Hi Andreas:
I have seen your mail of Sunday, though I make my
remarks here because they concern present debian
package for i386.
I am not going to details, only basic features from my
personal viewpoint of potential user. Then, it is up
to you to average the various requests.
First, I must
On Sun, 28 Jan 2007, Andreas wrote:
4. debian/compat
The current debhelper version is 5.x. So if you have no
certain reason (like backporting to Sarge for instance),
I would recommend to use debhelper 5 here.
I used the version 4 because otherwise I could not build the
Le Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 03:21:29AM -0500, Andreas a écrit :
I have still one problem: Recognizing the PowerPC architecture.
Currently the corresponding section in our configuration files looks like:
PROCESSOR=`${UNAME} -m`
if test `echo $PROCESSOR|${CUT} -c3` = ppc ; then
Francesco Pietra schrieb:
First, I must congratulate with you and your staff for
this beautiful work. Then, I would like to see in the
future a BAKMDL-type global conformational search in
molecular mechanics. The basic step in any
computational work with natural products, be that
semiempirical
On Sun, 2007-01-28 at 09:45 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
I'm replying to the reply, since I can't find a copy of the original
message in my MUA. Sorry for the sub-optimal threading.
On Sun, 28 Jan 2007, Andreas wrote:
4. debian/compat
The current debhelper version is 5.x. So if
On 1/28/07, Andreas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have still one problem: Recognizing the PowerPC architecture.
Currently the corresponding section in our configuration files looks like:
PROCESSOR=`${UNAME} -m`
if test `echo $PROCESSOR|${CUT} -c3` = ppc ; then
ARCHITECTURE=ppc32
Teemu Ikonen schrieb:
The code above causes a build failure in 32-bit powerpc, the uname -m
output in this case is 'ppc'. The attached patch fixed this for me.
Hi,
thank you very much for the patch, it will be included in the next
package version.
I also built ballview on a 6-month old
Hi,
I have created a new version of package, that takes into account the
following points:
2. The debian-upstream directory is a really interesting
alternative to something we do not really like if upstream
provides a debian directory. I have to
Hi,
I have uploaded a new version of the package.
As BALLview is a new package, if it fails to build on one architecture,
its propagation to the testing distribution will not be impaired. This
lets you one year or two to either fix the problem or drop arch support
before inclusion in the next
On Fri, 26 Jan 2007, Andreas Moll wrote:
I have uploaded a new version of the package.
Well, I checked your work offline and my comments are concerning
the version from tomorrow morning. So feel free to ignore issues
that might be voided by your new version.
I have changed the control file
a very minor correction...
On 1/26/07, Andreas Tille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 26 Jan 2007, Andreas Moll wrote:
I have uploaded a new version of the package.
Well, I checked your work offline and my comments are concerning
the version from tomorrow morning. So feel free to ignore
On Fri, 26 Jan 2007, Kevin B. McCarty wrote:
I'm pretty sure you meant to say Architecture: any here. (For
anyone who might need clarification: an Architecture: any package must
Yes, Thanks for the hint.
I hope this didn't come across as nitpicky, just wanted to make sure
things were clear
12 matches
Mail list logo
