Re: partimage/0.6.9-2 new upstream build partimage-0.6.9
Hi Andrew, Fine! Uploaded. Thanks for your work. Regards, Eriberto 2016-09-18 5:03 GMT-03:00 Andrew Worsley : > Ok Uploaded partimage-0.6.9-1 again... > On 18 September 2016 at 00:58, Eriberto wrote: >> Hi, >> >> 2016-09-17 11:38 GMT-03:00 Andrew Worsley : >>> On 17 September 2016 at 22:43, Eriberto wrote: Hi Andrew, >> >> However, the last revision (0.6.9-1) is not in Debian yet. Do you >> understand now? The Police tells about revisions already in Debian. >> >> >>> Should I do it again - or is it too late now? >> >> >> Not late! Send to mentors and I will help you. >> >> Regards, >> >> Eriberto > ok - just uploaded partimage-0.6.9-1 again... - hopefully that is what > you meant... -) > > Andrew
Re: partimage/0.6.9-2 new upstream build partimage-0.6.9
Ok Uploaded partimage-0.6.9-1 again... On 18 September 2016 at 00:58, Eriberto wrote: > Hi, > > 2016-09-17 11:38 GMT-03:00 Andrew Worsley : >> On 17 September 2016 at 22:43, Eriberto wrote: >>> Hi Andrew, > > However, the last revision (0.6.9-1) is not in Debian yet. Do you > understand now? The Police tells about revisions already in Debian. > > >> Should I do it again - or is it too late now? > > > Not late! Send to mentors and I will help you. > > Regards, > > Eriberto ok - just uploaded partimage-0.6.9-1 again... - hopefully that is what you meant... -) Andrew
Re: partimage/0.6.9-2 new upstream build partimage-0.6.9
Hi, 2016-09-17 11:38 GMT-03:00 Andrew Worsley : > On 17 September 2016 at 22:43, Eriberto wrote: >> Hi Andrew, >> >> (I removed debian-qa from Cc) >> >> Considering that you are fixing some issues that I pointed in my >> review, you need put all changes in 0.6.9-1 revision in d/changelog. >> You shouldn't release a new revision (0.6.9-2). >> >> Regards, >> >> Eriberto >> > ok - I took the point from the policy of better to add a new changelog > that - re-issue the same package. However, the last revision (0.6.9-1) is not in Debian yet. Do you understand now? The Police tells about revisions already in Debian. > Should I do it again - or is it too late now? Not late! Send to mentors and I will help you. Regards, Eriberto
Re: partimage/0.6.9-2 new upstream build partimage-0.6.9
On 17 September 2016 at 22:43, Eriberto wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > (I removed debian-qa from Cc) > > Considering that you are fixing some issues that I pointed in my > review, you need put all changes in 0.6.9-1 revision in d/changelog. > You shouldn't release a new revision (0.6.9-2). > > Regards, > > Eriberto > ok - I took the point from the policy of better to add a new changelog that - re-issue the same package. Should I do it again - or is it too late now? Andrew
Re: partimage/0.6.9-2 new upstream build partimage-0.6.9
Hi Andrew, (I removed debian-qa from Cc) Considering that you are fixing some issues that I pointed in my review, you need put all changes in 0.6.9-1 revision in d/changelog. You shouldn't release a new revision (0.6.9-2). Regards, Eriberto 2016-09-17 4:47 GMT-03:00 Andrew Worsley : > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new packages] > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "partimage" build of the > orphan'ed package. > - it includes some fixes to address issues identified in the -1 > upload (thanks for the comments). > > Andrew > > * Package name: partimage > Version : 0.6.9-2 > Upstream Author : Orphaned package > * URL : http://www.partimage.org/ > * License : GPLv2 > Section : admin > > It builds these binary packages: > > partimage - backup partitions into a compressed image file > partimage-server - server to use partimage across a network > > To access further information about this package, please visit the > following URL: > > https://mentors.debian.net/package/partimage > > Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command: > > dget -x > https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/partimage/partimage_0.6.9-2.dsc > > More information about partimage can be obtained from > https://www.example.com. > > Changes since the last upload: > * QA upload > * Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.8. No further changes. > * Detail of patch changes in previous release missing > - renamed 03-ftbfs-zlib.patch to 01-ftbfs-zlib.patch > * Fix spelling error reported by lintian > - let's replaced by lets > Changes in previous release > * New upstream release. > * Drop now redundant patches as now in new upstream release: > - 01-openssl.patch > - 02-format-security.patch > > new upstream release (from upstream's changelog): > 0.6.9) 2010-07-25: > applied modifications by Vadim S. (v...@slackware.ru) > applied patch nvieville_server_closenowait_clients_number.patch from > Nicolas Vieville > applied patch nvieville_filesel_NEWT_FLAG_SCROLL.patch from Nicolas > Vieville > applied patch partimage-0.6.7-chown.patch from mandriva (on Makefile.am) > applied patch partimage-0.6.8-format-security.patch from mandriva > applied patches from Nicolas Vieville to fix compilation warnings with > gcc-4.4 / glibc-2.10 > applied patches from Nicolas Vieville to improve internationalisation > (mostly on partimaged) > applied patches from Nicolas Vieville to free ressources in netclient > (fixes memory leaks) > applied patches from Nicolas Vieville to fix issues with openssl-1.0.0 > allow different versions to connect as long as they use the same > protocol and ssl/login options > > I have created a vfat image (it still has the same slightly clunky X > windows / function key interface) and can read the image > > Regards, > Andrew Worsley
