Re: LibreOffice (code) extensions broken on mips64el/riscv64 (was: Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures)

Am 10.07.23 um 18:01 schrieb Rene Engelhard: For both the mips64el and mipsel(!) chroots. This means "bundled" extensions *SEEMS TO* work, those to be installed from .oxt apparently not... The question really is whether they actually do work or whether it's just a wrong positive display.

Re: LibreOffice (code) extensions broken on mips64el/riscv64 (was: Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures)

Hi, Am 04.07.23 um 23:56 schrieb Rene Engelhard: So - Java extension (said TestExtension.oxt used in the smoketest): fails - pure dictionary extension: works - python extension (hungarian grammarcheck - Python): fails - no C++ extension available to test on riscv64 ;-) Tested on riscv64 on

LibreOffice (code) extensions broken on mips64el/riscv64 (was: Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures)

Hi, Am 04.07.23 um 14:23 schrieb René Engelhard: >>... >> This test extension to be installed is a Java extension. >> So I am running a nojava build on eller now... I don't really like disabling >> Java since this opens Pandoras box but for mips64el we probably could do >> that. > >It