lv2core_3.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Dear Maintainer, REJECT: missing license/copyright data in debian/copyright. autowaf.py is also (C) 2008 Nedko Arnaudov and is GPL 2+. The GPL is only mentioned with respect to the debian/* files lv2.h is also (C) 2000-2002 Richard W.E. Furse, Paul Barton-Davis, Stefan Westerfield and is LGPL

Bug#492871: moreninfo

tag 492871 moreinfo thanks This alone is not very useful. Please see: http://wiki.debian.org/HowToGetABacktrace thanks, stew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-multimedia-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

RFS: rosegarden 1.6.1-3

I checked in a 1.6.1-3 revision of rosegarden to the demudi repository on alioth. It adds a patch which fixes build problems with g++ 4.3, which is now the default on (at least) ppc and arm, which is currently causing build failures: http://buildd.debian.org/pkg.cgi?pkg=rosegarden I'd

Bug#460477: not kdesu but kdialog

We are not depending on kdebase-bin becuase of kdesu but becuase of kdialog. Is this binary also changing locations? Is there somewhere that you could point me that documents these changes? thanks, stew signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#457007: [Rosegarden-devel] 1.6.1rc1 to test

tags 457007 fixed-upstream tags 457007 confirmed tags 457007 pending thanks On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 01:47:35PM +, Chris Cannam wrote: http://www.rosegardenmusic.com/pre/rosegarden-1.6.1rc1.tar.bz2 This has two fixes in it -- the fix to saving un-ramped tempos, and a fairly substantial

Re: rosegarden 1.6

On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 09:35:54AM +, Free Ekanayaka wrote: Hi Mike, I've seen you've been working on rosegarden 1.6. When you think the package is ready I can upload it. Ciao! Free -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Re: Some of your Debian packages might need attention

On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 12:17:15PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote: On Thursday 23 August 2007 08:30:05 DDPOMail robot wrote: === rosegarden: = This package has not been able to migrate from unstable to testing for 123 days. This one is waiting for libopenexr-dev =1.2.2-3 on hppa,

Bug#422289: -m3dnow -msse

It looks like: CFLAGS += -m3dnow -msse was recently added to debian/rules. Those flags would not be valid outside of i686. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#410587: tagging as upstream

severity 410587 wishlist tag 410587 upstream forwarded 410587 [EMAIL PROTECTED] thanks I have sent this request to the upstream developers that they include the changelog in their next release. thanks, stew signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#410587: what upstream changelog

tags 410587 moreinfo thanks As far as I know, there is no upstream changelog in the upstream changelog. If there is an upstream changelog that I'm missing, please tell me where it is. Otherwise, i'll close this bug soon. Thanks, stew signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#210978: unable to reproduce

tags 288591 moreinfo tags 210978 moreinfo tags 254637 moreinfo tags 291473 moreinfo tags 311869 moreinfo tags 317446 moreinfo thanks This is an old bug filed against an old version of rosegarden. I am not able to reproduce it. Are you still able to reproduce this bug with a more current

Bug#392181: rosegarden: Documentation in README.Debian about rtc / jackd / low-latency needs to be updated

Package: rosegarden Version: 1:1.4.0-1 Severity: wishlist The documentation in /usr/share/doc/rosegarden/README.Debian is a bit out of date with respect to low latency / RTC. Some things have changed since it was written, and it points you to a no longer existent file in the jackd documentation.

Bug#387907: rosegarden: missing dependancy on qjackctl

On Sun, 2006-09-17 at 14:47 +0300, Ognyan Kulev wrote: I'm using GNOME and when started, rosegarden complained that there is no jackd. I have jackd packages and it turned that qjackctl should also be installed. It's good if this is reflected in dependancies in some way. qjackctl is not

Bug#374814: can't reproduce

tags 374814 moreinfo thanks I cannot reproduce this big here. I have no /etc/lircrc nor a ~/.lircrc. What lirc related pacakges do you have installed? Can you provide an strace log? thanks, stew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Bug#304372:

tags 346448 moreinfo tags 304372 moreinfo thanks I'm unable to reproduce this bug. Are you able to reproduce this bug with the lastest rosegarden package? stew -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Rosegarden 1.2.3

On Wed, 2006-06-07 at 13:29 +0200, Free Ekanayaka wrote: |--== Free Ekanayaka writes: FE Hi Mike, FE I'm starting to work on the rosegarden source package you have FE injected in the demudi Alioth SVN repository. It builds fine, but FE there are still some little things

Re: [Fwd: RFC/RFS: rosegarden4: music editor and MIDI/audio sequencer]

On Fri, 2006-03-17 at 15:20 +, tim hall wrote: I assume this is a glibc6 / gcc4 build, so I won't be testing this immediately. My binary package is built in an up to date pbuilder, so it is the lastest libc6 and gcc packages in sid. I kept the debhelper compatibility at 4 so that the