Quoting T o n g (2013-07-08 14:15:37)
On Sat, 06 Jul 2013 20:52:48 +0600, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
I: libpam-ssh-agent-auth source: missing-debian-source-format
That's your main problem. Without debian/source/format assumed format
is 1.0 which means both no tar.bz2 support and
(0.9.5-2) unstable; urgency=low
* Debian release in dpkg-source 3.0 (quilt) format
-- Tong Sun (vub) suntong...@users.sourceforge.net Mon, 08 Jul 2013
10:22:07 -0400
libpam-ssh-agent-auth (0.9.5-1) stable; urgency=low
* Portability fixes for BSD/Mac
-- Jamie Beverly soup
Hi,
I'm trying to fix the following lintian problems:
W: libpam-ssh-agent-auth source: ancient-standards-version 3.8.0 (current is
3.9.4)
but googling on source: ancient-standards-version didn't give me much helpful
answer.
How should I fix the problem?
Detailed help appreciated.
Thanks
from
http://sfxpt.wordpress.com/libpam-ssh-agent-auth/.
Changes since the last upload:
libpam-ssh-agent-auth (0.9.5-2) unstable; urgency=low
* Debian release in dpkg-source 3.0 (quilt) format, with added README.Debian
Regards,
Tong Sun
PS. Please CC me when replying.
Thanks
Hi,
I'm wondering why the binary package built from my source package is empty.
Here is what I've discovered so far:
- If I unpack the upstream tarball and build the binary debian package with
'debuild -us -uc', then the built binary package contains the files I want
- If I build the
Re: Empty binary package
I'm wondering why the binary package built from my source package is empty.
Here is what I've discovered so far:
- If I unpack the upstream tarball and build the binary debian package with
'debuild -us -uc', then the built binary package contains the files I
[trying to post in text]
Hard to say without seeing your debian/ folder.
Right here:
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/pamsshagentauth/pam_ssh_agent_auth/v0.9.5/pam_ssh_agent_auth-0.9.5.tar.bz2
Don't ask us why some 3rd party packages don't build properly, it's
expected. If
as to build the binary package properly
Regards,
Tong Sun
PS. Please CC me when replying.
Thanks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org
as to build the binary package properly
Regards,
Tong Sun
PS. Please CC me when replying.
Thanks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/CAMmz1Odg3NOHC_VLU6u
Hi,
I got an old Debian source package that is no longer exist in the repo any
more, and want to pick up from there. I.e., apply all the patches then remove
them for debian/patches. That's what I did, but when I tried to build it via
pbuilder, I get:
make clean
dh_quilt_unpatch
Patch
debian/source/format likely still has quilt as the package format.
No, the package is so old that it doesn't even have the debian/source/format
file.
Hmmm... maybe I should start all over from scratch?
But, but, but.. why are you removing the patch system and manually
patching the upstream
That quilt error may be from a .pc directory still in the build tree?
BINGO!
Removing the .pc directory solved the problem.
Thanks!!!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
Hi,
Multiple pbuilders setting from pbuilder User's Manual doesn't seem to work
for me.
The FAQ section 8 from pbuilder User's Manual
(http://www.red-bean.com/doc/pbuilder/pbuilder-doc.html#ENVVARDISTRIBUTIONSWITCH)
describes briefly a way to setup and use multiple pbuilder setups by
Hi,
I've already removed the Dm-Upload-Allowed entry from my *downloaded* .dsc
file, but it still shows up in the *built* .dsc file.
What's the proper way to fix it?
thx
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Hi,
Is it OK to have compile warnings when building a package? If not,
how can I fix the following:
dial.c: In function 'main':
dial.c:273:8: warning: ignoring return value of 'write', declared with
attribute warn_unused_result [-Wunused-result]
write(fd, buf, bufidx);
I got a bunch of
The FAQ section 8 from pbuilder User's Manual describes briefly a way to
setup and use multiple pbuilder setups...
Here's some examples on running pbuilder or pdebuild:
DIST=gutsy sudo pbuilder create
DIST=sid sudo pbuilder create --mirror http://http.us.debian.org/debian
It turns
I've already removed the Dm-Upload-Allowed entry from my
*downloaded* .dsc file, but it still shows up in the *built*
.dsc file. What's the proper way to fix it?
Remove the DMUA entry from debian/control.
Thanks Vincent.
JFTR, this is what I tried before asking the question,
grep
/
* Package name: dbab
Version : 1.0.1
Upstream Author : Tong Sun suntong...@users.sourceforge.net
* URL : https://github.com/suntong001/dbab
* License : bsd
Section : net
It builds those binary packages:
dbab - dnsmasq-based ad-blocking using
the
following URL:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/shc
Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/shc/shc_3.8.9-1.dsc
Please review and sponsor.
Thanks
Tong Sun
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ
.1.gz:101
I suggest to you fix the problems and re-upload your package, that is
very interesting and useful.
Regards,
Eriberto
2014/1/18 Tong Sun suntong...@users.sourceforge.net:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package shc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 7:50 AM, Eriberto eribe...@eriberto.pro.br wrote:
You have a lintian message yet:
I: shc: spelling-error-in-manpage usr/share/man/man1/shc.1.gz comand command
And your problem isn't lintian version, but the configuration. Please,
read this:
Dear mentors,
I'd like to bring to your attention again to my package shc.
I am still looking for a sponsor for it.
Thanks to Eriberto's tireless help, I think I have cleared all the problems.
Please review and sponsor.
Thanks
* Package name: shc
Version : 3.8.9-1
Upstream
: dbab
Version : 1.1.1-1
Upstream Author : Tong Sun suntong...@users.sourceforge.net
* URL : https://github.com/suntong001/dbab
* License : BSD
Section : net
It builds those binary packages:
dbab - dnsmasq-based ad-blocking using pixelserv
at
http://sfxpt.wordpress.com/2014/11/30/use-new-dbab-to-set-proxy-
automatically/#advantages;
Once again, I am looking for a sponsor for my newly upgraded package
dbab
* Package name: dbab
Version : 1.1.1-1
Upstream Author : Tong Sun suntong...@users.sourceforge.net
* URL
at
http://sfxpt.wordpress.com/2014/11/30/use-new-dbab-to-set-proxy-
automatically/#advantages;
Once again, I am looking for a sponsor for my newly upgraded package
dbab
* Package name: dbab
Version : 1.1.1-1
Upstream Author : Tong Sun suntong...@users.sourceforge.net
* URL
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Johannes Schauer j.scha...@email.de wrote:
posting it every 3 hours will only help you to NOT find a sponsor for your
package.
I understand your concern, but that's not my intention.
If you take a look at
-proxy-automatically/#advantages.
Thanks
Best Regards,
Tong Sun
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
https://lists.debian.org/cammz1od0zaapfirp6h12x1g4z+p5dt6w1izse7o-mftb4lq
build from source will
also benefit from the manpage.
* There are a few minor grammatical errors in histring --help:
useage should be usage
your self should be yourself hilighting should be
highlighting
Good luck getting your package into Debian!
Riley Baird
Thanks
Best Regards,
Tong Sun
source will
also benefit from the manpage.
* There are a few minor grammatical errors in histring --help:
useage should be usage
your self should be yourself hilighting should be
highlighting
Good luck getting your package into Debian!
Riley Baird
Thanks
Best Regards,
Tong Sun
Hi Gianfranco,
Thanks for the review.
All have been fixed as instructed. Ref
https://github.com/suntong/shc-build/commits/master
And new build is uploaded to
http://mentors.debian.net/package/shc
The respective dsc file can be found at:
ained from
https://github.com/suntong/shc-build/commits/master
Regards,
Tong Sun
HI Mattia, thanks for the reivew.
On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 12:32 PM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> control: tag -1 + moreinfo
>
> Hi!
>
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 11:47:21PM -0500, Tong Sun wrote:
> > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dbab/dbab_1.3.1-1.dsc
> >
>
Ops, you are totally right. :)
On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 9:03 PM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 08:51:46PM -0500, Tong Sun wrote:
> > hmm..., wait, addition of dnutils to the depends has been documented
> > in changelog, right?
> >
> > $ gre
ent errors
- [!] fix "dep5-copyright-license-name-not-unique"
- [!] fix "missing-license-paragraph"
-- Tong Sun <suntong...@users.sourceforge.net> Fri, ...
dbab (1.2.2-2) unstable; urgency=high
...
Would that be looking good?
Thanks
On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 8:12 P
now looking for a sponsor.
* Package name: dbab
Version : 1.3.1-1
Upstream Author : Tong Sun <suntong...@users.sourceforge.net>
* URL : https://github.com/suntong/dbab
* License : BSD
Section : net
It builds those binary packages:
is apparently packaging Debian packages officially for
the first time?
Thanks
On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 11:50 AM, Tong Sun <suntong...@users.sourceforge.net
> wrote:
> Oh, yeah, Md Jahidul Hamid is now the new upstream maintainer, and he has
> agreed to do the Debian packaging as well.
>
Oh, yeah, Md Jahidul Hamid is now the new upstream maintainer, and he has
agreed to do the Debian packaging as well.
See the bug#861180 at the bottom.
Is there anything else that I need to do, Gianfranco?
On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 6:50 AM, Gianfranco Costamagna <
locutusofb...@debian.org> wrote:
Hi,
Would anyone helping with the following please?
On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 11:33 AM Tong Sun wrote:
>
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I updated my dbab to a newer version -- to accommodate for the bug
> #903065, which requested
Hi,
I have a d/rules file that uses systemd:
rules: dh $@ --with systemd
When setting debhelper-compat-version to 11 to fix the
“package-uses-old-debhelper-compat-version” problem, I got:
dh: unable to load addon systemd: dh: The systemd-sequence is no
longer provided in compat >= 11,
On Monday, August 27, 2018, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 11:30:55AM -0400, Tong Sun wrote:
> > I updated my dbab to a newer version -- to accommodate for the bug
> > #903065, which requested to update Build-Depends: ruby-ronn -> ronn.
> You
ess and your mobile device browsing without
even installing any apps to them.
* Package name: dbab
Version : 1.3.2-2
Upstream Author : Tong Sun
* URL : https://github.com/suntong/dbab
* License : BSD
Section : net
It builds those binary packa
On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 1:49 PM Tong Sun wrote:
>
> On Monday, August 27, 2018, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 11:30:55AM -0400, Tong Sun wrote:
>> > I updated my dbab to a newer version -- to accommodate for the bug
>> > #903065, whi
On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 4:41 AM Dominique Dumont wrote:
>
>
> Note that the copyright file can be generated from sources:
..
> You can also check the file with: cme edit dpkg-copyright.
>
> These tools require cme packages with its recommended dependencies.
cme - Check or edit configuration
Hi,
I sent the following email to Debian FTP Master a while back, but
haven't received anything till now.
Can somebody else help please, to send me the .dak file for the 'dbab'
package that I maintain?
thx
-- Forwarded message -
From: Tong Sun
Date: Fri, Jul 6, 2018 at 8:35 AM
On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 12:20 PM Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
>
> On Friday, July 20 2018, Tong Sun wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I sent the following email to Debian FTP Master a while back, but
> > haven't received anything till now.
> >
> > Can somebo
On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 12:10 PM Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 12:00:30PM -0400, Tong Sun wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I sent the following email to Debian FTP Master a while back, but
> > haven't received anything till now.
> >
> >
On Sun, Jul 8, 2018 at 9:09 AM Tong Sun wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 8, 2018 at 2:30 AM Geert Stappers wrote:
>> . . .
>> `gbp clone URL` is only intended for URL which has gbp information.
>>
>> Direction to go: Take a detour
>>
>> Do `gbp clone EXISTING_GB
Try again, for the weekend. Thanks everyone.
On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 10:24 PM Tong Sun wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Would anyone helping with the following please?
>
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 11:33 AM Tong Sun wrote:
> >
> > Package: sponsorship-requests
> > Severity: no
Try again. *new sponsor* needed. thx.
On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 6:01 PM Tong Sun wrote:
> Try again, for the weekend. Thanks everyone.
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 10:24 PM Tong Sun wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Would anyone helping with the following please?
> >
Thanks a lot Shengjing, you've been most helpful -- always bang on, always.
> However, then, how to make `dpkg-source` happy as well, without
> complaining? I shouldn't remove them from upstream git (therefore in my
> master as well), should I?
> >
> That's because the upstream repo has
Hi,
I did a
gbp clone -v https://github.com/neurobin/shc.git
from scratch, but found that my branches are:
$ git branch -v
* master 556fd7a release after fix #38
release 379c501 release after fix #38
See? the upstream-branch is not 'upstream' but called `release` instead.
Why?
Shouldn't
Hi,
I'm adding a lintian check to my gbp postbuild:
$ grep lintian ~/.gbp.conf
# Run lintian to check package after build
postbuild = lintian $GBP_CHANGES_FILE
However, I'll get this error at the end:
--
gbp:info: Running Postbuild hook
warning:
On Sun, Jul 8, 2018 at 9:53 PM Daniele Nicolodi - dani...@grinta.net
wrote:
> On 08/07/2018 19:28, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > On Sun, 08 Jul 2018, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
> >> After a successful package build done with 'gbp buildpackage' the
> >> package directory is left in a state
Hi,
I want to extend the gpg-agent's entry cache time by giving
the max-cache-ttl some crazy big number,
--max-cache-ttl n
Set the maximum time a cache entry is valid to n seconds.
After
this time a cache entry will be expired even if it has
been
On Sat, Jul 7, 2018 at 10:38 PM Tong Sun wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a question following
> https://honk.sigxcpu.org/projects/git-buildpackage/manual-html/gbp.import.upstream-git.html
> ,
>
> > If upstream doesn't build upstream tarballs, or you don't care about
> them, t
Hi,
I have a question following
https://honk.sigxcpu.org/projects/git-buildpackage/manual-html/gbp.import.upstream-git.html
,
> If upstream doesn't build upstream tarballs, or you don't care about
them, the simplest way is to clone upstream's repository and create a
separate packaging branch in
On Sun, Jul 8, 2018 at 2:30 AM Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 07, 2018 at 10:38:51PM -0400, Tong Sun wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have a question following
> >
> https://honk.sigxcpu.org/projects/git-buildpackage/manual-html/gbp.import.upstream-git.html
> > ,
On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 2:53 AM Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jul 08, 2018 at 06:16:47PM -0400, Tong Sun wrote:
> > Did you create `pristine-tar` manually before calling `gbp buildpackage`?
> This is wrong.
So would you explain what steps are correct instead then,
andy audio/video compression tool that wraps ffmpeg for easy usage.
Please consider to review and upload it.
Thanks,
tong
* Package name: ffcvt
Version : 1.3.1
Upstream Author : Tong Sun
* URL : https://github.com/suntong/ffcvt
* License : MIT
Programmin
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
I've prepared the Debian package of
"golang-github-danverbraganza-varcaser". The package was
tested on sbuild and was successfully built. I've
uploaded the package to the salsa repo which may be found at:
On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 10:27 AM Patrice Duroux wrote:
> And so here is the current work available at Salsa on my guest account:
> https://salsa.debian.org/Peutch-guest/abcm2ps
I'm not an expert at all, but I think the project on Salsa should
include 3 branches, including upstream, pristine-tar
On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 7:05 AM ant wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 07:06:29AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> ...
> > The D-M-Faq doesn't mention any other available sponsors but does
> > contain tips on finding sponsors.
> >
> > Another page that could be mentioned is the Mentoring one, which
> >
Hi,
My debian/control has the
possible-unindented-list-in-extended-description warning.
I've checked back-and-forth several times but really couldn't figure
out where that possibility could be.
Could somebody check it for me please? I've post it at --
On Sat, Dec 1, 2018 at 12:58 PM Andreas Ronnquist wrote:
> >My debian/control has the
> >possible-unindented-list-in-extended-description warning.
> >
> >I've checked back-and-forth several times but really couldn't figure
> >out where that possibility could be.
> >
> >Could somebody check it for
On Sat, Dec 1, 2018 at 12:46 PM Dominik George wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > My debian/control has the
> > possible-unindented-list-in-extended-description warning.
> >
> > I've checked back-and-forth several times but really couldn't figure
> > out where that possibility could be.
>
> It comes from the
> On Sat, Dec 01, 2018 at 12:21:17PM -0500, Tong Sun wrote:
> > My debian/control has the
> > possible-unindented-list-in-extended-description warning.
> >
> > I've checked back-and-forth several times but really couldn't figure
> > out where that possibility
On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 10:54 AM Raju Devidas wrote:
> I am looking to file an ITP for a package with name xyz.
> While looking for current ITP's or other bugs on WNPP.
>
> I found that there is already a package named xyz for RFP.
> The xyz ITP and the xyz RFP are two different packages with the
On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 11:00 AM Popout3D - popou...@yahoo.com wrote:
> ... I need to upload a source package.
>
> . . . The command is dput
> .changes which doesn't specify source/binary, so how do I ensure that
> dput uploads the source package?
build the source, then dput the .changes of the
Please disregard the following message.
Found the answer from
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/33235395/run-chroot-within-docker
On Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 10:37 AM Tong Sun
wrote:
>
> Package: sbuild
> Version: 0.78.1-1
> Severity: normal
>
> Hi,
>
> Does sbuild work
Package: sbuild
Version: 0.78.1-1
Severity: normal
Hi,
Does sbuild works within docker?
I'm getting "Chroot setup failed" error.
Here are the steps to reproduce (within docker):
gbp clone --all --pristine-tar
g...@salsa.debian.org:go-team/packages/golang-github-ghodss-yaml.git
cd
How long does it normally take for a Full-freeze to turn into a release?
The https://release.debian.org/buster/freeze_policy.html only list to
Full-freeze, so I'm wondering when it is good to do packaging again.
thx.
On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 5:04 PM Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
>
> On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 04:29:19PM -0400, Tong Sun wrote:
> > How long does it normally take for a Full-freeze to turn into a release?
> Several months.
>
> > The https://release.debian.org/buster/free
How long does it normally take for a Full-freeze to turn into a release?
The https://release.debian.org/buster/freeze_policy.html only list to
Full-freeze, so I'm wondering when it is good to do packaging again.
thx.
Hi,
I want to reportbug from docker, but am getting:
reportbug will not run as root non-interactively.
I.e.,
% reportbug --template -S normal sbuild-debian-developer-setup
Warning: no reportbug configuration found. Proceeding in novice mode.
reportbug will not run as root
Hi,
I'm new to Debian packaging and gbp buildpackage, and many time I want
to try out my fixes without checking them in, would that be possible
with `gbp buildpackage`?
Because whenever, I have above situation, gbp buildpackage will complains:
- - - - - - - - - - - -
gbp:error: You have
On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 6:08 AM Emmanuel Arias wrote:
> >> Using `--git-ignore-new` will get my changes ignore entirely, and the
> >> build will keep complaining about the same error.
> >>
> >> What's the solution? Thx
> >>
> That is weird. Currently I am working with gbp and --git-ignore-new
On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 1:28 PM Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 12:27:15PM -0400, Tong Sun wrote:
> > Yes, I noticed that `--git-ignore-new` will ignore my changes entirely
> It doesn't do that.
> Also, it all is described in the manpage.
>
> &
On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 1:39 PM Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 01:32:46PM -0400, Tong Sun wrote:
> > > Haven't you seen my email with the correct answer?
> >
> > Too short to figure out what you were trying to say.
> I see.
>
> > In my
On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 11:42 AM Adam Lewenberg wrote:
>
> On 3/19/2019 3:08 AM, Emmanuel Arias wrote:
> > HI,
> >
> >
> >>> Using `--git-ignore-new` will get my changes ignore entirely, and the
> >>> build will keep complaining about the same error.
> >>>
> >>> What's the solution? Thx
> >>>
> >
Hi,
`debuild clean` failed for me strangely:
$ debuild clean
dpkg-buildpackage -us -uc -ui clean
dpkg-buildpackage: error: unknown option or argument clean
Use --help for program usage information.
debuild: fatal error at line 1182:
dpkg-buildpackage -us -uc -ui clean
On Sat, Jan 26, 2019 at 10:24 AM Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jan 26, 2019 at 04:26:49PM +0200, Tommi Höynälänmaa wrote:
> > I uploaded a new version 0.7.5-2 of package theme-d-gnome about five hours
> > ago but so far I haven't received any response.
>
> I think the importer was stuck
On Sat, Feb 2, 2019 at 10:14 AM Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> ffcvt is now in NEW: . . .
Thanks for your kind explanation Mattia, after which I found that
email in my trash bin, :-(
Thanks again everyone!
On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 12:27 AM Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
> Done.
Thanks again Sergio
I'm preparing for the Greater Toronto Area Linux Users Group Debian
Bug Squashing Party at the end of this month.
See you there.
On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 12:18 AM Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, April 17 2019, Tong Sun wrote:
>
> > If I need to create a project on Salsa, what should I do?
> >
> > Here are the details
> >
> > The Debian package I'm talking about is shc, i
Hi,
If I need to create a project on Salsa, what should I do?
Here are the details
The Debian package I'm talking about is shc, i.e.:
https://sources.debian.org/src/shc/3.9.6-1/debian/control/
I.e.,
Source: shc
Section: devel
I guess I can't create such project on my own right?
please help.
On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 7:45 AM Tong Sun wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 4:40 AM Bart Martens wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 4:26 PM Tong Sun wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jun 6, 2019 at 8:05 AM Tong Sun wrote:
> > > >
&g
have
included 928...@bugs.debian.org at the very beginning.
And I'm sorry for not having done that sooner, which might have changed
everything, or might be not. But I'll start doing it now.
On Sun, Jun 16, 2019 at 10:39 AM Mo Zhou - lu...@debian.org
wrote:
> Hi Tong Sun,
>
&g
On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 11:28 AM Vipul
> . . . Since I'm using Debian for work purpose also so, I don't want to
> mess-up with my system by installing unstable packages or libraries. Is
> there a way to get isolation for work & contribution purpose to keep yourself
> organized?
> I can get
On Sat, May 18, 2019 at 1:39 PM Geert Stappers wrote:
> Why the hurry?
Sorry, my bad. Should have wait 5 minutes longer, to see your post.
Apologize.
On Sat, May 18, 2019 at 11:53 AM Tong Sun wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> How to fix this?
>
> $ gbp import-orig --uscan --verbose
> gbp:debug: ['git', 'rev-parse', '--show-cdup']
> gbp:debug: ['git', 'rev-parse', '--is-bare-repository']
> gbp:debug: ['git', 'rev-parse', '--g
On Sat, May 18, 2019 at 1:26 PM Geert Stappers wrote:
> In other words:uscan tries to express there is NO new upstream version
Ha!
> Why `uscan` returns a non-zero value for "no new version"
> is unclear to me.
Yeah, that scared the shit out of me, :-)
Thanks Geert.
I'll ask the upstream
Hi,
How to fix this?
$ gbp import-orig --uscan --verbose
gbp:debug: ['git', 'rev-parse', '--show-cdup']
gbp:debug: ['git', 'rev-parse', '--is-bare-repository']
gbp:debug: ['git', 'rev-parse', '--git-dir']
gbp:debug: ['git', 'for-each-ref', '--format=%(refname:short)', 'refs/heads/']
gbp:debug:
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 9:16 AM Tong Sun
wrote:
>
> The RFS fixes all the following action items in the bug tracker
> (https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/shc):
>
> A new upstream version is available: 4.0.1 high
> Failed to analyze the VCS repository. Please troubleshoot and fix
On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 12:42 AM Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
>
> On Saturday, May 18 2019, Geert Stappers wrote:
>
> > On Sat, May 18, 2019 at 11:53:13AM -0400, Tong Sun wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> How to fix this?
> >>
> >> $ gbp impo
On Wed, May 1, 2019 at 3:50 PM Shreyas Bapat wrote:
> I made a stop for good, and departed from the train station in a very little
> time towards the destination. :)
, I view such departure as the result of poking fun at the
new-comers, instead of giving them direct answers -- direct answers
this package. normal
lintian reports 1 warning normal
Standards version of the package is outdated. wishlist
ubuntu version: 3.9.6-1
1 bug
Thanks
On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 6:51 PM Tong Sun - suntong...@gmail.com
wrote:
>
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear
On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 2:56 PM Tong Sun wrote:
> I saw many people are stop using the "pristine-tar" branch, since the
> "pristine-tar" tool can do just that.
To add more content, this is where the idea comes from:
https://joeyh.name/blog/entry/generating_pristine_tarb
Hi,
What is the simplest way to put all contributors into the Debian copyright file?
I know the hardest way is associate each with their corresponding
change files, but for popular projects, the Debian copyright file
would be unnecessarily HUGE.
Would this be acceptable? Especially for those
On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 3:15 PM Dominik George wrote:
> You can use pristine-tar or not. You cannot use pristine-tar without a
> pristine-tar branch.
Gotya. THX!
Hi,
I saw many people are stop using the "pristine-tar" branch, since the
"pristine-tar" tool can do just that.
If I want to do the same,
- what should I do, if I have a repo that contains such pristine-tar branch?
- If I have a repo that contains such pristine-tar branch that has
never been
1 - 100 of 205 matches
Mail list logo
