Bug#892417: RFS: streamlink/0.11.0+dfsg-1

2018-03-11 Thread Paul Wise 
On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 1:31 AM, Alexis Murzeau wrote:

> Shouldn't not so much used packages preferably not be backported (to
> avoid maintenance costs to other involved parties) ?

The backports policy says "Please only upload package with a notable
userbase. User request for the package may be an indicator.", but I
guess this package qualifies based on the popcon information for
streamlink and livestreamer:

https://backports.debian.org/Contribute/
https://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=streamlink
https://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=livestreamer

> Also, why should backports be uploaded after the unstable package enter
> testing ?
> To ensure there is a clean upgrade path from stable / stable-backport to
> testing ?

The backports policy says "To guarantee an upgrade path from
stable+backports to the next stable, the package should be in
testing."

-- 
bye,
pabs

https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

Bug#892417: RFS: streamlink/0.11.0+dfsg-1

2018-03-11 Thread Alexis Murzeau 
Le 09/03/2018 à 03:14, Paul Wise a écrit :
> On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 7:37 AM, Alexis Murzeau wrote:
> 
>> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "streamlink" for a new
>> upstream version 0.11.0.
> 
> Uploaded.
> 
> PS: if you would like to upload an official backport, feel free to
> file another RFS for that when it reaches testing.
> 

Thanks :)

About the backport, I'm keeping it in a unofficial repository as there
were not so much downloads. Now that this repository is advertised on
streamlink download page, I might reconsider this choice.

Shouldn't not so much used packages preferably not be backported (to
avoid maintenance costs to other involved parties) ?

If, in any case, unofficial backports are better made official, I can
surely target official backports repository.

Also, why should backports be uploaded after the unstable package enter
testing ?
To ensure there is a clean upgrade path from stable / stable-backport to
testing ?

-- 
Alexis Murzeau
PGP: B7E6 0EBB 9293 7B06 BDBC  2787 E7BD 1904 F480 937F



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#892417: RFS: streamlink/0.11.0+dfsg-1

2018-03-08 Thread Paul Wise 
On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 7:37 AM, Alexis Murzeau wrote:

> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "streamlink" for a new
> upstream version 0.11.0.

Uploaded.

PS: if you would like to upload an official backport, feel free to
file another RFS for that when it reaches testing.

-- 
bye,
pabs

https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

Bug#892417: RFS: streamlink/0.11.0+dfsg-1

2018-03-08 Thread Alexis Murzeau 
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist

Dear mentors,

I am looking for a sponsor for my package "streamlink" for a new
upstream version 0.11.0.

 * Package name: streamlink
   Version : 0.11.0+dfsg-1
   Upstream Author : Streamlink Team
 * URL : https://streamlink.github.io/
 * License : BSD-2-clause, Apache-2.0, MIT/Expat, SIL-OFL-1.1
   Section : python

It builds those binary packages:

  livestreamer - transitional package - streamlink
  python3-streamlink - Python module for extracting video streams from
various websites
  python3-streamlink-doc - CLI for extracting video streams from various
websites (documenta
  streamlink - CLI for extracting video streams from various websites to
a video

To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:
  https://mentors.debian.net/package/streamlink


Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:

  dget -x
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/streamlink/streamlink_0.11.0+dfsg-1.dsc

More information about streamlink can be obtained from
https://streamlink.github.io/

Changes since the last upload:
streamlink (0.11.0+dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=low

  * Fix comments in d/rules.
  * Use streamlink's own donation page instead of opencollective one.
  * Fix random test failure caused by hexdump output optimization with
 wildcards.
  * Add example directory.
  * New upstream version 0.11.0+dfsg.
  * python3-socks is now required as a build dependency.

 -- Alexis Murzeau   Fri, 09 Mar 2018 00:12:49 +0100

Regards,
--
 Alexis Murzeau
 PGP: B7E6 0EBB 9293 7B06 BDBC  2787 E7BD 1904 F480 937F







signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature