Bug#891182: RFS: ssh-tools/1.4-1

2018-04-22 Thread Sven Wick
Hi Andrey, still something wrong with the package?

Bug#891182: RFS: ssh-tools/1.4-1

2018-02-26 Thread Sven Wick
Ah well, after some fiddling lintian stopped complaining... On 02/26/2018 08:20 PM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 07:23:35PM +0100, Sven Wick wrote: Yeah, I did. But when I tried to get rid of the warnings it complained about the whole control file. Didn't find this

Bug#891182: RFS: ssh-tools/1.4-1

2018-02-26 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 07:23:35PM +0100, Sven Wick wrote: > Yeah, I did. But when I tried to get rid of the warnings > it complained about the whole control file. > > Didn't find this "empty paragraph" Description: collection of various tools using ssh . > and how to get rid of the

Bug#891182: RFS: ssh-tools/1.4-1

2018-02-26 Thread Sven Wick
Yeah, I did. But when I tried to get rid of the warnings it complained about the whole control file. Didn't find this "empty paragraph" and how to get rid of the "unindented list" warning On 02/26/2018 06:25 PM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 12:01:18AM +0100, Sven Wick

Bug#891182: RFS: ssh-tools/1.4-1

2018-02-26 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 12:01:18AM +0100, Sven Wick wrote: > OK. It's done and uploaded to mentors Have you run lintian on it? Or at least looked at the mentors page? -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#891182: RFS: ssh-tools/1.4-1

2018-02-25 Thread Sven Wick
OK. It's done and uploaded to mentors On 02/25/2018 11:10 PM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 10:22:08PM +0100, Sven Wick wrote: Hm, which one would you suggest? In the Debian Policy "Recommends" is said to be a "strong" dependency which I think "jq" and "jo" are not, so I

Bug#891182: RFS: ssh-tools/1.4-1

2018-02-25 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 10:22:08PM +0100, Sven Wick wrote: > Hm, which one would you suggest? > In the Debian Policy "Recommends" is said to be a "strong" dependency > which I think "jq" and "jo" are not, so I used "Suggests" Nothing, otherwise packages would declare Suggests: less. -- WBR, wRAR

Bug#891182: RFS: ssh-tools/1.4-1

2018-02-25 Thread Sven Wick
On 02/25/2018 03:27 PM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: Control: tags -1 + moreinfo You shouldn't write changelog entries for releases that were not uploaded. And you first changelog entry should close an ITP. Ok, will change that Looking at the repo, you shouldn't keep debian/ in the master

Bug#891182: RFS: ssh-tools/1.4-1

2018-02-25 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo You shouldn't write changelog entries for releases that were not uploaded. And you first changelog entry should close an ITP. Looking at the repo, you shouldn't keep debian/ in the master branch as that implies packaging changes are a part of the project release

Bug#891182: RFS: ssh-tools/1.4-1

2018-02-22 Thread Sven Wick
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ssh-tools" * Package name: ssh-tools Version : 1.4-1 Upstream Author : Sven Wick * URL : https://github.com/vaporup/ssh-tools/ *