create_0.1.3-2_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Maintainer, rejected, sorry. The package name is a little bit too generic - create. And yes, even if its upstreams name (a very bad name selection looking at its contents). -- bye Joerg === If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the override file requires editing,

create_0.1.3-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

please see -2 reject === If you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if the override file requires editing, reply to this email. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: create_0.1.3-2_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Joerg, The package name is a little bit too generic - create. And yes, even if its upstreams name (a very bad name selection looking at its contents). How about 'creative-resources' for a package name? Cheers! Daniel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

Re: create_0.1.3-2_amd64.changes REJECTED

On 11013 March 1977, Daniel James wrote: The package name is a little bit too generic - create. And yes, even if its upstreams name (a very bad name selection looking at its contents). How about 'creative-resources' for a package name? Thats way better, and also fits more for what is in. --

Bug#417415: marked as done (fluidsynth-dssi: Insufficient Description)

Your message dated Tue, 08 May 2007 22:02:03 + with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#417415: fixed in fluidsynth-dssi 0.9.1-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

: Favor confirmar

, Gostariamos de saber se recebeu nosso e-mail sobre como adquirir os ? Tudo pronto para iniciar a sua divulgaçao? Cordi