Re: A package to be removed
Hello The removal is OK now. - Tommi OpenPGP_0xBB861FDE40460F83.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: A package to be removed
On Mon, 2021-11-22 at 08:47 +0200, Tommi Höynälänmaa wrote: > Package theme-d-gnome was scheduled for autoremoval on 2021-11-21 but > it looks like the package has not been removed yet. It looks like the autoremoval was processed: $ apt-cache madison theme-d-gnome theme-d-gnome |0.9.6-3 | https://deb.debian.org/debian unstable/main amd64 Packages theme-d-gnome |0.9.6-3 | https://deb.debian.org/debian unstable/main Sources $ rmadison theme-d-gnome theme-d-gnome | 0.7.5-2 | oldstable | source, all theme-d-gnome | 0.9.5-4 | stable | source, all theme-d-gnome | 0.9.6-3 | unstable | source, all $ w3m -dump https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/theme-d-gnome | grep -A6 versions | tail -n3 • oldstable: 0.7.5-2 • stable: 0.9.5-4 • unstable: 0.9.6-3 > I searched the package at packages.debian.org and the package was > displayed there in testing and unstable distributions. The packages site usually takes longer to update than other sources. > Grep-excuses displays theme-d-gnome as "flagged for removal". It is still in the list of auto-removals hints but not in the autoremoval calculations, so next time the hints are regenerated and then the testing migration runs I expect the excuses will change. https://release.debian.org/britney/hints/auto-removals https://udd.debian.org/cgi-bin/autoremovals.yaml.cgi -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: ghdl package has been removed from Mentors
Le 19/07/2014 17:00, Guido van Steen a écrit : I agree with Joris. Users are not properly informed that discussions on mentors.debian.net may be automatically lost after a package is removed from mentors.debian.net. This should be changed. I would rather see the information backed-up in some way before it is deleted. Does this require a bug report again debexpo, or is this mailing list the place for a discussion? Hi, IMHO, the right place for discussing a particular package is it's ITP bug (when the package is prospective) or the RFS bug. Kind regards, Thibaut. -- * Dr Thibaut Paumard | LESIA/CNRS - Table équatoriale (bât. 5) * * Tel: +33 1 45 07 78 60 | Observatoire de Paris - Section de Meudon * * Fax: +33 1 45 07 79 17 | 5, Place Jules Janssen* * thibaut.paum...@obspm.fr | 92195 MEUDON CEDEX (France) * smime.p7s Description: Signature cryptographique S/MIME
Re: ghdl package has been removed from Mentors
} IMHO, the right place for discussing a particular package is it's ITP } bug (when the package is prospective) or the RFS bug. AFAIAA there is no ITP or RFS for the package debexpo (the software at issue, which is running at mentors.debian.net). Guido -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/camtvz+utjlwja7usdj-gxtphkfhxgvu8ymcwgrcetxync61...@mail.gmail.com
Re: ghdl package has been removed from Mentors
Le 21/07/2014 10:37, Guido van Steen a écrit : } IMHO, the right place for discussing a particular package is it's ITP } bug (when the package is prospective) or the RFS bug. AFAIAA there is no ITP or RFS for the package debexpo (the software at issue, which is running at mentors.debian.net). Guido Hi, this is not what I mean: I don't like the comments feature of debexpo, my opinion is that comments on a to-be-sponsored package should be sent to the corresponding RFS bug. Debexpo has its own bug tracker: https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?atid=413115group_id=100127func=browse I guess it is supposed to be used for feature requests concerning debexpo. Kind regards, Thibaut. -- * Dr Thibaut Paumard | LESIA/CNRS - Table équatoriale (bât. 5) * * Tel: +33 1 45 07 78 60 | Observatoire de Paris - Section de Meudon * * Fax: +33 1 45 07 79 17 | 5, Place Jules Janssen* * thibaut.paum...@obspm.fr | 92195 MEUDON CEDEX (France) * smime.p7s Description: Signature cryptographique S/MIME
Re: ghdl package has been removed from Mentors
Hi Thibaut, } this is not what I mean: I don't like the comments feature of debexpo, } my opinion is that comments on a to-be-sponsored package should be sent } to the corresponding RFS bug. Sorry for my misunderstanding. Yes, comments could indeed be referred to the RFS/ITP bug. Debexpo could take care of handling this automatically. } Debexpo has its own bug tracker: } https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?atid=413115group_id=100127func=browse Thanks for the url of the debexpo's bug tracker. Bug# 314604 seems to reflect the remarks by Joris van Rantwijk. However, noone has addressed the lost comments feature yet. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/camtvz+t1nxpvwymumvffn3bw9hkijpqossrsezj+de5fian...@mail.gmail.com
Re: ghdl package has been removed from Mentors
I have just submitted the issue as bug# 314771. On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 5:17 PM, Guido van Steen vanst...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: Hi Thibaut, } this is not what I mean: I don't like the comments feature of debexpo, } my opinion is that comments on a to-be-sponsored package should be sent } to the corresponding RFS bug. Sorry for my misunderstanding. Yes, comments could indeed be referred to the RFS/ITP bug. Debexpo could take care of handling this automatically. } Debexpo has its own bug tracker: } https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/?atid=413115group_id=100127func=browse Thanks for the url of the debexpo's bug tracker. Bug# 314604 seems to reflect the remarks by Joris van Rantwijk. However, noone has addressed the lost comments feature yet. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/camtvz+vimo+ayyks8w3k4qm8djluszmfqh0dmtxryhrnu+i...@mail.gmail.com
Re: ghdl package has been removed from Mentors
On 2014-07-19, mentors.debian.net wrote: Your package ghdl all versions has been removed from mentors.debian.net for the following reason: Your package found no sponsor for 20 weeks Ok. This comes as a bit of a surprise, and it may be unfortunate. My idea was that, even if no sponsor would be found, at least mentors.debian.net would reflect the latest state of development of the package, possibly as a starting point for further work. By removing the package, you have made my work unavailable for the world, and you have also deleted any comments that were posted by prospective sponsors. On the other hand, it is true that I have essentially given up on attempts to get my package into the distribution. I can understand that you want to focus mentors.debian.net on work which is actively developed, and not let it become a dumping ground for half-finished stuff. Fair enough. I will simply move the packaging files back to my personal website. Two points which I think you should consider: * A little warning ahead of time would be nice before you delete stuff. I don't see your 20-weeks rule in the QA, for example. * If I follow the URL to my (now deleted) package page, I would expect an error message saying that the packgage does not currently exist. Instead, the server silently redirects me to the list of packages. That is not helpful. If something goes completely wrong inside a computer, it is important to tell the user about it. There is this misguided notion that users dislike error messages, therefore software should never report errors. Please don't believe that. Kind regards, Joris. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: ghdl package has been removed from Mentors
Hi Andrew, On 2014-07-19, Andrew Shadura wrote: Don't give up. Upload it again and continue trying to find a sponsor. I used to be a ghdl user in the past, but I'm not good at Ada stuff (afaik ghdl is written in Ada), so maybe I'm not the best person for this. Try to approach someone from the Ada team, maybe they can help you. Thanks for your encouragement. I actually found two Debian developers who have been very helpful and were willing to sponsor the package. Unfortunately we then discovered a copyright issue which makes it impossible to distribute GHDL in the Debian archive. I'm still making unofficial GHDL Debian packages available, but my efforts to get GHDL in the Debian archive are on hold. So I agree that this packages does not belong on mentors.debian.net right now. But I think the removal process could be more careful to avoid losing track of work that has already been done. Joris. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: ghdl package has been removed from Mentors
Joris, Don't give up. Upload it again and continue trying to find a sponsor. I used to be a ghdl user in the past, but I'm not good at Ada stuff (afaik ghdl is written in Ada), so maybe I'm not the best person for this. Try to approach someone from the Ada team, maybe they can help you. -- Cheers, Andrew
Re: ghdl package has been removed from Mentors
I agree with Joris. Users are not properly informed that discussions on mentors.debian.net may be automatically lost after a package is removed from mentors.debian.net. This should be changed. I would rather see the information backed-up in some way before it is deleted. Does this require a bug report again debexpo, or is this mailing list the place for a discussion? Best wishes, Guido -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAMtVZ+vO=yvrq0cc7b1q8jt5odsfxjdrq_g_v0hhmmeflja...@mail.gmail.com
Re: ghdl package has been removed from Mentors
On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 11:00 PM, Guido van Steen wrote: Does this require a bug report again debexpo, or is this mailing list the place for a discussion? I think a patch would be more useful, AFAICS no-one has found the time to work on debexpo since February. The point of the removal is that mentors is about active maintenance and old packages means inactive maintainers (probably). Yes, the debexpo codebase should communicate that more effectively and have options for maintainers to keep packages in extenuating circumstances but right now no-one is working on that. -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAKTje6H_iex-6Je7Us3zTgd25=mVpD3=BHOTurO6g=wpr4m...@mail.gmail.com
Re: ghdl package has been removed from Mentors
On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 5:17 PM, Joris van Rantwijk wrote: I actually found two Debian developers who have been very helpful and were willing to sponsor the package. Unfortunately we then discovered a copyright issue which makes it impossible to distribute GHDL in the Debian archive. I'm still making unofficial GHDL Debian packages available, but my efforts to get GHDL in the Debian archive are on hold. I don't know the nature of the copyright issue but in general if Debian can't distribute something, mentors can't either. It sounds like you should have removed ghdl from mentors immediately after discovering this issue. BTW, ghdl is still in unstable/oldstable, should it be removed from there too? https://packages.qa.debian.org/g/ghdl.html -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/caktje6e0sy4oyubfsalyhgfqbyz3x0tmeskm6xmqw_s15qq...@mail.gmail.com
Re: nbc package has been removed from Mentors
Le 16/07/2012 11:17, Slavko a écrit : Dear mentors, Dňa Sun, 15 Jul 2012 09:54:17 + (UTC) mentors.debian.net supp...@mentors.debian.net napísal: Your package nbc all versions has been removed from mentors.debian.net for the following reason: Your package found no sponsor for 20 weeks I was patient with my package, but i was no success to find the sponsor. Please, what did i wrong? Or, please, what i must do better? Need i upload it again? Or something other? Or i need to suppose, that this package is not interested for Debian people and do not waste the sponsor's and my time with it, please? I think that this package can be interesting for Debian users. But, for now, you need to find a DD that is interested in it to sponsor it. This usually mean a DD that have LEGO Mindstorms NXT bricks so that he can test the package. Not sure there are lots of them. And, in this small population, one of them must accept to sponsor you. Ie, he must have some free time to check and test the package. I think that the best thing to do is to continue to maintain this package and to upload it regularly on mentor until a DD accepts to introduce it in Debian. Regards, Vincent thanks -- Vincent Danjean GPG key ID 0x9D025E87 vdanj...@debian.org GPG key fingerprint: FC95 08A6 854D DB48 4B9A 8A94 0BF7 7867 9D02 5E87 Unofficial pkgs: http://moais.imag.fr/membres/vincent.danjean/deb.html APT repo: deb http://people.debian.org/~vdanjean/debian unstable main -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/510fd638.40...@free.fr
Re: nbc package has been removed from Mentors
Hi, Dňa Mon, 16 Jul 2012 12:34:55 +0200 George Danchev danc...@spnet.net napísal: Of course, you should try again. Just put some more salt, in hope to whet the prospective sponsor's appetite. thanks, i will wait some time now. IMO it seems as useless to try it in freeze time. regards -- Slavko http://slavino.sk signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: nbc package has been removed from Mentors
Dear mentors, Dňa Sun, 15 Jul 2012 09:54:17 + (UTC) mentors.debian.net supp...@mentors.debian.net napísal: Your package nbc all versions has been removed from mentors.debian.net for the following reason: Your package found no sponsor for 20 weeks I was patient with my package, but i was no success to find the sponsor. Please, what did i wrong? Or, please, what i must do better? Need i upload it again? Or something other? Or i need to suppose, that this package is not interested for Debian people and do not waste the sponsor's and my time with it, please? thanks -- Slavko http://slavino.sk signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: nbc package has been removed from Mentors
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Le 16/07/12 11:17, Slavko a écrit : Dear mentors, Dňa Sun, 15 Jul 2012 09:54:17 + (UTC) mentors.debian.net supp...@mentors.debian.net napísal: Your package nbc all versions has been removed from mentors.debian.net for the following reason: Your package found no sponsor for 20 weeks I was patient with my package, but i was no success to find the sponsor. Please, what did i wrong? Or, please, what i must do better? Need i upload it again? Or something other? Or i need to suppose, that this package is not interested for Debian people and do not waste the sponsor's and my time with it, please? thanks Dear Slavko, It's not easy to get a sponsor, especially during a freeze (please read my previous message from 15min ago entitled Re: freeze policy - open requests for sponsorship). Don't give up, re-upload and try to send your RFS to maintainers (team or other) who you think should be interested (not only to debian-mentors). When I'm looking for a sponsor, I personally answer my own RFS with a [ping] message every month or so, just to show I'm still there, waiting for a sponsor. Concerning your RFS: you should perhaps explain why you think nbc is good for Debian, whether you intend on maintaining it on the longer run (think 5-10 years) and why... In the meantime you can upload your package on a personal repository (have a look at the reprepro package) and try building a userbase outside Debian. Reading the ITP, I see you already have a prospective user, contact him. Regards,Thibaut. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJQA986AAoJEJOUU0jg3ChA1rAP/2EWacXzO5ao0Rp4qpK++HDm 8AHFKQL/7kV96oFD5x8XrfPkijEfld4DLmm5f4ZIoKDji8H1jULL8nsIiaQEoX58 nk7oLi/J5zZq4q4PRCEWFdwOhDqGPSoxuSXdWxCe40A9YBNCt8cgrhV/HN20CIhl RHXq0dKEH0VySr9LVwND4xKdShhkHMZsyQLiEK0C8dpjtnnSQSPfHKBMxkTW0YKh 2sfF08HrQxNq1BxQLumJCAWI9HAGA312NGs8Q6rrbS01tIR2sbq3xq/Wpmx7LAFI SGvAs42tOzj6YwXB8q+3EL3HfKH1yzSX54EZlK+wL01fG9pXbg4glc2ctMO3IgvX iX6pd39Df4+wf8jRJyUS53YrQehFvIGffcamvALdUQc+ZKIxk1M+4Wl803gCSeBc WWRaJcNKqw1rTze4cEo5EXI2zJWGDMT8Y//3ExTp2j25FUjnh8ijSn39eV5vtWOA dLFJMqzeFOKy8Zu/BbW4mDnIhbYRd9mPt1X9qBr5d1H6FYd0+zpveptQAIYHV6fV BC5sRn83RXO721jf7OCP8LeC6tKgIf+RTy3pAxONtqH800ej3vJvM2eFQ2zpWqLa RbRk8Je6mW4vUMAfeMW69Gkv0Wbt4iajf771NvOaT/PuYZvs+7yZFykatYdTldlj TBZYVFPa7cYiTqc4OK6v =Tc3l -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5003df3b.2090...@users.sourceforge.net
Re: nbc package has been removed from Mentors
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Thibaut, thank you for quick reply. Dňa Mon, 16 Jul 2012 11:30:35 +0200 Thibaut Paumard paum...@users.sourceforge.net napísal: It's not easy to get a sponsor, especially during a freeze (please read my previous message from 15min ago entitled Re: freeze policy - open requests for sponsorship). my package was uploaded a long time before freeze. After freeze i am do not expect, that it will be the part of wheeze. Don't give up, re-upload and try to send your RFS to maintainers (team or other) who you think should be interested (not only to debian-mentors). When I'm looking for a sponsor, I personally answer my own RFS with a [ping] message every month or so, just to show I'm still there, waiting for a sponsor. I tried post to electronics team, but without any reply. I am confused with these pings now - after the sponsorship-request pseudo package was introduced (and RFS bugreports) i understand, that there are no pings needed. Another confusion is about the existing RFS bugreport now. It will be closed and new one must be created? Or after new upload i will only need to post reply to existing bug? Is this somewhere documented, please? Concerning your RFS: you should perhaps explain why you think nbc is good for Debian, whether you intend on maintaining it on the longer run (think 5-10 years) and why... In the meantime you can upload your package on a personal repository (have a look at the reprepro package) and try building a userbase outside Debian. Reading the ITP, I see you already have a prospective user, contact him. I have published it in my public personal repo for some (two or three) years, along with others (older or SVN versions) NXT brick's related packages for Debian. You can see them at http://slavino.sk/ulozisko-apt but thanks, i will try it again :-) regards - -- Slavko http://slavino.sk -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQA+W/AAoJEIP5qrg5GI22n8YH/i+Z5UmdWXJf9IoeGVMwaQmv sIHpHUDBvWTSOCzjg0VADpIoPmlr4tdrbEPlHf+D3ISXeE4fgNZPjyVXBnqMtwHt olWL+VaZEd61aD4u6pfrOIauJIfV1g78QCDbUQpBlqZpz/syKOk2QJz4mGAUDOWR LoLLd9FcCAF1I5XeHjRp9YIZDdrq5kdNHVPkTwJW+KtMkQVASEI2QBSxC3p6ADK5 znJkJkWubD1mnRX95lgXC+qxlBfVgrNAO28nugzyP4D95aDrcB2JAYuw4PxHGIVi 3pKXmfdffv2//cfKJTh1PFyogQ+oCSp2rINv4dltJf29KAN+NzyooiJoqmB1PD8= =pIhM -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: nbc package has been removed from Mentors
On Monday 16 July 2012 11:58:23 Slavko wrote: Hi Thibaut, Hi, thank you for quick reply. Dňa Mon, 16 Jul 2012 11:30:35 +0200 Thibaut Paumard paum...@users.sourceforge.net napísal: It's not easy to get a sponsor, especially during a freeze (please read my previous message from 15min ago entitled Re: freeze policy - open requests for sponsorship). my package was uploaded a long time before freeze. After freeze i am do not expect, that it will be the part of wheeze. Don't give up, re-upload and try to send your RFS to maintainers (team or other) who you think should be interested (not only to debian-mentors). When I'm looking for a sponsor, I personally answer my own RFS with a [ping] message every month or so, just to show I'm still there, waiting for a sponsor. I tried post to electronics team, but without any reply. Sometimes it is really hard to find the balance... Consider for instance, that adding more packages to Debian would increase the overall maintenance (in terms of bugs, reviews, uploads, etc - all human time), which in turn might lead to exhaustion of sometimes very scarce human resources, which are then possibly supposed to take care of theirs, and sponsor yours or anyone else other packages as well. See the loop? Therefore, it is sometimes (but not always) more appropriate to just help the existing packages, by joining established teams or simply looking after bug logs of the existing packages you care for, provided you have the time and the will. I'm pretty sure, any well maintained package with responsible maintainer deserves to enter the Debian archive... but the sad part is that sometimes even such good candidates are not considered on time, due to prosaic reasons, like lack of time and/or lack of interest. Hence, just keep trying again. I am confused with these pings now - after the sponsorship-request pseudo package was introduced (and RFS bugreports) i understand, that there are no pings needed. You can still prod people and lists from time to time, you think might be interested in it. Another confusion is about the existing RFS bugreport now. It will be closed and new one must be created? Or after new upload i will only need to post reply to existing bug? Is this somewhere documented, please? Just re-use the existing one (reportbug -N bugnumber) Concerning your RFS: you should perhaps explain why you think nbc is good for Debian, whether you intend on maintaining it on the longer run (think 5-10 years) and why... In the meantime you can upload your package on a personal repository (have a look at the reprepro package) and try building a userbase outside Debian. Reading the ITP, I see you already have a prospective user, contact him. I have published it in my public personal repo for some (two or three) years, along with others (older or SVN versions) NXT brick's related packages for Debian. You can see them at http://slavino.sk/ulozisko-apt but thanks, i will try it again :-) Of course, you should try again. Just put some more salt, in hope to whet the prospective sponsor's appetite. -- pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB people.fccf.net/danchev/key pgp.mit.edu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201207161234.55457.danc...@spnet.net
Re: nbc package has been removed from Mentors
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi again Slavko, Le 16/07/12 11:58, Slavko a écrit : Don't give up, re-upload and try to send your RFS to maintainers (team or other) who you think should be interested (not only to debian-mentors). When I'm looking for a sponsor, I personally answer my own RFS with a [ping] message every month or so, just to show I'm still there, waiting for a sponsor. I tried post to electronics team, but without any reply. I am confused with these pings now - after the sponsorship-request pseudo package was introduced (and RFS bugreports) i understand, that there are no pings needed. You're right, that why I'm not saying you should send them. It may be considered harassment by some sponsors, I don't know. I still send ~monthly pings, and each time try to rephrase why I think it's good to have the package and I try to send it to other people who may want to sponsor it. Another confusion is about the existing RFS bugreport now. It will be closed and new one must be created? Or after new upload i will only need to post reply to existing bug? Is this somewhere documented, please? There is no reason why it would be closed automatically, just answer it. IF it is closed, reopen it. IF it is retitled, retitle it back. In short, as long as your reasonable and don't spam people, it's OK to insist. Being stubborn is not a bad thing :-) Put your heart into it, document in your RFS the fact that you have been effectively maintaining the package for three years already... Also, move on: take care of other packages, find a good sponsor to whom you can then personally ask to review nbc. Enter the NM process, become a DD and then you can finally upload it yourself if everything else fails... Kind regards, Thibaut. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJQBAmJAAoJEJOUU0jg3ChAxLMQANjCzhURYhylUonT8GY/FNZf jN0pj3VSpv92K5iZx5aGhdCHH4EH1tzcMN9gnOmJMK6KCZYl32CcB/0QbdcUWKhz azL+Uf43y+kanCLup5vwv3+BMZMnIQX8lxarotfazZNT9Ux0ouG5PIynQ2o36pLN JuBzPgdSNi4bFXiQocM+YFj7W77jzbCdy4Q83J2WV9JC6HhTyzspnPFQVsf46uZs ATbVSYvZv+DXzbNYtb+WLdjKymEUVbOa+Z9fTPER4KMn3Kw6f139i1nfbWlPuDMD wPVPtQzv+M0Q68YnNrgaOpJJxrOUS64cbbcX3NXWyd9vd+3uXePQdfW88m2HSh0y Xqu8PHkpgiBv72+RqQRAWq53Sr64XuQfs2jGLHTItl6VPaoXGHcbObnOSZgiWKOy pxVxYjWPwDmzHlq+IL8hKod0dHfYJk5H1h5gue1rFmC4+8y1J9ZDy7ko7X6r4IgH AstDzIYsQXHuXZhClEBj2W73+YnEsUhRlJeOtAsE6COtJqhj21P+BnjeXUVNwTMm jBPFQ48QdmEcEqEnxfuSEWgSJOsZMswxlrZ2adyrciUWMXtIYje8PGT1J4b/GgYN KNbJ0j0309o50o+UlE8hG2t9UVPFZ4McaF/uEb02mAW+aBbrTIKzgbHYKPexilM1 /sJEUnPNq5alNx4CiLEX =sqCx -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/50040989.7030...@users.sourceforge.net
