On 2008-10-05, Laurent Léonard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--nextPart1380824.HK0hGSmbvk
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Hi,=20
I try to build the package kio-ftps, but the 0.2 version (for KDE 4) uses=20
On 2008-10-06, Jose Luis Blanco [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If your question is how to build a Debian package... I don't know about any
standard procedure. I had to do such one package and I created a dummy
configure scripts which in turn calls cmake with some proper variables
set.
Apart from
On 2008-10-06, Robin Cornelius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
cmake does not have a proper clean target in the unix makefiles in
generates, which is a pain. Or not one that cleans as you would fully
expect. It does keep its working files in the current directory so a
the way i have done this is to
On 2008-10-06, Robin Cornelius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 4:52 PM, Sune Vuorela [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
roduces working debs and keeps the orig.tar.gz clean too.
This does seem a little dirty which makes me think i'm not quite doing
it right though so if anyone has
On 2008-10-07, Laurent Léonard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--nextPart1512095.XNzvprD9R2
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package kio-ftps-kde4.
* Package
On 2008-10-07, Laurent Léonard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's with all those commented dh_ foo lines in the rules file ?
Mmm it's default dh_ commands, I suppose I have to delete what I don't need=
?
They clutter reading of the rules file, no reason to keep them around.
You asked about
On 2008-10-08, Laurent Léonard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--nextPart1282828.IVFam4LvNy
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Can I simply update the package after the modifications or do I have to=20
increment
On 2008-11-01, Sandro Tosi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Laurent,
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 16:04, Laurent L?onard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package kio-ftps.
...
kio-ftps - an ftps KIO slave for KDE 4
Did you consider joining KDE packaging
On 2008-11-09, Guido Loupias [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Could someone tell me if there is a preferred version format for svn
revisions?
Right now I have something like latestupstreamversion+svnrevisionnumber.
If it is a snapshot after a release, I also do that.
If it is a snapshot
On 2008-12-09, Paul Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I doubt that - merely adding a new symbol is NOT a bug, let alone
release-critical.
Right, but not bumping shlibs at the same time is an RC bug AFAIK.
I agree.
/Sune
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
On 2008-12-27, Hiroyuki Yamamoto yama1...@gmail.com wrote:
Upstream Author: Hideki Ikemoto ikemo _at_ users.sourceforge.jp
* URL: http://kita.sourceforge.jp/
Looking at this page, without much japanese knowledge, it looks like a
kde3 application
* License: The MIT License
Section: net
On 2008-12-28, Hiroyuki Yamamoto yama1...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Sune Vuorela wrote:
On 2008-12-27, Hiroyuki Yamamoto yama1...@gmail.com wrote:
Upstream Author: Hideki Ikemoto ikemo _at_ users.sourceforge.jp
* URL: http://kita.sourceforge.jp/
Looking at this page, without much japanese
On 2008-12-28, Hiroyuki Yamamoto yama1...@gmail.com wrote:
How about kde4?
KDE4 has nice ruby bindings, currently available in experimental.
Oh, thanks.
When kde4 has entered in sid, kita2 should depend on korundum4 package.
http://packages.debian.org/experimental/korundum4
It needs more
On 2008-12-29, Junichi Uekawa dan...@netfort.gr.jp wrote:
It needs more work than just change the dependencies to make it work
with korundum4
Are we talking about a package which only exists in experimental
replacing the version in sid?
Yes. and the replacement is planned ASAP.
Let the
On 2009-01-19, Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au wrote:
* When fixing bugs that prevented a previous release (e.g. one made to
mentors.debian.net) from making it into Debian (e.g. because the
sponsor requires further changes), recommended practice is to
increment the release number
On 2009-02-09, Antonio Radici anto...@dyne.org wrote:
Hi,
as part of ITP #497701 I'm packaging libv8, a high-performance
java script library written by Google and used in Chrominum, the
open source version of the Chrome browser.
The source code is taken directly from the SVN tags here:
On 2009-03-15, Laurent Guignard lguignard.deb...@gmail.com wrote:
On dim, 15 mar 2009 13:57:40 +0100, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
Hello,
Hello,
I am not sure what to fill to Section in control file for my new package I
am building.
Program is small easy CLI utility generating sound (pink and
Hi!
After a discussion on #debian-mentors and other places, I will not
sponsor packages using the copyright file format described on
http://wiki.debian.org/Proposals/CopyrightFormat
It is a too complex, overengineered solution to a very minor issue.
It is not easy readables for humans
It is
On 2009-03-21, Hideki Yamane henr...@debian.or.jp wrote:
On Sat, 17 Jan 2009 12:42:43 +0900
Junichi Uekawa dan...@netfort.gr.jp wrote:
So instead of adding a package to be removed soon after it is clear of
NEW, I suggest not adding it at all.
So, it's been two weeks, is there a working
On 2009-04-17, Stefanos Harhalakis v...@v13.gr wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package katimon.
* Package name: katimon
Version : 1.0.2-2
Upstream Author : me
* URL : http://www.v13.gr/proj/katimon/
: also available from
On 2009-04-25, Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote:
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 3:02 AM, Jonas Meurer jo...@freesources.org wrote:
I intend to maintain libmimelib1 as a seperate source package now that
kdepim 3.5.9 has been removed from debian/unstable.
What does lurker link against on other distros
On 2009-05-08, LI Daobing lidaob...@debian.org wrote:
there is a proposed copyright format in [2], you also can use that format.
[2] http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5/
Note that this is just a proposal and many people don't like it, so
please don't take it too serious.
And some people won't
On 2009-05-19, Matthias Julius m...@julius-net.net wrote:
I would really appreciate if someone could either help me to get my
krecipes package into Debian.
I am just not quite sure whether it is OK to hijack a package like
that from an unresponsive packaging team. Should I ask QA to orphan
On 2009-05-19, Matthias Julius m...@julius-net.net wrote:
I just noticed that he actually cross-posted his messages to
pkg-kde-talk. There seems to be a little more human presence. Next
time I'll post there.
That's *NOT* a sponsering list, but sending sponsoring requests there is
the
On 2009-05-19, Matthias Julius m...@julius-net.net wrote:
Barry deFreese bdefre...@verizon.net writes:
Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
I'm not a DD, but I think the correct way is to ping MIA team about it
and then after 2 weeks time you ping them again and they do a little
chat and come up with a
On 2009-05-22, John Stamp jst...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
On Friday 22 May 2009 11:12:36 am Kai Wasserbäch wrote:
Dear mentors,
an updated package of kde-plasmoid-yawp has been uploaded to
mentors.debian.net, the new dgetable URL is:
On 2009-05-24, Jack Kelly endgame@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 8:07 AM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
I have a problem building a library, starting with a dh_make template.
The basic problem seems to boil down to files don't get moved from
DESTDIR (debian/tmp)
On 2009-05-24, Jack Kelly endgame@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 9:40 AM, Sune Vuorela nos...@vuorela.dk wrote:
On 2009-05-24, Jack Kelly endgame@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 8:07 AM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com
wrote:
I have a problem building
On 2009-05-25, Russ Allbery r...@debian.org wrote:
The new version of the library is no longer exporting its internal
portability functions. This is good -- libraries should not export
Only lurker is using this library.
/Sune
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On 2009-05-29, Alexander Prinsier aphe...@mailhaven.com wrote:
PS2: for DD's, is it customary to upload a new version to unstable even
if it only fixes a small issue? Or should small issues be batched into
one update? Couldn't find an answer on this in the Debian policy.
It depends.
On 2009-06-04, Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au wrote:
Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre mathieu...@gmail.com writes:
I've applied the suggested changes to the files, and pushed it back on
mentors.debian.net. It's using the same version number as before, just
overwrote the files. Not sure if this
On 2009-06-08, Adrian von Bidder avbid...@fortytwo.ch wrote:
* how can I build the dependencies of the -dev package in a sane way? I'm=
=20
sure creating them by hand is not optimal. (And I'm sure I've read at some=
You need to create it by hand by looking at what includes is in *your*
On 2009-07-10, Jonathan Wiltshire deb...@jwiltshire.org.uk wrote:
--ibTvN161/egqYuK8
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 11:26:04AM +0200, Adrian Stel wrote:
And my question is: can i
On 2009-08-18, Leinier Cruz Salfran salfra...@ipigto.rimed.cu wrote:
--=-+HFkoxaqb4DFPsQ5uB2y
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
why is so hard to find a sponsor?
I have a package online since 2 weeks ago, I sent 3 RFS and I have found
no sponsor yet.
On 2009-08-19, Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au wrote:
Sune Vuorela nos...@vuorela.dk writes:
For example, I would be very reluctant to sponsor a first package of a
person that was a new library without any application using it,
whereas a interesting kde application might easier catch my
On 2009-08-19, Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au wrote:
Sune Vuorela nos...@vuorela.dk writes:
On 2009-08-19, Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au wrote:
That's interesting, thank you for that perspective. What do you
propose, then, for a maintainer who wants to get a new package
On 2009-09-06, Rogério Brito rbr...@ime.usp.br wrote:
- I doubt that many sponsors will be happy DM-Upload-Allowed: yes
on a NEW package.
While I understand that you mentioned this regarding a NEW package, I'm
a slightly bit confused about the best current practices of the DMUA
On 2009-10-05, Charles Plessy ple...@debian.org wrote:
I have repened the Policy bug where the renaming policy was decided, and hope
to get it reverted.
Don't expect it to happen, but you are free to hope.
/Sune
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
On 2009-10-16, Felipe Sateler fsate...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 2009-10-16 at 21:36 +0200, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote:
Michael Tokarev ha scritto:
You are trying to hijack kvm, this is not the way to do it appropriately.
I'm trying to make it to work.
And to my shame, I don't know how to
On 2009-10-31, Lukasz Janyst jan...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi there,
I have been using Debian for a couple of years now. I really
appreciate the great work you're doing and I would like to help. I
have read some docs and faqs on contributing to the project and
decided to start with this simple
On 2009-11-03, Don Armstrong d...@debian.org wrote:
It's fairly rare for someone to laboriously create multiple versions
of icons at different resolutions in PNG. [I know I certainly haven't
done it since about 1992.]
Yes and no. Some icon artists create it in svg and then export to png
and
On 2009-11-07, Matthias Klumpp matth...@nlinux.org wrote:
http://users.telenet.be/Jan.Van.hijfte/qtforfpc/fpcqt4.html
* License : GPL
Looks like lgpl
It builds these binary packages:
libqt4intf-dev - Qt4 interface bindings
libqt4intf5 - Qt4 interface bindings
For which language?
On 2009-11-07, Harry Rickards ha...@linux.com wrote:
Hi,
I sent an email to new-maintai...@debian.org about a week ago, and
haven't received a response yet. It's only been a week, so I'm still
hoping to get a reply soon. However, I just found
On 2009-11-07, Harry Rickards ha...@linux.com wrote:
2009/11/7 Sune Vuorela nos...@vuorela.dk:
On 2009-11-07, Harry Rickards ha...@linux.com wrote:
Hi,
I sent an email to new-maintai...@debian.org about a week ago, and
haven't received a response yet. It's only been a week, so I'm still
On 2009-11-10, Matthias Klumpp matth...@nlinux.org wrote:
Makefiles just serve to finally create calls to gcc,
And I think the way the gcc calls are made requires a amazing amount of
RAM for no apparant reason.
these calls I wrote by hand (there was no qmake in qt2)
to more easily configure
On 2009-11-26, George Danchev danc...@spnet.net wrote:
* start with learning how Debian Bug Tracking System is manipulated
(which is one of the most valuable Debian assets)
* look for neglected bug reports, eventually in packages you are using
* try to submit patches and/or helpful comments
On 2007-08-08, Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm, I have something crap to ask...
As you may have noticed, wxwidget 2.8 is not available in Debian.
However Mathias Klose maintain it in Ubuntu...
Would you sponsor my wx2.8 ubuntu sync uploads ?
Please coordinate with ron,
On 2007-08-15, Krzysztof Burghardt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
xawtv-plugin-qt - quicktime plugin for xawtv and motv
Has this been fixed in a way that doesn't make it segfault all the time?
And become buildable with newer libquicktime?
(I was the one hacking the quicktime plugin out of the package
On 2007-09-12, Raphael Geissert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/09/2007, Francesco Cecconi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 11 September 2007, Raphael Geissert wrote:
On 10/09/2007, Francesco Cecconi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear DD,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package
On 2007-10-03, Kartik Mistry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
My package Xosview is failed to build on (atleast) two arch with same
reason. Following are links from buildd.
Hi!
Did you actualy read the logs?
It says quite clearly: your config.guess and config.sub is outdated.
Find newer
On 2007-12-23, Free Ekanayaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Sorry, wrong terminology. It's a very useful multimedia application,
which many people use and would expect to find in Debian. Therefore it
is worth making the extra effort to keep it well maintained IMO. The
point being that
On 2008-01-18, Iván Forcada Atienza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--yLVHuoLXiP9kZBkt
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi mentors!!
I am interested in kgtk application [1]. After a search, I've found that
it
On 2008-02-04, Salvatore Ansani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package kde4-style-qtcurve.
* Package name: kde4-style-qtcurve
Version : 0.55.2-1
Upstream Author : Craig Drummond [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL :
On 2008-02-05, Salvatore Ansani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I need to change package_name-version-1 to package_name-version-2 before
upload on mentors ???
I don't think that is needed.
/Sune
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
On 2008-03-04, Neil Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are sponsors going to start recommending changing SONAMEs in an NMU
next? Adding -dbg packages? Of course not, NMUs are different to typical
RFS activity.
of course is changing SONAMEs in a NMU appropriate if it is appropriate.
Having a
On 2008-03-05, Neil Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. Let orange be removed from Lenny due to the existing RC bug, or
2. Let orange behave as it has in previous stable releases without
fixing a bug that nobody seems to care about.
3. Fixing the bugs.
/Sune
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On 2008-03-05, Neil Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, fix known bugs but don't delay the RC bugs just to fix less
important ones. That's perverse.
Do two uploads ;) - one to now and one to delayed.
All I'm saying here is that sponsors should not expect NMUs to fix the
full range of
On 2008-03-05, Richard Hecker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If the maintainer is truly MIA, that is a bigger issue than any
single bug. Others have made this argument that we should
Yes. but luckily, we can do both at the same time (fixing bugs and
figuring out wether a maintainer is MIA)
And a
On 2008-04-20, Andrea De Iacovo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
They're all solved in 2.5.0 (already in sid) and someone is solved
also in 2.3. However I'm waiting fort hte first package upload to
close a buch of bugs.
Etch is 2.0 series
/Sune
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
On 2008-06-07, David Paleino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any opinion about this? Is there a consensus on how to behave? Is that a ma=
tter
of taste?
Leave it and educate upstream.
/Sune
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
On 2008-08-28, Salvatore Ansani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package plasma-netgraph.
* Package name: plasma-netgraph
Version : 0.3-1
Upstream Author : John Varouhakis
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/ivplasma/
*
On 2008-09-02, Andreas Schildbach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now, when I (or a co-maintainer) check out the project from SVN, I get
(as expected) a nearly empty project directory, containing just the
debian directory. But, how am I supposed to actually create the patches
that go into
On 2008-09-09, Michael Biebl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
while quilt push ; do quilt refresh ; done
quilt new 05_README_changes.diff
quilt edit README
quilt refresh
I assume you have set QUILT_PATCHES=3Ddebian/patches in ~/.quiltrc for
this to work properly?
yes. along with a lot of other
On 2008-09-14, Raphael Geissert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Russ Allbery wrote:
Raphael Geissert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
if [ -e ${where}debian/rules -a -d ${where}debian/patches ]; then
export QUILT_PATCHES=debian/patches
Shouldn't it be
export
Hi!
I have a couple of ITPs where I finally got the two packages in shape to
close
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=348101 and
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=348103
They are quite similar, it is only approx. the name that differs.
And the packaging is quite
Hi !
I have just recieved a bug: #364742 - and piuparts is as always right.
Something fails in removing alternatives again.
/usr/share/icons/default/index.theme pointing into alternatives
# update-alternatives --display x-cursor-theme
x-cursor-theme - status is auto.
link currently points to
On 2006-04-26, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
what does update-alternatives --list x-cursor-theme list in this case?
It shows nothing.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/# update-alternatives --list x-cursor-theme
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/#
It really looks to me like a u-a bug, not a bug in the calling
On 2006-04-26, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, if update-alternatives --list shows nothing, and symlinks are left in
place on the filesystem, that sounds like a bug in u-a to me.
But shouldn't a bug in u-a be easy to reproduce ?
I tried something minimal:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/# for
On 2006-04-25, Sune Vuorela [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have just recieved a bug: #364742 - and piuparts is as always right.
Something fails in removing alternatives again.
I had a typo in my prerm script. Will fix it soon.
if someone does a 's/ComixCursorss/ComixCursors-/' in the prerm
On 2006-04-22, Sune Vuorela [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
I have a couple of ITPs where I finally got the two packages in shape to
close
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=348101 and
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=348103
They are quite similar, it is only
On 2006-05-01, Sune Vuorela [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2006-04-22, Sune Vuorela [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
I have a couple of ITPs where I finally got the two packages in shape to
close
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=348101 and
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin
Hi!
I have a package ready for kwin-style-crystal.
ITP:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=364360
Source: kwin-style-crystal
Section: kde
Priority: optional
Maintainer: Sune Vuorela [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Build-Depends: debhelper (= 4.0.0), autotools-dev, kdebase-dev
Standards-Version
ITP:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=338635
Source: polyester
Section: kde
Priority: optional
Maintainer: Sune Vuorela [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Build-Depends: debhelper (= 5.0.0), automake1.9, autoconf, libtool,
kdelibs4-dev (= 4:3.2), kdebase-dev (= 4:3.2)
Standards-Version: 3.7.2
On 2006-05-28, Christoph Haas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And the package is here:
http://mirror.pusling.com/polyester-rfs/
Could you name the source package kde-style-polyester, too? I find it
confusing when source and binary packages have totally different names.
Sure. Reuploadet.
/Sune
On 2006-05-28, Christoph Haas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://mirror.pusling.com/kgorilla
Just checking kde-icons-korilla. Lintian is right:
E: kde-icons-korilla; The font
Gah.
I just did something to the packages now.
/Sune
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
Hi!
I am looking for comments - and hopefully a sponsorship - for
kwin-style-dekorator.
Source: kwin-style-dekorator
Section: kde
Priority: optional
Maintainer: Sune Vuorela [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Build-Depends: debhelper (= 5), autotools-dev, kdebase-dev
Standards-Version: 3.7.2
Package: kwin-style
On 2006-06-25, Sune Vuorela [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am looking for comments - and hopefully a sponsorship - for
kwin-style-dekorator.
Source: kwin-style-dekorator
Section: kde
Priority: optional
Maintainer: Sune Vuorela [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Build-Depends: debhelper (= 5), autotools-dev
On 2006-07-01, George Danchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looks correct... a couple of extra things you may want to correct anyway:
- since nothing goes to usr/{s}bin you don't need the debian/dirs file, so
you
can safely remove it.
Removed.
- also remove the last two commented lines in
On Sunday 02 July 2006 21:45, Zsolt Rizsanyi wrote:
OTOH I don't really like the idea of manually trimming down the size of the
diff.gz.
I have not manually trimmed down the size. I have just chosen the relevant
parts of the patches to the autofoo generated files and only applied them.
Also
On 2006-07-13, Nigel Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From memory, aren't NMU's (even more so, non-DD NMU's) only meant to
fix RC bugs? Not new upstream releases?
0-day nmus are to fix RC bugs.
/Sune
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On 2006-09-11, James Healy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The upstream tarball has an examples directory which I am installing
into the package using dh_installexamples. None of the examples are
shell scripts or ELF binaries, yet they seem to untar with executable
permissions.
What is the best way
On 2006-09-11, Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think exec bit in a tarball is right. Best way is to repack upstream
sources.
No. Upstream should only be repacked in rare cases like when it contains
non-free materials.
/Sune
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
On 2006-11-14, Ritesh Raj Sarraf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How would I then add entry of the old changelog into the current knetstats
package i.e. 1.6.2 ?
I hope there is a proper way to tackle such situations.
apt-get install devscripts
man uupdate
it does exactly what you ask for.
/Sune
On 2006-11-26, Matthias Julius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm, the opinion on this matter seems to be somwhat devided. Some
people suggest the revision should be increased every time an upload
is made to a public place like mentors.d.n.
I have only seen keep -2 if you uploaded somewhere that
On 2006-12-11, Neil Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What are the problems with CDBS (apart from debian/control automation)?
The biggest problem are the layers of obscurity added by cdbs and the
fact that the best docs are diving into the source.
(and the fact that there has been some cdbs
On 2007-01-01, Nico Golde [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess not since this is not defined in the policy. Maybe=20
if Homepage becomes a real control field.
with two spaces it is formatted on the web like this:
http://packages.debian.org/unstable/kde/yakuake
with one space like this:
On 2007-01-14, Justin Pryzby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
maintscripts often don't support downgrades just because downgrading has
always
been advertised as not guaranteed to work, so very few maintainers put the
additional effort and clutter into their code.
It is not about 'additional effort'
On 2007-01-26, Andrea Bolognani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2. Edit the Makefile only in the Debian package, commenting out the
offending
lines
3. Remove the file in debian/rules, *after* installing it
I would go for 3)
it is the easiest - and often fiddling around with upstream
On 2007-03-16, Daniel Leidert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
What would you choose and why?
If there is a need for a click-wrap license - look at the sun java
packages.
But if the license don't require click-wrap, I would just ship it in
debian/copyright. People should know that non-free stuff is
On 2007-03-18, Michael Rasmussen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi mentors,
When packaging for Debian you have two distinct ways of doing it,
native versus orig.
My question is, if I am in close contact with upstream and upstream
always adds my patches to upstream source is there then any reason
On 2007-03-21, Charles Plessy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The easiest way to manage patches I know is cdbs, but I was not brave
enough to study wether it is possible to separate this feature from the
others.
It is possible to use cdbs patchsys in non-cdbs packages, but it is very
ugly and I
On 2007-05-09, Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
chrooting into the dir, the error is that base-files postinst
cannot find awk. mawk had indeed been configured earlier. So, while
/etc/alternatives/awk exists, and points to mawk, there is no symlink
/usr/bin/awk created.
On 2007-05-25, Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Bas Wijnen:
This is slightly off-topic, for which I apologise. It's just that I
learned about symbol versioning during my NM process, and nobody outside
Debian seems to understand what it is. :-(
*sigh* It's a bit sad that this is
On 2007-05-27, Jabka Atu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Package name: klthemes
Version : 1.003-1
Upstream Author : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : scex.sf.net
* License : GPLv3
Section : contrib/kde
Why contrib??
It builds these binary packages:
On 2012-01-01, Thomas Müller thomas.muel...@tmit.eu wrote:
[about a non-free file]
Or wget'ing it within postinst?
erm ?!?
/Sune
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
On 2012-05-02, Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu wrote:
Hi,
I tried to fix the problem in the jellyfish package but the general
hints given did not helped me really. Any more precise help to fix
this problem:
parse_dna.cc:97:3: error: narrowing conversion of '-3' from 'int' to 'const
uint_t
On 2012-05-09, Boris Pek tehnic...@yandex.ru wrote:
My regular sponsor is very busy now and I am looking for a sponsor for my new
package kde-gtk-config.
Description : KDE configuration module for GTK+ 2.x and GTK+ 3.x style
selection
first, kde configuration modules are packaged as
On 2012-05-11, Boris Pek tehnic...@yandex.ru wrote:
kde-config-gtk-style does not allow to:
* select themes for Gtk 3.x applications
* preview available themes for Gtk 2.x and Gtk 3.x applications
* custmize toolbars and menus for Gtk applications
* select icon themes for Gtk applications
*
On 2012-05-26, Benjamin Eltzner b.eltz...@gmx.de wrote:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package qpdfview
* Package name: qpdfview
Version : 0.2.2-1
Upstream Author : Adam Reichold adamreich...@myopera.com
On 2012-08-10, Felix Geyer fge...@debian.org wrote:
On 10.08.2012 16:47, Jakub Adam wrote:
debian/patches/gammaray-probe-versioned-soname.patch:
Why do you set a SONAME for gammaray_probe?
When gammaray changes the ABI custom plugins will break anyway
since you can't install different
1 - 100 of 173 matches
Mail list logo
