Weekly Report on Debian New Maintainers
===
For week ending 04 Sep 2005.
Weekly Summary Statistics
=
3 more people applied to become a new maintainer
2 applicants became maintainers.
New Maintainers
===
Hi!
Since I don't only want to ask theoretical questions to my applicants,
I had given them a nonofficial and really broken bogus package (that
was sent to me for sponsoring a long time ago), and asked them to fix
all packaging bugs they could find and make it a really perfect
package.
However,
On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 08:27:58AM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
However, since this is just wasted effort, I would rather want to have
them work on an actually useful thing. It recently sprang into my mind
that it could be a good idea to pick some really poor packaged
orphaned packages and ask
Hi Matthew!
Matthew Palmer [2005-09-05 20:31 +1000]:
I've pointed my applicants at orphaned packages in the past. It works
fairly well -- it gives them some experience dealing with real-world messes,
and the end result is something that won't just get binned.
I've been content with asking
On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 08:27:58AM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
I think by working on orphaned packages we should not step on
anybody's toes, right?
You're right, you won't step on anyone's toes.
What do you think about this idea?
I personally do think it's better to have effort being put in
Hi Jeroen!
Jeroen van Wolffelaar [2005-09-05 14:56 +0200]:
I personally do think it's better to have effort being put in
packages/whatever that are either important or of specific interest to a given
contributor.
Right.
By specifically directing efforts to exactly those packages that,
by
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 09:05:59PM -0300, Guilherme de S. Pastore wrote:
Em Dom, 2005-09-04 às 01:40 +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas escreveu:
while going through the first application as AM i thought it might be
useful to ask a question about the nice new feature of our BTS: version
tracking. I
On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 04:10:17PM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
Jeroen van Wolffelaar [2005-09-05 14:56 +0200]:
By specifically directing efforts to exactly those packages that,
by definition, have nobody interested in them at the moment, I think you're
still spending time inefficiently:
8 matches
Mail list logo