Hi Matt,
On 2018-08-11 22:46, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 12:18 PM J.P.Malhado wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 9 Jul 2018 18:13:43 +0800, YunQiang Su wrote:
> > > We need some more build machines, current we use some ER8s,
> > > which use NFS as rootfs and they have no FPU.
> > > So the
Hello everyone,
On 12 Aug 2018, at 07:46, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 12:18 PM J.P.Malhado wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 9 Jul 2018 18:13:43 +0800, YunQiang Su wrote:
>>> We need some more build machines, current we use some ER8s,
>>> which use NFS as rootfs and they have no FPU.
>>>
On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 12:18 PM J.P.Malhado wrote:
>
> On Mon, 9 Jul 2018 18:13:43 +0800, YunQiang Su wrote:
> > We need some more build machines, current we use some ER8s,
> > which use NFS as rootfs and they have no FPU.
> > So the performance and stability are bad.
>
> I'm commenting here
On Mon, 9 Jul 2018 18:13:43 +0800, YunQiang Su wrote:
> We need some more build machines, current we use some ER8s,
> which use NFS as rootfs and they have no FPU.
> So the performance and stability are bad.
I'm commenting here from a position of ignorance:
Would SGI hardware make good build
Mathieu Malaterre 于2018年7月10日周二 下午2:27写道：
>
> On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 12:47 PM YunQiang Su wrote:
> >
> > Mathieu Malaterre 于2018年7月9日周一 下午6:31写道：
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 12:12 PM YunQiang Su wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Adi Kriegisch 于2018年7月9日周一 下午4:34写道：
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi!
> > > >
On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 2:28 PM Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 12:47 PM YunQiang Su wrote:
> >
> > Mathieu Malaterre 于2018年7月9日周一 下午6:31写道：
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 12:12 PM YunQiang Su wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Adi Kriegisch 于2018年7月9日周一 下午4:34写道：
> > > > >
> > >
On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 12:47 PM YunQiang Su wrote:
>
> Mathieu Malaterre 于2018年7月9日周一 下午6:31写道：
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 12:12 PM YunQiang Su wrote:
> > >
> > > Adi Kriegisch 于2018年7月9日周一 下午4:34写道：
> > > >
> > > > Hi!
> > > >
> > > > > due to lack of enough man power and build machines
On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 1:21 AM Brock Wittrock wrote:
>
> I'm still actively using it for a couple of different devices.
>
Let's avoid cross posting and keep this thread in
debian-mips@lists.d.o. We'll move to other forum when suitable.
Regards,
Aron
Hi!
> > > In fact I don't know anybody is using Debian's mips32eb port.
> > > If you are using it, please tell us.
> > I am using mips32eb a lot on wifi routers (self-compiled kernel with
> > rootfs on a usb stick). There are some people here at a community
> > wireless network that do use such
Mathieu Malaterre 于2018年7月9日周一 下午6:31写道：
>
> On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 12:12 PM YunQiang Su wrote:
> >
> > Adi Kriegisch 于2018年7月9日周一 下午4:34写道：
> > >
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > > due to lack of enough man power and build machines for 3 mips* port at
> > > > the same time, I think that now it is time
On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 12:12 PM YunQiang Su wrote:
>
> Adi Kriegisch 于2018年7月9日周一 下午4:34写道：
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> > > due to lack of enough man power and build machines for 3 mips* port at
> > > the same time, I think that now it is time for us to have a talk about
> > > dropping mips32eb support
Adi Kriegisch 于2018年7月9日周一 下午4:34写道：
>
> Hi!
>
> > due to lack of enough man power and build machines for 3 mips* port at
> > the same time, I think that now it is time for us to have a talk about
> > dropping mips32eb support now.
> [...]
> > In fact I don't know anybody is using Debian's
Hi!
> due to lack of enough man power and build machines for 3 mips* port at
> the same time, I think that now it is time for us to have a talk about
> dropping mips32eb support now.
[...]
> In fact I don't know anybody is using Debian's mips32eb port.
> If you are using it, please tell us.
I am
Hi!
You should ask in a more public forum rather than on Debian mailing lists if
you want to know about potential users.
Adrian
> On Jul 7, 2018, at 8:31 AM, YunQiang Su wrote:
>
> Hi, folks,
> due to lack of enough man power and build machines for 3 mips* port at
> the same time, I think
On Sat, Jul 7, 2018 at 11:42 PM Paul Wise wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2018-07-07 at 23:29 +0800, YunQiang Su wrote:
>
> > Since they are quite new, I expect they support mips r2.
>
> I was not able to find any info about that.
>
> > Maybe the problem is due to lack of FPU?
>
> Possibly, did Debian jessie
Paul Wise 于2018年7月7日周六 下午11:42写道：
>
> On Sat, 2018-07-07 at 23:29 +0800, YunQiang Su wrote:
>
> > Since they are quite new, I expect they support mips r2.
>
> I was not able to find any info about that.
>
> > Maybe the problem is due to lack of FPU?
>
> Possibly, did Debian jessie have FPU
On Sat, 2018-07-07 at 23:29 +0800, YunQiang Su wrote:
> Since they are quite new, I expect they support mips r2.
I was not able to find any info about that.
> Maybe the problem is due to lack of FPU?
Possibly, did Debian jessie have FPU disabled and stretch has FPU enabled?
Here is
Paul Wise 于2018年7月7日周六 下午11:20写道：
>
> On Sat, 2018-07-07 at 22:54 +0800, YunQiang Su wrote:
>
> > use eb in a chroot env of openwrt etc env is a use case.
>
> In my case it was the default firmware with help of this:
>
> https://github.com/mattimustang/optus-sagemcom-fast-3864-hacks
>
> > What
On Sat, 2018-07-07 at 22:54 +0800, YunQiang Su wrote:
> use eb in a chroot env of openwrt etc env is a use case.
In my case it was the default firmware with help of this:
https://github.com/mattimustang/optus-sagemcom-fast-3864-hacks
> What CPU is your router? mips r2 is a quite old ISA
Paul Wise 于2018年7月7日周六 下午10:41写道：
>
> On Sat, Jul 7, 2018 at 10:31 PM, YunQiang Su wrote:
>
> > In fact I don't know anybody is using Debian's mips32eb port.
>
> I used jessie mips on my router in a chroot and was considering going
you are right, use eb in a chroot env of openwrt etc env is a
On Sat, Jul 7, 2018 at 10:31 PM, YunQiang Su wrote:
> In fact I don't know anybody is using Debian's mips32eb port.
I used jessie mips on my router in a chroot and was considering going
further, but stretch bumped the ISA requirements so I cannot use it
any longer. Likewise someone on
Hi, folks,
due to lack of enough man power and build machines for 3 mips* port at
the same time, I think that now it is time for us to have a talk about
dropping mips32eb support now.
mips32eb, named mips, in our namespace, is used by few people now, at
least compare with mipsel/mips64el.
The
22 matches
Mail list logo
