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: >> Thank to everybody who replied. Really appreciated. >> >> Fabian, I think it's OK if you just update the upstream project's >> copyright info, s

Bug#896988: RFS: nautilus-hide/0.2.3-3

On Saturday, April 28 2018, Carlos Maddela wrote: > On 29/04/18 07:11, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: >> By the way, if you want to move your packages repositories from your >> private namespace to the Debian namespace on salsa, just let me know and >> I can create the prop

Bug#897046: RFS: link-grammar/5.4.4-1 [QA upload]

On Monday, April 30 2018, Fabian Wolff wrote: > On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 12:24:42PM +0200, Steve Langasek wrote: >> I don't think you should be taking it upon yourself to add copyright >> statements regarding debian/ contents where authors have not asserted their >> copyright up front. There is

Re: Changes coming with VCS for Debian packaging

On Saturday, December 30 2017, Gabriel F. T. Gomes wrote: > On 30 Dec 2017, Ben Finney wrote: > >>"Gabriel F. T. Gomes" writes: >> >>> Not really. If I understood it correctly, anonscm.debian.org is >>> alioth, which was being decomissioned when I started to work on

Bug#877450: RFS: bash-completion/1:2.7-1 [ITA]

On Friday, December 29 2017, Gabriel F. T. Gomes wrote: > On 22 Dec 2017, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: > >>As promised, here's my review. > > Thank you! ^^ > >>The first thing I did was to "gbp >>clone" your repository and build it locally. After that

Bug#877450: RFS: bash-completion/1:2.7-1 [ITA]

On Friday, December 29 2017, Gabriel F. T. Gomes wrote: > On 29 Dec 2017, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: >>On Friday, December 29 2017, Gabriel F. T. Gomes wrote: >>> On 22 Dec 2017, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: >>> >>Yeah, that's right. I'm still using git.de

Bug#877450: RFS: bash-completion/1:2.7-1 [ITA]

On Sunday, October 01 2017, Gabriel F. T. Gomes wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: normal > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "bash-completion" > > * Package name: bash-completion >Version : 1:2.7-1 >Upstream Author : Bash

Re: PermissionError: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/sbuild-nonexistent'

On Thursday, August 02 2018, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote: > Hello, > > I am preparing the new silx package and I get this error message during the > build > > WARNING: autodoc: failed to import module 'silx.opencl.codec.byte_offset'; > the following exception was raised: > Traceback (most

Re: RFS: pcapy/0.11.3-1 [ITA]

On Friday, August 10 2018, eamanu wrote: > Hello Sergio, Hi Emmanuel, > I am really sorry for the delay. No need to apologize :-). > I finish the update of pcapy package. I push the commit, but is on > UNRELEASED status. > > Please, check if whole the things are ok, and then I will make

Re: RFS: pcapy/0.11.3-1 [ITA]

Hi Emmanuel, Sorry, you still have to fix a few things before the package is ready for upload. We're almost there; don't give up! On Tuesday, August 21 2018, eamanu wrote: > No problem. However, the "License:" still doesn't reflect the license >> of the software. According to LICENSE: >> >>

Re: RFS: pcapy/0.11.3-1 [ITA]

On Saturday, August 11 2018, eamanu wrote: > Hello Sergio! > > Thanks for your comments! No problem, and sorry for the delay. > 1) On d/copyright, the license specified for the project is wrong. >> According to the LICENSE file, the project is released under a slightly >> modified version of

Re: Fwd: dbab_1.3.2-2_source.changes REJECTED

On Friday, July 20 2018, Tong Sun wrote: > On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 12:20 PM Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: >> >> On Friday, July 20 2018, Tong Sun wrote: >> >> > Hi, >> > >> > I sent the following email to Debian FTP Master a while back, but >&g

Re: Fwd: dbab_1.3.2-2_source.changes REJECTED

On Friday, July 20 2018, Tong Sun wrote: > Hi, > > I sent the following email to Debian FTP Master a while back, but > haven't received anything till now. > > Can somebody else help please, to send me the .dak file for the 'dbab' > package that I maintain? Hello Tong, If you take a look at the

Re: Fwd: dbab_1.3.2-2_source.changes REJECTED

On Friday, July 20 2018, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 12:20:30PM -0400, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: >> Since "dbab" doesn't exist on Debian > But it does? > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/dbab Ops, thanks, I didn't check before writing. -- Ser

Bug#903880: RFS: pw/1.2-1 [ITP] -- simple command-line password manager

On Monday, July 16 2018, Dashamir Hoxha wrote: > On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 6:53 AM Sergio Durigan Junior > wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> Thank you for your interest in Debian. >> >> From the website (which unfortunately uses github): >> >> pw

Bug#903880: RFS: pw/1.2-1 [ITP] -- simple command-line password manager

Control: tags -1 + moreinfo On Sunday, July 15 2018, Dashamir Hoxha wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pw" > > * Package name: pw >Version : 1.2-1 >Upstream Author : Dashamir Hoxha > * URL : https://github.com/dashohoxha/pw >

Bug#903670: RFS: pius/2.2.6-1 -- Tools to help before and after key-signing parties

Control: owner -1 ! On Thursday, July 12 2018, Felix Lechner wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pius" > >Package name: pius >Version : 2.2.6-1 >Upstream Author : Phil Dibowitz >URL : http://www.phildev.net/pius/ >

Bug#903270: RFS: sharness/1.0.0-1 [ITP] shell library for running tests

On Friday, July 13 2018, Lars Kruse wrote: > Hello Sergio, Hey Lars, >> Created: >> >> https://salsa.debian.org/debian/sharness >> >> And added you as a Developer there. > > Thank you! > I pushed my repository to its new location. I will remove the old project > after the next packaging

Bug#903668: RFS: enchive/3.4-3 [ITP]

Control: owner -1 ! Control: tags -1 + moreinfo On Thursday, July 12 2018, Zebulon McCorkle wrote: > Dear mentors, Hello Zebulon, > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "enchive" > > * Package name: enchive >Version : 3.4-3 >Upstream Author : Christopher Wellons

Re: RFS: pcapy/0.11.3-1 [ITA]

On Wednesday, August 29 2018, eamanu wrote: > Hello Sergio, > > I made the changes! Thanks. Did you build the package and run lintian against it, using "-EI --pedantic" (you can use "-i" if you want more information about each warning/info tag)? I can't reply in more detail right now, but you

Bug#903270: RFS: sharness/1.0.0-1 [ITP] shell library for running tests

On Thursday, July 12 2018, Lars Kruse wrote: > Hello Sergio, Hey Lars, > thank you for reviewing my packaging attempt! No problem. Thank you for packaging for Debian :-). > Am Wed, 11 Jul 2018 23:21:05 -0400 > schrieb Sergio Durigan Junior : > >> [..] >> 1) On

Bug#902405: RFS: photoflare/1.5.4-1

Control: owner -1 ! On Tuesday, June 26 2018, Dylan Aïssi wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "photoflare" > > * Package name: photoflare > Version : 1.5.4-1 > Upstream Author : Dylan Coakley > * URL : http://photoflare.io/ > * License

Bug#903270: RFS: sharness/1.0.0-1 [ITP] shell library for running tests

Control: owner -1 ! Control: tags -1 + moreinfo On Sunday, July 08 2018, Lars Kruse wrote: > Dear mentors, Hi Lars, > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "sharness" > > Package name: sharness > Version : 1.0.0-1 > Upstream Author : Christian Couder > URL :

Bug#898773: RFS: python-fibra/0.0.17-1 [ITP 898736]

On Thursday, July 12 2018, Mario Frasca wrote: > I've not been able to satisfy all packaging requirements, and gave up. > > so I wish to close this issue, there is no candidate package any more. You can send an e-mail to 898773-cl...@bugs.debian.org. -- Sergio GPG key ID: 237A 54B1 0287 28BF

Bug#903270: RFS: sharness/1.0.0-1 [ITP] shell library for running tests

On Friday, July 13 2018, Lars Kruse wrote: >> When you're ready, please contact me and I can create the sharness >> repository under the 'debian' namespace on salsa, so you can migrate it. > > Please go ahead. Or is there anything, I need to do? Created:

Bug#895580: RFS: peek/1.3.1-1 [ITP] -- Simple animated GIF screen recorder with GUI

On Thursday, April 12 2018, Boyuan Yang wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "peek" > > * Package name: peek >Version : 1.3.1-1 >Upstream Author : Philipp Wolfer > * URL : https://github.com/phw/peek > *

Bug#895580: RFS: peek/1.3.1-1 [ITP] -- Simple animated GIF screen recorder with GUI

On Friday, April 13 2018, I wrote: > On Thursday, April 12 2018, Boyuan Yang wrote: > >> Dear mentors, >> >> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "peek" >> >> * Package name: peek >>Version : 1.3.1-1 >>Upstream Author : Philipp Wolfer >> * URL

Bug#895580: RFS: peek/1.3.1-1 [ITP] -- Simple animated GIF screen recorder with GUI

On Saturday, April 14 2018, I wrote: > On Friday, April 13 2018, I wrote: > >> On Thursday, April 12 2018, Boyuan Yang wrote: >> >>> Dear mentors, >>> >>> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "peek" >>> >>> * Package name: peek >>>Version : 1.3.1-1 >>>Upstream Author

Bug#896115: RFS: python-cerberus/1.2-1 [ITP]

On Thursday, April 19 2018, Joel Cross wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-cerberus" > > * Package name: python-cerberus >Version : 1.2-1 >Upstream Author : Nicola Iarocci > * URL :

Bug#896704: RFS: python-picklable-itertools/0.1.1-2 [RC]

On Tuesday, April 24 2018, Fabian Wolff wrote: > On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 08:58:30PM -0400, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: >> Hi Fabian, >> >> I can help with it, but there are two things I'd like to see first. > > Thank you for your review! My pleasure. Thanks for the

Bug#896579: RFS: goodvibes/0.3.6-1 [ITP]

Control: owner -1 ! On Sunday, April 22 2018, Elías Alejandro wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "goodvibes" > > * Package name: goodvibes >Version : 0.3.6-1 >Upstream Author : Arnaud Rebillout > * URL

Bug#896579: RFS: goodvibes/0.3.6-1 [ITP]

On Sunday, April 22 2018, Elías Alejandro wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "goodvibes" > > * Package name: goodvibes >Version : 0.3.6-1 >Upstream Author : Arnaud Rebillout > * URL :

Bug#896579: RFS: goodvibes/0.3.6-1 [ITP]

On Sunday, April 22 2018, I wrote: > On d/control, I see you explicitly listed the dependencies ("Depends:" > field). Some of them are OK to be there, but you actually need to > explicitly list these: Sorry, I meant "you actually *don't* need to explicitly list these:". > Depends: >... >

Bug#896579: RFS: goodvibes/0.3.6-1 [ITP]

On Sunday, April 22 2018, Elías Alejandro wrote: > On Sun, Apr 22, 2018 at 6:40 PM, Sergio Durigan Junior > <sergi...@debian.org> wrote: >> On Sunday, April 22 2018, I wrote: >> >>> On d/control, I see you explicitly listed the dependencies ("Depe

Bug#896579: RFS: goodvibes/0.3.6-1 [ITP]

On Monday, April 23 2018, Elías Alejandro wrote: > On Sun, Apr 22, 2018 at 11:37 PM, Sergio Durigan Junior > <sergi...@debian.org> wrote: >> Something else worth mentioning is the possibility to move the package >> repository from your personal namespace to the Debian name

Bug#896704: RFS: python-picklable-itertools/0.1.1-2 [RC]

Control: tags -1 + moreinfo Control: owner -1 ! On Monday, April 23 2018, Fabian Wolff wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: important > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-picklable-itertools". > > The current version of this package is missing a

Bug#896115: RFS: python-cerberus/1.2-1 [ITP]

Control: tags -1 + moreinfo On Friday, April 20 2018, I wrote: > On Thursday, April 19 2018, Joel Cross wrote: > >> Dear mentors, >> >> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-cerberus" >> >> * Package name: python-cerberus >>Version : 1.2-1 >>Upstream Author :

Bug#895940: RFS: python-dataclasses/0.5-1 [ITP]

Control: tags -1 + moreinfo On Tuesday, April 17 2018, Joel Cross wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-dataclasses" > > * Package name: python-dataclasses >Version : 0.5-1 >Upstream Author : Eric V. Smith > * URL

Bug#896115: RFS: python-cerberus/1.2-1 [ITP]

Control: owner -1 ! On Thursday, April 19 2018, Joel Cross wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-cerberus" > > * Package name: python-cerberus >Version : 1.2-1 >Upstream Author : Nicola Iarocci > * URL

Re: CMake and NDEBUG

On Wednesday, April 25 2018, Sébastien Jodogne wrote: > Dear Debian mentors, Hey, Sébastien, Disclaimer: I'm not a cmake expert. > I write this message as the maintainer of the Debian packages of the > Orthanc project [1]. > > The Debian packages for Orthanc and its associated plugins pay >

Re: RFS: impacket/0.9.17-1

On Monday, December 31 2019, eamanu wrote: > El lun., 31 de dic. de 2018 a la(s) 10:17, Mattia Rizzolo (mat...@debian.org) > escribió: > >> >> Hi Emmanuel, >> >> On Mon, Dec 31, 2018 at 12:11:53AM -0300, eamanu15 wrote: >> > Package: sponsorship-requests >> > Severity: normal >> > X-Debbugs-CC:

Re: VCS warnings

On Wednesday, December 12 2018, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 02:58:20PM -0500, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: >> >> I'm fixing the packaging of guile-cairo. I get the following warnings and >> >> notes related to the VCS fields: vcs-obsole

Re: VCS warnings

On Wednesday, December 12 2018, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 03:46:32PM +0200, Tommi Höynälänmaa wrote: >> >> I'm fixing the packaging of guile-cairo. I get the following warnings and >> notes related to the VCS fields: vcs-obsolete-in-debian-infrastructure, >>

Re: Salsa repository request

On Thursday, December 06 2018, Peter Colberg wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I would like to migrate the packages cgit [1] and fcgiwrap [2] to > salsa, but as a DM lack the needed permission for the debian group. > Could you create the two projects and set me (pcolberg-guest) as > master? (I have

Re: How to make meson accept that `pkg-config --cflags ` has empty result in case only /usr/include is needed

On Monday, September 10 2018, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Andrey, > > On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 07:40:45PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: >> > is correct behaviour and return code is 0. >> You are not running this in a minimal chroot. >> >> # pkg-config --cflags pbbam >> Package zlib was not

Re: bison/flex (?) issue: error: cannot convert 'UserLevelRewritingContext::ParseResult*' to 'char*'

On Sunday, September 16 2018, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi, > > in the latest version of maude[1] I get: > > ... > g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../.. -I../../src/Utility -I../../src/Temporal > -I../../src/Interface -I../../src/Core -I../../src/Variable > -I../../src/FullCompiler -I../../src/Higher

Re: Salsa project creation, shc

On Thursday, April 18 2019, Tong Sun wrote: > On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 12:18 AM Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: >> You have to provide your salsa username so that I (or any other DD) can >> put you as Developer there. > > Ah, yeah, forgot about that -- my salsa username is sunt

Re: Salsa project creation, shc

On Wednesday, April 17 2019, Tong Sun wrote: > If I need to create a project on Salsa, what should I do? > > Here are the details > > The Debian package I'm talking about is shc, i.e.: > https://sources.debian.org/src/shc/3.9.6-1/debian/control/ > > I.e., > > Source: shc > Section: devel > > I

Re: Salsa project creation, shc

On Thursday, April 18 2019, Tong Sun wrote: > On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 12:27 AM Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: > >> Done. > > Thanks again Sergio No problem. > I'm preparing for the Greater Toronto Area Linux Users Group Debian > Bug Squashing Party at the end of

Re: gbp:error: Uscan failed

On Saturday, May 18 2019, Geert Stappers wrote: > On Sat, May 18, 2019 at 11:53:13AM -0400, Tong Sun wrote: >> Hi, >> >> How to fix this? >> >> $ gbp import-orig --uscan --verbose >> gbp:debug: ['git', 'rev-parse', '--show-cdup'] >> gbp:debug: ['git', 'rev-parse', '--is-bare-repository'] >>

Bug#935808: RFS: dbacl 1.14.1-2 [QA upload]

On Monday, August 26 2019, Fabian Wolff wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for a QA upload of the dbacl package. > > This upload attempts to fix a FTBFS bug (#916182), and I have also performed > some standard package maintenance tasks. > > I will push to the proper repository

  1   2   >