Re: Should I split off arch independant part?

2012-02-09 Thread Savvas Radevic
It has been suggested that I split off the build process so that the archetecture dependant parts of the program can be built without building the documentation each time. If I were you, I'd just convert the .doc to a .pdf. Likewise, your programmer can do that in seconds with a

Re: Should I split off arch independant part?

2012-02-09 Thread Paul Elliott
On Thursday, February 09, 2012 04:37:55 PM Savvas Radevic wrote: If I were you, I'd just convert the .doc to a .pdf. Likewise, your programmer can do that in seconds with a pluginhttp://www.microsoft.com/download/en/details.aspx?id=7(and file save as.. or export?) or a

Re: Should I split off arch independant part?

2012-02-09 Thread Andrea Bolognani
On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 05:21:55PM -0600, Paul Elliott wrote: Unfortunately the .doc file is the source, so everything must be rebuilt from source i.e. the .doc file as part of the build process. What kind of documentation are we talking about? If it’s just a reference manual of some sort,

Re: Should I split off arch independant part?

2012-02-09 Thread gregor herrmann
On Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:00:55 -0600, Paul Elliott wrote: The untimate source of my project is a windows programer who GPLed. He thought it would be a good idea to write the documentation in windows word .doc file! Bad move. The only free program that I can find to convert this document