Steven Chamberlain, on mer. 12 avril 2017 13:55:08 +0100, wrote:
> I expect there might be problems trying to build linux arches from a
> kfreebsd host. But we should try to find out, and then maybe fix it.
FWIW, I have been building hurd-i386 images from a linux box for a long
time without
James Cowgill, on Wed 02 Nov 2016 15:31:57 +, wrote:
> Also currently the architecture is described as "64-bit Mipsel", but I
> think "64-bit MIPS (little endian)" or something similar would be
> better. "Mipsel" is just an internal name used to refer to little endian
> mips. The other 2 mips
Hello,
For the coming d-i alpha release, I have added the mips64el architecture
to the installation manual. I have basically copied mipsel bits, since
AIUI mips64el is merely the 64bit version of mipsel. It would be worth
proofreading it. Basically it boils down to:
svn co
Matthias Klose, le Mon 06 May 2013 16:22:30 +0200, a écrit :
- hurd never had openjdk support, and afaik, nobody is working on that.
There has been work towards this, notably by Jeremie Koenig. I don't
know the status, we just have not made it a strong priority so far.
Samuel
--
To
Kurt Roeckx, le Tue 26 Apr 2011 21:28:57 +0200, a écrit :
Is there a reason not to switch the remaining (release) arches
(ia64, kfreebsd-*, sparc, s390)? Maybe hurd-i386 too?
There's no real reason to defer hurd-i386, as it's basically like i386,
and the key packages (glibc/hurd/gnumach)
Matt Turner, le Mon 15 Nov 2010 19:51:10 -0500, a écrit :
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 7:24 PM, Roger Leigh rle...@codelibre.net wrote:
What's the actual problem --as-needed is trying to solve?
The answer is mainly unwanted libraries being linked in as a result
of using pkg-config (and various
Mmm, mips post on debian-hurd? :)
Sylvestre Ledru, le Thu 01 Apr 2010 15:18:28 +0200, a écrit :
I would like to fix a bug in the atlas build process in experimental
which fails under mips:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?suite=experimentalp=atlas
Is there a porterbox available
7 matches
Mail list logo
