On Sun, 2023-08-06 at 13:54 +0200, Florian Lohoff wrote:
> I am late to the party but as i mentioned a couple times on debian-mips
> already i'd like to keep mipsel as a debian-port - and i'd like to
> revert away from mips32r2 back to mips2/mips3 - That change (with
> stretch) basically dropped
On Tue, 2023-07-18 at 12:45 +0800, YunQiang Su wrote:
> As CIP United, we do maintain an unofficial port of mipsel.
> So I wish that Debian can still accept our patch to support mipsel
> port (source only).
> https://repo.oss.cipunited.com/debian/
The closest Debian has to source-only ports are
On Tue, 2023-06-20 at 22:46 +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> Can I suggest that if you file a few bugs and add some information in
> it so that maybe someone can look at it? If it only affects one
> architecture, send a mail to that list asking for help.
PS: when filing architecture-specific bugs,
On Sat, 2018-07-07 at 23:29 +0800, YunQiang Su wrote:
> Since they are quite new, I expect they support mips r2.
I was not able to find any info about that.
> Maybe the problem is due to lack of FPU?
Possibly, did Debian jessie have FPU disabled and stretch has FPU enabled?
Here is
On Sat, 2018-07-07 at 22:54 +0800, YunQiang Su wrote:
> use eb in a chroot env of openwrt etc env is a use case.
In my case it was the default firmware with help of this:
https://github.com/mattimustang/optus-sagemcom-fast-3864-hacks
> What CPU is your router? mips r2 is a quite old ISA
On Sat, Jul 7, 2018 at 10:31 PM, YunQiang Su wrote:
> In fact I don't know anybody is using Debian's mips32eb port.
I used jessie mips on my router in a chroot and was considering going
further, but stretch bumped the ISA requirements so I cannot use it
any longer. Likewise someone on
On Wed, 2017-04-12 at 10:41 +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> So the link has disappeared. What is the status of xburst-tools in
> Debian ? Do we really want that package in Debian ?
It is only needed for the Ben NanoNote, which is no longer shipping.
It looks like Ingenic are no longer actively
On Wed, 2016-06-15 at 01:37 +0300, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> At the openmainframeproject EU meetup, it was indicated that SUSE
> joined with indication that Open Build Service might be able to use
> resources hosted by Marist.
>
> I wonder if it makes sense to reach out, and see if there are
If you have a MIPS-based device, the place to start would be to get
Debian working on that.
You could also work on fixing the issues listed in Build-Attempted,
BD-Uninstallable, Failed and Not-For-Us/Auto-Not-For-Us on these pages:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/architecture.php?a=mips=sid
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 1:21 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
I'm in favor of the old design because I think it's important to havw a list
which can be used to make announcements about important issues that all
porters should be aware of.
We have debian-devel-announce for that, the
Hi all,
Do any porters have any input on this page?
https://wiki.debian.org/GettingPorted
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Mon, 2015-02-02 at 10:56 +0800, YunQiang Su wrote:
Maybe you need updating pmon?
Which version of pmon do you use?
Where can we find updates for pmon?
I note that pmon isn't available in Debian, is anyone planning on
packaging it? It would be nice if we could update it easily.
--
bye,
On Mon, 2015-02-02 at 12:50 +0800, Aron Xu wrote:
That's happening, and AFAIK it's the reason we are having this
incompatible kernel change to provide a unified interface.
Good news, thanks.
u-boot source provides a u-boot-tools package, guess that's more
important than u-boot as a
On Sun, 2014-12-14 at 08:31 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
hopefully the crashes will be less frequent though.
Now the crashes have extended to python and buildd processes.
Possibilities include dying hardware or the Linux kernel upgrade.
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
On Thu, 2014-12-11 at 12:23 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
For now I've switched ball to using ruby1.9.1, which doesn't appear to
have the problem.
We just got a crash with ruby1.9.1 unfortunately, hopefully the crashes
will be less frequent though.
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
Hi MIPS porters,
puppetd (ruby1.8) has recently (since 2014-11-30) been segfaulting on
ball.d.o[1] (SWARM mips buildd). We don't appear to get segfaults on any
other mips machines so this might be hardware-specific. The crash
doesn't happen every time ruby runs either. I've included two sample
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 5:53 AM, Don Armstrong wrote:
These are the list of ports that I see:
I would strongly suggest not hardcoding this list and instead
harvesting the Architecture fields of the Release files for oldstable
- experimental on ftp.d.o, ftp.d-p.o and maybe archive.d.o.
We have
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 1:57 AM, YunQiang Su wrote:
It can be download from:
http://mips64el.debian.net/debian/rootfs/
This rootfs contains things that should not be shared between multiple
machines (like the dbus machine-id), luckily you didn't install
openssh-server or this would result
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 1:19 PM, YunQiang Su wzss...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 12:15 PM, Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote:
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 1:57 AM, YunQiang Su wrote:
It can be download from:
http://mips64el.debian.net/debian/rootfs/
This rootfs contains things
Woops, sorry for the blank mail.
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 1:19 PM, YunQiang Su wrote:
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 12:15 PM, Paul Wise wrote:
Point users at debootstrap or d-i instead of the rootfs (best option).
I agree, while we have no generic kernel image for mips64el,
the kernel patch
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 7:33 PM, YunQiang Su wrote:
We are working on the port of mips64el, and the progress is quite good.
Please add that to debian-ports.org so that maintainers can find
failed build logs linked from the PTS and work on fixing the issues.
Until you are able to add mips64el to
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 4:51 PM, Peter Palfrader wrote:
If our existing eight-year old hardware is the only mips machines we can
reasonably get then that doesn't bode well for mips. We don't think
relying on the SWARMs (alone) is an option.
Perhaps Calvium will interested in providing newer
Hi all,
I'm looking for a way to replace my current home network infrastructure
with a single device running Debian. I currently have these devices:
* Siemens SpeedStream 4200. This is an ADSL2+ modem running the
supplied OS. It is running in bridge mode, DSL port plugged into
On Wed, 2011-11-23 at 14:55 +0800, Xiangfu Liu wrote:
I have a debian package name 'xburst-tools'
http://packages.qa.debian.org/x/xburst-tools.html
but there is a bug about this package:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=613610
those three binary package needs
On Thu, 2011-11-24 at 22:27 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
It might be acceptable for a sponsor to build the software in a Debian
install running under qemu-system-mipsel, but you would need to build
under qemu and test the resulting firmware on your NanoNote to ensure
that it works before your
25 matches
Mail list logo
